skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Explore Research Products in the PAR
It may take a few hours for recently added research products to appear in PAR search results.


  • NSF Public Access
  • Search Results
  • Preliminary Results from a Dense Short-Period Seismic Deployment around the Source Zone of the 1886 M 7 South Carolina Earthquake
Title: Preliminary Results from a Dense Short-Period Seismic Deployment around the Source Zone of the 1886 M 7 South Carolina Earthquake
Abstract The 1886 magnitude ∼7 Summerville, South Carolina, earthquake was the largest recorded on the east coast of the United States. A better understanding of this earthquake would allow for an improved evaluation of the intraplate seismic hazard in this region. However, its source fault structure remains unclear. Starting in May 2021, a temporary 19-station short-period seismic network was deployed in the Summerville region. Here, we present our scientific motivation, station geometry, and quality of the recorded seismic data. We also show preliminary results of microearthquake detections and relocations using recordings from both our temporary and four permanent stations in the region. Starting with 52 template events, including two magnitude ∼3 events on 27 September 2021, we perform a matched filter detection with the one year of continuous data, resulting in a catalog of 181 total events. We then determine precise relative locations of a portion of these events using differential travel-time relocation methods, and compare the results with relocation results of 269 events from a previous seismic deployment in 2011–2012. We also determine focal mechanism solutions for three events from 27 September 2021 with magnitudes 2.0, 3.1, and 3.3, and infer their fault planes. Our relocation results show a south-striking west-dipping zone in the southern seismicity cluster, which is consistent with the thrust focal mechanism of the magnitude 3.3 earthquake on 27 September 2021 and results from the previous study based on the temporary deployment in 2011–2012. In comparison, the magnitudes 3.1 and 2.0 events likely occur on a north–south-striking right-lateral strike-slip fault further north, indicating complex patterns of stress and faulting styles in the region.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
2225395
PAR ID:
10450538
Author(s) / Creator(s):
; ; ; ; ; ;
Date Published:
Journal Name:
Seismological Research Letters
Volume:
94
Issue:
5
ISSN:
0895-0695
Page Range / eLocation ID:
2479 to 2488
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. ; ; (, Journal of Seismology)
    Abstract On October 28, 2022, a moment magnitude (Mw) 3.8 earthquake occurred in Goesan, South Korea, typically characterized as a stable continental region. Herein, we analyze 42 earthquakes, including the Mw 3.8 earthquake, the largest foreshock (Mw 3.3), which preceded the mainshock by 17 s, and the largest aftershock (Mw 2.9). The primary aim of this study is to identify interactions among the seismic events. To this end, we utilized the permanent seismic networks with the closest station at 8.3 km from the epicenter, and the temporary network deployed eight hours after the mainshock’s occurrence. Relocation results delineate that the mainshock occurred at the southeastern tip of the hypocenter distribution of three foreshocks, trending west-northwest–east-southeast. The aftershocks form an overall spatially diffused seismic pattern that propagates toward both ends of the inferred lineament in the downdip direction. The rupture directivity of the mainshock, along with waveform similarity across the mainshock and foreshocks, confirms the inferred geometry, corresponding well with the focal mechanisms of the mainshock and the largest foreshock. We demonstrate that the change in Coulomb failure stress (ΔCFS) by the largest foreshock was positive where the mainshock occurred and that the mainshock generated ΔCFS capable of triggering the propagation of the aftershocks. 
    more » « less
  2. ; ; (, Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth)
    Abstract We apply the Matrix Profile algorithm to 100 days of continuous data starting 10 days before the 2019 M 6.4 and M 7.1 Ridgecrest earthquakes from borehole seismic station B921 near the Ridgecrest aftershock sequence. We identify many examples of reversely polarized waveforms, but focus on one particularly striking earthquake pair with strongly negatively correlated P and S waveforms at B921 and several other nearby stations. Waveform‐cross‐correlation‐based relocation of these events indicates they are at about 10 km depth and separated by only 115 m. Individual focal mechanisms are poorly resolved for these events because of the limited number of recording stations with unambiguous P polarities. However, relative P and S polarity and amplitude information can be used to constrain the likely difference in fault plane orientation between the two events to be 5–20°. We explore possible models to explain these observations, including low effective coefficients of fault friction and short‐wavelength stress heterogeneity caused by prior earthquakes. Although definitive conclusions are lacking, we favor local stress heterogeneity as being more consistent with other observations for the Ridgecrest region. 
    more » « less
  3. (, Seismological Research Letters)
    Abstract I present a high-precision earthquake relocation catalog and first-motion focal mechanisms before and during the 2019 Ridgecrest earthquake sequence in eastern California. I obtain phase arrivals, first-motion polarities, and waveform data from the Southern California Earthquake Data Center for more than 24,000 earthquakes with the magnitudes varying between −0.7 and 7.1 from 1 January to 31 July 2019. I first relocate all the earthquakes using phase arrivals through a previously developed 3D seismic-velocity model and then improve relative location accuracies using differential times from waveform cross correlation. The majority of the relocated seismicity is distributed above 12 km depth. The seismicity migration along the northwest–southeast direction can be clearly seen with an aseismic zone near the Coso volcanic field. Focal mechanisms are solved for all the relocated events based on the first-motion polarity data with dominant strike-slip fault solutions. The Mw 6.4 and 7.1 earthquakes are positioned at 12.45 and 4.16 km depths after the 3D relocation, respectively, with strike-slip focal solutions. These results can help our understanding of the 2019 Ridgecrest earthquake sequence and can be used in other seismological and geophysical studies. 
    more » « less
  4. ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; et al (, Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors)
    The M 7.8 Kaikoura earthquake occurred in the northern South Island of New Zealand on 3 Nov., 2016, involving the rupture of >20 faults. To understand the complexity of the Kaikoura earthquake, details of the fault ge- ometry, seismic velocity distribution, and stress field are necessary. We have undertaken seismic tomography along the c. 200 km length of the rupture zone. Data from both 51 temporary stations and 22 permanent (GeoNet) stations were collected from March 2011 to December 2018. The hypocenter of the Kaikoura earthquake and aftershocks near the Kekerengu fault locate along lineaments where seismic velocity changes laterally in the epicentral region. In the uppermost crust, lower velocities occur beneath the Emu Plain and Cape Campbell. A higher velocity region near Kaikoura may have acted as a barrier that prevented eastward rupture from the hypocenter and led to the complex fault distribution in this area. These complexities in the seismic velocity structure may relate to the multi-segment rupture character of the Kaikoura earthquake. Spatial correlations between rupture areas and high Vp/Vs suggest the involvement of overpressured fluid in the nucleation and propagation of rupture segments, which is also supported by the reactivation of unfavourably oriented strike-slip ruptures, many lying at c.70◦ to the regional maximum compressive stress trajectories. 
    more » « less
  5. ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; et al (, The Seismic Record)
    Abstract On 5 April 2024, 10:23 a.m. local time, a moment magnitude 4.8 earthquake struck Tewksbury Township, New Jersey, about 65 km west of New York City. Millions of people from Virginia to Maine and beyond felt the ground shaking, resulting in the largest number (>180,000) of U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) “Did You Feel It?” reports of any earthquake. A team deployed by the Geotechnical Extreme Events Reconnaissance Association and the National Institute of Standards and Technology documented structural and nonstructural damage, including substantial damage to a historic masonry building in Lebanon, New Jersey. The USGS National Earthquake Information Center reported a focal depth of about 5 km, consistent with a lack of signal in Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar data. The focal mechanism solution is strike slip with a substantial thrust component. Neither mechanism’s nodal plane is parallel to the primary northeast trend of geologic discontinuities and mapped faults in the region, including the Ramapo fault. However, many of the relocated aftershocks, for which locations were augmented by temporary seismic deployments, form a cluster that parallels the general northeast trend of the faults. The aftershocks lie near the Tewksbury fault, north of the Ramapo fault. 
    more » « less
  • Citation Formats
  • MLA
  • APA
  • Chicago
  • BibTeX
  • Save / Share this Record
  • Send to Email