skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Title: On the climatic influence of CO 2 forcing in the Pliocene
Abstract. Understanding the dominant climate forcings in the Pliocene is crucial to assessing the usefulness of the Pliocene as an analogue for our warmer future. Here, we implement a novel yet simple linear factorisation method to assess the relative influence of CO2 forcing in seven models of the Pliocene Model Intercomparison Project Phase 2 (PlioMIP2) ensemble. Outputs are termed “FCO2” and show the fraction of Pliocene climate change driven by CO2. The accuracy of the FCO2 method is first assessed through comparison to an energy balance analysis previously used to assess drivers of surface air temperature in the PlioMIP1 ensemble. After this assessment, the FCO2 method is applied to achieve an understanding of the drivers of Pliocene sea surface temperature and precipitation for the first time. CO2 is found to be the most important forcing in the ensemble forPliocene surface air temperature (global mean FCO2=0.56), sea surface temperature (global mean FCO2=0.56), and precipitation (global mean FCO2=0.51). The range between individual models is found to be consistent between these three climate variables, and the models generally show good agreement on the sign of the most important forcing. Our results provide the most spatially complete view of the drivers ofPliocene climate to date and have implications for both data–modelcomparison and the use of the Pliocene as an analogue for the future. ThatCO2 is found to be the most important forcing reinforces thePliocene as a good palaeoclimate analogue, but the significant effect ofnon-CO2 forcing at a regional scale (e.g. orography and ice sheet forcing at high latitudes) reminds us that it is not perfect, and these additional influencing factors must not be overlooked. This comparison is further complicated when considering the Pliocene as a state in quasi-equilibrium with CO2 forcing compared to the transient warming being experienced at present.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
2103055
PAR ID:
10410175
Author(s) / Creator(s):
; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;
Date Published:
Journal Name:
Climate of the Past
Volume:
19
Issue:
3
ISSN:
1814-9332
Page Range / eLocation ID:
747 to 764
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. null (Ed.)
    Abstract. The Pliocene epoch has great potential to improve ourunderstanding of the long-term climatic and environmental consequences of an atmospheric CO2 concentration near ∼400 parts permillion by volume. Here we present the large-scale features of Plioceneclimate as simulated by a new ensemble of climate models of varyingcomplexity and spatial resolution based on new reconstructions ofboundary conditions (the Pliocene Model Intercomparison Project Phase 2;PlioMIP2). As a global annual average, modelled surface air temperaturesincrease by between 1.7 and 5.2 ∘C relative to the pre-industrial erawith a multi-model mean value of 3.2 ∘C. Annual mean totalprecipitation rates increase by 7 % (range: 2 %–13 %). On average, surface air temperature (SAT) increases by 4.3 ∘C over land and 2.8 ∘C over the oceans. There is a clear pattern of polar amplification with warming polewards of 60∘ N and 60∘ S exceeding the global mean warming by a factor of 2.3. In the Atlantic and Pacific oceans, meridional temperature gradients are reduced, while tropical zonal gradients remain largely unchanged. There is a statistically significant relationship between a model's climate response associated with a doubling in CO2 (equilibrium climate sensitivity; ECS) and its simulated Pliocene surface temperature response. The mean ensemble Earth system response to a doubling of CO2 (including ice sheet feedbacks) is 67 % greater than ECS; this is larger than the increase of 47 % obtained from the PlioMIP1 ensemble. Proxy-derived estimates of Pliocene sea surface temperatures are used to assess model estimates of ECS and give an ECS range of 2.6–4.8 ∘C. This result is in general accord with the ECS range presented by previous Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Assessment Reports. 
    more » « less
  2. Past climate states hold valuable insights into future climate change. Among those states, mid-Pliocene (3.3 - 3.0 Ma) is often studied as an important analog to near future climate change following an intermediate warming pathway. This time interval featured topography and geography like present-day, yet with retreated polar ice sheets and expanded boreal forests, potentially reflecting equilibrium earth system responses to CO2 forcing at a centennial to millennial time scale. Despite the prolific research on Pliocene climate, little is known about the amount of radiative forcing, especially from changing boundary conditions, that drives the Pliocene climate. Existing constraints mainly focused on well-mixed greenhouse gases and aerosols. Here, we applied the methodology commonly used to quantify radiative forcing of future climate and its sources to constrain radiative forcing of the mid-Pliocene climate using three generations of Community Earth System Models (CCSM4, CESM1.2, and CESM2). To calculate ERF, the difference in net top of the atmosphere radiative fluxes is computed between a pre-industrial control and a mid-Pliocene simulation. Both are carried out with prescribed pre-industrial sea surface temperature. The three mid-Pliocene simulations separately feature a 400 ppm CO2 (the level of mid-Pliocene), mid-Pliocene geography and topography, and mid-Pliocene ice and vegetation. Changing atmospheric temperature, water vapor, surface albedo, and clear vs total sky radiative fluxes are further extracted from these simulations to calculate radiative adjustments with published radiative kernels for CESM. In our preliminary results with CESM1.2, we found that ERF is 1.754 W m-2 for CO2 forcings, 1.143 W m-2 for vegetation and ice sheet forcing, and -0.339 W m-2 for geographic and topographic forcing. Further, ERF from boundary condition changes mostly arises from changing surface albedo with 1.626 W m-2 for vegetation and ice sheet changes and –0.54 W m-2 for geographic and topographic changes respectively. Radiative adjustments from water vapor responses tend to amplify the instantaneous forcing with the most profound effect induced by vegetation and ice sheet changes. These results underscore the importance of constraining radiative forcing from changes in boundary conditions, which is potentially key to understanding drivers of past climate warmth and inter-model spread in simulated past climate states. 
    more » « less
  3. null (Ed.)
    Abstract. Changes in glacier length reflect the integrated response to local fluctuations in temperature and precipitation resulting from both external forcing (e.g., volcanic eruptions or anthropogenic CO2) and internal climate variability. In order to interpret the climate history reflected in the glacier moraine record, the influence of both sources of climate variability must therefore be considered. Here we study the last millennium of glacier-length variability across the globe using a simple dynamic glacier model, which we force with temperature and precipitation time series from a 13-member ensemble of simulations from a global climate model. The ensemble allows us to quantify the contributions to glacier-length variability from external forcing (given by the ensemble mean) and internal variability (given by the ensemble spread). Within this framework, we find that internal variability is the predominant source of length fluctuations for glaciers with a shorter response time (less than a few decades). However, for glaciers with longer response timescales (more than a few decades) external forcing has a greater influence than internal variability. We further find that external forcing also dominates when the response of glaciers from widely separated regions is averaged. Single-forcing simulations indicate that, for this climate model, most of the forced response over the last millennium, pre-anthropogenic warming, has been driven by global-scale temperature change associated with volcanic aerosols. 
    more » « less
  4. Equilibrium climate sensitivity (ECS) quantifies the amount of warming resulting from a doubling of the atmospheric CO2 forcing. Despite recent advancements in climate simulation capabilities and global observations, there remains large uncertainty on the degree of future warming. To help alleviate this uncertainty, past climates provide a valuable insight into how the Earth will respond to elevated atmospheric CO2. However, there is evidence to suggest that ECS is dependent on background climate warmth, which may interfere with the direct utilization of paleo-ECS to understand present-day ECS. Thus, it is important that a range of different climate states are considered to better understand the factors modulating the relationship between CO2 and temperature. In this study, we focus on three time intervals: the mid-Pliocene Warm Period (3.3 – 3.0 Ma), the mid-Miocene (16.75 – 14.5 Ma), and the early Eocene (~50 Ma), in order to sample ECS from Cenozoic coolhouse to hothouse climates. Here, we combine the Bayesian framework of constraining the ECS and its uncertainty with several published methods to estimate the global mean surface temperature (GMST) from sparse proxy records. This framework utilizes an emergent constraint between the simulated GMST changes and climate sensitivities across the model ensemble. For each time interval, we employ a combination of parametric and non-parametric functions, coupled with a probabilistic approach to derive a refined estimate. Preliminary results for the Pliocene indicate a GMST reconstruction of approximately 19.3°C, which is higher than previous estimates that were derived using only marine records. Using this estimate, we calculate an ECS that is also higher than previously published values, especially due to the inclusion of high-latitude terrestrial temperature records into our estimates. Intriguingly, using the consistent methodology, our calculated ECS for the early Eocene is lower than that of the mid-Pliocene. This result does not support an amplified ECS in hothouse climate, and points to a potentially important role of ice albedo feedback in amplifying the ECS in coolhouse climate. Ongoing work will apply the same methodology to the mid-Miocene and further investigate the source for the estimated ECS state dependency between these climate intervals. 
    more » « less
  5. This dataset includes surface underway chemical, meteorological and physical data collected from Autonomous Surface Vehicle (ASV) Saildrone 1038 (EXPOCODE 316420220616) in the Indian Ocean, Southern Ocean from 2022-06-16 to 2022-07-26. These data include xCO2 SW (wet) - mole fraction of CO2 in air in equilibrium with the seawater at sea surface temperature and measured humidity; H2O SW - Mole fraction of H2O in air from equilibrator; xCO2 Air (wet) - Mole fraction of CO2 in air from airblock, 0.67m (26") above the sea surface at measured humidity; H2O Air - Mole fraction of H2O in air from airblock, 0.67m (26") above the sea surface; Atmospheric pressure at the airblock, 0.67m (26") above the sea surface; Atmospheric pressure at the airblock, 0.67m (26") above the sea surface; Temperature of the Infrared Licor 820 in degrees Celsius; MAPCO2 %O2 - The percent oxygen of the surface seawater divided by the percent oxygen of the atmosphere at 0.67m (26") above the sea surface; Sea Surface Temperature; Sea Surface Salinity; xCO2 SW (dry) - Mole fraction of CO2 in air in equilibrium with the seawater at sea surface temperature (dry air); xCO2 Air (dry) - Mole fraction of CO2 in air at the airblock, 0.67m (26") above the sea surface (dry air); fCO2 SW (sat) - Fugacity of CO2 in air in equilibrium with the seawater at sea surface temperature (100% humidity); fCO2 Air (sat) - Fugacity of CO2 in air at the airblock, 0.67m (26") above the sea surface (100% humidity); dfCO2 - Difference of the fugacity of the CO2 in seawater and the fugacity of the CO2 in air (fCO2 SW - fCO2 Air); pCO2 SW (wet) - Partial Pressure of CO2 in air in equilibrium with the seawater at sea surface temperature (100% humidity); pCO2 Air (wet) - Partial Pressure of CO2 in air at the airblock, 0.67m (26") above the sea surface (100% humidity); dpCO2 - Difference of the partial pressure of CO2 in seawater and air (pCO2 SW - pCO2 Air; pH of Seawater (total scale). The Autonomous Surface Vehicle CO2 (ASVCO2) instruments used to collect these data include Bubble type equilibrator for autonomous carbon dioxide (CO2) measurement, Carbon dioxide (CO2) gas analyzer, Humidity Sensor, and oxygen meter. 
    more » « less