skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Attention:

The NSF Public Access Repository (PAR) system will be intermittently unavailable from 7:00 PM ET on Thursday, April 16 until 10:00 PM ET on Thursday, April 16 due to maintenance. We apologize for the inconvenience.

Explore Research Products in the PAR
It may take a few hours for recently added research products to appear in PAR search results.


Title: Examining whether and how instructional coordination occurs within introductory undergraduate STEM courses
Instructors’ interactions can foster knowledge sharing around teaching and the use of research-based instructional strategies (RBIS). Coordinated teaching presents an impetus for instructors’ interactions and creates opportunities for instructional improvement but also potentially limits an instructor’s autonomy. In this study, we sought to characterize the extent of coordination present in introductory undergraduate courses and to understand how departments and instructors implement and experience course coordination. We examined survey data from 3,641 chemistry, mathematics, and physics instructors at three institution types and conducted follow-up interviews with a subset of 24 survey respondents to determine what types of coordination existed, what factors led to coordination, how coordination constrained instruction, and how instructors maintained autonomy within coordinated contexts. We classified three approaches to coordination at both the overall course and course component levels: independent (i.e., not coordinated), collaborative (decision-making by instructor and others), controlled (decision-making by others, not instructor). Two course components, content coverage and textbooks, were highly coordinated. These curricular components were often decided through formal or informal committees, but these decisions were seldom revisited. This limited the ability for instructors to participate in the decision-making process, the level of interactions between instructors, and the pedagogical growth that could have occurred through these conversations. Decision-making around the other two course components, instructional methods and exams, was more likely to be independently determined by the instructors, who valued this autonomy. Participants in the study identified various ways in which collaborative coordination of courses can promote but also inhibit pedagogical growth. Our findings indicate that the benefits of collaborative course coordination can be realized when departments develop coordinated approaches that value each instructor’s autonomy, incorporate shared and ongoing decision-making, and facilitate collaborative interactions and knowledge sharing among instructors.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
1726328
PAR ID:
10459091
Author(s) / Creator(s):
; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;
Date Published:
Journal Name:
Frontiers in Education
Volume:
8
ISSN:
2504-284X
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. ; ; (, Numeracy)
    Grawe, Nathan D (Ed.)
    Many educators and professional organizations recommend Quantitative Reasoning as the best entry-level postsecondary mathematics course for non-STEM majors. However, novice and veteran instructors who have no prior experience in teaching a QR course often express their ignorance of the content to choose for this course, the instruction to offer students, and the assessments to measure student learning. We conducted a case study to investigate the initial implementation of an entry-level university quantitative reasoning course during fall semester, 2018. The participants were the course instructor and students. We examined the instructor’s motives and actions and the students’ responses to the course. The instructor had no prior experience teaching a QR course but did have 15 years of experience teaching student-centered mathematics. Data included course artifacts, class observations, an instructor interview, and students’ written reflections. Because this was a new course—and to adapt to student needs—the instructor employed his instructional autonomy and remained flexible in designing and enacting the course content, instruction, and assessment. His instructional decision making and flexible approach helped the instructor tailor the learning activities and teaching practices to the needs and interests of the students. The students generally appreciated and benefited from this approach, enjoyed the course, and provided positive remarks about the instructors’ practices. 
    more » « less
  2. ; ; ; (, International Journal of Engineering Education)
    Despite a large body of work devoted to understanding why instructors struggle to implement reformed instructional practices, researchers only understand part of the variation in instructor learning and implementation of the practices. This narrative inquiry case study explored how a mechanical engineering department adopted and adapted Freeform (Ff), which is a pedagogical system, that includes instructional resources and instructional ethos. Findings show that the department adopted Ff with a vision to standardize its dynamics course. The three instructors of four sections of the course had some shared and unshared mental models of engineering teaching and learning that somewhat aligned with the vision. While one instructor adopted all five critical components of Ff in her teaching, the other two instructors did not leverage all the components. The instructors shared some resources for the course and discussed their teaching with others but not sufficient to come to a consensus on the final exam. Consequently, the department could standardize the course materials, homework, quizzes, and schedule, but not the final exam. Via eliciting different dimensions of organizational learning that occurred at the mechanical engineering department, the research suggests ways to improve adopting reformed instructional practices. Moreover, our study contributes to the body of literature by revealing the complexity of instructors’ decision-making to adopt and adapt Ff and the relationship and interaction among disciplines of organizational learning in the context of teaching the dynamics course. 
    more » « less
  3. ; ; ; ; (, International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology)
    This case study examines the relations between the instructional resources, the instructors’ pedagogy and the multivariable calculus content. The resources used included digital resources, 3D-printed models and other physical resources. Pedagogy practices included both collaborative and individual in-class learning activities, instructor demonstrations and homework. Content included topics that typically appear in multivariable calculus. The 35 specific topics were grouped into the general areas of introductory/foundational ideas, differential calculus, integral calculus and vector calculus. We also consider the instructor’s assessment of the activities they use. Data were obtained from three instructors working at three different types of institutions in the United States. The study finds that instructors use digital resources primarily for demonstrations; 3D-printed materials are more likely to be used in collaborative vs. individual learning opportunities; instructors design more activities for the introductory/foundational and differential calculus topic areas of the course; the integral calculus, and to an even greater degree, the vector calculus portions of the course are lacking in resource-supported activities and instructors sharing materials could be beneficial to others who are just beginning to incorporate the use of resources in their multivariable calculus teaching. The study suggests instructional needs and informs about instructor practices for multivariable calculus topics. 
    more » « less
  4. ; ; ; (, CBE—Life Sciences Education)
    Andrews, Tessa C. (Ed.)
    Limited access to undergraduate research experiences for science, technology, engineering, and mathematics students has led to creation of classroom-based opportunities for students to participate in authentic science. Revising laboratory courses to engage students in the practices of science has been shown to have many benefits for students. However, the instructor’s role in successful implementation of authentic-inquiry curricula requires further investigation. Previous work has demonstrated that navigating an instructional role within the open-ended format of an inquiry curriculum is challenging for instructors. Little is known about effective strategies for supporting students in authentic scientific practices. To address this challenge, we investigated instructors with prior experience teaching Authentic Inquiry through Modeling in Biology (AIM-Bio) in order to reveal strategies that are likely to help students succeed in this context. We took a unique approach that uncovered how instructors supported students and how they intended to support students in the scientific practices of modeling and experimental design. Analysis included in vivo recordings of instructor–student interactions paired with instructor interviews over the course of a semester. Findings detail the ways in which instructors flexibly responded to students through their in-the-moment actions. Additionally, the instructor intentions provided crucial explanatory power to explain the rationale behind teaching choices made. 
    more » « less
  5. (, The online journal of new horizons in education)
    null (Ed.)
    Student-to-instructor interaction is crucial in online education. Through this interaction, the instructors guide students on contents and create a learning environment that allows students to communicate between themselves. The student-to-instructor interaction is of the factors that determine student participation and satisfaction. Thus, this study uses a systematic review to discuss the strategies that instructors can use to increase student-to-instructor interaction in online courses. This study highlights four strategies, including the instructor’s participation in online courses, the feedback from an online instructor, the availability of an online instructor and timely response, and pre- and during class communications in online courses. The online instructors and instructional designers may use these strategies to improve interaction with the students. These strategies may also assist instructional designers and instructors who develop and teach hybrid or blended courses. Keywords: student-to-instructor, online course, instructor participation, instructor feedback, instructor availability, and class communication 
    more » « less
  • Citation Formats
  • MLA
  • APA
  • Chicago
  • BibTeX
  • Text Encoded Conversion
  • XML
  • Save / Share this Record
  • Send to Email