skip to main content


Title: Event-scale power law recession analysis: quantifying methodological uncertainty
Abstract. The study of single streamflow recession events is receiving increasing attention following the presentation of novel theoretical explanations for the emergence of power law forms of the recession relationship, and drivers of its variability. Individually characterizing streamflow recessions often involves describing the similarities and differences between model parameters fitted to each recession time series. Significant methodological sensitivity has been identified in the fitting and parameterization of models that describe populations of many recessions, but the dependence of estimated model parameters on methodological choices has not been evaluated for event-by-event forms of analysis. Here, we use daily streamflow data from 16 catchments in northern California and southern Oregon to investigate how combinations of commonly used streamflow recession definitions and fitting techniques impact parameter estimates of a widely used power law recession model. Results are relevant to watersheds that are relatively steep, forested, and rain-dominated. The highly seasonal mediterranean climate of northern California and southern Oregon ensures study catchments explore a wide range of recession behaviors and wetness states, ideal for a sensitivity analysis. In such catchments, we show the following: (i) methodological decisions, including ones that have received little attention in the literature, can impact parameter value estimates and model goodness of fit; (ii) the central tendencies of event-scale recession parameter probability distributions are largely robust to methodological choices, in the sense that differing methods rank catchments similarly according to the medians of these distributions; (iii) recession parameter distributions are method-dependent, but roughly catchment-independent, such that changing the choices made about a particular method affects a given parameter in similar ways across most catchments; and (iv) the observed correlative relationship between the power-law recession scale parameter and catchment antecedent wetness varies depending on recession definition and fitting choices. Considering study results, we recommend a combination of four key methodological decisions to maximize the quality of fitted recession curves, and to minimize bias in the related populations of fitted recession parameters.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
1331940
NSF-PAR ID:
10401595
Author(s) / Creator(s):
; ; ; ;
Date Published:
Journal Name:
Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
Volume:
21
Issue:
1
ISSN:
1607-7938
Page Range / eLocation ID:
65 to 81
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. Abstract

    The flow duration curve (FDC) is a hydrologically meaningful representation of the statistical distribution of daily streamflows. The complexity of processes contributing to the FDC introduces challenges for the direct exploration of physical controls on FDC. In this paper, the controls of climate and catchment characteristics on FDC are explored using a stochastic framework that enables construction of the FDC from three components of streamflow: fast and slow flow (during wet days) and slow flow during dry days. The FDC during wet days (FDCw) is computed as the statistical sum of the fast flow duration curve (FFDC) and the slow flow duration curve (SFDCw), considering their dependency. FDC is modeled as the mixture distribution of FDCwand the slow flow duration curve during dry days (SFDCd), by considering the fraction of wet days (δ) for perennial streams and bothδand the fraction of days of zero streamflow for ephemeral streams. The Kappa distribution is employed to fit the FFDC, SFDCw, and SFDCdfor 300 catchments from Model Parameter Estimation Experiment (MOPEX) across the United States. Results show that the 0–20th percentile of FDC is controlled by FFDC and SFDCw, the 90–100th percentile of FDC is controlled by SFDCd, and the 20–90th percentile of FDC is controlled by three components. The relationships between estimated Kappa distribution parameters and climate and catchment characteristics reveal that the aridity index, the coefficient of variation of daily precipitation, timing of precipitation, time interval between storms, snow, topographic slope, and slope of recession slope curve are dominant controlling factors.

     
    more » « less
  2. Abstract

    Solute transit or travel time distributions (TTDs) in catchments are relevant to both hydrochemical response and inference of hydrologic mechanisms. Long‐tailed TTDs and fractal scaling behavior of stream concentration power spectra (∼1/frequency, or 1/frequency to a power <2) are widely observed in catchment studies. In several catchments, a significant fraction of streamflow is derived from groundwater in shallow fractured bedrock, where matrix diffusion significantly influences solute transport. I present frequency and time domain theoretical analyses of solute transport to quantify the influence of matrix diffusion on fractal scaling and long‐tailed TTDs. The theoretical concentration power spectra exhibit fractal scaling, and the corresponding TTDs resemble a gamma distribution. The tails of the TTDs are influenced by accessible matrix width, exhibiting a sustained power‐law (rather than exponential) decline for large matrix widths. Application to an experimental catchment shows that theoretical spectra match previously reported power spectral estimates derived from concentration measurements.

     
    more » « less
  3. In the Anthropocene, humans have altered the properties and processes of hydrological systems across scales. The extent of human intervention in the landscape limits the utility of traditional hydrological modelling schemes. Since purely hydrological conceptual models no longer fit these systems, hydrologists must integrate key human interventions into conceptual models of human-modified catchments. Despite the advances in analyzing the observed changes within the hydrological cycle using bottom-up (or reductionist) modelling approaches, the aptitude of top-down hydrologic schemes for socio-hydrological system analysis is still untested. Here we show the potential of top-down hydrological modelling human modified watersheds using anthropogenic hydrological signatures. Specifically, we assess the ability of the top-down modelling method in human-modified catchments to improve the representation hydrological signatures (e.g. mean monthly runoff, flow duration curve) while ensuring a sufficient, but not excessive, level of complexity in model formulation. First, we develop new conceptual models which include human hydrological modifications commonly identified in the literature. Then, we link these new features in the conceptual models to features in the hydrological signatures. We apply the proposed methodology to the Lake Mendocino Watershed in Northern California, US. We compare a purely hydrological model developed for this catchment based on natural watershed properties using naturalized streamflow to a hydrological model of the human-modified catchment using observed streamflow. We anticipate that the proposed approach contributes to the development of detection and attribution frameworks for key anthropogenic changes of observed hydrological variability and improved model performance in human-modified catchments. 
    more » « less
  4. Abstract

    Flow recession analysis, relating dischargeQand its time rate of change −dQ/dt, has been widely used to understand catchment scale flow dynamics. However, data points in the recession plot, the plot of −dQ/dtversusQ, typically form a wide point cloud due to noise and hysteresis in the storage‐discharge relationship, and it is still unclear what information we can extract from the plot and how to understand the information. There seem to be two contrasting approaches to interpret the plot. One emphasizes the importance of the ensemble characteristics of many recessions (i.e., the lower envelope or a measure of central tendency), and the other highlights the importance of the event scale analysis and questions the meaning of the ensemble characteristics. We examine if those approaches can be reconciled. We utilize a machine learning tool to capture the point cloud using the past trajectory of daily discharge. Our model results for a catchment show that most of the data points can be captured using 5 days of past discharge. We show that we can learn the catchment scale flow recession dynamics from what the machine learned. We analyze patterns learned by the machine and explain and hypothesize why the machine learned those characteristics. The hysteresis in the plot mainly occurs during the early time dynamics, and the flow recession dynamics eventually converge to an attractor in the plot, which represents the master recession curve. We also illustrate that a hysteretic storage‐discharge relationship can be estimated based on the attractor.

     
    more » « less
  5. Abstract

    Recent studies have demonstrated that compartmentalized pools of water preferentially supply either plant transpiration (poorly mobile water) or streamflow and groundwater (highly mobile water) in some catchments, a phenomenon referred to as ecohydrologic separation. The omission of processes accounting for ecohydrologic separation in standard applications of hydrological models is expected to influence estimates of water residence times and plant water availability. However, few studies have tested this expectation or investigated how ecohydrologic separation alters interpretations of stores and fluxes of water within a catchment. In this study, we compare two rainfall‐runoff models that integrate catchment‐scale representations of transport, one that incorporates ecohydrologic separation and one that does not. The models were developed for a second‐order watershed at the H.J. Andrews Experimental Forest (Oregon, USA), the site where ecohydrologic separation was first observed, and calibrated against multiple years of stream discharge and chloride concentration. Model structural variations caused mixed results for differences in calibrated parameters and differences in storage between reservoirs. However, large differences in catchment storage volumes and fluxes arise when considering only mobile water. These changes influence interpreted residence times for streamflow‐generating water, demonstrating the importance of ecohydrologic separation in catchment‐scale water and solute transport.

     
    more » « less