An official website of the United States government
Abstract When learning about scientific phenomena, students are expected tomechanisticallyexplain how underlying interactions produce the observable phenomenon andconceptuallyconnect the observed phenomenon to canonical scientific knowledge. This paper investigates how the integration of the complementary processes of designing and refining computational models using real‐world data can support students in developing mechanistic and canonically accurate explanations of diffusion. Specifically, we examine two types of shifts in how students explain diffusion as they create and refine computational models using real‐world data: a shift towards mechanistic reasoning and a shift from noncanonical to canonical explanations. We present descriptive statistics for the whole class as well as three student work examples to illustrate these two shifts as 6th grade students engage in an 8‐day unit on the diffusion of ink in hot and cold water. Our findings show that (1) students develop mechanistic explanations as they build agent‐based models, (2) students' mechanistic reasoning can co‐exist with noncanonical explanations, and (3) students shift their thinking toward canonical explanations after comparing their models against data. These findings could inform the design of modeling tools that support learners in both expressing a diverse range of mechanistic explanations of scientific phenomena and aligning those explanations with canonical science.
more »
« less
How Can Computational Modeling Help Students Shift Their Ideas Towards Scientifically Accurate Explanations?
This paper explores how MoDa, an integrated computational modeling and data environment, enabled students to express their ideas about diffusion and shift them toward canonical ideas. Drawing on data from an 8-day unit with two 6th-grade science classes, we analyze students' utterances in presentations, drawings, and written responses to document their diverse ideas about diffusion We present three case studies to illustrate how engaging with computational modeling in MoDa and the unit around it enabled students to shift from non-canonical ideas towards more canonical explanations of diffusion. In particular, we identify three factors that helped in shifting students’ ideas: the availability of code blocks to represent a diverse range of ideas including non-canonical ones, consistent access to video data of the phenomenon, and model presentations to the whole class. The paper illustrates how a computational modeling tool and curriculum can make students' diverse ideas visible and shift them toward canonical explanations.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 2010413
- PAR ID:
- 10424607
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Proceedings of the 2023 Annual Meeting of the International Society for the Learning Sciences
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
This study explores how the interplay between data analysis and model design shifts 6th-grade students' understanding of diffusion from simple to sophisticated mechanistic reasoning and from non-canonical to canonical ideas about diffusion. Using mixed-methods qualitative analysis, we determine students' mechanistic reasoning and ideas about diffusion at five different points in a curricular sequence using a new tool for computational modeling called MoDa. With this data, we present a framework for the relationship between students' developing mechanistic reasoning and their canonical understanding, suggesting that they develop independently. Further, we illustrate how the computational modeling environment, MoDa, used in this study pushed students' mechanistic reasoning toward sophistication. Moreover, in allowing them to explore non-canonical mechanisms, MoDa supported their convergence on canonical scientific ideas about diffusion.more » « less
-
This paper draws on a larger project in which we design for students to iteratively engage in scientific practices of computational modeling and data analysis. Here, we report on two sixth-grade science classes’ work in a unit about how ink diffuses through hot and cold water. Using interaction analysis, we analyzed what dimensions students attended to as they analyzed data, constructed computational models, and compared the two to validate their models. Our analysis led to three findings: 1. Visual cues from video data were salient to students who heavily drew on them to iterate on their models.; 2. Programming computational models raised questions about the behavior of the individual particles in the phenomenon.; and 3. The visual data made salient the contrasting conditions being modeled. However, instead of developing a single model that explained diffusion in both hot and cold water, students programmed distinct behaviors for each condition. The findings illustrate how visual data and modeling together can help students generate explanations to account for scientific phenomena and show evidence that students need explicit supports for thinking about models as providing an explanation for a range of related conditions in the system.more » « less
-
Computational modeling tools present unique opportunities and challenges for student learning. Each tool has a representational system that impacts the kinds of explorations students engage in. Inquiry aligned with a tool’s representational system can support more productive engagement toward target learning goals. However, little research has examined how teachers can make visible the ways students’ ideas about a phenomenon can be expressed and explored within a tool’s representational system. In this paper, we elaborate on the construct of ontological alignment—that is, identifying and leveraging points of resonance between students’ existing ideas and the representational system of a tool. Using interaction analysis, we identify alignment practices adopted by a science teacher and her students in a computational agent-based modeling unit. Specifically, we describe three practices: (1) Elevating student ideas relevant to the tool’s representational system; (2) Exploring and testing links between students’ conceptual and computational models; and (3) Drawing on evidence resonant with the tool’s representational system to differentiate between theories. Finally, we discuss the pedagogical value of ontological alignment as a way to leverage students’ ideas in alignment with a tool’s representational system and suggest the presented practices as exemplary ways to support students’ computational modeling for science learning.more » « less
-
Abstract Inquiry instruction often neglects graphing. It gives students few opportunities to develop the knowledge and skills necessary to take advantage of graphs, and which are called for by current science education standards. Yet, it is not well known how to support graphing skills, particularly within middle school science inquiry contexts. Using qualitative graphs is a promising, but underexplored approach. In contrast to quantitative graphs, which can lead students to focus too narrowly on the mechanics of plotting points, qualitative graphs can encourage students to relate graphical representations to their conceptual meaning. Guided by the Knowledge Integration framework, which recognizes and guides students in integrating their diverse ideas about science, we incorporated qualitative graphing activities into a seventh grade web‐based inquiry unit about cell division and cancer treatment. In Study 1, we characterized the kinds of graphs students generated in terms of their integration of graphical and scientific knowledge. We also found that students (n = 30) using the unit made significant learning gains based on their pretest to post‐test scores. In Study 2, we compared students' performance in two versions of the same unit: One that had students construct, and second that had them critique qualitative graphs. Results showed that both activities had distinct benefits, and improved students' (n = 117) integrated understanding of graphs and science. Specifically, critiquing graphs helped students improve their scientific explanations within the unit, while constructing graphs led students to link key science ideas within both their in‐unit and post‐unit explanations. We discuss the relative affordances and constraints of critique and construction activities, and observe students' common misunderstandings of graphs. In all, this study offers a critical exploration of how to design instruction that simultaneously supports students' science and graph understanding within complex inquiry contexts.more » « less
- Free Publicly Accessible Full Text
-
Accepted Manuscript1.0
- Conference Paper:
- The DOI is not currently available.
