skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Explore Research Products in the PAR
It may take a few hours for recently added research products to appear in PAR search results.


Title: Machine learning and logic: a new frontier in artificial intelligence
Machine learning and logical reasoning have been the two foundational pillars of Artificial Intelligence (AI) since its inception, and yet, until recently the interactions between these two fields have been relatively limited. Despite their individual success and largely inde- pendent development, there are new problems on the horizon that seem solvable only via a combination of ideas from these two fields of AI. These problems can be broadly char- acterized as follows: how can learning be used to make logical reasoning and synthesis/ verification engines more efficient and powerful, and in the reverse direction, how can we use reasoning to improve the accuracy, generalizability, and trustworthiness of learning. In this perspective paper, we address the above-mentioned questions with an emphasis on certain paradigmatic trends at the intersection of learning and reasoning. Our intent here is not to be a comprehensive survey of all the ways in which learning and reasoning have been combined in the past. Rather we focus on certain recent paradigms where corrective feedback loops between learning and reasoning seem to play a particularly important role. Specifically, we observe the following three trends: first, the use of learning techniques (especially, reinforcement learning) in sequencing, selecting, and initializing proof rules in solvers/provers; second, combinations of inductive learning and deductive reasoning in the context of program synthesis and verification; and third, the use of solver layers in providing corrective feedback to machine learning models in order to help improve their accuracy, generalizability, and robustness with respect to partial specifications or domain knowledge. We believe that these paradigms are likely to have significant and dramatic impact on AI and its applications for a long time to come  more » « less
Award ID(s):
1804648
PAR ID:
10471546
Author(s) / Creator(s):
; ;
Publisher / Repository:
Formal Methods in System Design (
Date Published:
Journal Name:
Formal Methods in System Design
Volume:
60
Issue:
3
ISSN:
0925-9856
Page Range / eLocation ID:
426 to 451
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. ; ; (, Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages)
    We present Scallop, a language which combines the benefits of deep learning and logical reasoning. Scallop enables users to write a wide range of neurosymbolic applications and train them in a data- and compute-efficient manner. It achieves these goals through three key features: 1) a flexible symbolic representation that is based on the relational data model; 2) a declarative logic programming language that is based on Datalog and supports recursion, aggregation, and negation; and 3) a framework for automatic and efficient differentiable reasoning that is based on the theory of provenance semirings. We evaluate Scallop on a suite of eight neurosymbolic applications from the literature. Our evaluation demonstrates that Scallop is capable of expressing algorithmic reasoning in diverse and challenging AI tasks, provides a succinct interface for machine learning programmers to integrate logical domain knowledge, and yields solutions that are comparable or superior to state-of-the-art models in terms of accuracy. Furthermore, Scallop's solutions outperform these models in aspects such as runtime and data efficiency, interpretability, and generalizability. 
    more » « less
  2. (, Numerical Software Verification, 2019)
    In this tutorial, we present our recent work on building trusted, resilient and interpretable AI models by combining symbolic methods developed for automated reasoning with connectionist learning methods that use deep neural networks. The increasing adoption of artificial intelligence and machine learning in systems, including safety-critical systems, has created a pressing need for developing scalable techniques that can be used to establish trust over their safe behavior, resilience to adversarial attacks, and interpretability to enable human audits. This tutorial is comprised of three components: review of techniques for verification of neural networks, methods for using geometric invariants to defend against adversarial attacks, and techniques for extracting logical symbolic rules by reverse engineering machine learning models. These techniques form the core of TRINITY: Trusted, Resilient and Interpretable AI framework being developed at SRI. In this tutorial, we identify the key challenges in building the TRINITY framework, and report recent results on each of these three fronts. 
    more » « less
  3. ; ; (, Theory and Practice of Logic Programming)
    Abstract Knowledge representation and reasoning (KRR) systems describe and reason with complex concepts and relations in the form of facts and rules. Unfortunately, wide deployment of KRR systems runs into the problem that domain experts have great difficulty constructing correct logical representations of their domain knowledge. Knowledge engineers can help with this construction process, but there is a deficit of such specialists. The earlier Knowledge Authoring Logic Machine (KALM) based on Controlled Natural Language (CNL) was shown to have very high accuracy for authoring facts and questions. More recently, KALMFL, a successor of KALM, replaced CNL withfactualEnglish, which is much less restrictive and requires very little training from users. However, KALMFLhas limitations in representing certain types of knowledge, such as authoring rules for multi-step reasoning or understanding actions with timestamps. To address these limitations, we propose KALMRAto enable authoring of rules and actions. Our evaluation using the UTI guidelines benchmark shows that KALMRAachieves a high level of correctness (100%) on rule authoring. When used for authoring and reasoning with actions, KALMRAachieves more than 99.3% correctness on the bAbI benchmark, demonstrating its effectiveness in more sophisticated KRR jobs. Finally, we illustrate the logical reasoning capabilities of KALMRAby drawing attention to the problems faced by the recently made famous AI, ChatGPT. 
    more » « less
  4. ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (, EPiC Series in Computing)
    This report presents the results of a friendly competition for formal verification of continuous and hybrid systems with artificial intelligence (AI) components. Specifically, machine learning (ML) components in cyber-physical systems (CPS), such as feedforward neural networks used as feedback controllers in closed-loop systems are considered, which is a class of systems classically known as intelligent control systems, or in more modern and specific terms, neural network control systems (NNCS). We more broadly refer to this category as AI and NNCS (AINNCS). The friendly competition took place as part of the workshop Applied Verification for Continuous and Hybrid Systems (ARCH) in 2020. In the second edition of this AINNCS category at ARCH-COMP, four tools have been applied to solve seven different benchmark problems, (in alphabetical order): NNV, OVERT, ReachNN*, and VenMAS. This report is a snapshot of the current landscape of tools and the types of benchmarks for which these tools are suited. Due to the diversity of problems, lack of a shared hardware platform, and the early stage of the competition, we are not ranking tools in terms of performance, yet the presented results probably provide the most complete assessment of current tools for safety verification of NNCS. 
    more » « less
  5. ; ; (, Behavior research methods)
    Analogical reasoning is an active topic of investigation across education, artificial intelligence (AI), cognitive psychology, and related fields. In all fields of inquiry, explicit analogy problems provide useful tools for investigating the mechanisms underlying analogical reasoning. Such sets have been developed by researchers working in the fields of educational testing, AI, and cognitive psychology. However, these analogy tests have not been systematically made accessible across all the relevant fields. The present paper aims to remedy this situation by presenting a working inventory of verbal analogy problem sets, intended to capture and organize sets from diverse sources. 
    more » « less
  • Citation Formats
  • MLA
  • APA
  • Chicago
  • BibTeX
  • Save / Share this Record
  • Send to Email