Compound‐specific stable isotope analysis (
Ecologists increasingly determine the δ15N values of amino acids (AA) in animal tissue; “source” AA typically exhibit minor variation between diet and consumer, while “trophic” AA have increased δ15N values in consumers. Thus, trophic‐source δ15N offsets (i.e., Δ15NT‐S) reflect trophic position in a food web. However, even minor variations in δ15Nsource AAvalues may influence the magnitude of offset that represents a trophic step, known as the trophic discrimination factor (i.e., TDFT‐S). Diet digestibility and protein content can influence the δ15N values of bulk animal tissue, but the effects of these factors on AA Δ15NT‐Sand TDFT‐Sin mammals are unknown.
We fed captive mice (
As dietary protein increased, Δ15NConsumer‐Dietslightly declined for bulk muscle tissue in both experiments; increased for AA in the low‐fat, high‐fiber diet (A); and remained the same or decreased for AA in the high‐fat, low‐fiber diet (B). The effects of dietary protein on Δ15NT‐Sand on TDFT‐Svaried by AA but were consistent between variables.
Diets were less digestible and included more protein in Experiment A than in Experiment B. As a result, the mice in Experiment A probably oxidized more AA, resulting in greater Δ15NConsumer‐Dietvalues. However, the similar responses of Δ15NT‐Sand of TDFT‐Sto diet variation suggest that if diet samples are available, Δ15NT‐Saccurately tracks trophic position. If diet samples are not available, the patterns presented here provide a basis to interpret Δ15NT‐Svalues. The trophic‐source offset of Pro‐Lys did not vary across diets, and therefore may be more reliable for omnivores than other offsets (e.g., Glu‐Phe).
- NSF-PAR ID:
- 10452550
- Publisher / Repository:
- Wiley Blackwell (John Wiley & Sons)
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry
- Volume:
- 35
- Issue:
- 11
- ISSN:
- 0951-4198
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
more » « less
Abstract CSIA ) of amino acids (AA ) has rapidly become a powerful tool in studies of food web architecture, resource use, and biogeochemical cycling. However, applications to avian ecology have been limited because no controlled studies have examined the patterns inAA isotope fractionation in birds. We conducted a controlledCSIA feeding experiment on an avian species, the gentoo penguin (Pygoscelis papua ), to examine patterns in individualAA carbon and nitrogen stable isotope fractionation between diet (D) and consumer (C) (Δ13CC‐Dand Δ15NC‐D, respectively). We found that essentialAA δ 13C values and sourceAA δ 15N values in feathers showed minimal trophic fractionation between diet and consumer, providing independent but complimentary archival proxies for primary producers and nitrogen sources respectively, at the base of food webs supporting penguins. Variations in nonessentialAA Δ13CC‐Dvalues reflected differences in macromolecule sources used for biosynthesis (e.g., protein vs. lipids) and provided a metric to assess resource utilization. The avian‐specific nitrogen trophic discrimination factor (TDF Glu‐Phe= 3.5 ± 0.4‰) that we calculated from the difference in trophic fractionation (Δ15NC ‐D) of glutamic acid and phenylalanine was significantly lower than the conventional literature value of 7.6‰. Trophic positions of five species of wild penguins calculated using a multi‐TDFG lu‐Pheequation with the avian‐specificTDFG lu‐Phevalue from our experiment provided estimates that were more ecologically realistic than estimates using a singleTDFG lu‐Pheof 7.6‰ from the previous literature. Our results provide a quantitative, mechanistic framework for the use ofCSIA in nonlethal, archival feathers to study the movement and foraging ecology of avian consumers. -
more » « less
Abstract Compound‐specific stable isotope analysis of individual amino acids (CSIA‐AA) has emerged as a transformative approach to estimate consumer trophic positions (TPCSIA) that are internally indexed to primary producer nitrogen isotope baselines. Central to accurate TPCSIAestimation is an understanding of beta (
β ) values—the differences between trophic and source AA δ15N values in the primary producers at the base of a consumers’ food web. Growing evidence suggests higher taxonomic and tissue‐specificβ value variability than typically appreciated.This meta‐analysis fulfils a pressing need to comprehensively evaluate relevant sources of
β value variability and its contribution to TPCSIAuncertainty. We first synthesized all published primary producer AA δ15N data to investigate ecologically relevant sources of variability (e.g. taxonomy, tissue type, habitat type, mode of photosynthesis). We then reviewed the biogeochemical mechanisms underpinning AA δ15N andβ value variability. Lastly, we evaluated the sensitivity of TPCSIAestimates to uncertainty in meanβ Glx‐Phevalues and Glx‐Phe trophic discrimination factors (TDFGlx‐Phe).We show that variation in
β Glx‐Phevalues is two times greater than previously considered, with degree of vascularization, not habitat type (terrestrial vs. aquatic), providing the greatest source of variability (vascular autotroph = −6.6 ± 3.4‰; non‐vascular autotroph = +3.3 ± 1.8‰). Within vascular plants, tissue type secondarily contributed toβ Glx‐Phevalue variability, but we found no clear distinction among C3, C4and CAM plantβ Glx‐Phevalues. Notably, we found that vascular plantβ Glx‐Lysvalues (+2.5 ± 1.6‰) are considerably less variable thanβ Glx‐Phevalues, making Lys a useful AA tracer of primary production sources in terrestrial systems. Our multi‐trophic level sensitivity analyses demonstrate that TPCSIAestimates are highly sensitive to changes in bothβ Glx‐Pheand TDFGlx‐Phevalues but that the relative influence ofβ values dissipates at higher trophic levels.Our results highlight that primary producer
β values are integral to accurate trophic position estimation. We outline four key recommendations for identifying, constraining and accounting forβ value variability to improve TPCSIAestimation accuracy and precision moving forward. We must ultimately expand libraries of primary producer AA δ15N values to better understand the mechanistic drivers ofβ value variation. -
more » « less
Rationale Nitrogen isotopic compositions (δ15N) of source and trophic amino acids (AAs) are crucial tracers of N sources and trophic enrichments in diverse fields, including archeology, astrobiochemistry, ecology, oceanography, and paleo‐sciences. The current analytical technique using gas chromatography‐combustion‐isotope ratio mass spectrometry (GC/C/IRMS) requires derivatization, which is not compatible with some key AAs. Another approach using high‐performance liquid chromatography‐elemental analyzer‐IRMS (HPLC/EA/IRMS) may experience coelution issues with other compounds in certain types of samples, and the highly sensitive nano‐EA/IRMS instrumentations are not widely available.
Methods We present a method for high‐precision δ15N measurements of AAs (δ15N‐AA) optimized for canonical source AA‐phenylalanine (Phe) and trophic AA‐glutamic acid (Glu). This offline approach entails purification and separation via high‐pressure ion‐exchange chromatography (IC) with automated fraction collection, the sequential chemical conversion of AA to nitrite and then to nitrous oxide (N2O), and the final determination of δ15N of the produced N2O via purge‐and‐trap continuous‐flow isotope ratio mass spectrometry (PT/CF/IRMS).
Results The cross‐plots of δ15N of Glu and Phe standards (four different natural‐abundance levels) generated by this method and their accepted values have a linear regression slope of 1 and small intercepts demonstrating high accuracy. The precisions were 0.36‰–0.67‰ for Phe standards and 0.27‰–0.35‰ for Glu standards. Our method and the GC/C/IRMS approach produced equivalent δ15N values for two lab standards (McCarthy Lab AA mixture and cyanobacteria) within error. We further tested our method on a wide range of natural sample matrices and obtained reasonable results.
Conclusions Our method provides a reliable alternative to the current methods for δ15N‐AA measurement as IC or HPLC‐based techniques that can collect underivatized AAs are widely available. Our chemical approach that converts AA to N2O can be easily implemented in laboratories currently analyzing δ15N of N2O using PT/CF/IRMS. This method will help promote the use of δ15N‐AA in important studies of N cycling and trophic ecology in a wide range of research areas.
-
more » « less
Rationale It is imperative to understand how chemical preservation alters tissue isotopic compositions before using historical samples in ecological studies. Specifically, although compound‐specific isotope analysis of amino acids (CSIA‐AA) is becoming a widely used tool, there is little information on how preservation techniques affect amino acid
δ 15N values.Methods We evaluated the effects of chemical preservatives on bulk tissue
δ 13C andδ 15N and amino acidδ 15N values, measured by gas chromatography/isotope ratio mass spectrometry (GC/IRMS), of (a) tuna (Thunnus albacares Dosidicus gigas Calanus pacificus Eucalanus californicus Results Tissues in formaldehyde‐ethanol had higher bulk
δ 15N values (+1.4,D. gigas T. albacares δ 13C values forD. gigas δ 13C values forT. albacares δ 15N values from copepods were not different those from frozen samples, although theδ 13C values from both species were lower (−1.0‰ forE. californicus C. pacificus δ 15N values from chemically preserved tissues were largely within 1‰ of those of frozen tissues, but the phenylalanineδ 15N values were altered to a larger extent (range: 0.5–4.5‰).Conclusions The effects of preservation on bulk
δ 13C values were variable, where the direction and magnitude of change varied among taxa. The changes in bulkδ 15N values associated with chemical preservation were mostly minimal, suggesting that storage in formaldehyde or ethanol will not affect the interpretation ofδ 15N values used in ecological studies. The preservation effects on amino acidδ 15N values were also mostly minimal, mirroring bulkδ 15N trends, which is promising for future CSIA‐AA studies of archived specimens. However, there were substantial differences in phenylalanine and valineδ 15N values, which we speculate resulted from interference in the chromatographic resolution of unknown compounds rather than alteration of tissue isotopic composition due to chemical preservation. -
more » « less
Abstract Animals often consume resources from multiple energy channels, thereby connecting food webs and driving trophic structure. Such ‘multichannel feeding’ can dictate ecosystem function and stability, but tools to quantify this process are lacking. Stable isotope ‘fingerprints’ are unique patterns in essential amino acid (EAA) δ13C values that vary consistently between energy channels like primary production and detritus, and they have emerged as a tool to trace energy flow in wild systems. Because animals cannot synthesize EAAs de novo and must acquire them from dietary proteins, ecologists often assume δ13C fingerprints travel through food webs unaltered. Numerous studies have used this approach to quantify energy flow and multichannel feeding in animals, but δ13C fingerprinting has never been experimentally tested in a vertebrate consumer.
We tested the efficacy of δ13C fingerprinting using captive deer mice
Peromyscus maniculatus raised on diets containing bacterial, fungal and plant protein, as well as a combination of all three sources. We measured the transfer of δ13C fingerprints from diet to consumer liver, muscle and bone collagen, and we used linear discriminant analysis (LDA) and isotopic mixing models to estimate dietary proportions compared to known contributions. Lastly, we tested the use of published δ13C source fingerprints previously used to estimate energy flow and multichannel feeding by consumers.We found that EAA δ13C values exhibit significant isotopic (i.e. trophic) fractionation between consumer tissues and diets. Nevertheless, LDA revealed that δ13C fingerprints are consistently routed and assimilated into consumer tissues, regardless of isotopic incorporation rate. Isotopic mixing models accurately estimated the proportional diets of consumers, but all models overestimated plant‐based protein contributions, likely due to the digestive efficiencies of protein sources. Lastly, we found that δ13C source fingerprints from published literature can lead to erroneous diet reconstruction.
We show that δ13C fingerprints accurately measure energy flow to vertebrate consumers across tissues with different isotopic incorporation rates, thereby enabling the estimation of multichannel feeding at various temporal scales. Our findings illustrate the power of δ13C fingerprinting for quantifying food web dynamics, but also reveal that careful selection of dietary source data is critical to the accuracy of this emerging technique.
