skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Title: Global‐Scale Shifts in Rooting Depths Due To Anthropocene Land Cover Changes Pose Unexamined Consequences for Critical Zone Functioning
Abstract Rooting depth is an ecosystem trait that determines the extent of soil development and carbon (C) and water cycling. Recent hypotheses propose that human‐induced changes to Earth's biogeochemical cycles propagate deeply into Earth's subsurface due to rooting depth changes from agricultural and climate‐induced land cover changes. Yet, the lack of a global‐scale quantification of rooting depth responses to human activity limits knowledge of hydrosphere‐atmosphere‐lithosphere feedbacks in the Anthropocene. Here we use land cover data sets to demonstrate that root depth distributions are changing globally as a consequence of agricultural expansion truncating depths above which 99% of root biomass occurs (D99) by ∼60 cm, and woody encroachment linked to anthropogenic climate change extending D99 in other regions by ∼38 cm. The net result of these two opposing drivers is a global reduction of D99 by 5%, or ∼8 cm, representing a loss of ∼11,600 km3of rooted volume. Projected land cover scenarios in 2100 suggest additional future D99 shallowing of up to 30 cm, generating further losses of rooted volume of ∼43,500 km3, values exceeding root losses experienced to date and suggesting that the pace of root shallowing will quicken in the coming century. Losses of Earth's deepest roots—soil‐forming agents—suggest unanticipated changes in fluxes of water, solutes, and C. Two important messages emerge from our analyses: dynamic, human‐modified root distributions should be incorporated into earth systems models, and a significant gap in deep root research inhibits accurate projections of future root distributions and their biogeochemical consequences.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
2026874 2034232 2012878 1656006
PAR ID:
10441148
Author(s) / Creator(s):
 ;  ;  ;  ;  
Publisher / Repository:
DOI PREFIX: 10.1029
Date Published:
Journal Name:
Earth's Future
Volume:
10
Issue:
11
ISSN:
2328-4277
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. Climate models project changing patterns of precipitation and increases in temperature that modify soil moisture dynamics. Land use and changing frequency and intensity of precipitation can induce changes in soil structure and rooting abundances at timescales shorter than commonly considered. Soil structure is a critical ecosystem that governs water flow through soil profiles and across landscapes, and can influence weathering rates and thus solute release and soil development. We hypothesize that the altered soil structure and modification of rooting depth distributions linked to land use change can influence soil solute concentrations, and that those shifts in solute release are dependent on patterns of precipitation. We installed suction lysimeters to collect soil water for ~3 y in two grassland regions with distinct mean annual precipitation (800 mm y-1, 1100 mm y-1) in native prairie, agriculture, and post-agriculture land uses at depths of 10, 40, and 120 cm. We linked solute concentrations to soil moisture, aggregate-size distribution, pore geometry, and rooting depth distributions to assess how land use change and the altered rooting abundance it imposes can modify soil structure and hydrologic fluxes, and to infer how soil weathering can shift deep in the subsurface. We reveal how soil moisture residence time and the soil pore network can govern solute production, and the importance of precipitation and thus of soil moisture accumulation over growing seasons for mineral weathering and solute production. Specifically, we find that the solubility potential of multiple weathering products and organic carbon increases with precipitation, dominance of relatively small aggregates at the surface, and fewer coarse roots. Enhanced solute concentrations at depth may also reflect transport down-profile. Our findings reveal unintended consequences of land use change that influence important hydrologic dynamics and nutrient cycling in the vadose zone and how deeply and how persistently unexpected consequences of changes in land cover can propagate. 
    more » « less
  2. Abstract Deep soils represent a dynamic interface between surface soils and saprolite or bedrock, influencing water flow, solute and gas exchange, and mineral and organic matter transformations from local to global scales. Root architecture reflects land cover and soil heterogeneity, enabling vegetation access to resources that vary temporally and spatially while shaping soil structure and formation. However, how land use can influence roots and soil structure relatively deep in the subsurface (>30 cm) remains poorly understood. We investigate how cropland‐related land use and subsequent vegetation recovery alter rooting dynamics and soil structure in deeper horizons. Using a large‐scale data set representing multiple land uses as a means of varying root abundance across four soil orders, we demonstrate that B horizon root loss and regeneration are linked to changes in multiple soil structural attributes deep within soil profiles. Our findings further suggest that the degree of soil development modulates the extent of structural transformations, with less‐developed soils showing greater susceptibility to root‐associated structural shifts. The greatest change in structural development and distinctness was observed in Inceptisols, while Ultisols exhibited the least change. Such soil structural changes affect water flowpaths, carbon retention, and nutrient transport throughout the subsurface. This work thus underscores the need for Earth system models to capture dynamic soil structural attributes that respond to land‐use change. We suggest that changes in deep‐rooting abundance, such as those accelerating in the Anthropocene, may be an important agent of subsurface structural change with meaningful implications for contemporary and future ecosystem feedbacks to climate. 
    more » « less
  3. ABSTRACT To accurately predict earth system response to global change, we must be able to predict the responses of important properties of that system, such as the depths over which plant roots are distributed. In 2008, H. J. Schenk proposed a model for the depth distribution of plant roots based on a simple hydrological scheme and the assumptions that plants will take up the shallowest water available first and will distribute their roots in proportion to long‐term mean uptake at each depth. Here, we derive an analytical solution to the Schenk model under an idealised climate (in which infiltration events are treated as a marked Poisson process), explore properties of the result and compare with data. The solution suggests that in very humid and arid climates, the soil wetting and drying cycles induced by root water uptake are generally confined to a characteristic depth below the surface. This depth depends on the typical magnitude of rainfall events (most strongly so in arid climates), the typical total transpiration demand between rainfall events (most strongly in humid climates) and the plant‐available water holding capacity of the soil. Root water uptake (and thus predicted root density) in very humid and arid landscapes decreases exponentially with depth at a rate determined by this characteristic depth. However, in a mesic climate, soils may be wet or dry to greater depths below the near‐surface, and the duration spent in each state increases with depth. Consequently, root water uptake and root density in mesic climates more closely resemble a power law distribution. When the aridity index is exactly 1, the characteristic depth diverges and the mean rooting depth approaches infinity. This suggests that the most skewed root depth distributions might occur in mesic environments. We compared this model to another analytical solution and a compiled database of root distributions (159 combined locations). For a larger comparison dataset, we also compared 99th percentile rooting depth to rooting depths modeled by two other frameworks and a database of observed rooting depths (1271 combined locations). Results demonstrate that the analytical formulation of the Schenk model performs well as a shallow bound on rooting depths and captures something of the nonexponential form of root distributions, and its error is similar to or less than that of other modeling frameworks. Errors may be partly explained by the deviation of real climate from the idealisations used to obtain an analytical solution (exponentially distributed infiltration events and no seasonality). 
    more » « less
  4. Abandoned agricultural fields (old fields) are thought to accumulate soil organic matter (SOM) after cultivation cessation. However, most research on old fields soil carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) sequestration has focused on the surface (10 or 30 cm depth) and overlooked their dynamics below 30 cm. This study quantified C and N stock change in both the surface and subsurface with repeated inventories over 13 years. We conducted repeated soil surveys in 8 old fields that form a 64-year chronosequence at Cedar Creek Ecosystem Science Reserve (CCESR), Minnesota in 2001 and 2014. On average, soil C and N accumulated by 16.5 ± 14.5 g C m−2 y−1 and 1.0 ± 1.1 g N m−2 y−1 in the surface (0–20 cm). In contrast, we found soil C and N decreased by 78.9 ± 26.3 g C m−2 y−1 and 12.9 ± 2.42 g N m−2 y−1 in the subsurface (20–100 cm). The C and N losses in the subsurface soil were correlated with low deep root biomass; the majority of roots are located in the top 20 cm of soil. Such root distribution may be attributed to the continuing dominance of nonnative and shallow-rooted C3 grasses and the lack of legumes after field abandonment. This study shows that agriculture has a long legacy effect after abandonment on subsurface soil C and N. Some abandoned agricultural fields can continue to lose C and N because surface C and N accumulation does not offset the ongoing deeper soil C and N losses. 
    more » « less
  5. Abstract. Root-zone water storage capacity (Sr) – the maximum water volume available for vegetation uptake – bolsters ecosystem resilience to droughts and heatwaves, influences land–atmosphere exchange, and controls runoff and groundwater recharge. In land models, Sr serves as a critical parameter to simulate water availability for vegetation and its impact on processes like transpiration and soil moisture dynamics. However, Sr is difficult to measure, especially at large spatial scales, hindering an accurate understanding of many biophysical processes, such as photosynthesis, evapotranspiration, tree mortality, and wildfire risk. Here, we present a global estimate of Sr using measurements of total water storage (TWS) anomalies from the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) and GRACE Follow-On satellite missions. We find that the median Sr value for global vegetated regions is at least 220±40 mm, which is over 50 % larger than the latest estimate derived from tracking storage change via water fluxes and 380 % larger than that calculated using a typical soil and rooting-depth parameterization. These findings reveal that plant-available water stores exceed the storage capacity of 2 m deep soil in nearly half of Earth's vegetated surface, representing a notably larger extent than previous estimates. Applying our Sr estimates in a global hydrological model improves evapotranspiration simulations compared to other Sr estimates across much of the globe, particularly during droughts, highlighting the robustness of our approach. Our study highlights the importance of continued refinement and validation of Sr estimates and provides a new observational approach for further exploring the impacts of Sr on water resource management and ecosystem sustainability. 
    more » « less