skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Explore Research Products in the PAR
It may take a few hours for recently added research products to appear in PAR search results.


Title: Embodied Communication: How Robots and People Communicate Through Physical Interaction
Early research on physical human–robot interaction (pHRI) has necessarily focused on device design—the creation of compliant and sensorized hardware, such as exoskeletons, prostheses, and robot arms, that enables people to safely come in contact with robotic systems and to communicate about their collaborative intent. As hardware capabilities have become sufficient for many applications, and as computing has become more powerful, algorithms that support fluent and expressive use of pHRI systems have begun to play a prominent role in determining the systems’ usefulness. In this review, we describe a selection of representative algorithmic approaches that regulate and interpret pHRI, describing the progression from algorithms based on physical analogies, such as admittance control, to computational methods based on higher-level reasoning, which take advantage of multimodal communication channels. Existing algorithmic approaches largely enable task-specific pHRI, but they do not generalize to versatile human–robot collaboration. Throughout the review and in our discussion of next steps, we therefore argue that emergent embodied dialogue—bidirectional, multimodal communication that can be learned through continuous interaction—is one of the next frontiers of pHRI.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
1837515
PAR ID:
10471783
Author(s) / Creator(s):
; ;
Publisher / Repository:
Annual Reviews
Date Published:
Journal Name:
Annual Review of Control, Robotics, and Autonomous Systems
Volume:
6
Issue:
1
ISSN:
2573-5144
Page Range / eLocation ID:
205 to 232
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. ; ; (, PLOS ONE)
    Ferretti, Gianni (Ed.)
    Many anticipated physical human-robot interaction (pHRI) applications in the near future are overground tasks such as walking assistance. For investigating the biomechanics of human movement during pHRI, this work presents Ophrie, a novel interactive robot dedicated for physical interaction tasks with a human in overground settings. Unique design requirements for pHRI were considered in implementing the one-arm mobile robot, such as the low output impedance and the ability to apply small interaction forces. The robot can measure the human arm stiffness, an important physical quantity that can reveal human biomechanics during overground pHRI, while the human walks alongside the robot. This robot is anticipated to enable novel pHRI experiments and advance our understanding of intuitive and effective overground pHRI. 
    more » « less
  2. ; ; (, ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction)
    Robots increasingly interact with humans through touch, where people are touching or being touched by robots. Yet, little is known about how such interactions shape a user’s experience. To inform future work in this area, we conduct a systematic review of 44 studies on physical human-robot interaction (pHRI). Our review examines the parameters of the touch (e.g., the role of touch, location), the experimental variations used by researchers, and the methods used to assess user experience. We identify five facets of user experience metrics from the questionnaire items and data recordings for pHRI studies. We highlight gaps and methodological issues in studying pHRI and compare user evaluation trends with the Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) literature. Based on the review, we propose a conceptual model of the pHRI experience. The model highlights the components of such touch experiences to guide the design and evaluation of physical interactions with robots and inform future user experience questionnaire development. 
    more » « less
  3. ; (, Automation in Construction)
    Robots have the potential to enhance safety on construction job sites by assuming hazardous tasks. While existing safety research on physical human-robot interaction (pHRI) primarily addresses collision risks, ensuring inherently safe collaborative workflows is equally important. For example, ergonomic optimization in co-manipulation is an important safety consideration in pHRI. While frameworks such as Rapid Entire Body Assessment (REBA) have been an industry standard for these interventions, their lack of a rigorous mathematical structure poses challenges for using them with optimization algorithms. Previous works have tackled this gap by developing approximations or statistical approaches that are error-prone or data-dependent. This paper presents a framework using Reinforcement Learning for precise ergonomic optimization that generalizes to different types of tasks. To ensure practicality and safe experimentations, the training leverages Inverse Kinematics in virtual reality to simulate human movement mechanics. Results of a comparison between the developed framework and ergonomically naive approaches are presented. 
    more » « less
  4. ; ; (, Scientific Reports)
    Abstract Physical human–robot interactions (pHRI) often provide mechanical force and power to aid walking without requiring voluntary effort from the human. Alternatively, principles of physical human–human interactions (pHHI) can inspire pHRI that aids walking by engaging human sensorimotor processes. We hypothesize that low-force pHHI can intuitively induce a person to alter their walking through haptic communication. In our experiment, an expert partner dancer influenced novice participants to alter step frequency solely through hand interactions. Without prior instruction, training, or knowledge of the expert’s goal, novices decreased step frequency 29% and increased step frequency 18% based on low forces (< 20 N) at the hand. Power transfer at the hands was 3–700 × smaller than what is necessary to propel locomotion, suggesting that hand interactions did not mechanically constrain the novice’s gait. Instead, the sign/direction of hand forces and power may communicate information about how to alter walking. Finally, the expert modulated her arm effective dynamics to match that of each novice, suggesting a bidirectional haptic communication strategy for pHRI that adapts to the human. Our results provide a framework for developing pHRI at the hand that may be applicable to assistive technology and physical rehabilitation, human-robot manufacturing, physical education, and recreation. 
    more » « less
  5. ; ; (, Scientific Reports)
    Abstract Understanding the human motor control strategy during physical interaction tasks is crucial for developing future robots for physical human–robot interaction (pHRI). In physical human–human interaction (pHHI), small interaction forces are known to convey their intent between the partners for effective motor communication. The aim of this work is to investigate what affects the human’s sensitivity to the externally applied interaction forces. The hypothesis is that one way the small interaction forces are sensed is through the movement of the arm and the resulting proprioceptive signals. A pHRI setup was used to provide small interaction forces to the hand of seated participants in one of four directions, while the participants were asked to identify the direction of the push while blindfolded. The result shows that participants’ ability to correctly report the direction of the interaction force was lower with low interaction force as well as with high muscle contraction. The sensitivity to the interaction force direction increased with the radial displacement of the participant’s hand from the initial position: the further they moved the more correct their responses were. It was also observed that the estimated stiffness of the arm varies with the level of muscle contraction and robot interaction force. 
    more » « less
  • Citation Formats
  • MLA
  • APA
  • Chicago
  • BibTeX
  • Save / Share this Record
  • Send to Email