skip to main content

Explore Research Products in the NSF-PAR

Title: Can dynamic network modelling be used to identify adaptive microbiomes?
Abstract

In recent times, interest has grown in understanding how microbiomes – the collection of microorganisms in a specific environment – influence the survivability or fitness of their plant and animal hosts. The profound diversity of bacterial and fungal species found in certain environments, such as soil, provides a large pool of potential microbial partners that can interact in ways that reveal patterns of associations linking host–microbiome traits developed over time. However, most microbiome sequence data are reported as a community fingerprint, without analysis of interaction networks across microbial taxa through time.

To address this knowledge gap, more robust tools are needed to account for microbiome dynamics that could signal a beneficial change to a plant or animal host. In this paper, we discuss applying mathematical tools, such as dynamic network modelling, which involves the use of longitudinal data to study system dynamics and microbiomes that identify potential alterations in microbial communities over time in response to an environmental change. In addition, we discuss the potential challenges and pitfalls of these methodologies, such as handling large amounts of sequencing data and accounting for random processes that influence community dynamics, as well as potential ways to address them.

Ultimately, we argue that components of microbial community interactions can be characterized through mathematical models to reveal insights into complex dynamics associated with a plant or animal host trait. The inclusion of interaction networks in microbiome studies could provide insights into the behaviour of complex communities in tandem with host trait modification and evolution.

A freePlain Language Summarycan be found within the Supporting Information of this article.

  more » « less
NSF-PAR ID:
10457037
Author(s) / Creator(s):
 ;  ;
Publisher / Repository:
Wiley-Blackwell
Date Published:
Journal Name:
Functional Ecology
Volume:
34
Issue:
10
ISSN:
0269-8463
Page Range / eLocation ID:
p. 2065-2074
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. ; ; ; ; ( , Functional Ecology)
    Abstract

    Rescue effects arise when ecological and evolutionary processes restore positive intrinsic growth rates in populations that are at risk of going extinct. Rescue effects have traditionally focused on the roles of immigration, phenotypic plasticity, gene flow, and adaptation. However, species interactions are also critical for understanding how populations respond to environmental change.

    In particular, the fitness of plant and animal hosts is strongly influenced by symbiotic associations with the bacteria, archaea, microeukaryotes and viruses that collectively make up a host's microbiome. While some are pathogenic, many microorganisms confer nutritional, immunological, and developmental benefits that can protect hosts against the effects of rapid environmental change.

    Microbial rescue occurs when changes in microbiome abundance, composition, or activity influence host physiology or behaviour in ways that improve host fitness. If these microbial attributes and their beneficial effects are transmitted through a population, it may stabilize growth rates and reduce the probability of extinction.

    In addition to providing a framework to guide theoretical and empirical efforts in host‐microbiome research, the principles of microbial rescue may also be useful for adaptively managing at‐risk species. We discuss the risks and rewards of incorporating microbial rescue into conservation strategies such as probiotics, assisted migration, and captive breeding.

    A freePlain Language Summarycan be found within the Supporting Information of this article.

     
    more » « less
  2. ; ; ; ( , New Phytologist)
    Summary

    Soil microorganisms can colonize plant roots and assemble in communities engaged in symbiotic relationships with their host. Though the compositional dynamics of root‐associated microbiomes have been extensively studied, the host transcriptional response to these communities is poorly understood.

    Here, we developed an experimental system by which rice plants grown under axenic conditions can acquire a defined endosphere microbiome. Using this setup, we performed a cross‐sectional characterization of plant transcriptomes in the presence or absence of a complex microbial community. To account for compositional variation, plants were inoculated with soil‐derived microbiomes harvested from three distinct agricultural sites.

    Soil microbiomes triggered a major shift in the transcriptional profiles of rice plants that included the downregulation of one‐third to one‐fourth of the families of leucine‐rich repeat receptor‐like kinases and nucleotide‐binding leucine‐rich repeat receptors expressed in roots. Though the expression of several genes was consistent across all soil sources, a large fraction of this response was differentially impacted by soil type.

    These results demonstrate the role of root microbiomes in sculpting the transcriptomes of host plants and highlight the potential involvement of the two main receptor families of the plant immune system in the recruitment and maintenance of an endosphere microbiome.

     
    more » « less
  3. ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; et al ( , Functional Ecology)
    Abstract

    The field of eco‐evolutionary dynamics is developing rapidly, with a growing number of well‐designed experiments quantifying the impact of evolution on ecological processes and patterns, ranging from population demography to community composition and ecosystem functioning. The key challenge remains to transfer the insights of these proof‐of‐principle experiments to natural settings, where multiple species interact and the dynamics are far more complex than those studied in most experiments.

    Here, we discuss potential pitfalls of building a framework on eco‐evolutionary dynamics that is based on data on single species studied in isolation from interspecific interactions, which can lead to both under‐ and overestimation of the impact of evolution on ecological processes. Underestimation of evolution‐driven ecological changes could occur in a single‐species approach when the focal species is involved in co‐evolutionary dynamics, whereas overestimation might occur due to increased rates of evolution following ecological release of the focal species.

    In order to develop a multi‐species perspective on eco‐evolutionary dynamics, we discuss the need for a broad‐sense definition of “eco‐evolutionary feedbacks” that includes any reciprocal interaction between ecological and evolutionary processes, next to a narrow‐sense definition that refers to interactions that directly feed back on the interactor that evolves.

    We discuss the challenges and opportunities of using more natural settings in eco‐evolutionary studies by gradually adding complexity: (a) multiple interacting species within a guild, (b) food web interactions and (c) evolving metacommunities in multiple habitat patches in a landscape. A literature survey indicated that only a few studies on microbial systems so far developed a truly multi‐species approach in their analysis of eco‐evolutionary dynamics, and mostly so in artificially constructed communities.

    Finally, we provide a road map of methods to study eco‐evolutionary dynamics in more natural settings. Eco‐evolutionary studies involving multiple species are necessarily demanding and might require intensive collaboration among research teams, but are highly needed.

    Aplain language summaryis available for this article.

     
    more » « less
  4. ; ; ( , Journal of Animal Ecology)
    Abstract

    Although stability is relatively well understood in macro‐organisms, much less is known about its drivers in host–microbial systems where processes operating at multiple levels of biological organisation jointly regulate the microbiome.

    We conducted an experiment to examine the microbiome stability of three Caribbean corals (Acropora cervicornis,Pseudodiploria strigosaandPorites astreoides) by placing them in aquaria and exposing them to a pulse perturbation consisting of a large dose of broad‐spectrum antibiotics before transplanting them into the field.

    We found that coral hosts harboured persistent, species‐specific microbiomes. Stability was generally high but variable across coral species, withA. cervicornismicrobiomes displaying the lowest community turnover in both the non‐perturbed and the perturbed field transplants. Interestingly, the microbiome ofP. astreoideswas stable in the non‐perturbed field transplants, but unstable in the perturbed field transplants.

    A mathematical model of host–microbial dynamics helped resolve this paradox by showing that when microbiome regulation is driven by host sanctioning, both resistance and resilience to invasion are low and can lead to instability despite the high direct costs bourne by corals. Conversely, when microbiome regulation is mainly associated with microbial processes, both resistance and resilience to invasion are high and promote stability at no direct cost to corals. We suggest that corals that are mainly regulated by microbial processes can be likened to ‘glass cannons’ because the high stability they exhibit in the field is due to their microbiome's potent suppression of invasive microbes. However, these corals are susceptible to destabilisation when exposed to perturbations that target the vulnerable members of their microbiomes who are responsible for mounting such powerful attacks against invasive microbes. The differential patterns of stability exhibited byP. astreoidesacross perturbed and non‐perturbed field transplants suggest it is a ‘glass cannon’ whose microbiome is regulated by microbial processes, whereasA. cervicornis’ consistent patterns of stability suggest that its microbiome is mainly regulated by host‐level processes.

    Our results show that understanding how processes that operate at multiple levels of biological organisation interact to regulate microbiomes is critical for predicting the effects of environmental perturbations on host–microbial systems.

     
    more » « less
  5. ; ; ( , Functional Ecology)
    Abstract

    Soil moisture is a major driver of microbial activity and thus, of the release of carbon (C) into the Earth's atmosphere. Yet, there is no consensus on the relationship between soil moisture and microbial respiration, and as a result, moisture response functions are a poorly constrained aspect of C models. In addition, models assume that the response of microbial respiration to moisture is the same for all ecosystems, regardless of climate history, an assumption that many empirical studies have challenged. These gaps in understanding of the microbial respiration response to moisture contribute to uncertainty in model predictions.

    We review our understanding of what drives microbial moisture response, highlighting evidence that historical precipitation can influence both responses to moisture and sensitivity to drought. We present two hypotheses, the ‘climate history hypothesis’, where we predict that baseline moisture response functions change as a function of precipitation history, and the ‘drought legacy hypothesis’, in which we suggest that the intensity and frequency of historical drought have shaped microbial communities in ways that will control moisture responses to contemporary drought. Underlying mechanisms include biological selection and filtering of the microbial community by rainfall regimes, which result in microbial traits and trade‐offs that shape function.

    We present an integrated modelling and empirical approach for understanding microbial moisture responses and improving models. Standardized measures of moisture response (respiration rate across a range of moistures) and accompanying microbial properties are needed across sites. These data can be incorporated into trait‐based models to produce generalized moisture response functions, which can then be validated and incorporated into conventional and microbially explicit ecosystem models of soil C cycling. Future studies should strive to analyse realistic moisture conditions and consider the role of environmental factors and soil structure in microbial response.

    Microbes are the engines that drive C storage and are sensitive to changes in rainfall. A greater understanding of the factors that govern this sensitivity could be a key part of improving predictions of soil C dynamics, climate change and C‐climate feedbacks.

    Read the freePlain Language Summaryfor this article on the Journal blog.

     
    more » « less
  • Citation Formats
  • MLA
  • APA
  • Chicago
  • BibTeX
  • Save / Share this Record
  • Send to Email