Deep learning techniques have been widely adopted in daily life with applications ranging from face recognition to recommender systems. The substantial overhead of conventional error tolerance techniques precludes their widespread use, while approaches involving median filtering and invariant generation rely on alterations to DNN training that may be difficult to achieve for larger networks on larger datasets. To address this issue, this paper presents a novel approach taking advantage of the statistics of neuron output gradients to identify and suppress erroneous neuron values. By using the statistics of neurons’ gradients with respect to their neighbors, tighter statistical thresholds are obtained compared to the use of neuron output values alone. This approach is modular and is combined with accurate, low-overhead error detection methods to ensure it is used only when needed, further reducing its cost. Deep learning models can be trained using standard methods and our error correction module is fit to a trained DNN, achieving comparable or superior performance compared to baseline error correction methods while incurring comparable hardware overhead without needing to modify DNN training or utilize specialized hardware architectures.
more »
« less
Soft Error Resilient Deep Learning Systems Using Neuron Gradient Statistics
Deep learning techniques have been widely adopted in daily life with applications ranging from face recognition to recommender systems. The substantial overhead of conventional error tolerance techniques precludes their widespread use, while approaches involving median filtering and invariant generation rely on alterations to DNN training that may be difficult to achieve for larger networks on larger datasets. To address this issue, this paper presents a novel approach taking advantage of the statistics of neuron output gradients to identify and suppress erroneous neuron values. By using the statistics of neurons’ gradients with respect to their neighbors, tighter statistical thresholds are obtained compared to the use of neuron output values alone. This approach is modular and is combined with accurate, low-overhead error detection methods to ensure it is used only when needed, further reducing its cost. Deep learning models can be trained using standard methods and our error correction module is fit to a trained DNN, achieving comparable or superior performance compared to baseline error correction methods while incurring comparable hardware overhead without needing to modify DNN training or utilize specialized hardware architectures.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 2128419
- PAR ID:
- 10453090
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- International On-Line Testing Symposium
- Page Range / eLocation ID:
- 1 to 6
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
more » « less
Abstract To improve predictive machine learning-based models limited by sparse data, supplemental physics-related features are introduced into a deep neural network (DNN). While some approaches inject physics through differential equations or numerical simulation, improvements are possible using simplified relationships from engineering references. To evaluate this hypothesis, thin rectangular plates were simulated to generate training datasets. With plate dimensions and material properties as input features and fundamental natural frequency as the output, predictive performance of a data-driven DNN-based model is compared with models using supplemental inputs, such as modulus of rigidity. To evaluate model accuracy improvements, these additional features are injected into various DNN layers, and the network is trained with four different dataset sizes. When evaluated against independent data of similar features to the training sets, supplementation provides no statistically-significant prediction error reduction. However, notable accuracy gains occur when independent test data is of material and dimensions different from the original training set. Furthermore, when physics-enhanced data is injected into multiple DNN layers, reductions in mean error from 33.2% to 19.6%, 34.9% to 19.9%, 35.8% to 22.4%, and 43.0% to 28.4% are achieved for dataset sizes of 261, 117, 60, and 30, respectively, demonstrating potential for generalizability using a data supplementation approach. Additionally, when compared with other methods—such as linear regression and support vector machine (SVM) approaches—the physics-enhanced DNN demonstrates an order of magnitude reduction in percentage error for dataset sizes of 261, 117, and 60 and a 30% reduction for a size of 30 when compared with a cubic SVM model independently tested with data divergent from the training and validation set.
-
Online reinforcement learning (RL) based systems are being increasingly deployed in a variety of safety-critical applications ranging from drone control to medical robotics. These systems typically use RL onboard rather than relying on remote operation from high-performance datacenters. Due to the dynamic nature of the environments they work in, onboard RL hardware is vulnerable to soft errors from radiation, thermal effects and electrical noise that corrupt the results of computations. Existing approaches to on-line error resilience in machine learning systems have relied on availability of the large training datasets to configure resilience parameters, which is not necessarily feasible for online RL systems. Similarly, other approaches involving specialized hardware or modifications to training algorithms are difficult to implement for onboard RL applications. In contrast, we present a novel error resilience approach for online RL that makes use of running statistics collected across the (real-time) RL training process to configure error detection thresholds without the need to access a reference training dataset. In this methodology, statistical concentration bounds leveraging running statistics are used to diagnose neuron outputs as erroneous. These erroneous neurons are then set to zero (suppressed). Our approach is compared against the state of the art and validated on several RL algorithms involving the use of multiple concentration bounds on CPU as well as GPU hardware.more » « less
-
null (Ed.)Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) are becoming an integral part of most software systems. Previous work has shown that DNNs have bugs. Unfortunately, existing debugging techniques don't support localizing DNN bugs because of the lack of understanding of model behaviors. The entire DNN model appears as a black box. To address these problems, we propose an approach and a tool that automatically determines whether the model is buggy or not, and identifies the root causes for DNN errors. Our key insight is that historic trends in values propagated between layers can be analyzed to identify faults, and also localize faults. To that end, we first enable dynamic analysis of deep learning applications: by converting it into an imperative representation and alternatively using a callback mechanism. Both mechanisms allows us to insert probes that enable dynamic analysis over the traces produced by the DNN while it is being trained on the training data. We then conduct dynamic analysis over the traces to identify the faulty layer or hyperparameter that causes the error. We propose an algorithm for identifying root causes by capturing any numerical error and monitoring the model during training and finding the relevance of every layer/parameter on the DNN outcome. We have collected a benchmark containing 40 buggy models and patches that contain real errors in deep learning applications from Stack Overflow and GitHub. Our benchmark can be used to evaluate automated debugging tools and repair techniques. We have evaluated our approach using this DNN bug-and-patch benchmark, and the results showed that our approach is much more effective than the existing debugging approach used in the state-of-the-practice Keras library. For 34/40 cases, our approach was able to detect faults whereas the best debugging approach provided by Keras detected 32/40 faults. Our approach was able to localize 21/40 bugs whereas Keras did not localize any faults.more » « less
-
Deep learning models are trained with certain assumptions about the data during the development stage and then used for prediction in the deployment stage. It is important to reason about the trustworthiness of the model's predictions with unseen data during deployment. Existing methods for specifying and verifying traditional software are insufficient for this task, as they cannot handle the complexity of DNN model architecture and expected outcomes. In this work, we propose a novel technique that uses rules derived from neural network computations to infer data preconditions for a DNN model to determine the trustworthiness of its predictions. Our approach, DeepInfer involves introducing a novel abstraction for a trained DNN model that enables weakest precondition reasoning using Dijkstra's Predicate Transformer Semantics. By deriving rules over the inductive type of neural network abstract representation, we can overcome the matrix dimensionality issues that arise from the backward non-linear computation from the output layer to the input layer. We utilize the weakest precondition computation using rules of each kind of activation function to compute layer-wise precondition from the given postcondition on the final output of a deep neural network. We extensively evaluated DeepInfer on 29 real-world DNN models using four different datasets collected from five different sources and demonstrated the utility, effectiveness, and performance improvement over closely related work. DeepInfer efficiently detects correct and incorrect predictions of high-accuracy models with high recall (0.98) and high F-1 score (0.84) and has significantly improved over the prior technique, SelfChecker. The average runtime overhead of DeepInfer is low, 0.22 sec for all the unseen datasets. We also compared runtime overhead using the same hardware settings and found that DeepInfer is 3.27 times faster than SelfChecker, the state-of- the-art in this area.more » « less
- Free Publicly Accessible Full Text
-
Accepted Manuscript1.0
- Conference Paper:
- https://doi.org/10.1109/IOLTS56730.2022.9897815
