An official website of the United States government
Abstract PremiseRubiaceae is among the most species‐rich plant families, as well as one of the most morphologically and geographically diverse. Currently available phylogenies have mostly relied on few genomic and plastid loci, as opposed to large‐scale genomic data. Target enrichment provides the ability to generate sequence data for hundreds to thousands of phylogenetically informative, single‐copy loci, which often leads to improved phylogenetic resolution at both shallow and deep taxonomic scales; however, a publicly accessible Rubiaceae‐specific probe set that allows for comparable phylogenetic inference across clades is lacking. MethodsHere, we use publicly accessible genomic resources to identify putatively single‐copy nuclear loci for target enrichment in two Rubiaceae groups: tribe Hillieae (Cinchonoideae) and tribal complex Palicoureeae+Psychotrieae (Rubioideae). We sequenced 2270 exonic regions corresponding to 1059 loci in our target clades and generated in silico target enrichment sequences for other Rubiaceae taxa using our designed probe set. To test the utility of our probe set for phylogenetic inference across Rubiaceae, we performed a coalescent‐aware phylogenetic analysis using a subset of 27 Rubiaceae taxa from 10 different tribes and three subfamilies, and one outgroup in Apocynaceae. ResultsWe recovered an average of 75% and 84% of targeted exons and loci, respectively, per Rubiaceae sample. Probes designed using genomic resources from a particular subfamily were most efficient at targeting sequences from taxa in that subfamily. The number of paralogs recovered during assembly varied for each clade. Phylogenetic inference of Rubiaceae with our target regions resolves relationships at various scales. Relationships are largely consistent with previous studies of relationships in the family with high support (≥0.98 local posterior probability) at nearly all nodes and evidence of gene tree discordance. DiscussionOur probe set, which we call Rubiaceae2270x, was effective for targeting loci in species across and even outside of Rubiaceae. This probe set will facilitate phylogenomic studies in Rubiaceae and advance systematics and macroevolutionary studies in the family.
more »
« less
Settling a family feud: a high‐level phylogenomic framework for the Gentianales based on 353 nuclear genes and partial plastomes
PremiseComprising five families that vastly differ in species richness—ranging from Gelsemiaceae with 13 species to the Rubiaceae with 13,775 species—members of the Gentianales are often among the most species‐rich and abundant plants in tropical forests. Despite considerable phylogenetic work within particular families and genera, several alternative topologies for family‐level relationships within Gentianales have been presented in previous studies. MethodsHere we present a phylogenomic analysis based on nuclear genes targeted by the Angiosperms353 probe set for approximately 150 species, representing all families and approximately 85% of the formally recognized tribes. We were able to retrieve partial plastomes from off‐target reads for most taxa and infer phylogenetic trees for comparison with the nuclear‐derived trees. ResultsWe recovered high support for over 80% of all nodes. The plastid and nuclear data are largely in agreement, except for some weakly to moderately supported relationships. We discuss the implications of our results for the order’s classification, highlighting points of increased support for previously uncertain relationships. Rubiaceae is sister to a clade comprising (Gentianaceae + Gelsemiaceae) + (Apocynaceae + Loganiaceae). ConclusionsThe higher‐level phylogenetic relationships within Gentianales are confidently resolved. In contrast to recent studies, our results support the division of Rubiaceae into two subfamilies: Cinchonoideae and Rubioideae. We do not formally recognize Coptosapelteae and Luculieae within any particular subfamily but treat them as incertae sedis. Our framework paves the way for further work on the phylogenetics, biogeography, morphological evolution, and macroecology of this important group of flowering plants.
more »
« less
- PAR ID:
- 10445006
- Publisher / Repository:
- Wiley Blackwell (John Wiley & Sons)
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- American Journal of Botany
- Volume:
- 108
- Issue:
- 7
- ISSN:
- 0002-9122
- Format(s):
- Medium: X Size: p. 1143-1165
- Size(s):
- p. 1143-1165
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
PremiseCornales is an order of flowering plants containing ecologically and horticulturally important families, including Cornaceae (dogwoods) and Hydrangeaceae (hydrangeas), among others. While many relationships in Cornales are strongly supported by previous studies, some uncertainty remains with regards to the placement of Hydrostachyaceae and to relationships among families in Cornales and within Cornaceae. Here we analyzed hundreds of nuclear loci to test published phylogenetic hypotheses and estimated a robust species tree for Cornales. MethodsUsing the Angiosperms353 probe set and existing data sets, we generated phylogenomic data for 158 samples, representing all families in the Cornales, with intensive sampling in the Cornaceae. ResultsWe curated an average of 312 genes per sample, constructed maximum likelihood gene trees, and inferred a species tree using the summary approach implemented in ASTRAL‐III, a method statistically consistent with the multispecies coalescent model. ConclusionsThe species tree we constructed generally shows high support values and a high degree of concordance among individual nuclear gene trees. Relationships among families are largely congruent with previous molecular studies, except for the placement of the nyssoids and the Grubbiaceae‐Curtisiaceae clades. Furthermore, we were able to place Hydrostachyaceae within Cornales, and within Cornaceae, the monophyly of known morphogroups was well supported. However, patterns of gene tree discordance suggest potential ancient reticulation, gene flow, and/or ILS in the Hydrostachyaceae lineage and the early diversification ofCornus. Our findings reveal new insights into the diversification process across Cornales and demonstrate the utility of the Angiosperms353 probe set.more » « less
-
Abstract PremiseTo date, phylogenetic relationships within the monogeneric Brunelliaceae have been based on morphological evidence, which does not provide sufficient phylogenetic resolution. Here we use target‐enriched nuclear data to improve our understanding of phylogenetic relationships in the family. MethodsWe used the Angiosperms353 toolkit for targeted recovery of exonic regions and supercontigs (exons + introns) from low copy nuclear genes from 53 of 70 species inBrunellia, and several outgroup taxa. We removed loci that indicated biased inference of relationships and applied concatenated and coalescent methods to inferBrunelliaphylogeny. We identified conflicts among gene trees that may reflect hybridization or incomplete lineage sorting events and assessed their impact on phylogenetic inference. Finally, we performed ancestral‐state reconstructions of morphological traits and assessed the homology of character states used to define sections and subsections inBrunellia. ResultsBrunelliacomprises two major clades and several subclades. Most of these clades/subclades do not correspond to previous infrageneric taxa. There is high topological incongruence among the subclades across analyses. ConclusionsPhylogenetic reconstructions point to rapid species diversification in Brunelliaceae, reflected in very short branches between successive species splits. The removal of putatively biased loci slightly improves phylogenetic support for individual clades. Reticulate evolution due to hybridization and/or incomplete lineage sorting likely both contribute to gene‐tree discordance. Morphological characters used to define taxa in current classification schemes are homoplastic in the ancestral character‐state reconstructions. While target enrichment data allows us to broaden our understanding of diversification inBrunellia, the relationships among subclades remain incompletely understood.more » « less
-
PremisePhylogenetic relationships within major angiosperm clades are increasingly well resolved, but largely informed by plastid data. Areas of poor resolution persist within the Dipsacales, including placement ofHeptacodiumandZabelia, and relationships within the Caprifolieae and Linnaeeae, hindering our interpretation of morphological evolution. Here, we sampled a significant number of nuclear loci using a Hyb‐Seq approach and used these data to infer the Dipsacales phylogeny and estimate divergence times. MethodsSampling all major clades within the Dipsacales, we applied the Angiosperms353 probe set to 96 species. Data were filtered based on locus completeness and taxon recovery per locus, and trees were inferred using RAxML and ASTRAL. Plastid loci were assembled from off‐target reads, and 10 fossils were used to calibrate dated trees. ResultsVarying numbers of targeted loci and off‐target plastomes were recovered from most taxa. Nuclear and plastid data confidently placeHeptacodiumwith Caprifolieae, implying homoplasy in calyx morphology, ovary development, and fruit type. Placement ofZabelia, and relationships within the Caprifolieae and Linnaeeae, remain uncertain. Dipsacales diversification began earlier than suggested by previous angiosperm‐wide dating analyses, but many major splitting events date to the Eocene. ConclusionsThe Angiosperms353 probe set facilitated the assembly of a large, single‐copy nuclear dataset for the Dipsacales. Nevertheless, many relationships remain unresolved, and resolution was poor for woody clades with low rates of molecular evolution. We favor expanding the Angiosperms353 probe set to include more variable loci and loci of special interest, such as developmental genes, within particular clades.more » « less
-
ABSTRACT AimThe aim of the current study is to conduct a comprehensive phylogenetic analysis of the genusArbaciato elucidate the evolution and phylogenetic relationships among all extant species and reevaluate the presence of geographic structure within species that have wide, fragmented distributions. LocationSpecimens ofArbaciawere collected from 34 localities spanning the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans, and the Mediterranean Sea. MethodsWe obtained sequences from three mitochondrial markers (COI, 16S and the control region and adjacent tRNAs) and two nuclear markers (28S and 18S; the latter ultimately excluded from the final analyses). Phylogenetic trees were constructed using maximum likelihood and Bayesian inference approaches. A time‐calibrated phylogenetic tree was inferred using a relaxed Bayesian molecular clock and three fossil calibration points. ResultsOur analysis supports the monophyly of the genusArbacia, including the speciesArbacia nigra(previously assigned to the monotypic genusTetrapygus). The new phylogenetic topology suggests an alternative biogeographic scenario of initial divergence between Atlantic and Pacific subclades occurring approximately 9 million years ago. The dispersal and subsequent diversification of the Pacific subclade to the southeast Pacific coincides with the onset of glacial and interglacial cycles in Patagonia. In the Atlantic subclade, the split betweenA. punctulataandA. lixulaoccurred 3.01–6.30 (median 3.74 million years ago), possibly associated with the strengthening of the Gulf Stream current connecting the western and eastern Atlantic. Our study also reveals significant genetic and phylogeographic structures within both Atlantic species, indicating ongoing differentiation processes between populations. Main ConclusionOur study provides valuable insights into the evolutionary history and biogeography of the genusArbaciaand highlights the complex interplay between historical climate changes and oceanic currents in shaping the distribution and diversification of echinoids in the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans.more » « less
