skip to main content


Title: Hunters versus hunted: New perspectives on the energetic costs of survival at the top of the food chain
Abstract

Global biotic and abiotic threats, particularly from pervasive human activities, are progressively pushing large, apex carnivorous mammals into the functional role of mesopredator. Hunters are now becoming the hunted. Despite marked impacts on these animals and the ecosystems in which they live, little is known about the physiological repercussions of this role downgrading from ultimate to penultimate predator.

Here we examine how such ecological role reversals alter the physiological processes associated with energy expenditure, and ultimately the cost of survival during peak performance.

Taxonomic group, preferred habitat and domestication affected the capacity of the oxygen pathway to support high levels of aerobic performance by carnivorous mammals. Fear responses associated with anthropogenic threats also impacted aerobic performance.

Allometric trends for three energetic metrics [maximum oxygen consumption, field metabolic rates (FMRs) and the cost per stride or stroke], showed distinct trends in aerobic capacity for different evolutionary lineages of mammalian predators. Cursorial canids that chase down prey demonstrated the highest relative maximum oxygen consumption rates (10–25 times resting levels) and FMRs, while ambush predators (i.e. felids) and diving marine mammals had aerobic capacities that were similar to or lower than sedentary domestic mammals of comparable size.

The maximum energetic cost of performance for apex predators depended on whether the animals were hunters or the hunted. Escape responses were exceptionally costly for marine (narwhalMonodon monoceros) and terrestrial (mountain lionPuma concolor) locomotor specialists, as well as semi‐aquatic (polar bearUrsus maritimus) species; all showed a nearly two‐fold increase in peak energy expenditure when avoiding threats.

As the duration and frequency of threats to wild species continue to grow, cumulative energetic costs are becoming more apparent. In view of this, attention to the energy demands of apex predators will provide vital predictive power to anticipate mismatches between a species' functional design and human‐induced pressures, and allow for the development of conservation strategies based on how species are built to survive.

A freePlain Language Summarycan be found within the Supporting Information of this article.

 
more » « less
NSF-PAR ID:
10457049
Author(s) / Creator(s):
 ;  ;  ;  ;
Publisher / Repository:
Wiley-Blackwell
Date Published:
Journal Name:
Functional Ecology
Volume:
34
Issue:
10
ISSN:
0269-8463
Page Range / eLocation ID:
p. 2015-2029
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. Abstract

    Spatiotemporal variation in predation risk arises from interactions between landscape heterogeneity, predator densities and predator hunting mode, generating landscapes of fear for prey species that can have important effects on prey behaviour and ecosystem dynamics.

    As widespread apex predators, humans present a significant source of risk for hunted animal populations. Spatiotemporal patterns of risk from hunters can overlap or contrast with patterns of risk from other predators. Human infrastructure can also reshape spatial patterns of risk by facilitating or impeding hunter or predator movement, or deterring predators that are themselves wary of humans.

    We examined how anthropogenic and natural landscape features interact with hunting modes of rifle hunters and mountain lionsPuma concolorto generate spatiotemporal patterns of risk for their primary prey. We explored the implications of human‐modified landscapes of fear for Columbian black‐tailed deerOdocoileus hemionus columbianusin Mendocino County, California. We used historical harvest records, hunter GPS trackers and camera trap records of mountain lions to model patterns of risk for deer. We then used camera traps to examine deer spatial and temporal activity patterns in response to this variation in risk.

    Hunters and mountain lions exhibited distinct, contrasting patterns of spatiotemporal activity. Risk from rifle hunters, who rely on long lines of sight, was highest in open grasslands and near roads and was confined to the daytime. Risk from mountain lions, an ambush predator, was highest in dense shrubland habitat, farther from developed areas, and during the night and crepuscular periods. Areas of human settlement provided a refuge from both hunters and mountain lions. We found no evidence that deer avoided risk in space at the scale of our observations, but deer adjusted their temporal activity patterns to reduce the risk of encounters with humans and mountain lions in areas of higher risk.

    Our study demonstrates that interactions between human infrastructure, habitat cover and predator hunting mode can result in distinct spatial patterns of predation risk from hunters and other predators that may lead to trade‐offs for prey species. However, distinct diel activity patterns of predators may create vacant hunting domains that reduce costly trade‐offs for prey. Our study highlights the importance of temporal partitioning as a mechanism of predation risk avoidance.

     
    more » « less
  2. Abstract

    Individual motivation for the rural use of common‐pool resources (CPRs) can be fluid, with the line between subsistence and commercial often unclear and in flux.

    Implications of fluid motivation are understudied yet important for social–ecological systems (SESs), such as bushmeat hunting throughout Central Africa that is essential to local protein/nutrition, income and culture.

    Making locally informative predictions of multiple SESs nested within a landscape‐scale SES has been historically difficult, but community‐driven participatory approaches provide new kinds and quantities of data, opening previously inaccessible doors for research and governance.

    We apply hierarchical Bayesian structural equation modelling to a novel dataset of 910 hunts from 111 gun and trap hunters across nine villages in Gabon, generated in a participatory process whereby hunters conducted GPS self‐follows in conjunction with paraecologist surveys of their motivation, behaviour and offtake. We (i) establish the human behaviour driving gun‐hunting and trapping success and predict its effect on offtake across villages and (ii) link fluid motivation of gun hunters to their behaviour, number of animals hunted, biomass yielded and income earned.

    Gun hunts across villages yielded more animals during the night than the day, and when hunters brought high amounts of ammunition and walked far distances from villages. Gun hunts were less successful when coupled with trapping while per‐hunt success of trapping itself was generally low and difficult to predict. Fluid gun hunters hunted fewer animals when motivated strictly by subsistence, despite no reduction in ammunition brought or distance walked, while offtake from strictly commercial versus mixed motivation was the same. Numbers of animals hunted, biomass and income were tightly linked. We discuss the implications of these results for the ecological sustainability of hunting and participatory forecasting in bushmeat research and policy.

    Read the freePlain Language Summaryfor this article on the Journal blog.

     
    more » « less
  3. Abstract

    Landscapes of fear describe a spatial representation of an animal's perceived risk of predation and the associated foraging costs, while energy landscapes describe the spatial representation of their energetic cost of moving and foraging. Fear landscapes are often dynamic and change based on predator presence and behaviour, and variation in abiotic conditions that modify risk. Energy landscapes are also dynamic and can change across diel, seasonal, and climatic timescales based on variability in temperature, snowfall, wind/current speeds, etc.

    Recently, it was suggested that fear and energy landscapes should be integrated. In this paradigm, the interaction between landscapes relates to prey being forced to use areas of the energy landscape they would avoid if risk were not a factor. However, dynamic energy landscapes experienced by predators must also be considered since they can affect their ability to forage, irrespective of variation in prey behaviour. We propose an additional component to the fear and dynamic energy landscape paradigm that integrates landscapes of both prey and predators, where predator foraging behaviour is modulated by changes in their energyscape.

    Specifically, we integrate the predator's energy landscape into foraging theory that predicts prey patch‐leaving decisions under the threat of predation. We predict that as a predator's energetic cost of foraging increases in a habitat, then the prey's foraging cost of predation and patch quitting harvest rate, will decrease. Prey may also decrease their vigilance in response to increased energetic foraging costs for predators, which will lower giving‐up densities of prey.

    We then provide examples in terrestrial, aerial, and marine ecosystems where we might expect to see these effects. These include birds and sharks which use updrafts that vary based on wind and current speeds, tidal state, or temperature, and terrestrial predators (e.g. wolves) whose landscapes vary seasonally with snow depth or ice cover which may influence their foraging success and even diet selection.

    A predator perspective is critical to considering the combination of these landscapes and their ecological consequences. Dynamic predator energy landscapes could add an additional spatiotemporal component to risk effects, which may cascade through food webs.

    Read the freePlain Language Summaryfor this article on the Journal blog.

     
    more » « less
  4. Abstract

    Adaptive radiations are typically characterized by niche partitioning among their constituent species. Trophic niche partitioning is particularly important in predatory animals, which rely on limited food resources for survival.

    We test for trophic niche partitioning in an adaptive radiation of HawaiianTetragnathaspiders, which have diversified in situ on the Hawaiian Islands. We focus on a community of nine species belonging to two different clades, one web‐building and the other actively hunting, which co‐occur in wet forest on East Maui. We hypothesize that trophic niches differ significantly both: (a) among species within a clade, indicating food resource partitioning, and (b) between the two clades, corresponding to their differences in foraging strategy.

    To assess niches of the spider species, we measure: (a) web architecture, the structure of the hunting tool, and (b) site choice, the physical placement of the web in the habitat. We then test whether differences in these parameters translate into meaningful differences in trophic niche by measuring (c) stable isotope signatures of carbon and nitrogen in the spiders’ tissues, and (d) gut content of spiders based on metabarcoding data.

    We find significant interspecific differences in web architecture and site choice. Importantly, these differences are reflected in stable isotope signatures among the five web‐building species, as well as significant isotopic differences between web‐builders and active hunters. Gut content data also show interspecific and inter‐clade differences. Pairwise overlaps of web architecture between species are positively correlated with overlaps of isotopic signature.

    Our results reveal trophic niche partitioning among species within each clade, as well as between the web‐building and actively hunting clades. Based on the correlation between web architecture and stable isotopes, it appears that the isotopic signatures of spiders’ tissues are influenced by architectural differences among their webs. Our findings indicate an important link between web structure, microhabitat preference and diet in the HawaiianTetragnatha.

    A freePlain Language Summarycan be found within the Supporting Information of this article.

     
    more » « less
  5. Abstract

    Animal movement is often largely determined by abiotic conditions of the environment, including substrate properties. While a large body of work has improved our understanding of how different substrate properties can impact locomotor performance and behaviour, few of these studies have investigated this relationship during transitions within a single locomotor event.

    In nature, terrestrial animals frequently encounter substrate transitions, or changes in substrate level, incline, texture and/or compliance during a single bout of movement, which can be sudden for high‐speed animals. These animals often adjust their posture and kinematics during transitions, and in some cases lose forward velocity.

    We examined the occurrence and effect of non‐elastic compliance transitions inRhoptropus afer, a cursorial day gecko known for its ability to sprint rapidly for several metres at a time. We recorded substrate use during provoked escapes in the field and conducted locomotor trials on a trackway that mimicked natural structural habitat conditions with transitions from a rigid surface into sand and from sand back to a rigid surface.

    During escapes,R. aferused substrates of different compliance (i.e. rock, gravel and sand) and transitioned to and from the more compliant surfaces with even frequency, which matched substrate and compliance availability estimates. In laboratory experiments, sprint speed was not significantly affected by acute changes in compliance, which was likely facilitated by an increased body angle and duty factor upon entering the sand, and potentially a high yield strength of the sand relative to applied forces.

    We speculate that this species' ability to maintain speed during compliance transitions underlies their apparent indiscriminate substrate use during escapes, and that this behaviour may offer a selective advantage for evading larger terrestrial predators. Using field data to inform and contextualize laboratory experiments thus yields important insights as to how animals accommodate acute changes in substrate conditions encountered during critical locomotor events.

    A freePlain Language Summarycan be found within the Supporting Information of this article.

     
    more » « less