The eastern portion of the Shumagin gap along the Alaska Peninsula ruptured in an
- Award ID(s):
- 1949130
- NSF-PAR ID:
- 10422414
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Seismological Research Letters
- Volume:
- 94
- Issue:
- 1
- ISSN:
- 0895-0695
- Page Range / eLocation ID:
- 522 to 530
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
more » « less
Abstract M W 7.8 thrust earthquake on 22 July 2020. The megathrust fault space‐time slip history is determined by joint inversion of regional and teleseismic waveform data along with co‐seismic static Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) displacements. The rupture expanded westward and along‐dip from the hypocenter, located adjacent to the 1938M W 8.2 Alaska earthquake, with slip and aftershocks extending into the gap about 180 to 205 km, respectively, at depths from 15 to 40 km. The deeper half of ~75% of the Shumagin gap experienced faulting. However, the patchy slip is significantly less than possible accumulated slip since the region's last major rupture in 1917, compatible with geodetic seismic‐coupling estimates of 10‐40% beneath the Shumagin Islands. The rupture terminated in the western region of very low seismic coupling. There was a regional decade‐scale decrease in b‐value prior to the 2020 event. -
Abstract The Alaska Amphibious Community Seismic Experiment (AACSE) is a shoreline-crossing passive- and active-source seismic experiment that took place from May 2018 through August 2019 along an ∼700 km long section of the Aleutian subduction zone spanning Kodiak Island and the Alaska Peninsula. The experiment featured 105 broadband seismometers; 30 were deployed onshore, and 75 were deployed offshore in Ocean Bottom Seismometer (OBS) packages. Additional strong-motion instruments were also deployed at six onshore seismic sites. Offshore OBS stretched from the outer rise across the trench to the shelf. OBSs in shallow water (<262 m depth) were deployed with a trawl-resistant shield, and deeper OBSs were unshielded. Additionally, a number of OBS-mounted strong-motion instruments, differential and absolute pressure gauges, hydrophones, and temperature and salinity sensors were deployed. OBSs were deployed on two cruises of the R/V Sikuliaq in May and July 2018 and retrieved on two cruises aboard the R/V Sikuliaq and R/V Langseth in August–September 2019. A complementary 398-instrument nodal seismometer array was deployed on Kodiak Island for four weeks in May–June 2019, and an active-source seismic survey on the R/V Langseth was arranged in June 2019 to shoot into the AACSE broadband network and the nodes. Additional underway data from cruises include seafloor bathymetry and sub-bottom profiles, with extra data collected near the rupture zone of the 2018 Mw 7.9 offshore-Kodiak earthquake. The AACSE network was deployed simultaneously with the EarthScope Transportable Array (TA) in Alaska, effectively densifying and extending the TA offshore in the region of the Alaska Peninsula. AACSE is a community experiment, and all data were made available publicly as soon as feasible in appropriate repositories.more » « less
-
more » « less
Abstract On 29 July 2021, an
M W 8.2 thrust‐faulting earthquake ruptured offshore of the Alaska Peninsula within the rupture zone of the 1938M W 8.2 earthquake. The spatiotemporal distribution of megathrust slip is resolved by jointly inverting regional and teleseismic broadband waveforms along with co‐seismic static and high‐rate GNSS displacements. The primarily unilateral rupture expanded northeastward, away from the rupture zone of the 22 July 2020M W 7.8 Shumagin earthquake. Large slip extends along approximately 175 km, spanning about two third of the estimated 1938 aftershock zone, with well‐bounded depth from 20 to 40 km, and up to 8.6 m slip near the hypocenter. The rupture terminated in the eastern portion of the 1938 aftershock zone in a region of very large geodetic slip deficit where peak slip appears to have occurred in the 1938 rupture. The 2021 and 1938 events do not have similar slip distributions and do not indicate persistent asperities. -
null (Ed.)In the 1970s, the Shumagin Islands region of the Alaska subduction zone was identified as a seismic gap expected to host a future great [moment magnitude ( M w ) ≥8.0] earthquake. More recent geodetic data indicate that this region is weakly coupled, and the geologic record shows little evidence of past large events. From July to October 2020, a series of earthquakes occurred in this region, raising the possibility of greater coupling. The initial M w 7.8 thrust faulting earthquake straddled the eastern edge of the Shumagin Gap and was followed by an M w 7.6 strike-slip earthquake within the Shumagin Gap. Stress modeling indicates that this strike-slip earthquake is in fact favored if the Shumagin Gap has low coupling, whereas a highly coupled Shumagin Gap inhibits that type and location of earthquake. The initial thrust earthquake and its afterslip enhanced the strike-slip loading within the subducting slab, helping to trigger the October event.more » « less
-
more » « less
Abstract We derive new, 3D, isotropic models of seismic compressional and shear wavespeeds, Vp and Vs, respectively, their ratio, Vp/Vs, and a catalog of relocated earthquakes for Southern California from more than 10 million P‐ and S‐wave arrivals associated with over 0.3 million earthquakes that occurred between 2000 and 2020. We augment high‐quality analyst‐reviewed phase arrival picks from the Southern California Earthquake Data Center with S‐wave arrival picks obtained with an automated algorithm, and we derive new wavespeed models via traveltime tomography formulated using Poisson‐Voronoi cells (Fang et al., 2020,
https://doi.org/10.1785/0220190141 ). The results contribute to improved regional wavespeed models, particularly the Vp/Vs model, and absolute event locations. The obtained models correlate well with regional geological features and yield more accurate synthetic waveforms than other regional models do for waves with periods shorter than 5 s in much of the modeled region. The derived event catalog exhibits tighter spatial clustering than the standard regional catalog, thereby helping to characterize subsurface features of major faults. The regional 1D averaged Vp/Vs ratio shows high values at shallow depths, decreases to a minimum at about 10 km, then increases again at greater depths below 15 km. Deep seismicity correlates well with regions of Vp/Vs ratio lower than 1.75, which may indicate an increased brittle‐to‐ductile transition depth with an important influence on crustal mechanics. The new wavespeed models and seismic catalog can be useful for various studies including analyses of seismicity patterns and simulations of crustal deformation and ground motion.
- Free Publicly Accessible Full Text
-
Accepted Manuscript1.0
- Journal Article:
- https://doi.org/10.1785/0220220226
