This research paper examines faculty perceptions of and approaches towards fostering students’ motivation to learn engineering at Hispanic-Serving Institutions (HSIs). By aligning learning experiences with what motivates Hispanic or Latinx students, the resulting higher student motivation could increase the sense of belonging for underrepresented populations in engineering, ultimately improving student retention and persistence through meaningful instructional practices. Motivation to learn encompasses individuals' perspectives about themselves, the course material, the broader educational curriculum, and their role in their own learning [1]. Students’ motivation can be supported or hindered by their interactions with others, peers, and educators. As such, an educator’s teaching style is a critical part of this process [2]. Therefore, because of the link between a faculty member’s ability to foster student motivation and improved learning outcomes, this paper seeks to explore how engineering faculty approach student motivation in their course designs at Hispanic-Serving Institutions.
Humans are curious beings naturally drawn to exploration and learning. Self Determination Theory (SDT), popularized by Ryan and Deci, describes the interconnection of extrinsic (external) and intrinsic (internal) motivators, acknowledging the link between student’s physiological needs and their learning motivations [1], [3]. SDT proposes that students must experience the satisfaction of competence, autonomy, and relatedness for a high level of intrinsic motivation. Further, research indicates that appropriately structured, highly autonomy-supportive teaching styles that foster intrinsic motivation are associated with improved student outcomes [2]. However, further research is needed to observe how faculty prioritize students’ innate needs and how they seek to foster student motivation in tangible ways within their engineering classrooms. Therefore, this paper seeks to answer the following research question: What educational supports do engineering faculty at HSIs propose to embed in their curricula to increase their students’ intrinsic motivation?
To answer this question, thirty-six engineering educators from thirteen two- and four-year HSIs from across the continental United States were introduced to the SDT and approaches for supporting students’ intrinsic motivation during a multi-institutional faculty development workshop series. Participants were asked to reflect on and prototype learning experiences that would promote intrinsic motivation and fulfill students’ needs for competence, relatedness, and autonomy to learn engineering [1]. Data were collected through a series of reflection worksheets where participants were asked to describe their target stakeholders, define a course redesign goal, and generate possible solutions while considering the impact of the redesign on student motivation. Qualitative analysis was used to explore participant responses. Analysis indicates that the participants were more likely to simultaneously address multiple motivational constructs when attempting to improve student motivation, rather than addressing them individually. Some
of these approaches included the adoption of autonomy-supportive and structured teaching styles. As a result of this research, there is potential to influence future faculty development opportunities at HSIs and further explore intentional learning experiences that promote and foster intrinsic motivation in the engineering classroom.
more »
« less
Students’ needs satisfaction in a gamified math practice
Though many studies suggest the positive effects of gamification on participants’ learning and motivation, limited research has examined the basic psychological needs satisfaction in gamified learning. Based on self-determination theory (SDT), this study examined students’ actual competence, perceived competence, perceived autonomy, and perceived relatedness in a gamified math practice. The results showed that students had varied degree of needs satisfaction in perceived competence, perceived autonomy, and perceived relatedness. The implications and significance of the study provide practical teaching implementation suggestions and research insights for gamification research.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 2142608
- NSF-PAR ID:
- 10410064
- Editor(s):
- E. Langran, P. Christensen
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference
- Page Range / eLocation ID:
- 1654-1656
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
For engineering students, how might three basic needs—competency, autonomy, and relatedness—promote intrinsic motivation among students? In this research paper, two studies are presented which assess satisfaction and relationship of these basic needs among students in a project-based, undergraduate-only engineering program. In study one, a quantitative study, we surveyed students (N = 162) using the Situational Motivation Scale and the Basic Need Satisfaction Scale (BNSS). The results of study one are consistent with previous research showing strong correlations between the three basic needs and intrinsic motivation. In study two, a qualitative study, we analyzed in-depth phenomenologically based interviews (N = 9 participants resulting in 756 pages of single-spaced transcripts) using the BNSS as a heuristic framework to identify instances when students express satisfaction or frustration of competency, autonomy, and relatedness. Study two illustrates when and how supportive contexts and behaviors contribute to feelings of competency, autonomy, and relatedness. These studies expand research on SDT by showing ways in which engineering students develop feelings of competency, how specific needs-supportive actions contributed to feelings of competency, and the roles of autonomy and relatedness in the development of competency.more » « less
-
Cook, Samuel ; Katz, Brian ; Moore-Russo, Deborah (Ed.)One of the most used game design elements in gamification design is leaderboard, a scoreboard showing participants’ current scores and rankings. Though many studies suggest the positive effects of leaderboard on participants’ learning and motivation (Kalogiannakis, Papadakis, & Zourmpakis, 2021), research also shows that not all students benefit from the use of leaderboard (Andrade, Mizoguchi, & Isotani, 2016; Nicholson, 2013). Based on self-determination theory (SDT) (Ryan & Deci, 2017), we designed a study where undergraduate math students completed a leaderboard-based review, and addressed two questions: (RQ1) How are students’ perceived autonomy and competence associated with their enjoyment and intention of continued participation? (RQ2) How is student actual competence associated with their enjoyment and intention of continued participation?more » « less
-
Cook, Samuel ; Katz, Brian ; Moore-Russo, Deborah (Ed.)One of the most used game design elements in gamification design is leaderboard, a scoreboard showing participants’ current scores and rankings. Though many studies suggest the positive effects of leaderboard on participants’ learning and motivation (Kalogiannakis, Papadakis, & Zourmpakis, 2021), research also shows that not all students benefit from the use of leaderboard (Andrade, Mizoguchi, & Isotani, 2016; Nicholson, 2013). Based on self-determination theory (SDT) (Ryan & Deci, 2017), we designed a study where undergraduate math students completed a leaderboard-based review, and addressed two questions: (RQ1) How are students’ perceived autonomy and competence associated with their enjoyment and intention of continued participation? (RQ2) How is student actual competence associated with their enjoyment and intention of continued participation?more » « less
-
Abstract Background The Learning Assistant (LA) model with its subsequent support and training has evidenced significant gains for undergraduate STEM learning and persistence, especially in high-stakes courses like Calculus. Yet, when a swift and unexpected transition occurs from face-to-face to online, remote learning of the LA environment, it is unknown how LAs are able to maintain their motivation (competence, autonomy, and relatedness), adapt to these new challenges, and sustain their student-centered efforts. This study used Self-Determination Theory (SDT) to model theoretical aspects of LAs’ motivations (persistence and performance) both before and after changes were made in delivery of a Calculus II course at Texas Tech University due to COVID-19 interruptions. Results Analysis of weekly written reflections, a focus group session, and a post-course questionnaire of 13 Calculus II LAs throughout Spring semester of 2020 showed that LAs’ reports of competence proportionally decreased when they transitioned online, which was followed by a moderate proportional increase in reports of autonomy (actions they took to adapt to distance instruction) and a dramatic proportional increase in reports of relatedness (to build structures for maintaining communication and building community with undergraduate students). Conclusions Relatedness emerged as the most salient factor from SDT to maintain LA self-determination due to the COVID-19 facilitated interruption to course delivery in a high-stakes undergraduate STEM course. Given that online learning continues during the pandemic and is likely to continue after, this research provides an understanding to how LAs responded to this event and the mounting importance of relatedness when LAs are working with undergraduate STEM learners. Programmatic recommendations are given for enhancing LA preparation including selecting LAs for autonomy and relatedness factors (in addition to competence), modeling mentoring for remote learners, and coaching in best practices for online instruction.more » « less
- Free Publicly Accessible Full Text
-
Accepted Manuscript1.0
- Conference Paper:
- The DOI is not currently available.
