More Like this

1. FoxP2 Expression in a Highly Vocal Teleost Fish with Comparisons to Tetrapods

   https://doi.org/10.1159/000487793  

   Pengra, Ian G.G.; Marchaterre, Margaret A.; Bass, Andrew H. (July 2018, Brain, Behavior and Evolution)

   null (Ed.)

   Motivated by studies of speech deficits in humans, several studies over the past two decades have investigated the potential role of a forkhead domain transcription factor, FoxP2, in the central control of acoustic signaling/vocalization among vertebrates. Comparative neuroanatomical studies that mainly include mammalian and avian species have mapped the distribution of FoxP2 expression in multiple brain regions that imply a greater functional significance beyond vocalization that might be shared broadly across vertebrate lineages. To date, reports for teleost fish have been limited in number and scope to nonvocal species. Here, we map the neuroanatomical distribution of FoxP2 mRNA expression in a highly vocal teleost, the plainfin midshipman (Porichthys notatus). We report an extensive overlap between FoxP2 expression and vocal, auditory, and steroid-signaling systems with robust expression at multiple sites in the telencephalon, the preoptic area, the diencephalon, and the midbrain. Label was far more restricted in the hindbrain though robust in one region of the reticular formation. A comparison with other teleosts and tetrapods suggests an evolutionarily conserved FoxP2 phenotype important to vocal-acoustic and, more broadly, sensorimotor function among vertebrates. 

   more » « less
2. Vocal and electric fish: Reprising a comparison of two teleost models in the neuroethology of social behavior.

   https://doi.org/10.3389/fncir.2021.713105  

   Dunlap, K; Chagnaud BP.; Zakon HH.; Bass AH. (August 2021, Frontiers in neural circuits)

   Edward S Ruthhazer Takao K Hensch (Ed.)

   The communication behaviors of vocal fish and electric fish are among the vertebrate social behaviors best understood at the level of neural circuits. Both forms of signaling rely on midbrain inputs to hindbrain pattern generators that activate peripheral effectors (sonic muscles and electrocytes) to produce pulsatile signals that are modulated by frequency/repetition rate, amplitude and call duration. To generate signals that vary by sex, male phenotype, and social context, these circuits are responsive to a wide range of hormones and neuromodulators acting on different timescales at multiple loci. Bass and Zakon (2005) reviewed the behavioral neuroendocrinology of these two teleost groups, comparing how the regulation of their communication systems have both converged and diverged during their parallel evolution. Here, we revisit this comparison and review the complementary developments over the past 16 years. We (a) summarize recent work that expands our knowledge of the neural circuits underlying these two communication systems, (b) review parallel studies on the action of neuromodulators (e.g., serotonin, AVT, melatonin), brain steroidogenesis (via aromatase), and social stimuli on the output of these circuits, (c) highlight recent transcriptomic studies that illustrate how contemporary molecular methods have elucidated the genetic regulation of social behavior in these fish, and (d) describe recent studies of mochokid catfish, which use both vocal and electric communication, and that use both vocal and electric communication and consider how these two systems are spliced together in the same species. Finally, we offer avenues for future research to further probe how similarities and differences between these two communication systems emerge over ontogeny and evolution. 

   more » « less
3. Solitude and serotonin: juvenile isolation alters the covariation between social behavior and cFos expression by serotonergic neurons

   https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2024.1446866  

   Hutchens, Sarah_E D; Khurram, Izza; Hurley, Laura M (October 2024, Frontiers in Neuroscience)

   Variation in the mutual responsiveness of social partners to each other can be reflected in behavioral suites that covary with neural activity in ways that track the salience or valence of interactions. Juvenile social isolation alters social behavior and neural activity during social interaction, but whether and how it alters the covariation between behavior and neural activity has not been as well explored. To address this issue, four classes of experimental subjects: isolated males, socially housed males, isolated females, and socially housed females, were paired with an opposite-sex social partner that had been socially housed. Social behaviors and c-Fos expression in the serotonergic dorsal raphe nucleus (DRN) were then measured in subjects following the social interactions. Relative to social housing, postweaning isolation led to a decrease in the density of neurons double-labeled for tryptophan hydroxylase and c-Fos in the dorsomedial subdivision of the DRN, regardless of sex. Vocal and non-vocal behaviors were also affected by isolation. In interactions with isolated males, both ultrasonic vocalization (USVs) and broadband vocalizations (squeaks) increased in conjunction with greater male investigation of females. Neural and behavioral measures also correlated with each other. In the isolated male group, the density of double-labeled neurons in the dorsomedial DRN was negatively correlated with USV production and positively correlated with a principal component of non-vocal behavior corresponding to greater defensive kicking by females and less investigation and mounting behavior. This correlation was reversed in direction for socially housed males, and for isolated males versus isolated females. These findings confirm that the dynamics of social interactions are reflected in c-Fos activation in the dorsomedial DRN, and suggest an altered responsiveness of serotonergic neurons to social interaction following social isolation in males, in parallel with an altered male response to female cues. 

   more » « less
4. Role of deep breaths in ultrasonic vocal production of Sprague-Dawley rats

   https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00590.2019  

   Riede, Tobias; Schaefer, Charles; Stein, Amy (March 2020, Journal of Neurophysiology)

   Deep breaths are one of three breathing patterns in rodents characterized by an increased tidal volume. While humans incorporate deep breaths into vocal behavior, it was unknown whether nonhuman mammals use deep breaths for vocal production. We have utilized subglottal pressure recordings in awake, spontaneously behaving male Sprague-Dawley rats in five contexts: sleep, rest, noxious stimulation, exposure to a female in estrus, and exposure to an unknown male. Deep breaths were produced at rates ranging between 17.5 and 90.3 deep breaths per hour. While overall breathing and vocal rates were higher in social and noxious contexts, the rate of deep breaths was only increased during the male’s interaction with a female. Results also inform our understanding of vocal-respiratory integration in rats. The rate of deep breaths that were associated with a vocalization during the exhalation phase increased with vocal activity. The proportion of deep breaths that were associated with a vocalization (on average 22%) was similar to the proportion of sniffing or eupnea breaths that contain a vocalization. Therefore, vocal motor patterns appear to be entrained to the prevailing breathing rhythm, i.e., vocalization uses the available breathing pattern rather than recruiting a specific breathing pattern. Furthermore, the pattern of a deep breath was different when it was associated with a vocalization, suggesting that motor planning occurs. Finally, deep breaths are a source for acoustic variation; for example, call duration and fundamental frequency modulation were both larger in 22-kHz calls produced following a deep inhalation. NEW & NOTEWORTHY The emission of a long, deep, audible breath can express various emotions. The investigation of deep breaths, also known as sighing, in a nonhuman mammal demonstrated the occasional use of deep breaths for vocal production. Similar to the human equivalent, acoustic features of a deep breath vocalization are characteristic. 

   more » « less
5. To hum or not to hum: Neural transcriptome signature of male courtship vocalization in a teleost fish

   https://doi.org/10.1111/gbb.12740  

   Tripp, Joel_A; Feng, Ni_Y; Bass, Andrew_H (June 2021, Genes, Brain and Behavior)

   Abstract For many animal species, vocal communication is a critical social behavior and often a necessary component of reproductive success. Additionally, vocalizations are often demanding motor acts. Wanting to know whether a specific molecular toolkit might be required for vocalization, we used RNA‐sequencing to investigate neural gene expression underlying the performance of an extreme vocal behavior, the courtship hum of the plainfin midshipman fish (Porichthys notatus). Single hums can last up to 2 h and may be repeated throughout an evening of courtship activity. We asked whether vocal behavioral states are associated with specific gene expression signatures in key brain regions that regulate vocalization by comparing transcript expression levels in humming versus non‐humming males. We find that the circadian‐related genesperiod3andClockare significantly upregulated in the vocal motor nucleus and preoptic area‐anterior hypothalamus, respectively, in humming compared with non‐humming males, indicating that internal circadian clocks may differ between these divergent behavioral states. In addition, we identify suites of differentially expressed genes related to synaptic transmission, ion channels and transport, neuropeptide and hormone signaling, and metabolism and antioxidant activity that together may support the neural and energetic demands of humming behavior. Comparisons of transcript expression across regions stress regional differences in brain gene expression, while also showing coordinated gene regulation in the vocal motor circuit in preparation for courtship behavior. These results underscore the role of differential gene expression in shifts between behavioral states, in this case neuroendocrine, motor and circadian control of courtship vocalization. 

   more » « less