Over the past 30 plus years, the Arctic has warmed at a rate of 0.6°C per decade. This has resulted in considerable permafrost thaw and alterations of hydrological and biogeochemical processes. Coincident with these changes, recent studies document increases in annual fluxes of inorganic nutrients in larger Arctic rivers. Changing nutrient fluxes in Arctic rivers have been largely attributed to warming‐induced active layer expansion and newly exposed subsurface source areas. However, the ability of Arctic headwater streams to modulate inorganic nutrient patterns manifested in larger rivers remains unresolved. We evaluated environmental conditions, stream ecosystem metabolism, and nutrient uptake in three headwater streams of the Alaskan Arctic to quantify patterns of retention of inorganic nitrogen (N) and phosphorous (P). We observed elevated ambient nitrate‐N (NO3‐N) concentrations in late summer/early fall in two of three experimental stream reaches. We observed detectable increases in uptake as a result of nutrient addition in 88% of PO4‐P additions (
Current understanding of the relationship between nitrate (NO3−) uptake and energy cycling in lotic environments comes from studies conducted in low‐nutrient (NO3− < 1 mg‐N L−1), small (discharge <1 m3s−1) systems. Recent advances in sensor technology have allowed for continuous estimates of whole‐river NO3−uptake, allowing us to address how the relationship between nutrient uptake and metabolism changes over time and space in larger rivers. We used a six‐month, controlled nitrogen (N) waste release into the eighth order Kansas River (USA) as an ecosystem level nutrient addition experiment. We deployed four NO3−and dissolved oxygen sensors along a 33 km study reach, from February to May 2018, to assess the spatiotemporal relationship between nutrient uptake and stream metabolism during the waste addition. Contrary to our prediction, we did not find evidence of uptake saturation despite an extreme increase in nutrient supply during winter, a period of generally lower biological activity. Although high uptake rates were observed across the study reach, they were uncorrelated to gross primary production. Overall, despite winter temperatures, NO3−uptake rates were high compared to small streams and rivers. We provide evidence that large rivers can be effective ecosystems for retaining and transforming nutrients, while showing that the fine‐scale mechanisms that regulate nutrient retention in large rivers are still largely unknown.
more » « less- NSF-PAR ID:
- 10448108
- Publisher / Repository:
- DOI PREFIX: 10.1029
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences
- Volume:
- 126
- Issue:
- 12
- ISSN:
- 2169-8953
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
more » « less
Abstract n = 25), 38% of NH4‐N additions (n = 24), and 24% of NO3‐N additions (n = 25). We observed statistically significant relationships between NH4‐N uptake and ecosystem respiration, and PO4‐P uptake and gross primary productivity. Although these headwater streams demonstrate ability to control downstream transport of PO4‐P, we observed little evidence the same holds for dissolved inorganic N. Consequently, our results suggest that continued increases in terrestrial to aquatic N transfer in Arctic headwater landscapes are likely to be evident in larger Arctic rivers, in‐network lakes, and coastal environments. -
more » « less
Abstract Riverine biogeochemical processes are understudied relative to headwaters, and reach‐scale processes in rivers reflect both the water column and sediment. Denitrification in streams is difficult to measure, and is often assumed to occur only in sediment, but the water column is potentially important in rivers. Dissolved nitrogen (N) gas flux (as dinitrogen (N2)) and open‐channel N2exchange methods avoid many of the artificial conditions and expenses of common denitrification methods like acetylene block and15N‐tracer techniques. We used membrane‐inlet mass spectrometry and microcosm incubations to quantify net N2and oxygen flux from the sediment and water column of five Midwestern rivers spanning a land use gradient. Sediment and water column denitrification ranged from below detection to 1.8 mg N m−2 h−1and from below detection to 4.9 mg N m−2 h−1, respectively. Water column activity was variable across rivers, accounting for 0–85% of combined microcosm denitrification and 39–85% of combined microcosm respiration. Finally, we estimated reach‐scale denitrification at one Midwestern river using a diel, open‐channel N2exchange approach based on reach‐scale metabolism methods, providing an integrative estimate of riverine denitrification. Reach‐scale denitrification was 8.8 mg N m−2 h−1(95% credible interval: 7.8–9.7 mg N m−2 h−1), higher than combined sediment and water column microcosm estimates from the same river (4.3 mg N m−2 h−1) and other estimates of reach‐scale denitrification from streams. Our denitrification estimates, which span habitats and spatial scales, suggest that rivers can remove N via denitrification at equivalent or higher rates than headwater streams.
-
more » « less
Abstract River metabolism and, thus, carbon cycling are governed by gross primary production and ecosystem respiration. Traditionally river metabolism is derived from diel dissolved oxygen concentrations, which cannot resolve diel changes in ecosystem respiration. Here, we compare river metabolism derived from oxygen concentrations with estimates from stable oxygen isotope signatures (δ18O2) from 14 sites in rivers across three biomes using Bayesian inverse modeling. We find isotopically derived ecosystem respiration was greater in the day than night for all rivers (maximum change of 113 g O2 m−2 d−1, minimum of 1 g O2 m−2 d−1). Temperature (20 °C) normalized rates of ecosystem respiration and gross primary production were 1.1 to 87 and 1.5 to 22-fold higher when derived from oxygen isotope data compared to concentration data. Through accounting for diel variation in ecosystem respiration, our isotopically-derived rates suggest that ecosystem respiration and microbial carbon cycling in rivers is more rapid than predicted by traditional methods.
-
more » « less
Abstract In low‐gradient, macrophyte‐rich rivers, we expect that the significant change in macrophyte biomass among seasons will strongly influence both biological activity and hydraulic conditions resulting in significant effects on nutrient dynamics. Understanding seasonal variation will improve modelling of nutrient transport in river networks, including annual estimations of export, which could optimise decision‐making and management outcomes.
We explored the relationships among seasonal differences in reach‐scale nutrient uptake, macrophyte abundance, solute transport and transient storage in the River Gudenå (Denmark), a large macrophyte‐rich river. We used the minimal pulse addition technique to measure uptake of ammonium, nitrate, soluble reactive phosphorus, as well as reach‐scale metabolism, and surface transient storage in spring, summer, and autumn.
We found that riverine uptake changed among seasons and was linked to macrophyte biomass via both biological activity, reflected in reach‐scale metabolism, and through physical processes, as solute transport was influenced by longitudinal dispersion. In this macrophyte‐rich river, seasonal changes in macrophyte biomass affected contact time between the water and biota, which influenced ammonium and soluble reactive phosphorus uptake. Using stoichiometric scaling of reach‐scale metabolism, we found that seasonal variation also influenced the relative contributions of autotrophic and heterotrophic biota in assimilatory uptake.
In summary, riverine nutrient uptake was not static, highlighting the importance of seasonality, with significant implications for modelling of nutrient export in river networks. Moreover, current management strategies that remove macrophyte biomass (i.e. weed cutting and dredging) will short‐circuit the positive effects of enhanced nutrient uptake resulting from abundant macrophytes in rivers.
-
more » « less
Abstract Floods are dominant controls on export of solutes from catchments. In contrast, low‐flow periods such as droughts are potentially dominant control points for biogeochemical processing, enhancing spatiotemporal variation in solute concentrations, stream metabolism, and nutrient uptake. Using complementary time series (i.e., an Eulerian reference frame) and longitudinal profiling (i.e., a Lagrangian reference frame), we investigated hydrologic controls on temporal and spatial variation in solute flux and metabolism in the Lower Santa Fe River (FL, USA), where highly colored surface water mixes with exceptionally clear groundwater from springs. Gage measurements suggest groundwater inputs ranged from <1% (during extreme floods) to 86% (during extreme drought) of total discharge (
Q ). Mass transport of most solutes was dominated by high‐Q periods. Most soluteC ‐Q relationships exhibited statistically significant slope breakpoints near the transition between surface and groundwater dominance. In particular, parameters controlling water column light attenuation were chemostatic above medianQ but markedly reduced at lowQ . As a result, river metabolism and assimilatory nitrate (NO3−) uptake were consistently suppressed at highQ and enhanced at lowQ , with greater variability in response to drivers other than water column light transmittance. Spatial variation in solute concentrations was also enhanced at lowQ , induced by discrete groundwater inflow and biogeochemical processing along the reach. Contrasting reference frames yielded corroborative evidence for transport dominance at highQ , which damps spatiotemporal heterogeneity. In contrast, low‐Q periods enable localized mixing controls on solute concentrations and high rates of metabolism and nutrient processing that increase spatiotemporal variability.
