More Like this

1. Co-evolution of massive black holes and their host galaxies at high redshift: discrepancies from six cosmological simulations and the key role of JWST

   https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stac225  

   Habouzit, Mélanie; Onoue, Masafusa; Bañados, Eduardo; Neeleman, Marcel; Anglés-Alcázar, Daniel; Walter, Fabian; Pillepich, Annalisa; Davé, Romeel; Jahnke, Knud; Dubois, Yohan (January 2022, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society)

   ABSTRACT The James Webb Space Telescope will have the power to characterize high-redshift quasars at z ≥ 6 with an unprecedented depth and spatial resolution. While the brightest quasars at such redshift (i.e. with bolometric luminosity $$L_{\rm bol}\geqslant 10^{46}\, \rm erg/s$$) provide us with key information on the most extreme objects in the Universe, measuring the black hole (BH) mass and Eddington ratios of fainter quasars with $$L_{\rm bol}= 10^{45}-10^{46}\, \rm erg\,s^{ -1}$$ opens a path to understand the build-up of more normal BHs at z ≥ 6. In this paper, we show that the Illustris, TNG100, TNG300, Horizon-AGN, EAGLE, and SIMBA large-scale cosmological simulations do not agree on whether BHs at z ≥ 4 are overmassive or undermassive at fixed galaxy stellar mass with respect to the MBH − M⋆ scaling relation at z = 0 (BH mass offsets). Our conclusions are unchanged when using the local scaling relation produced by each simulation or empirical relations. We find that the BH mass offsets of the simulated faint quasar population at z ≥ 4, unlike those of bright quasars, represent the BH mass offsets of the entire BH population, for all the simulations. Thus, a population of faint quasars with $$L_{\rm bol}= 10^{45}-10^{46}\, \rm erg\,s^{ -1}$$ observed by JWST can provide key constraints on the assembly of BHs at high redshift. Moreover, this will help constraining the high-redshift regime of cosmological simulations, including BH seeding, early growth, and co-evolution with the host galaxies. Our results also motivate the need for simulations of larger cosmological volumes down to z ∼ 6, with the same diversity of subgrid physics, in order to gain statistics on the most extreme objects at high redshift. 

   more » « less
2. Gemini Near Infrared Spectrograph−Distant Quasar Survey: Rest-frame Ultraviolet−Optical Spectral Properties of Broad Absorption Line Quasars

   https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad3e69  

   Ahmed, Harum; Shemmer, Ohad; Matthews, Brandon; Dix, Cooper; Ha, Trung; Richards, Gordon_T; Brotherton, Michael_S; Myers, Adam_D; Brandt, W_N; Gallagher, Sarah_C; et al (June 2024, The Astrophysical Journal)

   Abstract We present the rest-frame ultraviolet−optical spectral properties of 65 broad absorption line (BAL) quasars from the Gemini Near Infrared Spectrograph−Distant Quasar Survey (GNIRS-DQS). These properties are compared with those of 195 non-BAL quasars from GNIRS-DQS in order to identify the drivers for the appearance of BALs in quasar spectra. In particular, we compare equivalent widths and velocity widths, as well as velocity offsets from systemic redshifts, of principal emission lines. In spite of the differences between their rest-frame ultraviolet spectra, we find that luminous BAL quasars are generally indistinguishable from their non-BAL counterparts in the rest-frame optical band at redshifts 1.55 ≲z≲ 3.50. We do not find any correlation between BAL trough properties and the Hβ-based supermassive black hole masses and normalized accretion rates in our sample. Considering the Sloan Digital Sky Survey quasar sample, which includes the GNIRS-DQS sample, we find that a monochromatic luminosity at rest-frame 2500 Å of ≳10⁴⁵erg s⁻¹is a necessary condition for launching BAL outflows in quasars. We compare our findings with other BAL quasar samples and discuss the roles that accretion rate and orientation play in the appearance of BAL troughs in quasar spectra. 

   more » « less
3. A unified model for the clustering of quasars and galaxies at z ≈ 6

   https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stae2307  

   Pizzati, Elia; Hennawi, Joseph_F; Schaye, Joop; Schaller, Matthieu; Eilers, Anna-Christina; Wang, Feige; Frenk, Carlos_S; Elbers, Willem; Helly, John_C; Mackenzie, Ruari; et al (October 2024, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society)

   ABSTRACT Recent observations from the EIGER JWST program have measured for the first time the quasar–galaxy cross-correlation function at $$z\approx 6$$. The autocorrelation function of faint $$z\approx 6$$ quasars was also recently estimated. These measurements provide key insights into the properties of quasars and galaxies at high redshift and their relation with the host dark matter haloes. In this work, we interpret these data building upon an empirical quasar population model that has been applied successfully to quasar clustering and demographic measurements at $$z\approx 2\!-\!4$$. We use a new, large-volume N-body simulation with more than a trillion particles, FLAMINGO-10k, to model quasars and galaxies simultaneously. We successfully reproduce observations of $$z\approx 6$$ quasars and galaxies (i.e. their clustering properties and luminosity functions), and infer key quantities such as their luminosity–halo mass relation, the mass function of their host haloes, and their duty cycle/occupation fraction. Our key findings are (i) quasars reside on average in $$\approx 10^{12.5}\, {\rm M}_{\odot }$$ haloes (corresponding to $$\approx 5\sigma$$ fluctuations in the initial conditions of the linear density field), but the distribution of host halo masses is quite broad; (ii) the duty cycle of (UV-bright) quasar activity is relatively low ($$\approx 1~{{\ \rm per\ cent}}$$); (iii) galaxies (that are bright in [O iii]) live in much smaller haloes ($$\approx 10^{10.9}\, {\rm M}_{\odot }$$) and have a larger duty cycle (occupation fraction) of $$\approx 13~{{\ \rm per\ cent}}$$. Finally, we focus on the inferred properties of quasars and present a homogeneous analysis of their evolution with redshift. The picture that emerges reveals a strong evolution of the host halo mass and duty cycle of quasars at $$z\approx 2\!-\!6$$, and calls for new investigations of the role of quasar activity across cosmic time. 

   more » « less
4. Forming massive seed black holes in high-redshift quasar host progenitors

   https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stab692  

   Lupi, Alessandro; Haiman, Zoltán; Volonteri, Marta (April 2021, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society)

   null (Ed.)

   ABSTRACT The presence of massive black holes (BHs) with masses of the order of $$10^9\, {\rm M_\odot }$$, powering bright quasars when the Universe was less than 1 Gyr old, poses strong constraints on their formation mechanism. Several scenarios have been proposed to date to explain massive BH formation, from the low-mass seed BH remnants of the first generation of stars to the massive seed BHs resulting from the rapid collapse of massive gas clouds. However, the plausibility of some of these scenarios to occur within the progenitors of high-z quasars has not yet been thoroughly explored. In this work, we investigate, by combining dark-matter only N-body simulations with a semi-analytic framework, whether the conditions for the formation of massive seed BHs from synchronized atomic-cooling halo pairs and/or dynamically heated (DH) mini-haloes are fulfilled in the overdense regions where the progenitors of a typical high-redshift quasar host form and evolve. Our analysis shows that the peculiar conditions in such regions, i.e. strong halo clustering and high star formation rates, are crucial to produce a non-negligible number of massive seed BH host candidates: we find ≈1400 DH metal-free mini-haloes, including one of these which evolves to a synchronized pair and ends up in the massive quasar-host halo by z = 6. This demonstrates that the progenitors of high-redshift quasar host haloes can harbour early massive seed BHs. Our results further suggest that multiple massive seed BHs may form in or near the quasar host’s progenitors, potentially merging at lower redshifts and yielding gravitational wave events. 

   more » « less
5. Running late: testing delayed supermassive black hole growth models against the quasar luminosity function

   https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stac398  

   Tillman, Megan Taylor; Wellons, Sarah; Faucher-Giguère, Claude-André; Kelley, Luke Zoltan; Anglés-Alcázar, Daniel (March 2022, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society)

   ABSTRACT Observations of massive galaxies at low redshift have revealed approximately linear scaling relations between the mass of a supermassive black hole (SMBH) and properties of its host galaxy. How these scaling relations evolve with redshift and whether they extend to lower-mass galaxies, however, remain open questions. Recent galaxy formation simulations predict a delayed, or ‘two-phase,’ growth of SMBHs: slow, highly intermittent BH growth due to repeated gas ejection by stellar feedback in low-mass galaxies, followed by more sustained gas accretion that eventually brings BHs on to the local scaling relations. The predicted two-phase growth implies a steep increase, or ‘kink,’ in BH-galaxy scaling relations at a stellar mass $$\rm {M}_{*}\sim 5\times 10^{10}$$ M⊙. We develop a parametric, semi-analytic model to compare different SMBH growth models against observations of the quasar luminosity function (QLF) at z ∼ 0.5−4. We compare models in which the relation between SMBH mass and galaxy mass is purely linear versus two-phase models. The models are anchored to the observed galaxy stellar mass function, and the BH mass functions at different redshifts are consistently connected by the accretion rates contributing to the QLF. The best fits suggest that two-phase evolution is significantly preferred by the QLF data over a purely linear scaling relation. Moreover, when the model parameters are left free, the two-phase model fits imply a transition mass consistent with that predicted by simulations. Our analysis motivates further observational tests, including measurements of BH masses and active galactic nuclei activity at the low-mass end, which could more directly test two-phase SMBH growth. 

   more » « less