skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Explore Research Products in the PAR
It may take a few hours for recently added research products to appear in PAR search results.


Title: The Microbiology of Biological Soil Crusts
Biological soil crusts are thin, inconspicuous communities along the soil atmosphere ecotone that, until recently, were unrecognized by ecologists and even more so by microbiologists. In its broadest meaning, the term biological soil crust (or biocrust) encompasses a variety of communities that develop on soil surfaces and are powered by photosynthetic primary producers other than higher plants: cyanobacteria, microalgae, and cryptogams like lichens and mosses. Arid land biocrusts are the most studied, but biocrusts also exist in other settings where plant development is constrained. The minimal requirement is that light impinge directly on the soil; this is impeded by the accumulation of plant litter where plants abound. Since scientists started paying attention, much has been learned about their microbial communities, their composition, ecological extent, and biogeochemical roles, about how they alter the physical behavior of soils, and even how they inform an understanding of early life on land. This has opened new avenues for ecological restoration and agriculture. Expected final online publication date for the Annual Review of Microbiology, Volume 77 is September 2023. Please see http://www.annualreviews.org/page/journal/pubdates for revised estimates.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
2129537
PAR ID:
10430771
Author(s) / Creator(s):
Date Published:
Journal Name:
Annual Review of Microbiology
Volume:
77
Issue:
1
ISSN:
0066-4227
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; et al (, Journal of Ecology)
    Abstract Understanding the importance of biotic interactions in driving the distribution and abundance of species is a central goal of plant ecology. Early vascular plants likely colonized land occupied by biocrusts — photoautotrophic, surface‐dwelling soil communities comprised of cyanobacteria, bryophytes, lichens and fungi — suggesting biotic interactions between biocrusts and plants have been at play for some 2,000 million years. Today, biocrusts coexist with plants in dryland ecosystems worldwide, and have been shown to both facilitate or inhibit plant species performance depending on ecological context. Yet, the factors that drive the direction and magnitude of these effects remain largely unknown.We conducted a meta‐analysis of plant responses to biocrusts using a global dataset encompassing 1,004 studies from six continents.Meta‐analysis revealed there is no simple positive or negative effect of biocrusts on plants. Rather, plant responses differ by biocrust composition and plant species traits and vary across plant ontogeny. Moss‐dominated biocrusts facilitated, while lichen‐dominated biocrusts inhibited overall plant performance. Plant responses also varied among plant functional groups: C4grasses received greater benefits from biocrusts compared to C3grasses, and plants without N‐fixing symbionts responded more positively to biocrusts than plants with N‐fixing symbionts. Biocrusts decreased germination but facilitated growth of non‐native plant species.Synthesis. Results suggest that interspecific variation in plant responses to biocrusts, contingent on biocrust type, plant traits, and ontogeny can have strong impacts on plant species performance. These findings have important implications for understanding biocrust contributions to plant productivity and community assembly processes in ecosystems worldwide. 
    more » « less
  2. ; ; (, Scientific Reports)
    Abstract Biological soil crusts can have strong effects on vascular plant communities which have been inferred from short-term germination and early establishment responses. However, biocrusts are often assumed to function as an “organizing principle” in communities because their effects can “cascade” to interactions among crust-associated plant species. We conducted surveys and experiments to explore these cascades and found that biocrusts were positively associated with large patches (> 10 m diameter) of a dominant shrub Artemisia tridentata. At the smaller scale of individual shrubs and the open matrices between shrubs, biocrusts were negatively associated with Artemisia . Juveniles of Artemisia were found only in biocrusts in intershrub spaces and never under shrubs or in soil without biocrusts. In two-year field experiments, biocrusts increased the growth of Festuca and the photosynthetic rates of Artemisia . Festuca planted under Artemisia were also at least twice as large as those planted in open sites without crusts or where Artemisia were removed. Thus, biocrusts can facilitate vascular plants over long time periods and can contribute to a “realized” cascade with nested negative and positive interactions for a range of species, but unusual among documented cascades in that it includes only autotrophs. 
    more » « less
  3. ; ; ; ; ; ; (, Restoration Ecology)
    Drylands encompass over 40% of terrestrial ecosystems and face significant anthropogenic degradation causing a loss of ecosystem integrity, services, and deterioration of social‐ecological systems. To combat this degradation, some dryland restoration efforts have focused on the use of biological soil crusts (biocrusts): complex communities of cyanobacteria, algae, lichens, bryophytes, and other organisms living in association with the top millimeters of soil. Biocrusts are common in many ecosystems and especially drylands. They perform a suite of ecosystem functions: stabilizing soil surfaces to prevent erosion, contributing carbon through photosynthesis, fixing nitrogen, and mediating the hydrological cycle in drylands. Biocrusts have emerged as a potential tool in restoration; developing methods to implement effective biocrust restoration has the potential to return many ecosystem functions and services. Although culture‐based approaches have allowed researchers to learn about the biology, physiology, and cultivation of biocrusts, transferring this knowledge to field implementation has been more challenging. A large amount of research has amassed to improve our understanding of biocrust restoration, leaving us at an opportune time to learn from one another and to join approaches for maximum efficacy. The articles in this special issue improve the state of our current knowledge in biocrust restoration, highlighting efforts to effectively restore biocrusts through a variety of different ecosystems, across scales and utilizing a variety of lab and field methods. This collective work provides a useful resource for the scientific community as well as land managers. 
    more » « less
  4. ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (, Ecology)
    Abstract Interactions between plants and soil microbes influence plant nutrient transformations, including nitrogen (N) fixation, nutrient mineralization, and resource exchanges through fungal networks. Physical disturbances to soils can disrupt soil microbes and associated processes that support plant and microbial productivity. In low resource drylands, biological soil crusts (“biocrusts”) occupy surface soils and house key autotrophic and diazotrophic bacteria, non‐vascular plants, or lichens. Interactions among biocrusts, plants, and fungal networks between them are hypothesized to drive carbon and nutrient dynamics; however, comparisons across ecosystems are needed to generalize how soil disturbances alter microbial communities and their contributions to N pools and transformations. To evaluate linkages among plants, fungi, and biocrusts, we disturbed all unvegetated surfaces with human foot trampling twice yearly from 2013–2019 in dry conditions in cyanobacteria‐dominated biocrusts in the Chihuahuan Desert grassland and shrubland ecosystems. After 5 years, disturbance decreased the abundances of cyanobacteria (especiallyMicrocoleus steenstrupiiclade) and N‐fixers (Scytonemasp., andSchizothrixsp.) by >77% and chlorophyllaby up to 55% but, conversely, increased soil fungal abundance by 50% compared with controls. Responses of root‐associated fungi differed between the two dominant plant species and ecosystem types, with a maximum of 80% more aseptate hyphae in disturbed than in control plots. Although disturbance did not affect15N tracer transfer from biocrusts to the dominant grass,Bouteloua eriopoda, disturbance increased available soil N by 65% in the shrubland, and decreased leaf N ofB. eriopodaby up to 16%, suggesting that, although rapid N transfer during peak production was not affected by disturbance, over the long‐term plant nutrient content was disrupted. Altogether, the shrubland may be more resilient to detrimental changes due to disturbance than grassland, and these results demonstrated that disturbances to soil microbial communities have the potential to cause substantial changes in N pools by reducing and reordering biocrust taxa. 
    more » « less
  5. ; ; ; (, Environmental Data Initiative)
    {"Abstract":["Interactions between plants and soil microbes influence plant\n nutrient transformations, including nitrogen (N) fixation, nutrient\n mineralization, and resource exchanges through fungal networks.\n Physical disturbances to soils can disrupt soil microbes and\n associated processes that support plant and microbial productivity.\n In low resource drylands, biological soil crusts\n ("biocrusts") occupy surface soils and house key\n autotrophic and diazotrophic bacteria, non-vascular plants, or\n lichens. Interactions among biocrusts, plants, and fungal networks\n between them are hypothesized to drive carbon and nutrient dynamics;\n however, comparisons across ecosystems are needed to generalize how\n soil disturbances alter microbial communities and their\n contributions to N pools and transformations. To evaluate linkages\n among plants, fungi, and biocrusts, we disturbed all unvegetated\n surfaces with human foot trampling twice yearly in dry conditions\n from 2013-2018 in cyanobacteria-dominated biocrusts in Chihuahuan\n Desert grassland and shrubland ecosystems. Our study included\n microbial communities and N pools sampled at different time points\n in the disturbance treatments at one or both sites. We began our\n sampling after observations in April 2018 that the chlorophyll a\n content was at least double in control than disturbed plots in both\n ecosystems (Chung et al. 2019). Stomping occurred in May, and we\n collected soil and plant samples in June 2018 for N pools and soil\n and root fungal abundance. We collected additional soil samples in\n September 2018 and conducted the 15N tracer experiment to observe\n rates of N transfer from biocrust to plants before the fall stomp\n treatment in October. We collected chlorophyll a samples and soils\n for sequencing bacteria in September of 2019, also before the fall\n stomp treatment."]} 
    more » « less
  • Citation Formats
  • MLA
  • APA
  • Chicago
  • BibTeX
  • Save / Share this Record
  • Send to Email