More Like this

1. Energy policy for energy sovereignty: Can policy tools enhance energy sovereignty?

   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2020.05.056  

   Schelly, Chelsea; Bessette, Douglas; Brosemer, Kathleen; Gagnon, Valoree; Arola, Kristin L.; Fiss, Andrew; Pearce, Joshua M.; Halvorsen, Kathleen E. (July 2020, Solar Energy)
2. Decentralized Equitable Energy Access in Energy Communities

   https://doi.org/10.1109/Allerton63246.2024.10735271  

   Li, Siying; Mount, Timothy D; Tong, Lang (September 2024, IEEE)
3. Past energy allocation overwhelms current energy stresses in determining energy allocation trade‐offs

   https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.10402  

   Griffen, Blaine D; Bolander, Mikayla; Blakeslee, April; Crane, Laura C; Repetto, Michele F; Tepolt, Carolyn K; Toscano, Benjamin J (August 2023, Ecology and Evolution)

   Abstract Regeneration of lost appendages is a gradual process in many species, spreading energetic costs of regeneration through time. Energy allocated to the regeneration of lost appendages cannot be used for other purposes and, therefore, commonly elicits energetic trade‐offs in biological processes. We used limb loss in the Asian shore crabHemigrapsus sanguineusto compare the strength of energetic trade‐offs resulting from historic limb losses that have been partially regenerated versus current injuries that have not yet been repaired. Consistent with previous studies, we show that limb loss and regeneration results in trade‐offs that reduce reproduction, energy storage, and growth. As may be expected, we show that trade‐offs in these metrics from historic limb losses far outweigh trade‐offs from current limb losses, and correlate directly with the degree of historic limb loss that has been regenerated. As regenerating limbs get closer to their normal size, these historical injuries get harder to detect, despite the continued allocation of additional resources to limb development. Our results demonstrate the importance of and a method for identifying historic appendage losses and of quantifying the amount of regeneration that has already occurred, as opposed to assessing only current injury, to accurately assess the strength of energetic trade‐offs in animals recovering from nonlethal injury. 

   more » « less
4. Vibrational Energy Landscapes and Energy Flow in GPCRs

   https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcb.4c04513  

   Poudel, Humanath; Wales, David J; Leitner, David M (August 2024, The Journal of Physical Chemistry B)
5. Linking energy policy, energy insecurity, and health outcomes

   https://doi.org/10.3389/fsuep.2023.1231821  

   Tang, Tian; Kim, Hyunji (August 2023, Frontiers in Sustainable Energy Policy)

   Energy insecurity poses a global challenge with far-reaching social equity and health implications. This paper provides a comprehensive perspective on the relationship between energy insecurity and health outcomes in developed countries. Existing research has identified associations between energy insecurity and various physical and mental health outcomes. Moreover, climate change can exacerbate the adverse health consequences of energy insecurity, disproportionately affecting vulnerable populations. Based on a review of existing literature, this paper identifies several knowledge gaps, proposes future research directions, and discusses data challenges faced by researchers in measuring energy insecurity and assessing the health impacts of existing programs that tackle energy insecurity. Furthermore, the paper highlights the importance of fostering collaboration among different governmental agencies and other sectors to enhance energy insecurity program management and data collection for program evaluation. 

   more » « less