skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Title: Chlorophylls as primary electron acceptors in reaction centers: a blueprint for highly efficient charge separation in bio-inspired artificial photosynthetic systems
Photosynthetic Reaction Centers (RCs) can be considered blueprints for highly efficient energy transfer. Embedded with an array of cofactors, including (bacterio)chlorophyll ((B)Chl) and (B)pheophytin ((B)Pheo) molecules, RCs function with a high quantum yield that spans a wide spectral range. Understanding the principles that underlie their function can influence the design of the next generation of artificial photosynthetic devices. We are particularly interested in the factors that influence the early stages of light-driven charge separation in RCs. With the recent publication of several highly anticipated RC structures and advanced computational methods available, it is possible to probe both the geometric and electronic structures of an array of RCs. In this chapter, we review the electronic and geometric structures of the (B)Chl and (B)Pheo primary electron acceptors from five RCs, comprising both Type I and Type II RCs and representing both heterodimeric and homodimeric systems. We showcase the dimeric A0●– state of Type I RCs, whereby the unpaired electron is delocalized, to various extents, over two (B)Chl molecules, (B)Chl2 and (B)Chl3. This delocalization is controlled by several factors, including the structure of the (B)Chls, interactions with the surrounding protein matrix, and the orientation and distances of the cofactors themselves. In contrast, the primary acceptors of Type II RCs are entirely monomeric, with electron density residing solely on the (B)Pheo. We compare the natural design of the primary acceptors of the Type I and Type II RCs from both an evolutionary and application based perspective.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
1852309
PAR ID:
10464787
Author(s) / Creator(s):
; ; ; ; ; ; ;
Editor(s):
H. J. M. Hou and S. I. Allakhverdiev
Date Published:
Journal Name:
Advances in photosynthesis
ISSN:
1382-4252
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. Chlorophylls (Chl)s exist in a variety of flavors and are ubiquitous in both the energy and electron transfer processes of photosynthesis. The functions they perform often occur on the ultrafast (fs–ns) time scale and until recently, these have been difficult to measure in real time. Further, the complexity of the binding pockets and the resulting protein-matrix effects that alter the respective electronic properties have rendered theoretical modeling of these states difficult. Recent advances in experimental methodology, computational modeling, and emergence of new reaction center (RC) structures have renewed interest in these processes and allowed researchers to elucidate previously ambiguous functions of Chls and related pheophytins. This is complemented by a wealth of experimental data obtained from decades of prior research. Studying the electronic properties of Chl molecules has advanced our understanding of both the nature of the primary charge separation and subsequent electron transfer processes of RCs. In this review, we examine the structures of primary electron donors in Type I and Type II RCs in relation to the vast body of spectroscopic research that has been performed on them to date. Further, we present density functional theory calculations on each oxidized primary donor to study both their electronic properties and our ability to model experimental spectroscopic data. This allows us to directly compare the electronic properties of hetero- and homodimeric RCs. 
    more » « less
  2. Chemically identical chlorophyll (Chl) molecules undergo conformational changes when they are embedded in a protein matrix. The conformational changes will modulate their absorption spectra to meet the need for programmed excitation energy transfer or electron transfer. To interpret spectroscopic data using the knowledge of pigment–protein interactions requires a single pigment embedded in one polypeptide matrix. Unfortunately, most of the known photosynthetic systems contain a set of multiple pigments in each protein subunit. This makes it complicated to interpret spectroscopic data using structural data due to the potential overlapping spectra of two or more pigments. Chl–protein interactions have not been systematically studied to answer three fundamental questions: (i) What are the structural characteristics and commonly shared substructures of different types of Chl molecules (e.g., Chl a, b, c, d, and f)? (ii) How many structural groups can Chl molecules be divided into and how are different structural groups influenced by their surrounding environments? (iii) What are the structural characteristics of pigment surrounding environments? Having no clear answers to the unresolved questions is probably due to a lack of computational methods for quantifying conformational changes in individual Chls and individual surrounding amino acids. The first version of the Triangular Spatial Relationship (TSR)-based method was developed for comparing protein 3D structures. The input data for the TSR-based method are experimentally determined 3D structures from the Protein Data Bank (PDB). In this study, we take advantage of the 3D structures of Chl-binding proteins deposited in the PDB and the TSR-based method to systematically investigate the 3D structures of various types of Chls and their protein environments. The key contributions of this study can be summarized as follows: (i) Specific structural characteristics of Chl d and f were identified and are defined using the TSR keys. (ii) Two and three clusters were found for various types of Chls and Chls a, respectively. The signature structures for distinguishing their corresponding two and three clusters were identified. (iii) Histidine residues were used as an example for revealing structural characteristics of Chl-binding sites. This study provides evidence for the three unresolved questions and builds a structural foundation through quantifying Chl conformations as well as structures of their embedded protein environments for future mechanistic understanding of relationships between Chl–protein interactions and their corresponding spectroscopic data. 
    more » « less
  3. Abstract BackgroundAll chemical forms of energy and oxygen on Earth are generated via photosynthesis where light energy is converted into redox energy by two photosystems (PS I and PS II). There is an increasing number of PS I 3D structures deposited in the Protein Data Bank (PDB). The Triangular Spatial Relationship (TSR)-based algorithm converts 3D structures into integers (TSR keys). A comprehensive study was conducted, by taking advantage of the PS I 3D structures and the TSR-based algorithm, to answer three questions: (i) Are electron cofactors including P700, A-1and A0, which are chemically identical chlorophylls, structurally different? (ii) There are two electron transfer chains (A and B branches) in PS I. Are the cofactors on both branches structurally different? (iii) Are the amino acids in cofactor binding sites structurally different from those not in cofactor binding sites? ResultsThe key contributions and important findings include: (i) a novel TSR-based method for representing 3D structures of pigments as well as for quantifying pigment structures was developed; (ii) the results revealed that the redox cofactor, P700, are structurally conserved and different from other redox factors. Similar situations were also observed for both A-1and A0; (iii) the results demonstrated structural differences between A and B branches for the redox cofactors P700, A-1, A0and A1as well as their cofactor binding sites; (iv) the tryptophan residues close to A0and A1are structurally conserved; (v) The TSR-based method outperforms the Root Mean Square Deviation (RMSD) and the Ultrafast Shape Recognition (USR) methods. ConclusionsThe structural analyses of redox cofactors and their binding sites provide a foundation for understanding the unique chemical and physical properties of each redox cofactor in PS I, which are essential for modulating the rate and direction of energy and electron transfers. 
    more » « less
  4. The fusion of hydrogenases and photosynthetic reaction centers (RCs) has proven to be a promising strategy for the production of sustainable biofuels. Type I (iron-sulfur-containing) RCs, acting as photosensitizers, are capable of promoting electrons to a redox state that can be exploited by hydrogenases for the reduction of protons to dihydrogen (H2). While both [FeFe] and [NiFe] hydrogenases have been used successfully, they tend to be limited due to either O2sensitivity, binding specificity, or H2production rates. In this study, we fuse a peripheral (stromal) subunit of Photosystem I (PS I), PsaE, to an O2-tolerant [FeFe] hydrogenase fromClostridium beijerinckiiusing a flexible [GGS]4linker group (CbHydA1-PsaE). We demonstrate that theCbHydA1 chimera can be synthetically activated in vitro to show bidirectional activity and that it can be quantitatively bound to a PS I variant lacking the PsaE subunit. When illuminated in an anaerobic environment, the nanoconstruct generates H2at a rate of 84.9 ± 3.1 µmol H2mgchl–1h–1. Further, when prepared and illuminated in the presence of O2, the nanoconstruct retains the ability to generate H2, though at a diminished rate of 2.2 ± 0.5 µmol H2mgchl–1h–1. This demonstrates not only that PsaE is a promising scaffold for PS I-based nanoconstructs, but the use of an O2-tolerant [FeFe] hydrogenase opens the possibility for an in vivo H2generating system that can function in the presence of O2
    more » « less
  5. Photosystem I (PS I) is a photosynthetic pigment–protein complex that absorbs light and uses the absorbed energy to initiate electron transfer. Electron transfer has been shown to occur concurrently along two (A- and B-) branches of reaction center (RC) cofactors. The electron transfer chain originates from a special pair of chlorophyll a molecules (P700), followed by two chlorophylls and one phylloquinone in each branch (denoted as A−1, A0, A1, respectively), converging in a single iron–sulfur complex Fx. While there is a consensus that the ultimate electron donor–acceptor pair is P700+A0−, the involvement of A−1 in electron transfer, as well as the mechanism of the very first step in the charge separation sequence, has been under debate. To resolve this question, multiple groups have targeted electron transfer cofactors by site-directed mutations. In this work, the peripheral hydrogen bonds to keto groups of A0 chlorophylls have been disrupted by mutagenesis. Four mutants were generated: PsaA-Y692F; PsaB-Y667F; PsaB-Y667A; and a double mutant PsaA-Y692F/PsaB-Y667F. Contrary to expectations, but in agreement with density functional theory modeling, the removal of the hydrogen bond by Tyr → Phe substitution was found to have a negligible effect on redox potentials and optical absorption spectra of respective chlorophylls. In contrast, Tyr → Ala substitution was shown to have a fatal effect on the PS I function. It is thus inferred that PsaA-Y692 and PsaB-Y667 residues have primarily structural significance, and their ability to coordinate respective chlorophylls in electron transfer via hydrogen bond plays a minor role. 
    more » « less