skip to main content


Title: Spatial Gradients of Quantitative MRI as Biomarkers for Early Detection of Osteoarthritis: Data From Human Explants and the Osteoarthritis Initiative
Background

Healthy articular cartilage presents structural gradients defined by distinct zonal patterns through the thickness, which may be disrupted in the pathogenesis of several disorders. Analysis of textural patterns using quantitative MRI data may identify structural gradients of healthy or degenerating tissue that correlate with early osteoarthritis (OA).

Purpose

To quantify spatial gradients and patterns in MRI data, and to probe new candidate biomarkers for early severity of OA.

Study Type

Retrospective study.

Subjects

Fourteen volunteers receiving total knee replacement surgery (eight males/two females/four unknown, average age ± standard deviation: 68.1 ± 9.6 years) and 10 patients from the OA Initiative (OAI) with radiographic OA onset (two males/eight females, average age ± standard deviation: 57.7 ± 9.4 years; initial Kellgren‐Lawrence [KL] grade: 0; final KL grade: 3 over the 10‐year study).

Field Strength/Sequence

3.0‐T and 14.1‐T, biomechanics‐based displacement‐encoded imaging, fast spin echo, multi‐slice multi‐echoT2mapping.

Assessment

We studied structure and strain in cartilage explants from volunteers receiving total knee replacement, or structure in cartilage of OAI patients with progressive OA. We calculated spatial gradients of quantitative MRI measures (eg, T2) normal to the cartilage surface to enhance zonal variations. We compared gradient values against histologically OA severity, conventional relaxometry, and/or KL grades.

Statistical Tests

Multiparametric linear regression for evaluation of the relationship between residuals of the mixed effects models and histologically determined OA severity scoring, with a significance threshold atα = 0.05.

Results

Gradients of individual relaxometry and biomechanics measures significantly correlated with OA severity, outperforming conventional relaxometry and strain metrics. In human explants, analysis of spatial gradients provided the strongest relationship to OA severity (R2 = 0.627). Spatial gradients of T2 from OAI data identified variations in radiographic (KL Grade 2) OA severity in single subjects, while conventional T2 alone did not.

Data Conclusion

Spatial gradients of quantitative MRI data may improve the predictive power of noninvasive imaging for early‐stage degeneration.

Evidence Level

1

Technical Efficacy

Stage 1

 
more » « less
Award ID(s):
1662429
NSF-PAR ID:
10421394
Author(s) / Creator(s):
 ;  ;  ;  
Publisher / Repository:
Wiley Blackwell (John Wiley & Sons)
Date Published:
Journal Name:
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Volume:
58
Issue:
1
ISSN:
1053-1807
Page Range / eLocation ID:
p. 189-197
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. Finite element models of the knee can be used to identify regions at risk of mechanical failure in studies of osteoarthritis. Models of the knee often implement joint geometry obtained from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or gait kinematics from motion capture to increase model specificity for a given subject. However, differences exist in cartilage material properties regionally as well as between subjects. This paper presents a method to create subject-specific finite element models of the knee that assigns cartilage material properties from T2 relaxometry. We compared our T2-refined model to identical models with homogeneous material properties. When tested on three subjects from the Osteoarthritis Initiative data set, we found the T2-refined models estimated higher principal stresses and shear strains in most cartilage regions and corresponded better to increases in KL grade in follow-ups compared to their corresponding homogeneous material models. Measures of cumulative stress within regions of a T2-refined model also correlated better with the region's cartilage morphology MRI Osteoarthritis Knee Score as compared with the homogeneous model. We conclude that spatially heterogeneous T2-refined material properties improve the subject-specificity of finite element models compared to homogeneous material properties in osteoarthritis progression studies. Statement of Clinical Significance: T2-refined material properties can improve subject-specific finite element model assessments of cartilage degeneration. 
    more » « less
  2. null (Ed.)
    Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most common form of arthritis and can often occur in the knee. While convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have been widely used to study medical images, the application of a 3-dimensional (3D) CNN in knee OA diagnosis is limited. This study utilizes a 3D CNN model to analyze sequences of knee magnetic resonance (MR) images to perform knee OA classification. An advantage of using 3D CNNs is the ability to analyze the whole sequence of 3D MR images as a single unit as opposed to a traditional 2D CNN, which examines one image at a time. Therefore, 3D features could be extracted from adjacent slices, which may not be detectable from a single 2D image. The input data for each knee were a sequence of double-echo steady-state (DESS) MR images, and each knee was labeled by the Kellgren and Lawrence (KL) grade of severity at levels 0–4. In addition to the 5-category KL grade classification, we further examined a 2-category classification that distinguishes non-OA (KL ≤ 1) from OA (KL ≥ 2) knees. Clinically, diagnosing a patient with knee OA is the ultimate goal of assigning a KL grade. On a dataset with 1100 knees, the 3D CNN model that classifies knees with and without OA achieved an accuracy of 86.5% on the validation set and 83.0% on the testing set. We further conducted a comparative study between MRI and X-ray. Compared with a CNN model using X-ray images trained from the same group of patients, the proposed 3D model with MR images achieved higher accuracy in both the 5-category classification (54.0% vs. 50.0%) and the 2-category classification (83.0% vs. 77.0%). The result indicates that MRI, with the application of a 3D CNN model, has greater potential to improve diagnosis accuracy for knee OA clinically than the currently used X-ray methods. 
    more » « less
  3. Chemical exchange saturation transfer of glycosaminoglycans, gagCEST, is a quantitative MR technique that has potential for assessing cartilage proteoglycan content at field strengths of 7 T and higher. However, its utility at 3 T remains unclear. The objective of this work was to implement a rapid volumetric gagCEST sequence with higher gagCEST asymmetry at 3 T to evaluate its sensitivity to osteoarthritic changes in knee articular cartilage and in comparison withT2andTmeasures. We hypothesize that gagCEST asymmetry at 3 T decreases with increasing severity of osteoarthritis (OA). Forty‐two human volunteers, including 10 healthy subjects and 32 subjects with medial OA, were included in the study. Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores (KOOS) were assessed for all subjects, and Kellgren‐Lawrence grading was performed for OA volunteers. Healthy subjects were scanned consecutively at 3 T to assess the repeatability of the volumetric gagCEST sequence at 3 T. For healthy and OA subjects, gagCEST asymmetry andT2andTrelaxation times were calculated for the femoral articular cartilage to assess sensitivity to OA severity. Volumetric gagCEST imaging had higher gagCEST asymmetry than single‐slice acquisitions (p= 0.015). The average scan‐rescan coefficient of variation was 6.8%. There were no significant differences in average gagCEST asymmetry between younger and older healthy controls (p= 0.655) or between healthy controls and OA subjects (p= 0.310).T2andTrelaxation times were elevated in OA subjects (p< 0.001 for both) compared with healthy controls and both were moderately correlated with total KOOS scores (rho = −0.181 and rho = −0.332 respectively). The gagCEST technique developed here, with volumetric scan times under 10 min and high gagCEST asymmetry at 3 T, did not vary significantly between healthy subjects and those with mild‐moderate OA. This further supports a limited utility for gagCEST imaging at 3 T for assessment of early changes in cartilage composition in OA.

     
    more » « less
  4. Objective

    To elucidate the role of decorin, a small leucine‐rich proteoglycan, in the degradation of cartilage matrix during the progression of post‐traumatic osteoarthritis (OA).

    Methods

    Three‐month–old decorin‐null (Dcn−/−) and inducible decorin‐knockout (DcniKO) mice were subjected to surgical destabilization of the medial meniscus (DMM) to induce post‐traumaticOA. TheOAphenotype that resulted was evaluated by assessing joint morphology and sulfated glycosaminoglycan (sGAG) staining via histological analysis (n = 6 mice per group), surface collagen fibril nanostructure via scanning electron microscopy (n = 4 mice per group), tissue modulus via atomic force microscopy–nanoindentation (n = 5 or more mice per group) and subchondral bone structure via micro–computed tomography (n = 5 mice per group). Femoral head cartilage explants from wild‐type and Dcn−/−mice were stimulated with the inflammatory cytokine interleukin‐1β (IL‐1β) in vitro (n = 6 mice per group). The resulting chondrocyte response toIL‐1β and release ofsGAGs were quantified.

    Results

    In both Dcn−/−and DcniKOmice, the absence of decorin resulted in acceleratedsGAGloss and formation of highly aligned collagen fibrils on the cartilage surface relative to the control (P< 0.05). Also, Dcn−/−mice developed more salient osteophytes, illustrating more severeOA. In cartilage explants treated withIL‐1β, loss of decorin did not alter the expression of either anabolic or catabolic genes. However, a greater proportion ofsGAGs was released to the media from Dcn−/−mouse explants, in both live and devitalized conditions (P< 0.05).

    Conclusion

    In post‐traumaticOA, decorin delays the loss of fragmented aggrecan and fibrillation of cartilage surface, and thus, plays a protective role in ameliorating cartilage degeneration.

     
    more » « less
  5. Background

    Deep learning (DL)‐based automatic segmentation models can expedite manual segmentation yet require resource‐intensive fine‐tuning before deployment on new datasets. The generalizability of DL methods to new datasets without fine‐tuning is not well characterized.

    Purpose

    Evaluate the generalizability of DL‐based models by deploying pretrained models on independent datasets varying by MR scanner, acquisition parameters, and subject population.

    Study Type

    Retrospective based on prospectively acquired data.

    Population

    Overall test dataset: 59 subjects (26 females); Study 1: 5 healthy subjects (zero females), Study 2: 8 healthy subjects (eight females), Study 3: 10 subjects with osteoarthritis (eight females), Study 4: 36 subjects with various knee pathology (10 females).

    Field Strength/Sequence

    A 3‐T, quantitative double‐echo steady state (qDESS).

    Assessment

    Four annotators manually segmented knee cartilage. Each reader segmented one of four qDESS datasets in the test dataset. Two DL models, one trained on qDESS data and another on Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI)‐DESS data, were assessed. Manual and automatic segmentations were compared by quantifying variations in segmentation accuracy, volume, and T2 relaxation times for superficial and deep cartilage.

    Statistical Tests

    Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) for segmentation accuracy. Lin's concordance correlation coefficient (CCC), Wilcoxon rank‐sum tests, root‐mean‐squared error‐coefficient‐of‐variation to quantify manual vs. automatic T2 and volume variations. Bland–Altman plots for manual vs. automatic T2 agreement. APvalue < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

    Results

    DSCs for the qDESS‐trained model, 0.79–0.93, were higher than those for the OAI‐DESS‐trained model, 0.59–0.79. T2 and volume CCCs for the qDESS‐trained model, 0.75–0.98 and 0.47–0.95, were higher than respective CCCs for the OAI‐DESS‐trained model, 0.35–0.90 and 0.13–0.84. Bland–Altman 95% limits of agreement for superficial and deep cartilage T2 were lower for the qDESS‐trained model, ±2.4 msec and ±4.0 msec, than the OAI‐DESS‐trained model, ±4.4 msec and ±5.2 msec.

    Data Conclusion

    The qDESS‐trained model may generalize well to independent qDESS datasets regardless of MR scanner, acquisition parameters, and subject population.

    Evidence Level

    1

    Technical Efficacy

    Stage 1

     
    more » « less