An official website of the United States government
This paper explores how MoDa, an integrated computational modeling and data environment, enabled students to express their ideas about diffusion and shift them toward canonical ideas. Drawing on data from an 8-day unit with two 6th-grade science classes, we analyze students' utterances in presentations, drawings, and written responses to document their diverse ideas about diffusion We present three case studies to illustrate how engaging with computational modeling in MoDa and the unit around it enabled students to shift from non-canonical ideas towards more canonical explanations of diffusion. In particular, we identify three factors that helped in shifting students’ ideas: the availability of code blocks to represent a diverse range of ideas including non-canonical ones, consistent access to video data of the phenomenon, and model presentations to the whole class. The paper illustrates how a computational modeling tool and curriculum can make students' diverse ideas visible and shift them toward canonical explanations.
more »
« less
Right but Wrong: The Independence of Mechanistic Reasoning and Canonical Understanding in Studying Diffusion
This study explores how the interplay between data analysis and model design shifts 6th-grade students' understanding of diffusion from simple to sophisticated mechanistic reasoning and from non-canonical to canonical ideas about diffusion. Using mixed-methods qualitative analysis, we determine students' mechanistic reasoning and ideas about diffusion at five different points in a curricular sequence using a new tool for computational modeling called MoDa. With this data, we present a framework for the relationship between students' developing mechanistic reasoning and their canonical understanding, suggesting that they develop independently. Further, we illustrate how the computational modeling environment, MoDa, used in this study pushed students' mechanistic reasoning toward sophistication. Moreover, in allowing them to explore non-canonical mechanisms, MoDa supported their convergence on canonical scientific ideas about diffusion.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 2010413
- PAR ID:
- 10427849
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Annual International Conference of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching (NARST)
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
Abstract When learning about scientific phenomena, students are expected tomechanisticallyexplain how underlying interactions produce the observable phenomenon andconceptuallyconnect the observed phenomenon to canonical scientific knowledge. This paper investigates how the integration of the complementary processes of designing and refining computational models using real‐world data can support students in developing mechanistic and canonically accurate explanations of diffusion. Specifically, we examine two types of shifts in how students explain diffusion as they create and refine computational models using real‐world data: a shift towards mechanistic reasoning and a shift from noncanonical to canonical explanations. We present descriptive statistics for the whole class as well as three student work examples to illustrate these two shifts as 6th grade students engage in an 8‐day unit on the diffusion of ink in hot and cold water. Our findings show that (1) students develop mechanistic explanations as they build agent‐based models, (2) students' mechanistic reasoning can co‐exist with noncanonical explanations, and (3) students shift their thinking toward canonical explanations after comparing their models against data. These findings could inform the design of modeling tools that support learners in both expressing a diverse range of mechanistic explanations of scientific phenomena and aligning those explanations with canonical science.more » « less
-
Students often express Lamarckian ideas—that changes acquired during an organism’s lifetime can be inherited—when reasoning about natural selection. Researchers have described this reasoning as arising from incorrect and unproductive misconceptions. Using the theoretical tools of resource theory and data from interviews with college students, we argue that an alternative explanation for students’ apparent Lamarckian reasoning is that they are seeking to provide mechanisms that can account for trait change. Unlike canonical populationlevel mechanisms, organism-level mechanisms are grounded in plausible changes to organismal forms, physiologies, or behaviors. We found that organism-level mechanistic reasoning arose in interviews when students recognized a need for a mechanistic explanation and shifted into an epistemological framing of in-the-moment knowledge construction. Rather than interpret Lamarckian ideas as misconceptions, we argue that they can be viewed as evidence of students' generative epistemological resources for seeking and providing mechanisms.more » « less
-
Offerdahl, Erika (Ed.)Concepts of molecular biology and genetics are difficult for many biology undergraduate students to master yet are crucial for deep understanding of how life works. By asking students to draw their ideas, we attempted to uncover the mental models about genes and gene expression held by biology students ( n = 23) and experts ( n = 18) using semistructured interviews. A large divide was identified between novice and expert conceptions. While experts typically drew box-and-line representations and thought about genes as regions of DNA that were used to encode products, students typically drew whole chromosomes rather than focusing on gene structure and conflated gene expression with simple phenotypic outcomes. Experts universally described gene expression as a set of molecular processes involving transcription and translation, whereas students often associated gene expression with Punnett squares and phenotypic outcomes. Follow-up survey data containing a ranking question confirmed students’ alignment of their mental models with the images uncovered during interviews ( n = 156 undergraduate biology students) and indicated that Advanced students demonstrate a shift toward expert-like thinking. An analysis of 14 commonly used biology textbooks did not show any relationship between Punnett squares and discussions of gene expression, so it is doubtful students’ ideas originate directly from textbook reading assignments. Our findings add to the literature about mechanistic reasoning abilities of learners and provide new insights into how biology students think about genes and gene expression.more » « less
-
Blikstein, P; Van_Aalst, J; Kizito, R; Brennan, K (Ed.)We explored how Natural Language Processing (NLP) adaptive dialogs that are designed following Knowledge Integration (KI) pedagogy elicit rich student ideas about thermodynamics and contribute to productive revision. We analyzed how 619 6-8th graders interacted with two rounds of adaptive dialog on an end-of-year inventory. The adaptive dialog significantly improved students’ KI levels. Their revised explanations are more integrated across all grades, genders, and prior thermodynamics experiences. The dialog elicited many additional ideas, including normative ideas and vague reasoning. In the first round, students refined their explanation to focus on their normative ideas. In the second round they began to elaborate their reasoning and add new normative ideas. Students added more mechanistic ideas about conductivity, equilibrium, and the distinction between how an object feels and its temperature after the dialog. Thus, adaptive dialogs are a promising tool for scaffolding science sense-making.more » « less
- Free Publicly Accessible Full Text
-
Accepted Manuscript1.0
- Conference Paper:
- The DOI is not currently available.
