More Like this

1. Long-term variability of root production in bioenergy crops from ingrowth core measurements

   https://doi.org/10.1093/jpe/rtab018  

   Lei, Cheyenne; Abraha, Michael; Chen, Jiquan; Su, Yahn-Jauh (October 2021, Journal of Plant Ecology)

   Zhang, Wen-Hao (Ed.)

   Abstract Aims Long-term determination of root biomass production upon land-use conversion to biofuel crops is rare. To assess land-use legacy influences on belowground biomass accumulation, we converted 22-year-old Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) grasslands and 50+-year-old agricultural (AGR) lands to corn (C), switchgrass (Sw) and restored prairie (Pr) biofuel crops. We maintained one CRP grassland as a reference (Ref). We hypothesized that land-use history and crop type have significant effects on root density, with perennial crops on CRP grasslands having a higher root biomass productivity, while corn grown on former agricultural lands produce the lowest root biomass. Methods The ingrowth core method was used to determine in situ ingrowth root biomass, alongside measurements of aboveground net primary productivity (ANPP). Ancillary measurements, including air temperature, growing season length and precipitation were used to examine their influences on root biomass production. Important Findings Root biomass productivity was the highest in unconverted CRP grassland (1716 g m−2 yr−1) and lowest in corn fields (526 g m−2 yr−1). All perennial sites converted from CRP and AGR lands had lower root biomass and ANPP in the first year of planting but peaked in 2011 for switchgrass and a year later for restored prairies. Ecosystem stability was higher in restored prairies (AGR-Pr: 4.3 ± 0.11; CRP-Pr: 4.1 ± 0.10), with all monocultures exhibiting a lower stability. Root biomass production was positively related to ANPP (R2 = 0.40). Overall, attention should be given to root biomass accumulation in large-scale biofuel production as it is a major source of carbon sequestration. 

   more » « less
2. Balancing Non‐CO ₂ GHG Emissions and Soil Carbon Change in U.S. Rice Paddies: A Retrospective Meta‐Analysis and Agricultural Modeling Study

   https://doi.org/10.1029/2023AV001052  

   Zhang, Jingting; Tian, Hanqin; You, Yongfa; Liang, Xin‐Zhong; Ouyang, Zutao; Pan, Naiqing; Pan, Shufen (February 2024, AGU Advances)

   Abstract U.S. rice paddies, critical for food security, are increasingly contributing to non‐CO₂greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions like methane (CH₄) and nitrous oxide (N₂O). Yet, the full assessment of GHG balance, considering trade‐offs between soil organic carbon (SOC) change and non‐CO₂GHG emissions, is lacking. Integrating an improved agroecosystem model with a meta‐analysis of multiple field studies, we found that U.S. rice paddies were the rapidly growing net GHG emission sources, increased 138% from 3.7 ± 1.2 Tg CO₂eq yr⁻¹in the 1960s to 8.9 ± 2.7 Tg CO₂eq yr⁻¹in the 2010s. CH₄, as the primary contributor, accounted for 10.1 ± 2.3 Tg CO₂eq yr⁻¹in the 2010s, alongside a notable rise in N₂O emissions by 0.21 ± 0.03 Tg CO₂eq yr⁻¹. SOC change could offset 14.0% (1.45 ± 0.46 Tg CO₂eq yr⁻¹) of the climate‐warming effects of soil non‐CO₂GHG emissions in the 2010s. This escalation in net GHG emissions is linked to intensified land use, increased atmospheric CO₂, higher synthetic nitrogen fertilizer and manure application, and climate change. However, no/reduced tillage and non‐continuous irrigation could reduce net soil GHG emissions by approximately 10% and non‐CO₂GHG emissions by about 39%, respectively. Despite the rise in net GHG emissions, the cost of achieving higher rice yields has decreased over time, with an average of 0.84 ± 0.18 kg CO₂eq ha⁻¹emitted per kilogram of rice produced in the 2010s. The study suggests the potential for significant GHG emission reductions to achieve climate‐friendly rice production in the U.S. through optimizing the ratio of synthetic N to manure fertilizer, reducing tillage, and implementing intermittent irrigation. 

   more » « less
3. Albedo of crops as a nature-based climate solution to global warming

   https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ad5fa2  

   Lei, Cheyenne; Chen, Jiquan; Ibáñez, Inés; Sciusco, Pietro; Shirkey, Gabriela; Lei, Ming; Reich, Peter; Robertson, G_Philip (July 2024, Environmental Research Letters)

   Abstract Surface albedo can affect the energy budget and subsequently cause localized warming or cooling of the climate. When we convert a substantial portion of lands to agriculture, land surface properties are consequently altered, including albedo. Through crop selection and management, one can increase crop albedo to obtain higher levels of localized cooling effects to mitigate global warming. Still, there is little understanding about how distinctive features of a cropping system may be responsible for elevated albedo and consequently for the cooling potential of cultivated lands. To address this pressing issue, we conducted seasonal measurements of surface reflectivity during five growing seasons on annual crops of corn-soybean–winter wheat (Zea mays L.- Glycine max L.Merrill—Triticum aestivum L.; CSW) rotations at three agronomic intensities, a monoculture of perennial switchgrass, and perennial polycultures of early successional and restored prairie grasslands. We found that crop-species, agronomic intensity, seasonality, and plant phenology had significant effects on albedo. The mean ± SD of albedo was highest in perennial crops of switchgrass (Panicum virgatum; 0.179 ± 0.04), intermediate in early successional crops (0.170 ± 0.04), and lowest in a reduced input corn systems with cover crops (0.154 ± 0.02). Thestrongest cooling potentials were found in soybean (−0.450 kg CO₂e m⁻²yr⁻¹) and switchgrass (−0.367 kg CO₂e m⁻²yr⁻¹), with up to −0.265 kg CO₂e m⁻²yr⁻¹of localized climate cooling annually provided by different agroecosystems. We also demonstrated how diverse ecosystems, leaf canopy, and agronomic practices can affect surface reflectivity and provide another potential nature-based solution for reducing global warming at localized scales. 

   more » « less
4. Biomass yield potential on U.S. marginal land and its contribution to reach net‐zero emission

   https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.13128  

   He, Yufeng; Jaiswal, Deepak; Long, Stephen P.; Liang, Xin‐Zhong; Matthews, Megan L. (January 2024, GCB Bioenergy)

   Abstract Bioenergy with carbon capture and geological storage (BECCS) is considered one of the top options for both offsetting CO₂emissions and removing atmospheric CO₂. BECCS requires using limited land resources efficiently while ensuring minimal adverse impacts on the delicate food‐energy‐water nexus. Perennial C4 biomass crops are productive on marginal land under low‐input conditions avoiding conflict with food and feed crops. The eastern half of the contiguous U.S. contains a large amount of marginal land, which is not economically viable for food production and liable to wind and water erosion under annual cultivation. However, this land is suitable for geological CO₂storage and perennial crop growth. Given the climate variation across the region, three perennials are major contenders for planting. The yield potential and stability of Miscanthus, switchgrass, and energycane across the region were compared to select which would perform best under the recent (2000–2014) and future (2036–2050) climates. Miscanthus performed best in the Midwest, switchgrass in the Northeast and energycane in the Southeast. On average, Miscanthus yield decreased from present 19.1 t/ha to future 16.8 t/ha; switchgrass yield from 3.5 to 2.4 t/ha; and energycane yield increased from 14 to 15 t/ha. Future yield stability decreased in the region with higher predicted drought stress. Combined, these crops could produce 0.6–0.62 billion tonnes biomass per year for the present and future. Using the biomass for power generation with CCS would capture 703–726 million tonnes of atmospheric CO₂per year, which would offset about 11% of current total U.S. emission. Further, this biomass approximates the net primary CO₂productivity of two times the current baseline productivity of existing vegetation, suggesting a huge potential for BECCS. Beyond BECCS, C4 perennial grasses could also increase soil carbon and provide biomass for emerging industries developing replacements for non‐renewable products including plastics and building materials. 

   more » « less
5. The greenhouse gas cost of agricultural intensification with groundwater irrigation in a Midwest U.S. row cropping system

   https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14472  

   McGill, Bonnie M.; Hamilton, Stephen K.; Millar, Neville; Robertson, G. Philip (October 2018, Global Change Biology)

   Abstract Groundwater irrigation of cropland is expanding worldwide with poorly known implications for climate change. This study compares experimental measurements of the net global warming impact of a rainfed versus a groundwater‐irrigated corn (maize)–soybean–wheat, no‐till cropping system in the Midwest US, the region that produces the majority of U.S. corn and soybean. Irrigation significantly increased soil organic carbon (C) storage in the upper 25 cm, but not by enough to make up for the CO₂‐equivalent (CO₂e) costs of fossil fuel power, soil emissions of nitrous oxide (N₂O), and degassing of supersaturated CO₂and N₂O from the groundwater. A rainfed reference system had a net mitigating effect of −13.9 (±31) g CO₂e m⁻² year⁻¹, but with irrigation at an average rate for the region, the irrigated system contributed to global warming with net greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of 27.1 (±32) g CO₂e m⁻² year⁻¹. Compared to the rainfed system, the irrigated system had 45% more GHG emissions and 7% more C sequestration. The irrigation‐associated increase in soil N₂O and fossil fuel emissions contributed 18% and 9%, respectively, to the system's total emissions in an average irrigation year. Groundwater degassing of CO₂and N₂O are missing components of previous assessments of the GHG cost of groundwater irrigation; together they were 4% of the irrigated system's total emissions. The irrigated system's net impact normalized by crop yield (GHG intensity) was +0.04 (±0.006) kg CO₂e kg⁻¹yield, close to that of the rainfed system, which was −0.03 (±0.002) kg CO₂e kg⁻¹yield. Thus, the increased crop yield resulting from irrigation can ameliorate overall GHG emissions if intensification by irrigation prevents land conversion emissions elsewhere, although the expansion of irrigation risks depletion of local water resources. 

   more » « less