Explore Research Products in the PAR
It may take a few hours for recently added research products to appear in PAR search results.


Title: How Computer Science and Statistics Instructors Approach Data Science Pedagogy Differently: Three Case Studies
Over the past decade, data science courses have been growing more popular across university campuses. These courses often involve a mix of programming and statistics and are taught by instructors from diverse backgrounds. In our experiences launching a data science program at a large public U.S. university over the past four years, we noticed one central tension within many such courses: instructors must finely balance how much computing versus statistics to teach in the limited available time. In this experience report, we provide a detailed firsthand reflection on how we have personally balanced these two major topic areas within several offerings of a large introductory data science course that we taught and wrote an accompanying textbook for; our course has served several thousand students over the past four years. We present three case studies from our experiences to illustrate how computer science and statistics instructors approach data science differently on topics ranging from algorithmic depth to modeling to data acquisition. We then draw connections to deeper tradeoffs in data science to help guide instructors who design interdisciplinary courses. We conclude by suggesting ways that instructors can incorporate both computer science and statistics perspectives to improve data science teaching.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
1730628
PAR ID:
10399610
Author(s) / Creator(s):
; ; ;
Date Published:
Journal Name:
SIGCSE 2022: Proceedings of the 53rd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education
Volume:
1
Page Range / eLocation ID:
29 to 35
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. ; (, ACM)
    Introductory data science courses are appearing at colleges, universities, and high schools around the country and the world. What topics do we cover in these courses, and how and why are these decisions made? How do we consider the background knowledge of our students and how they hope to utilize their skills after this course (whether professionally, additional courses, or as an engaged citizen)? In addition, the course is being taught by computer scientists, statisticians, business analysts, mathematicians, journalists, etc. Each of these disciplines approaches the topics differently. What upskilling is required of instructors to prepare them to integrate material from academic disciplines in which they were not trained into the course? How much, if any, cross-disciplinary collaboration, and discussion occurs or should occur in designing this course? Participants in this birds-of-a-feather will share their decision processes and choices about introductory data science courses that they teach or are designing. This includes choices made about the content as well as whether and how upskilling occurs. They will review and refine a list of current data science topics created based on national surveys of data science instructors as well as a review of curriculum guidelines. Close attention will be paid to differing language between data science instructors from different academic backgrounds. We welcome new and experienced data science instructors, educators planning on or interested in teaching such a course. 
    more » « less
  2. ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; et al (, 2022 American Society Engineering Education Annual Meeting)
    With increasingly technology-driven workplaces and high data volumes, instructors across STEM+C disciplines are integrating more data science topics into their course learning objectives. However, instructors face significant challenges in integrating additional data science concepts into their already full course schedules. Streamlined instructional modules that are integrated with course content, and cover relevant data science topics, such as data collection, uncertainty in data, visualization, and analysis using statistical and machine learning methods can benefit instructors across multiple disciplines. As part of a cross-university research program, we designed a systematic structural approach–based on shared instructional and assessment principles–to construct modules that are tailored to meet the needs of multiple instructional disciplines, academic levels, and pedagogies. Adopting a research-practice partnership approach, we have collectively developed twelve modules working closely with instructors and their teaching assistants for six undergraduate courses. We identified and coded primary data science concepts in the modules into five common themes: 1) data acquisition, 2) data quality issues, 3) data use and visualization, 4) advanced machine learning techniques, and 5) miscellaneous topics that may be unique to a particular discipline (e.g., how to analyze data streams collected by a special sensor). These themes were further subdivided to make it easier for instructors to contextualize the data science concepts in discipline-specific work. In this paper, we present as a case study the design and analysis of four of the modules, primarily so we can compare and contrast pairs of similar courses that were taught at different levels or at different universities. Preliminary analyses show the wide distribution of data science topics that are common among a number of environmental science and engineering courses. We identified commonalities and differences in the integration of data science instruction (through modules) into these courses. This analysis informs the development of a set of key considerations for integrating data science concepts into a variety of STEM + C courses. 
    more » « less
  3. ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; et al (, 2022 American Society Engineering Education Annual Meeting)
    With increasingly technology-driven workplaces and high data volumes, instructors across STEM+C disciplines are integrating more data science topics into their course learning objectives. However, instructors face significant challenges in integrating additional data science concepts into their already full course schedules. Streamlined instructional modules that are integrated with course content, and cover relevant data science topics, such as data collection, uncertainty in data, visualization, and analysis using statistical and machine learning methods can benefit instructors across multiple disciplines. As part of a cross-university research program, we designed a systematic structural approach–based on shared instructional and assessment principles–to construct modules that are tailored to meet the needs of multiple instructional disciplines, academic levels, and pedagogies. Adopting a research-practice partnership approach, we have collectively developed twelve modules working closely with instructors and their teaching assistants for six undergraduate courses. We identified and coded primary data science concepts in the modules into five common themes: 1) data acquisition, 2) data quality issues, 3) data use and visualization, 4) advanced machine learning techniques, and 5) miscellaneous topics that may be unique to a particular discipline (e.g., how to analyze data streams collected by a special sensor). These themes were further subdivided to make it easier for instructors to contextualize the data science concepts in discipline-specific work. In this paper, we present as a case study the design and analysis of four of the modules, primarily so we can compare and contrast pairs of similar courses that were taught at different levels or at different universities. Preliminary analyses show the wide distribution of data science topics that are common among a number of environmental science and engineering courses. We identified commonalities and differences in the integration of data science instruction (through modules) into these courses. This analysis informs the development of a set of key considerations for integrating data science concepts into a variety of STEM + C courses. 
    more » « less
  4. ; ; ; ; ; ; (, ASEE Conferences)
    Not AvailThe Templeton Institute at Union College “catalyzes learning through a dynamic environment that fosters collaboration within and across engineering, computer science, and traditional liberal arts disciplines. Its mission is to enable connections, experimentation, innovation, and discovery through integrative coursework, projects, and research” (“Mission and Goals”). One mechanism used to complete this mission is the creation of multidisciplinary courses that blend Engineering, Computer Science, and the Liberal Arts. The Templeton Institute recognizes that time and resources can be barriers to designing new collaborative, multidisciplinary courses. To decrease the impact of these barriers, the Templeton Institute provides a number of one-time incentives for new course development, which provide critical support during the design and implementation phase of launching new courses. In the 2024-2025 academic year, the Templeton Institute selected three team-taught courses through a competitive application process. The first course, AMU/ECE-246 “What Does Data Sound Like?” is a collaboration between faculty members in Electrical and Computer Engineering and Music. This course introduces students to the field of data sonification, where they learn to translate data into sound, explore its interdisciplinary applications in fields such as Healthcare, Engineering, and the Arts, and gain hands-on experience with tools and techniques for both scientific and creative projects. The second course is a collaboration between Spanish and Hispanic Studies, German Studies, and Civil and Environmental Engineering, ESC/ISC-221 “Humanity-Centered Design: Ecodesign Your Life.” This Fall 2024 course focuses on offering a humanity-centered course which will enable students to broaden their understanding of ‘design’ from multiple disciplines and diverse perspectives with a focus on our lives, experiences, and stories of people, communities, and ecosystems. The third course offered through the Templeton Institute is STS-101 “Introduction to Science, Technology, and Society.” This introduces students to the range of methodologies, epistemologies, topics, and concerns central to the field of STS, including how scientific and technological concepts develop, take root, and evolve; the role of scientists and engineers as technologies interact and intersect with broader societies; and the ethical responsibilities associated with the development of technology. These and other fundamental questions are explored in this introductory survey course, team-taught by four of Union College’s faculty members from English, History, Classics, and Computer Science, with a guest lecturer from Engineering. This demonstrated team-taught, multidisciplinary approach taken by all of these Templeton Institute courses has had a number of immediate benefits to faculty and students both inside and outside of the classroom: (1) an increased mixing of Engineering, Computer Science, and Humanities disciplines; (2) the development of unique multidisciplinary undergraduate research projects; and (3) a number of collaborative grant proposals for more intentionally integrated and harmonious curricular planning. This paper (if selected) will introduce these three courses in more detail, outline benefits and challenges of this Union College and Templeton Institute model, provide first-hand faculty and student perspectives from the courses, and include a discussion of the benefits of providing differing, complementary, or contrasting perspectives on current issues through the lenses of various disciplines. 
    more » « less
  5. ; (, ACM)
    The rapid expansion of data science programs across a wide range of academic disciplines - including computer science, engineering, business, and other applied data domains - presents a challenge for standardizing curricula in line with established competencies. This paper critically examines whether university data science programs are aligned with the ACM Competencies for Undergraduate Data Science Curricula. Using a systematic review of 788 data science program offerings and 9,322 course titles, we assess levels of alignment with ACM's eleven competency areas. Additionally, we evaluate the inclusion of additional common skills course offerings, such as math/statistics, data analytics, and capstone courses. Our findings highlight significant variability in programs' adherence to the ACM competencies. This underscores the need for greater interdisciplinary collaboration towards integrating computing, statistics, and domain-specific coursework into the broad range of data science curricula, ensuring that data science graduates have a well-rounded, interdisciplinary skill set suited to the diverse applications of data science. 
    more » « less
  • Citation Formats
  • MLA
  • APA
  • Chicago
  • BibTeX
  • Text Encoded Conversion
  • XML
  • Save / Share this Record
  • Send to Email