An official website of the United States government
ABSTRACT Non‐perennial streams are globally prevalent. These streams are vital components of ecosystems, yet their drying patterns and resulting impacts on hydrologic connectivity remain poorly understood at the watershed scale. Aridity is a dominant driver of stream drying, but its influences on hydrologic connectivity have not been fully explored. In this study, we investigated the role of aridity in shaping streamflow and connectivity patterns in non‐perennial stream networks that span the continental United States aridity gradient. Using hydrologic models, we simulated daily streamflow and stream network connectivity under current and future climate scenarios. Our findings support previous research showing that aridity and streamflow are strongly linked. We also found that connectivity was related to aridity, although this relationship was weaker. Under the future climate scenario, mean runoff increased in most watersheds in the future, while mean connectivity decreased in the majority of watersheds. This difference is an indicator of the complex relationship between streamflow and connectivity. Aridity was a strong predictor of changes in very high and very low connectivity periods that resulted from climate change, but aridity did not predict changes in mean connectivity. Arid watersheds tended to experience more high connectivity days due to climate change while humid networks tended to have more low connectivity days. By modelling climate impacts at the network scale and across a broad hydroclimatic gradient, we highlight the importance of considering context‐dependent changes in network connectivity in river flow management and watershed conservation plans.
more »
« less
Detailed streamflow data for understanding hydrologic responses in the Logan River Observatory
Abstract The Logan River watershed, located in Northern Utah, USA, consists of a relatively pristine, mountainous area that drains to a lower elevation, valley area influenced by both urban development and agriculture. The Logan River Observatory has been collecting aquatic (streamflow and water quality) and climate data throughout the Logan River watershed since 2014. While streamflow measurements are commonly made at the outlets of research watersheds, the Logan River watershed consists of diverse hydrologic, topographic, and geologic settings that require a detailed understanding of streamflow variability over time at many locations. Here, we illustrate: (a) the importance of collecting streamflow time series throughout complex watersheds, and (b) how simple flow balances can provide much needed hydrologic insight into the locations and timing of gains and losses over reaches to guide future investigations.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 2043363
- PAR ID:
- 10446503
- Publisher / Repository:
- Wiley Blackwell (John Wiley & Sons)
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Hydrological Processes
- Volume:
- 35
- Issue:
- 8
- ISSN:
- 0885-6087
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
Hybrid Physically Based and Deep Learning Modeling of a Snow Dominated, Mountainous, Karst WatershedAbstract Snow dominated mountainous karst watersheds are the primary source of water supply in many areas in the western U.S. and worldwide. These watersheds are typically characterized by complex terrain, spatiotemporally varying snow accumulation and melt processes, and duality of flow and storage dynamics because of the juxtaposition of matrix (micropores and small fissures) and karst conduits. As a result, predicting streamflow from meteorological inputs has been challenging due to the inability of physically based or conceptual hydrologic models to represent these unique characteristics. We present a hybrid modeling approach that integrates a physically based, spatially distributed, snow model with a deep learning karst model. More specifically, the high‐resolution snow model captures spatiotemporal variability in snowmelt, and the deep learning model simulates the corresponding response of streamflow as influenced by complex surface and subsurface properties. The deep learning model is based on the Convolutional Long Short‐Term Memory (ConvLSTM) architecture capable of handling spatiotemporal recharge patterns and watershed storage dynamics. The hybrid modeling approach is tested on a watershed in northern Utah with seasonal snow cover and variably karstified carbonate bedrock. The hybrid models were able to simulate streamflow at the watershed outlet with high accuracy. The spatial and temporal recharge and discharge patterns learned by the ConvLSTM model were then examined and compared with known hydrogeologic information. Results suggest that ConvLSTM simulates streamflow with higher accuracy than reference models for the study area and provides insight into spatially influenced hydrologic responses that are unavailable within lumped modeling approaches.more » « less
-
Abstract In many regions globally, snowmelt‐recharged mountainous karst aquifers serve as crucial sources for municipal and agricultural water supplies. In these watersheds, complex interplay of meteorological, topographical, and hydrogeological factors leads to intricate recharge‐discharge pathways. This study introduces a spatially distributed deep learning precipitation‐runoff model that combines Convolutional Long Short‐Term Memory (ConvLSTM) with a spatial attention mechanism. The effectiveness of the deep learning model was evaluated using data from the Logan River watershed and subwatersheds, a characteristically karst‐dominated hydrological system in northern Utah. Compared to the ConvLSTM baseline, the inclusion of a spatial attention mechanism improved performance for simulating discharge at the watershed outlet. Analysis of attention weights in the trained model unveiled distinct areas contributing the most to discharge under snowmelt and recession conditions. Furthermore, fine‐tuning the model at subwatershed scales provided insights into cross‐subwatershed subsurface connectivity. These findings align with results obtained from detailed hydrogeochemical tracer studies. Results highlight the potential of the proposed deep learning approach to unravel the complexities of karst aquifer systems, offering valuable insights for water resource management under future climate conditions. Furthermore, results suggest that the proposed explainable, spatially distributed, deep learning approach to hydrologic modeling holds promise for non‐karstic watersheds.more » « less
-
In Arctic landscapes, watershed processes are tightly linked to cold temperatures, permafrost, snow, and strong seasonality in precipitation, storage, and runoff. Thus, a rapidly changing Arctic climate will affect watershed function and result in changes to the transport of water, sediment, and nutrients to downstream aquatic and marine ecosystems. There is increasing evidence of hydrologic intensification of the Arctic terrestrial water cycle, fueling inquiry into the hydrologic responses that integrate the varying climate and landscape units. Key to understanding these complex watershed processes is long-term hydrologic monitoring in Arctic Alaska. The goal of this study is to operate and maintain hydroclimate observation stations in the Kuparuk River basin to obtain continuous datasets for the community of Arctic stakeholders. Imnavait Creek is a small (2.2 square kilometers) watershed located in the northern foothills region of Brooks Range and the headwaters of the Kuparuk River. The Kuparuk River flows north through the foothills and coastal plain of Alaska, before discharging into the Beaufort Sea. The gauging station at Imnavait Creek is approximately 3 kilometers south of the Dalton Highway, near MP (milepost) 291. Imnavait Creek parallels the Upper Kuparuk River and enters the Kuparuk River 12 kilometers north of the Water and Environmental Research Center (WERC) Upper Kuparuk gauging station. Streamflow at Imnavait Creek persists throughout the summer months, but during the winter months flow is non-existent. Streamflow in Imnavait Creek has been measured by researchers at the University of Alaska Fairbanks (UAF) WERC from 1985 to 2023. This data package contains continuous streamflow data collected by researchers from University of Alaska Fairbanks from 2018-2023. For UAF-WERC historical discharge data for Imnavait Creek (1985-2017) see the data package at https://arcticdata.io/catalog/view/doi%3A10.18739%2FA2K649S9D.more » « less
-
Abstract Hydrologic signatures are quantitative metrics that describe a streamflow time series. Examples include annual maximum flow, baseflow index and recession shape descriptors. In this paper, we use machine learning (ML) to learn encodings that are optimal ML equivalents of hydrologic signatures, and that are derived directly from the data. We compare the learned signatures to classical signatures, interpret their meaning, and use them to build rainfall‐runoff models in otherwise ungauged watersheds. Our model has an encoder–decoder structure. The encoder is a convolutional neural net mapping historical flow and climate data to a low‐dimensional vector encoding, analogous to hydrological signatures. The decoder structure includes stores and fluxes similar to a classical hydrologic model. For each timestep, the decoder uses current climate data, watershed attributes and the encoding to predict coefficients that distribute precipitation between stores and store outflow coefficients. The model is trained end‐to‐end on the U.S. CAMELS watershed data set to minimize streamflow error. We show that learned signatures can extract new information from streamflow series, because using learned signatures as input to the process‐informed model improves prediction accuracy over benchmark configurations that use classical signatures or no signatures. We interpret learned signatures by correlation with classical signatures, and by using sensitivity analysis to assess their impact on modeled store dynamics. Learned signatures are spatially correlated and relate to streamflow dynamics including seasonality, high and low extremes, baseflow and recessions. We conclude that process‐informed ML models and other applications using hydrologic signatures may benefit from replacing expert‐selected signatures with learned signatures.more » « less
