This content will become publicly available on June 25, 2024
Title: Boosting Study Program Awareness via a Structured Introductory Experience to Engineering
This paper discusses the implementation of an introductory course to engineering established
to provide students with knowledge about the roles of engineers, the engineering method,
ethics, teamwork, and detailed information about each of the engineering majors offered in the
College of Engineering (CoE) of the host institution. The course is offered as part of a larger
initiative seeking to improve success indicators among low-income students. This paper
provides details about the course structure, implementation context, metrics, and results
measured via descriptive statistics among participant students. The results of a longitudinal
implementation, suggest that early provision of career information and awareness can impact
the engineering retention and persistence of students and their interest in their chosen majors,
particularly in educational settings where students declare their major on the entrance to their
first year. more »« less
This Complete Research paper will describe the implementation of an introductory course (ENGR194) for first semester engineering students. The course is meant to improve retention and academic success of engineering first-year students in the College of Engineering at the University of Illinois at Chicago. The implementation of this course is part of an ongoing National Science Foundation (NSF) Scholarships in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (S-STEM) project. This paper reports on the impact of combinatorial enrollment in ENGR194 and a previously described two-week Summer Bridge Program (SBP) offered only for entering S-STEM scholars before their first semester. To measure the impact of this course on student retention and academic success, various evaluation metrics are compared for three separate Comparison Groups (C-Groups) of students. The results show that the ENGR194 course had a significant positive impact on the first-year retention rate. The results also revealed that students who participated in both ENGR194 and SBP (C-Group 1) made changes to their declared majors earlier than students who had only taken ENGR 123 or neither of the courses (C-Groups 2 and 3 respectively). Furthermore, students in C-Group 1 received better grades in math and science than their peers, and students in C-Groups 1 and 2 had significantly higher GPAs than their peers in C-Group 3.
The Introduction to engineering (EGGN-100) is a project-based course offered every fall semester to first-year students with undecided engineering majors at California State University, Fullerton (CSUF). The primary objective of this course is to provide project-based learning (PBL) and introduce these students to major projects in Civil, Mechanical, Electrical, and Computer Engineering projects so that they can make an informed decision about their major. The PBL is an active learning method that aims to engage students in acquiring knowledge and skills through real-world experiences and well-planned project activities in engineering disciplines. The course comprises four team-based unique projects related to Civil, Mechanical, Electrical, and Computer Engineering. The project involves using a variety of engineering tools like AutoCAD, Multisim, and Arduino platforms. For the first time, due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the hands-on project-based EGGN-100 course was offered virtually. In this research, we document the learning experiences of students who attended EGGN-100 in a traditional face-to-face mode of instruction and students who participated in the same course in a virtual instruction mode. Surveys conducted during seemingly different modes of instruction show varying levels of satisfaction among students. Of the students who attended the course in traditional and instructional instruction mode, 69% and 90% responded that discipline-specific projects enabled them to make an informed decision, and PBL helped them choose their preferred major. Even the percentage of students who believed the PBL helped them make an informed decision about their major, they like to do more hands-on projects and prefer to attend the classes on campus. Students rated higher satisfaction in virtual instructional mode primarily due to the availability of video lectures, self-paced learning, and readily accessible project simulations. Learning by doing would have bought out the challenges and minor nuances of designing and executing an engineering project. Learning by watching is surficial and not necessarily exposes students to minor details that are critical. As such, the significance of this study is that maybe, after all, not all courses can be taught in a virtual environment, and some courses may be strictly taught in a traditional, hands-on instruction mode. We also study the socio-psychological impact of traditional and virtual learning experiences and report the remedies to cope with stress and loneliness in the online learning environment.
Yan, Yanjun; Kaul, Sudhir; Ferguson, Chip; Yanik, Paul; Tallant, April(
, American Society for Engineering Education)
A travel course takes a significant amount of effort in its planning and execution. The logistics are even more challenging when a travel course is introduced for the first time. In the Engineering and Technology department at Western Carolina University (WCU), a faculty-led travel course has never been taught. The Council on International Educational Exchange (CIEE) offered an inaugural grant opportunity, especially for a travel course in STEM. In response to that, a proposal was submitted after discussions among colleagues and administrators. Although the grant proposal was not funded, the CIEE offered a large discount for the program and the CIEE program manager worked tirelessly to accommodate the requests to revise the program. When the initial abstract of this paper was submitted in January 2016, nine student applications had been received, for travel in May 2016. Unfortunately, the class was cancelled after two students withdrew reducing the numbers below the required enrollment and budget limits. However, throughout the development of this course, many successful partnerships were fostered. The collaborating parties included: students, departmental colleagues, administration (the Department Head, Dean, and Associate Dean), the International Service Office, colleagues in other departments, the CIEE Program Manager, WCU’s Development Officer, and a private donor. It is no small feat for a travel course to be jump-started from scratch, and partnerships are the key for successful implementation. Although our travel course was unsuccessful at meeting the final objective, we gained valuable knowledge from the process. The current paper addresses several factors in establishing a new travel course, such as assessing a fair number of credit hours for a relatively short duration, developing an appropriate budget, and incorporating project-based learning into a short time table. Furthermore, the current paper shares some guidelines that may be helpful in establishing a new travel course, such as using survey tools to understand student needs, making infographics to advertise the course, and encouraging the students to talk to their friends and classmates about the course. These tools have been effective but need to be used carefully to avoid misleading the intended audience. The many lessons that have been learned during the development of this course will also be shared in this paper.
There is a critical need for more students with engineering and computer science majors to enter
into, persist in, and graduate from four-year postsecondary institutions. Increasing the diversity
of the workforce by inclusive practices in engineering and science is also a profound identified
need. According to national statistics, the largest groups of underrepresented minority students in
engineering and science attend U.S. public higher education institutions. Most often, a large
proportion of these students come to colleges and universities with unique challenges and needs,
and are more likely to be first in their family to attend college. In response to these needs,
engineering education researchers and practitioners have developed, implemented and assessed
interventions to provide support and help students succeed in college, particularly in their first
year. These interventions typically target relatively small cohorts of students and can be managed
by a small number of faculty and staff. In this paper, we report on “work in progress” research in
a large-scale, first-year engineering and computer science intervention program at a public,
comprehensive university using multivariate comparative statistical approaches.
Large-scale intervention programs are especially relevant to minority serving institutions that
prepare growing numbers of students who are first in their family to attend college and who are
also under-resourced, financially. These students most often encounter academic difficulties and
come to higher education with challenging experiences and backgrounds. Our studied first-year
intervention program, first piloted in 2015, is now in its 5th year of implementation. Its
intervention components include: (a) first-year block schedules, (b) project-based introductory
engineering and computer science courses, (c) an introduction to mechanics course, which
provides students with the foundation needed to succeed in a traditional physics sequence, and
(d) peer-led supplemental instruction workshops for calculus, physics and chemistry courses.
This intervention study responds to three research questions: (1) What role does the first-year
intervention’s components play in students’ persistence in engineering and computer science
majors across undergraduate program years? (2) What role do particular pedagogical and cocurricular
support structures play in students’ successes? And (3) What role do various student
socio-demographic and experiential factors play in the effectiveness of first-year interventions?
To address these research questions and therefore determine the formative impact of the firstyear
engineering and computer science program on which we are conducting research, we have
collected diverse student data including grade point averages, concept inventory scores, and data
from a multi-dimensional questionnaire that measures students’ use of support practices across
their four to five years in their degree program, and diverse background information necessary to
determine the impact of such factors on students’ persistence to degree. Background data
includes students’ experiences prior to enrolling in college, their socio-demographic
characteristics, and their college social capital throughout their higher education experience. For
this research, we compared students who were enrolled in the first-year intervention program to
those who were not enrolled in the first-year intervention. We have engaged in cross-sectional
2
data collection from students’ freshman through senior years and employed multivariate
statistical analytical techniques on the collected student data.
Results of these analyses were interesting and diverse. Generally, in terms of backgrounds, our
research indicates that students’ parental education is positively related to their success in
engineering and computer science across program years. Likewise, longitudinally (across
program years), students’ college social capital predicted their academic success and persistence
to degree. With regard to the study’s comparative research of the first-year intervention, our
results indicate that students who were enrolled in the first-year intervention program as
freshmen continued to use more support practices to assist them in academic success across their
degree matriculation compared to students who were not in the first-year program. This suggests
that the students continued to recognize the value of such supports as a consequence of having
supports required as first-year students. In terms of students’ understanding of scientific or
engineering-focused concepts, we found significant impact resulting from student support
practices that were academically focused. We also found that enrolling in the first-year
intervention was a significant predictor of the time that students spent preparing for classes and
ultimately their grade point average, especially in STEM subjects across students’ years in
college. In summary, we found that the studied first-year intervention program has longitudinal,
positive impacts on students’ success as they navigate through their undergraduate experiences
toward engineering and computer science degrees.
Van Den Einde, Lelli; Delson, Nathan; Cowan, Elizabeth(
, 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition)
null
(Ed.)
Mobile devices are becoming a more common part of the education experience. Students can access their devices at any time to perform assignments or review material. Mobile apps can have the added advantage of being able to automatically grade student work and provide instantaneous feedback. However, numerous challenges remain in implementing effective mobile educational apps. One challenge is the small screen size of smartphones, which was a concern for a spatial visualization training app where students sketch isometric and orthographic drawings. This app was originally developed for iPads, but the wide prevalence of smartphones led to porting the software to iPhone and Android phones. The sketching assignments on a smartphone screen required more frequent zooming and panning, and one of the hypotheses of this study was that the educational effectiveness on smartphones was the same as on the larger screen sizes using iPad tablets.
The spatial visualization mobile sketching app was implemented in a college freshman engineering graphics course to teach students how to sketch orthographic and isometric assignments. The app provides automatic grading and hint feedback to help students when they are stuck. Students in this pilot were assigned sketching problems as homework using their personal devices. Students were administered a pre- and post- spatial visualization test (PSVT-R, a reliable, well-validated instrument) to assess learning gains. The trial analysis focuses on students who entered the course with limited spatial visualization experience as identified based on a score of ≤70% on the PSVT:R since students entering college with low PSVT:R scores are at higher risk of dropping out of STEM majors. Among these low-performing students, those who used the app showed significant progress: (71%) raised their test scores above 70% bringing them out of the at-risk range for dropping out of engineering.
While the PSVT:R test has been well validated, there are benefits to developing alternative methods of assessing spatial visualization skills. We developed an assembly pre- and post- test based upon a timed Lego™ exercise. At the start of the quarter, students were timed to see how long it would take them to build small lego sets using only visual instructions. Students were timed again on a different lego set after completion of the spatial visualization app. One benefit of the test was that it illustrated to the engineering students a skill that could be perceived as more relevant to their careers, and thus possibly increased their motivation for spatial visualization training. In addition, it may be possible to adapt the assembly test to elementary school grade levels where the PSVT:R test would not be suitable. Preliminary results show that the average lego build times decreased significantly after using the mobile app, indicating an improvement in students’ spatial reasoning skills. A comparison will also be done between normalized completion times on the assembly test and the PSVT:R tests in order to see how the assembly test compares to the “gold standard”.
In addition to the PSVT-R instrument, a survey was conducted to evaluate student usage and their impressions of the app. Students found the app engaging, easy to use, and something they would do whenever they had “a free moment”. 95% of the students recommended the app to a friend if they are struggling with spatial visualization skills.
This paper will describe the implementation of the mobile spatial visualization sketching app in a large college classroom, and highlight the app’s impact in increasing self-efficacy in spatial visualization and sketching
Jimenez, M, Guillemard, L, Santiago, A, Santiago, N, Bartolomei, S, Quintero, P, Lopez, C, and Cardona, N. Boosting Study Program Awareness via a Structured Introductory Experience to Engineering. Retrieved from https://par.nsf.gov/biblio/10466840.
Jimenez, M, Guillemard, L, Santiago, A, Santiago, N, Bartolomei, S, Quintero, P, Lopez, C, & Cardona, N. Boosting Study Program Awareness via a Structured Introductory Experience to Engineering. Retrieved from https://par.nsf.gov/biblio/10466840.
Jimenez, M, Guillemard, L, Santiago, A, Santiago, N, Bartolomei, S, Quintero, P, Lopez, C, and Cardona, N.
"Boosting Study Program Awareness via a Structured Introductory Experience to Engineering". Country unknown/Code not available: 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. https://par.nsf.gov/biblio/10466840.
@article{osti_10466840,
place = {Country unknown/Code not available},
title = {Boosting Study Program Awareness via a Structured Introductory Experience to Engineering},
url = {https://par.nsf.gov/biblio/10466840},
abstractNote = {This paper discusses the implementation of an introductory course to engineering established to provide students with knowledge about the roles of engineers, the engineering method, ethics, teamwork, and detailed information about each of the engineering majors offered in the College of Engineering (CoE) of the host institution. The course is offered as part of a larger initiative seeking to improve success indicators among low-income students. This paper provides details about the course structure, implementation context, metrics, and results measured via descriptive statistics among participant students. The results of a longitudinal implementation, suggest that early provision of career information and awareness can impact the engineering retention and persistence of students and their interest in their chosen majors, particularly in educational settings where students declare their major on the entrance to their first year.},
journal = {},
publisher = {2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition},
author = {Jimenez, M and Guillemard, L and Santiago, A and Santiago, N and Bartolomei, S and Quintero, P and Lopez, C and Cardona, N},
}
Warning: Leaving National Science Foundation Website
You are now leaving the National Science Foundation website to go to a non-government website.
Website:
NSF takes no responsibility for and exercises no control over the views expressed or the accuracy of
the information contained on this site. Also be aware that NSF's privacy policy does not apply to this site.