An official website of the United States government
The Alchemical Transfer Method (ATM) is herein validated against the relative binding free energies of a diverse set of protein-ligand complexes. We employed a streamlined setup workflow, a bespoke force field, and the AToM-OpenMM software to compute the relative binding free energies (RBFE) of the benchmark set prepared by Schindler and collaborators at Merck KGaA. This benchmark set includes examples of standard small R-group ligand modifications as well as more challenging scenarios, such as large R-group changes, scaffold hopping, formal charge changes, and charge-shifting transformations. The novel coordinate perturbation scheme and a dual-topology approach of ATM address some of the challenges of single-topology alchemical relative binding free energy methods. Specifically, ATM eliminates the need for splitting electrostatic and Lennard-Jones interactions, atom mapping, defining ligand regions, and post-corrections for charge-changing perturbations. Thus, ATM is simpler and more broadly applicable than conventional alchemical methods, especially for scaffold-hopping and charge-changing transformations. Here, we performed well over 500 relative binding free energy calculations for eight protein targets and found that ATM achieves accuracy comparable to existing state-of-the-art methods, albeit with larger statistical fluctuations. We discuss insights into specific strengths and weaknesses of the ATM method that will inform future deployments. This study confirms that ATM is applicable as a production tool for relative binding free energy (RBFE) predictions across a wide range of perturbation types within a unified, open-source framework.
more »
« less
What to Make of Zero: Resolving the Statistical Noise from Conformational Reorganization in Alchemical Binding Free Energy Estimates with Metadynamics Sampling
We introduce the self-Relative Binding Free Energy (self-RBFE) approach to evaluate the intrinsic statistical variance of dual-topology alchemical binding free energy estimators. The self-RBFE is the relative binding free energy between a ligand and a copy of the same ligand, and its true value is zero. Nevertheless, because the two copies of the ligand move independently, the self-RBFE value produced by a finite-length simulation fluctuates and can be used to measure the variance of the model. The results of this validation provide evidence that a significant fraction of the errors observed in benchmark studies reflect the statistical fluctuations of unconverged estimates rather than the models' accuracy. Furthermore, we find that ligand reorganization is a significant contributing factor to the statistical variance of binding free energy estimates and that metadynamics-accelerated conformational sampling of torsional degrees of freedom of the ligand can drastically reduce the time to convergence.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 1750511
- PAR ID:
- 10472300
- Publisher / Repository:
- arXiv
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- arXivorg
- ISSN:
- 2331-8422
- Page Range / eLocation ID:
- 2310.14350
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
null (Ed.)D089-0563 is a highly promising anti-cancer compound that selectively binds the transcription-silencing G-quadruplex element (Pu27) at the promoter region of the human c-MYC oncogene; however, its binding mechanism remains elusive. The structure of Pu27 is not available due to its polymorphism, but the G-quadruplex structures of its two shorter derivatives in complex with a ligand (Pu24/Phen-DC3 and Pu22/DC-34) are available and show significant structural variance as well as different ligand binding patterns in the 3′ region. Because D089-0563 shares the same scaffold as DC34 while having a significantly different scaffold from Phen-DC3, we picked Pu24 instead of Pu22 for this study in order to gain additional ligand binding insight. Using free ligand molecular dynamics binding simulations (33 μs), we probed the binding of D089-0563 to Pu24. Our clustering analysis identified three binding modes (top, side, and bottom) and subsequent MMPBSA binding energy analysis identified the top mode as the most thermodynamically stable. Our Markov State Model (MSM) analysis revealed that there are three parallel pathways for D089-0563 to the top mode from unbound state and that the ligand binding follows the conformational selection mechanism. Combining our predicted complex structures with the two experimental structures, it is evident that structural differences in the 3′ region between Pu24 and Pu22 lead to different binding behaviors despite having similar ligands; this also explains the different promoter activity caused by the two G-quadruplex sequences observed in a recent synthetic biology study. Based on interaction insights, 625 D089-0563 derivatives were designed and docked; 59 of these showed slightly improved docking scores.more » « less
-
Simonson, Thomas (Ed.)This chapter discusses the theory and application of physics-based free energy methods to estimate protein-peptide binding free energies. It presents a statistical mechanics formulation of molecular binding, which is then specialized in three methodologies: (i) alchemical absolute binding free energy estimation with implicit solvation, (ii) alchemical relative binding free energy estimation with explicit solvation, and (iii) potential of mean force binding free energy estimation. Case studies of protein-peptide binding application taken from the recent literature are discussed for each method.more » « less
-
Abstract Gaussian accelerated molecular dynamics (GaMD) is a robust computational method for simultaneous unconstrained enhanced sampling and free energy calculations of biomolecules. It works by adding a harmonic boost potential to smooth biomolecular potential energy surface and reduce energy barriers. GaMD greatly accelerates biomolecular simulations by orders of magnitude. Without the need to set predefined reaction coordinates or collective variables, GaMD provides unconstrained enhanced sampling and is advantageous for simulating complex biological processes. The GaMD boost potential exhibits a Gaussian distribution, thereby allowing for energetic reweighting via cumulant expansion to the second order (i.e., “Gaussian approximation”). This leads to accurate reconstruction of free energy landscapes of biomolecules. Hybrid schemes with other enhanced sampling methods, such as the replica‐exchange GaMD (rex‐GaMD) and replica‐exchange umbrella sampling GaMD (GaREUS), have also been introduced, further improving sampling and free energy calculations. Recently, new “selective GaMD” algorithms including the Ligand GaMD (LiGaMD) and Peptide GaMD (Pep‐GaMD) enabled microsecond simulations to capture repetitive dissociation and binding of small‐molecule ligands and highly flexible peptides. The simulations then allowed highly efficient quantitative characterization of the ligand/peptide binding thermodynamics and kinetics. Taken together, GaMD and its innovative variants are applicable to simulate a wide variety of biomolecular dynamics, including protein folding, conformational changes and allostery, ligand binding, peptide binding, protein–protein/nucleic acid/carbohydrate interactions, and carbohydrate/nucleic acid interactions. In this review, we present principles of the GaMD algorithms and recent applications in biomolecular simulations and drug design. This article is categorized under:Structure and Mechanism > Computational Biochemistry and BiophysicsMolecular and Statistical Mechanics > Molecular Dynamics and Monte‐Carlo MethodsMolecular and Statistical Mechanics > Free Energy Methodsmore » « less
-
We propose a free energy calculation method for receptor–ligand binding, which have multiple binding poses that avoids exhaustive enumeration of the poses. For systems with multiple binding poses, the standard procedure is to enumerate orientations of the binding poses, restrain the ligand to each orientation, and then, calculate the binding free energies for each binding pose. In this study, we modify a part of the thermodynamic cycle in order to sample a broader conformational space of the ligand in the binding site. This modification leads to more accurate free energy calculation without performing separate free energy simulations for each binding pose. We applied our modification to simple model host–guest systems as a test, which have only two binding poses, by using a single decoupling method (SDM) in implicit solvent. The results showed that the binding free energies obtained from our method without knowing the two binding poses were in good agreement with the benchmark results obtained by explicit enumeration of the binding poses. Our method is applicable to other alchemical binding free energy calculation methods such as the double decoupling method (DDM) in explicit solvent. We performed a calculation for a protein–ligand system with explicit solvent using our modified thermodynamic path. The results of the free energy simulation along our modified path were in good agreement with the results of conventional DDM, which requires a separate binding free energy calculation for each of the binding poses of the example of phenol binding to T4 lysozyme in explicit solvent. © 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.more » « less
- Free Publicly Accessible Full Text
-
Accepted Manuscript1.0
- Journal Article:
- The DOI is not currently available.
