Abstract Mutations in human proteins lead to diseases. The structure of these proteins can help understand the mechanism of such diseases and develop therapeutics against them. With improved deep learning techniques, such as RoseTTAFold and AlphaFold, we can predict the structure of proteins even in the absence of structural homologs. We modeled and extracted the domains from 553 disease-associated human proteins without known protein structures or close homologs in the Protein Databank. We noticed that the model quality was higher and the Root mean square deviation (RMSD) lower between AlphaFold and RoseTTAFold models for domains that could be assigned to CATH families as compared to those which could only be assigned to Pfam families of unknown structure or could not be assigned to either. We predicted ligand-binding sites, protein–protein interfaces and conserved residues in these predicted structures. We then explored whether the disease-associated missense mutations were in the proximity of these predicted functional sites, whether they destabilized the protein structure based on ddG calculations or whether they were predicted to be pathogenic. We could explain 80% of these disease-associated mutations based on proximity to functional sites, structural destabilization or pathogenicity. When compared to polymorphisms, a larger percentage of disease-associated missense mutations were buried, closer to predicted functional sites, predicted as destabilizing and pathogenic. Usage of models from the two state-of-the-art techniques provide better confidence in our predictions, and we explain 93 additional mutations based on RoseTTAFold models which could not be explained based solely on AlphaFold models.
more »
« less
DPAM : A domain parser for AlphaFold models
The recent breakthroughs in structure prediction, where methods such as AlphaFold demonstrated near‐atomic accuracy, herald a paradigm shift in structural biology. The 200 million high‐accuracy models released in the AlphaFold Database are expected to guide protein science in the coming decades. Partitioning these AlphaFold models into domains and assigning them to an evolutionary hierarchy provide an efficient way to gain functional insights into proteins. However, classifying such a large number of predicted structures challenges the infrastructure of current structure classifications, including our Evolutionary Classification of protein Domains (ECOD). Better computational tools are urgently needed to parse and classify domains from AlphaFold models automatically. Here we present a Domain Parser for AlphaFold Models (DPAM) that can automatically recognize globular domains from these models based on inter‐residue distances in 3D structures, predicted aligned errors, and ECOD domains found by sequence (HHsuite) and structural (Dali) similarity searches. Based on a benchmark of 18,759 AlphaFold models, we demonstrate that DPAM can recognize 98.8% of domains and assign correct boundaries for 87.5%, significantly outperforming structure‐based domain parsers and homology‐based domain assignment using ECOD domains found by HHsuite or Dali. Application of DPAM to the massive AlphaFold models will enable efficient classification of domains, providing evolutionary contexts and facilitating functional studies.
more » « less- Award ID(s):
- 2224128
- NSF-PAR ID:
- 10394150
- Publisher / Repository:
- Wiley Blackwell (John Wiley & Sons)
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Protein Science
- Volume:
- 32
- Issue:
- 2
- ISSN:
- 0961-8368
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
Dunbrack, Roland L (Ed.)more » « less
Protein structure prediction has now been deployed widely across several different large protein sets. Large-scale domain annotation of these predictions can aid in the development of biological insights. Using our Evolutionary Classification of Protein Domains (ECOD) from experimental structures as a basis for classification, we describe the detection and cataloging of domains from 48 whole proteomes deposited in the AlphaFold Database. On average, we can provide positive classification (either of domains or other identifiable non-domain regions) for 90% of residues in all proteomes. We classified 746,349 domains from 536,808 proteins comprised of over 226,424,000 amino acid residues. We examine the varying populations of homologous groups in both eukaryotes and bacteria. In addition to containing a higher fraction of disordered regions and unassigned domains, eukaryotes show a higher proportion of repeated proteins, both globular and small repeats. We enumerate those highly populated domains that are shared in both eukaryotes and bacteria, such as the Rossmann domains, TIM barrels, and P-loop domains. Additionally, we compare the sampling of homologous groups from this whole proteome set against our stable ECOD reference and discuss groups that have been enriched by structure predictions. Finally, we discuss the implication of these results for protein target selection for future classification strategies for very large protein sets.
-
Recent advances in protein structure prediction have generated accurate structures of previously uncharacterized human proteins. Identifying domains in these predicted structures and classifying them into an evolutionary hierarchy can reveal biological insights. Here, we describe the detection and classification of domains from the human proteome. Our classification indicates that only 62% of residues are located in globular domains. We further classify these globular domains and observe that the majority (65%) can be classified among known folds by sequence, with a smaller fraction (33%) requiring structural data to refine the domain boundaries and/or to support their homology. A relatively small number (966 domains) cannot be confidently assigned using our automatic pipelines, thus demanding manual inspection. We classify 47,576 domains, of which only 23% have been included in experimental structures. A portion (6.3%) of these classified globular domains lack sequence-based annotation in InterPro. A quarter (23%) have not been structurally modeled by homology, and they contain 2,540 known disease-causing single amino acid variations whose pathogenesis can now be inferred using AF models. A comparison of classified domains from a series of model organisms revealed expansions of several immune response-related domains in humans and a depletion of olfactory receptors. Finally, we use this classification to expand well-known protein families of biological significance. These classifications are presented on the ECOD website ( http://prodata.swmed.edu/ecod/index_human.php ).more » « less
-
more » « less
Abstract Estimating the accuracy of protein structural models is a critical task in protein bioinformatics. The need for robust methods in the estimation of protein model accuracy (EMA) is prevalent in the field of protein structure prediction, where computationally‐predicted structures need to be screened rapidly for the reliability of the positions predicted for each of their amino acid residues and their overall quality. Current methods proposed for EMA are either coupled tightly to existing protein structure prediction methods or evaluate protein structures without sufficiently leveraging the rich, geometric information available in such structures to guide accuracy estimation. In this work, we propose a geometric message passing neural network referred to as the geometry‐complete perceptron network for protein structure EMA (GCPNet‐EMA), where we demonstrate through rigorous computational benchmarks that GCPNet‐EMA's accuracy estimations are 47% faster and more than 10% (6%) more correlated with ground‐truth measures of per‐residue (per‐target) structural accuracy compared to baseline state‐of‐the‐art methods for tertiary (multimer) structure EMA including AlphaFold 2. The source code and data for GCPNet‐EMA are available on GitHub, and a public web server implementation is freely available.
-
more » « less
Abstract The Membranome database provides comprehensive structural information on single‐pass (i.e., bitopic) membrane proteins from six evolutionarily distant organisms, including protein–protein interactions, complexes, mutations, experimental structures, and models of transmembrane α‐helical dimers. We present a new version of this database, Membranome 3.0, which was significantly updated by revising the set of 5,758 bitopic proteins and incorporating models generated by AlphaFold 2 in the database. The AlphaFold models were parsed into structural domains located at the different membrane sides, modified to exclude low‐confidence unstructured terminal regions and signal sequences, validated through comparison with available experimental structures, and positioned with respect to membrane boundaries. Membranome 3.0 was re‐developed to facilitate visualization and comparative analysis of multiple 3D structures of proteins that belong to a specified family, complex, biological pathway, or membrane type. New tools for advanced search and analysis of proteins, their interactions, complexes, and mutations were included. The database is freely accessible at
https://membranome.org .
