skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Title: Ranking Eco-Innovations to Enable a Sustainable Circular Economy with Net-Zero Emissions
The urgency of action toward mitigating climate change and reducing material leakage into the environment is inspiring a plethora of innovative technologies, supply chains, and policy actions. These are targeted toward reducing greenhouse gas emissions, natural resource uptake, and decoupling technological systems from fossil-based linear economies using circularity strategies. Industrial and governmental stakeholders are keen to rank these proposed eco-innovations and emerging alternatives based on their scope of contributing to a sustainable and circular economy to meet global warming curtailment and pollution mitigation targets. We describe a novel methodological framework that relies on a multiobjective optimization of cradle-to-cradle life-cycle pathways to screen from a large database of conceptual eco-innovations and rank them based on their potential for establishing a Sustainable Circular Economy (SCE). This methodology is implemented for a motivating case study to evaluate numerous packaging eco-innovations based on their improvement potential and readiness for adoption within the grocery bags value-chain network. It is demonstrated that a preliminary screening step identifies the 10 most promising eco-innovations from a large superset of alternatives, which if developed and adopted can help transition the value chain to a future scenario with net-zero emissions and adherence to the recycled and renewable-content targets set by the United States Plastics pact but at a higher cost.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
2029397
PAR ID:
10466760
Author(s) / Creator(s):
;
Publisher / Repository:
American Chemical Society
Date Published:
Journal Name:
ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering
Volume:
11
Issue:
4
ISSN:
2168-0485
Page Range / eLocation ID:
1363 to 1374
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. The escalating challenges posed by extreme climate change and the rapid greenhouse effect have heightened stress and urgency among governments, researchers, and the public. Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, particularly carbon dioxide (CO2), have signi昀椀cantly contributed to rising atmospheric temperatures, with agriculture, forestry, and industrial activities accounting for 22 % and 17 % of global emissions, respectively. In 2022, global GHG emissions reached 53.8 Gt CO2eq, underscoring the critical need for net-zero technologies and a circular carbon economy. This review systematically evaluates the ef昀椀ciencies of non-thermal and electrochemical CO2 conversion technologies, including plasma, arti昀椀cial photosynthesis, and electrochemical methods, for achieving net-zero emissions. These advanced technologies offer promising pathways for converting CO2 into value-added chemicals, such as syngas, methanol, and formic acid, while reducing atmospheric CO2 concentrations. However, upscaling these technologies from laboratory to industrial scales presents signi昀椀cant challenges, including high energy consumption, economic feasibility, and environmental impacts. The review highlights the mechanisms of CO2 conversion, economic considerations, and the potential for industrial implementation. Priority research directions are identi昀椀ed, focusing on ecological footprints, green supply chains, and the integration of renewable energy sources. By addressing these challenges, non-thermal and electrochemical CO2 conversion technologies can play a pivotal role in mitigating climate change and advancing toward a sustainable, circular carbon economy. 
    more » « less
  2. Many corporations and nations have pledged to reach net-zero emissions within a few decades. Meeting such targets for greenhouse gases, plastics, etc. requires systematic methods to guide investment in technologies and value-chain alternatives, and develop roadmaps. The proposed framework is a multi-period planning model to guide optimal reforms in cradle-to-cradle life-cycle networks across the time horizon. It aims to meet environmental targets while minimizing the total annualized marginal cost of natural resources and the investment cost associated with adoption of novel technologies. This considers the evolution of technology readiness levels as S-curves or continuous time Markov-chains. Integrated Assessment models account for climate change, decarbonization due to energy mix changes, and carbon taxes. Multiple climate change scenarios and shared socioeconomic pathways are used to model the future. In addition to providing roadmaps, the outputs can also be used to identify technologies that will be robust to future scenarios. 
    more » « less
  3. Purple non-sulfur bacteria and the circular economyArpita Bose, Associate Professor at Washington University in St. Louis, discusses the potential of microbial solutions in supporting sustainable and environmentally responsible alternatives to the traditional linear economy. Earth’s climate is undergoing unprecedented changes due to human activities, primarily the emission of greenhouse gases. Widespread petroleum-based production of fuels and plastics releases large amounts of pollution, contributing to rising global temperatures, extreme weather events, and ecosystem disruptions. Finding feasible solutions to the climate crisis is crucial to preserve essential resources and protect human and environmental health. Harnessing and strengthening the natural capabilities of microorganisms and microbial communities with synthetic biology will be the key to reducing and upcycling waste for a greener global economy. 
    more » « less
  4. Abstract Although the potential for cities and regions to contribute to global mitigation efforts is widely acknowledged, there is little evidence on the effectiveness of subnational mitigation strategies. Here we address this gap through a systematic review of 234 quantitative mitigation case studies. We use a meta-analytical approach to estimate expected greenhouse gas emissions reductions from 12 categories of mitigation strategies. We find that strategies related to land use and development, circular economy, and waste management are most effective and reliable for reducing emissions. The results demonstrate that cities and regions are taking widespread action to reduce emissions. However, we find misalignment between the strategies that policymakers and researchers focus on, compared to those with the highest expected impacts. The results inform climate action planning at the city and regional level and the evaluation of subnational climate targets. 
    more » « less
  5. Converging environmental crises have inspired a movement to shift dominant economic forms away from linear “take-make-waste” models and toward more circular forms that reimagine discarded materials as valuable resources. With the coming “end of cheap nature”, this invitation to reimagine waste as something more than “the political other of capitalist value” is seen as both an environmental necessity and an opportunity for green growth. Less often discussed is that the circular economy, in its reconfiguration of value, also has the potential to reshape contemporary property relations and dismantle existing forms of circularity. In this paper, we explore potential shifts in property relations through an analysis of three strategies often imagined as key to facilitating the transition to circularity—extended producer responsibility, repair, and online resale. Each case synthesizes existing research, public discourse, and findings from a series of focus groups and interviews with circular economy professionals. While this research is preliminary and demands additional research, all three cases suggest caution given the possibility that some circular economy strategies can concentrate value and control of existing materials stocks, dispossess those most vulnerable, and alienate participants in existing reuse, recycling, and repair markets. Drawing on and adapting Luxemburg's concept of primitive accumulation, Tsing's ideas about salvage accumulation, Moore's work on commodity frontiers and recent research which encourages more attention to processes of commoning—we argue that without careful attention to relations of power and justice in conceptualizations of ownership and the collective actions necessary to transform our economic formsin common, transitions toward the circular economy have the potential to enclose the value of discards and exacerbate inequality. 
    more » « less