An official website of the United States government
Protein–protein interactions are essential for life but rarely thermodynamically quantified in living cells. In vitro efforts show that protein complex stability is modulated by high concentrations of cosolutes, including synthetic polymers, proteins, and cell lysates via a combination of hard-core repulsions and chemical interactions. We quantified the stability of a model protein complex, the A34F GB1 homodimer, in buffer,Escherichia colicells andXenopus laevisoocytes. The complex is more stable in cells than in buffer and more stable in oocytes thanE. coli. Studies of several variants show that increasing the negative charge on the homodimer surface increases stability in cells. These data, taken together with the fact that oocytes are less crowded thanE. colicells, lead to the conclusion that chemical interactions are more important than hard-core repulsions under physiological conditions, a conclusion also gleaned from studies of protein stability in cells. Our studies have implications for understanding how promiscuous—and specific—interactions coherently evolve for a protein to properly function in the crowded cellular environment.
more »
« less
Controlling and quantifying protein concentration in Escherichia coli
Abstract The cellular environment is dynamic and complex, involving thousands of different macromolecules with total concentrations of hundreds of grams per liter. However, most biochemistry is conducted in dilute buffer where the concentration of macromolecules is less than 10 g/L. High concentrations of macromolecules affect protein stability, function, and protein complex formation, but to understand these phenomena fully we need to know the concentration of the test protein in cells. Here, we quantify the concentration of an overexpressed recombinant protein, a variant of the B1 domain of protein G, in Tuner (DE3)™Escherichia colicells as a function of inducer concentration. We find that the protein expression level is controllable, and expression saturates at over 2 mMupon induction with 0.4 mMisopropyl β‐d‐thiogalactoside. We discuss the results in terms of what can and cannot be learned from in‐cell protein NMR studies inE. coli.
more »
« less
- PAR ID:
- 10461089
- Publisher / Repository:
- Wiley Blackwell (John Wiley & Sons)
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Protein Science
- Volume:
- 28
- Issue:
- 7
- ISSN:
- 0961-8368
- Page Range / eLocation ID:
- p. 1307-1311
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
Abstract Adaptive laboratory evolution (ALE) can be used to make bacteria less susceptible to oxidative stress. An alternative to large batch scale ALE cultures is to use microfluidic platforms, which are often more economical and more efficient. Microfluidic ALE platforms have shown promise, but many have suffered from subpar cell passaging mechanisms and poor spatial definition. A new approach is presented using a microfluidic Evolution on a Chip (EVoc) design which progressively drives microbial cells from areas of lower H2O2concentration to areas of higher concentration. Prolonged exposure, up to 72 h, revealed the survival of adaptive strains ofLacticaseibacillus rhamnosusGG, a beneficial probiotic often included in food products. After performing ALE on this microfluidic platform, the bacteria persisted under high H2O2concentrations in repeated trials. After two progressive exposures, the ability ofL. rhamnosusto grow in the presence of H2O2increased from 1 mmH2O2after a lag time of 31 h to 1 mmafter 21 h, 2 mmafter 28 h, and 3 mmafter 42 h. The adaptive strains have different morphology, and gene expression compared to wild type, and genome sequencing revealed a potentially meaningful single nucleotide mutation in the protein omega‐amidase.more » « less
-
While the centrality of posttranscriptional modifications to RNA biology has long been acknowledged, the function of the vast majority of modified sites remains to be discovered. Illustrative of this, there is not yet a discrete biological role assigned for one of the most highly conserved modifications, 5-methyluridine at position 54 in tRNAs (m5U54). Here, we uncover contributions of m5U54 to both tRNA maturation and protein synthesis. Our mass spectrometry analyses demonstrate that cells lacking the enzyme that installs m5U in the T-loop (TrmA inEscherichia coli, Trm2 inSaccharomyces cerevisiae) exhibit altered tRNA modification patterns. Furthermore, m5U54-deficient tRNAs are desensitized to small molecules that prevent translocation in vitro. This finding is consistent with our observations that relative to wild-type cells,trm2Δcell growth and transcriptome-wide gene expression are less perturbed by translocation inhibitors. Together our data suggest a model in which m5U54 acts as an important modulator of tRNA maturation and translocation of the ribosome during protein synthesis.more » « less
-
While the centrality of post-transcriptional modifications to RNA biology has long been acknowledged, the function of the vast majority of modified sites remains to be discovered. Illustrative of this, there is not yet a discrete biological role assigned for one the most highly conserved modifications, 5-methyluridine at position 54 in tRNAs (m5U54). Here, we uncover contributions of m5U54 to both tRNA maturation and protein synthesis. Our mass spectrometry analyses demonstrate that cells lacking the enzyme that installs m5U in the T-loop (TrmA inE. coli, Trm2 inS. cerevisiae) exhibit altered tRNA modifications patterns. Furthermore, m5U54 deficient tRNAs are desensitized to small molecules that prevent translocationin vitro.This finding is consistent with our observations that, relative to wild-type cells,trm2Δ cell growth and transcriptome-wide gene expression are less perturbed by translocation inhibitors. Together our data suggest a model in which m5U54 acts as an important modulator of tRNA maturation and translocation of the ribosome during protein synthesis.more » « less
-
Protein stability is subject to environmental perturbations such as pressure and crowding, as well as sticking to other macromolecules and quinary structure. Thus, the environment inside and outside the cell plays a key role in how proteins fold, interact, and function on the scale from a few molecules to macroscopic ensembles. This review discusses three aspects of protein phase diagrams: first, the relevance of phase diagrams to protein folding and functionin vitroand in cells; next, how the evolution of protein surfaces impacts on interaction phase diagrams; and finally, how phase separation plays a role on much larger length‐scales than individual proteins or oligomers, when liquid phase‐separated regions form to assist protein function and cell homeostasis.more » « less
