skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Explore Research Products in the PAR
It may take a few hours for recently added research products to appear in PAR search results.


  • NSF Public Access
  • Search Results
  • Select liquefaction case histories from the 2001 Nisqually, Washington, earthquake: A digital data set and assessment of model performance
Title: Select liquefaction case histories from the 2001 Nisqually, Washington, earthquake: A digital data set and assessment of model performance
While soil liquefaction is common in earthquakes, the case-history data required to train and test state-of-practice prediction models remains comparatively scarce, owing to the breadth and expense of data that comprise a single case history. The 2001 Nisqually, Washington, earthquake, for example, occurred in a metropolitan region and induced damaging liquefaction in the urban cores of Seattle and Olympia, yet case-history data have not previously been published. Accordingly, this article compiles 24 cone-penetration-test (CPT) case histories from free-field locations. The many methods used to obtain and process the data are detailed herein, as is the structure of the digital data set. The case histories are then analyzed by 18 existing liquefaction response models to determine whether any is better, and to compare model performance in Nisqually against global observations. While differences are measured, both between models and against prior global case histories, these differences are often statistically insignificant considering finite-sample uncertainty. This alludes to the general inappropriateness of championing models based on individual earthquakes or otherwise small data sets, and to the ongoing needs for additional case-history data and more rigorous adherence to best practices in model training and testing.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
1751216
PAR ID:
10438256
Author(s) / Creator(s):
; ;
Date Published:
Journal Name:
Earthquake Spectra
ISSN:
8755-2930
Page Range / eLocation ID:
875529302311742
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. ; ; (, Designsafe-CI)
    While soil liquefaction is common in earthquakes, the case history data required to train and test state-of-practice prediction models remains comparatively scarce, owing to the breadth and expense of data that comprise a single case history. The 2001 Nisqually, Washington, earthquake, for example, occurred in a metropolitan region and induced damaging liquefaction in the urban cores of Seattle and Olympia, yet case history data has not previously been published. Accordingly, we compile 24 cone-penetration-test (CPT) case histories from free-field locations. The many methods used to obtain and process the data are detailed in the accompanying manuscript, as is the structure of the digital dataset. The case histories are then analyzed by 18 existing liquefaction response models to determine whether any is better, and to compare model performance in Nisqually against global observations. While differences are measured, both between models and against prior global case histories, these differences are often statistically insignificant considering finite-sample uncertainty. This alludes to the general impropriety of championing models based on individual earthquakes or otherwise small datasets, and to the ongoing need for additional case history data and more rigorous adherence to best practices in model training and testing. 
    more » « less
  2. ; ; (, Designsafe-CI)
    This dataset contains 332 CPT-based liquefaction case histories from 25 globally distributed earthquakes. These data, or subsets of these data, have been analyzed in the literature and are provided here to replicate published results. These cases are sourced from existing studies, to include observations of manifestation severity, CPT soundings, and estimation of GWT depth and ground-motion IMs, as generally reported by original investigators. When available, recent refinements were adopted from the literature. Of the 332 global cases, ~55% are “Manifestation” and ~45% are “No Manifestation.” The compiled, post-processed data is presented in a structure array (a single file), allowing researchers to easily access and analyze information pertinent to free-field liquefaction response (i.e., triggering and surface manifestation). Research opportunities using this data include, but are not limited to, the training or testing of new and existing liquefaction-prediction models. Information describing the contents and structure of the case-history data are provided in a ReadME document. Note: This database substantially augments, and thus supersedes, that of Geyin and Maurer (2021). Geyin, M., B. Maurer (2021). "CPT-Based Liquefaction Case Histories from Global Earthquakes: A Digital Dataset (Version 1)", in CPT-Based Liquefaction Case Histories from Global Earthquakes: A Digital Dataset (Version 1). DesignSafe-CI. https://doi.org/10.17603/ds2-wftt-mv37 
    more » « less
  3. ; ; ; ; (, Earthquake Spectra)
    null (Ed.)
    Earthquakes occurring over the past decade in the Canterbury region of New Zealand have resulted in liquefaction case-history data of unprecedented quantity. This provides the profession with a unique opportunity to advance the prediction of liquefaction occurrence and consequences. Toward that end, this article presents a curated dataset containing ∼15,000 cone-penetration-test-based liquefaction case histories compiled from three earthquakes in Canterbury. The compiled, post-processed data are presented in a dense array structure, allowing researchers to easily access and analyze a wealth of information pertinent to free-field liquefaction response (i.e. triggering and surface manifestation). Research opportunities using these data include, but are not limited to, the training or testing of new and existing liquefaction-prediction models. The many methods used to obtain and process the case-history data are detailed herein, as is the structure of the compiled digital file. Finally, recommendations for analyzing the data are outlined, including nuances and limitations that users should carefully consider. 
    more » « less
  4. ; ; (, Earthquake Spectra)
    Semi-empirical models based on in situ geotechnical tests have been the standard-of-practice for predicting soil liquefaction since 1971. More recently, prediction models based on free, readily available data were proposed. These “geospatial” models rely on satellite remote-sensing to infer subsurface traits without in situ tests. Using 15,223 liquefaction case-histories from 24 earthquakes, this study assesses the performance of 23 models based on geotechnical or geospatial data using standardized metrics. Uncertainty due to finite sampling of case-histories is accounted for and used to establish statistical significance. Geotechnical predictions are significantly more efficient on a global scale, yet successive models proposed over the last 20 years show little or no demonstrable improvement. In addition, geospatial models perform equally well for large subsets of the data—a provocative finding given the relative time- and cost-requirements underlying these predictions. Through this performance comparison, lessons for improving each class of model are elucidated in detail. 
    more » « less
  5. ; ; ; ; (, Designsafe-CI)
    Earthquakes occurring over the last decade in the Canterbury region of New Zealand have resulted in liquefaction case-history data of unprecedented quantity. This provides the profession with a unique opportunity to advance the prediction of liquefaction occurrence and consequence. Towards that end, this study presents a curated dataset of approximately 15,000 CPT-based liquefaction case-histories compiled from three earthquakes in Canterbury. The compiled, post-processed data is presented in a dense array structure, allowing researchers to easily access and analyze a wealth of information pertinent to free-field liquefaction response (i.e., triggering and surface manifestation). Research opportunities using this data include, but are not limited to, the training or testing of new and existing liquefaction-prediction models. The many methods used to obtain and process the case-history data are detailed in an accompanying data paper, as is the structure of the compiled digital file. Recommendations for analyzing the data are also outlined therein, including nuances and limitations that users should carefully consider. Version 2 (this posting) supersedes Version 1 (doi:10.17603/ds2-ydfc-cd47). Updates include: (i) Quantification of PGA uncertainties (only median values were provided in Version 1); (ii) Addition of a python data frame to facilitate greater use (only a matlab data file was provided in Version 1); and (iii) removal of several redundant data points. 
    more » « less
  • Citation Formats
  • MLA
  • APA
  • Chicago
  • BibTeX
  • Save / Share this Record
  • Send to Email