skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Explore Research Products in the PAR
It may take a few hours for recently added research products to appear in PAR search results.


Title: Image muting of mixed precipitation to improve identification of regions of heavy snow in radar data
Abstract. In winter storms, enhanced radar reflectivity is often associated with heavy snow. However, some higher reflectivities are the result of mixed precipitation including melting snow. The correlation coefficient (a dual-polarization radar variable) can identify regions of mixed precipitation, but this information is usually presented separately from reflectivity. Especially under time pressure, radar data users can mistake regions of mixed precipitation for heavy snow because of the high cognitive load associated with comparing data in two fields while simultaneously attempting to discount a portion of the high reflectivity values. We developed an image muting method for regional radar maps that visually de-emphasizes the high reflectivity values associated with mixed precipitation. These image muted depictions of winter storm precipitation structures are useful for analyzing regions of heavy snow and monitoring real-time weather conditions.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
1905736
PAR ID:
10473822
Author(s) / Creator(s):
; ; ;
Publisher / Repository:
European Geophysical Union
Date Published:
Journal Name:
Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
Volume:
15
Issue:
18
ISSN:
1867-8548
Page Range / eLocation ID:
5515 to 5525
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. ; ; ; ; (, Dryad)
    This dataset contains over 14,000 hours of regional radar mosaics over the northeast US from 600+ winter storm days between 1996-2023. Winter storm days are defined when at least 2 out of 15 surface stations in the northeast US (see attached map) produced at least 1 inch of snow over the 24 hour period. Sequences of these mosaics aid in analyzing the precipitation area and the structures within winter storms. Radar reflectivity data is combined from the first, lowest (0.5 degree) elevation angle from 12 NEXRAD WSR-88D radars in the northeast US (see attached). The scans occur every 5-10 minutes from each radar depending on the radar scan settings.  The time label of the regional map is based on the scan time central radar, KOKX (Upton, NY). Scans from other radars in the region are used for that time as long as they are within 8 minutes of the KOKX scan. The polar radar data from each radar is interpolated to a regional 1202 km x 1202 km Cartesian grid with 2 km grid spacing covering 35.73-46.8 degN and 66.36-81.85 degW. Where the radar domains overlap, we take the highest reflectivity value. For dates after dual-polarization integration (2012 onwards), files contain the correlation coefficient (RHO_HV) field and a binary field  that can be used to “image mute” the reflectivity which reduces the visual prominence of melting and mixed precipitation commonly mistaken for heavy snow. Image muting is applied where radar reflectivity is ≥ 20 dBZ and RHO_HV is ≤ 0.97. This product is different from other widely used radar mosaics such as the MRMS produced by NOAA since it does not interpolate to a constant altitude and thus preserves the finer scale details in the reflectivity field. Because the data used to create these mosaics are not interpolated to a constant altitude, the altitude varies over the region (altitudes of radar scan used at each grid point are provided as a field for each data file). This data set is specifically designed to analyze fine-scale structures in winter storms. Part 1 contains files pre-dual polarization integration (1996-2012)Part 2 contains files post-dual polarization integration (2012-2023) 
    more » « less
  2. ; ; ; ; (, Dryad)
    This dataset contains over 14,000 hours of regional radar mosaics over the northeast US from 600+ winter storm days between 1996-2023. Winter storm days are defined when at least 2 out of 15 surface stations in the northeast US (see attached map) produced at least 1 inch of snow over the 24 hour period. Sequences of these mosaics aid in analyzing the precipitation area and the structures within winter storms. Radar reflectivity data is combined from the first, lowest (0.5 degree) elevation angle from 12 NEXRAD WSR-88D radars in the northeast US (see attached). The scans occur every 5-10 minutes from each radar depending on the radar scan settings.  The time label of the regional map is based on the scan time central radar, KOKX (Upton, NY). Scans from other radars in the region are used for that time as long as they are within 8 minutes of the KOKX scan. The polar radar data from each radar is interpolated to a regional 1202 km x 1202 km Cartesian grid with 2 km grid spacing covering 35.73-46.8 degN and 66.36-81.85 degW. Where the radar domains overlap, we take the highest reflectivity value. For dates after dual-polarization integration (2012 onwards), files contain the correlation coefficient (RHO_HV) field and a binary field  that can be used to “image mute” the reflectivity which reduces the visual prominence of melting and mixed precipitation commonly mistaken for heavy snow. Image muting is applied where radar reflectivity is ≥ 20 dBZ and RHO_HV is ≤ 0.97. This product is different from other widely used radar mosaics such as the MRMS produced by NOAA since it does not interpolate to a constant altitude and thus preserves the finer scale details in the reflectivity field. Because the data used to create these mosaics are not interpolated to a constant altitude, the altitude varies over the region (altitudes of radar scan used at each grid point are provided as a field for each data file). This data set is specifically designed to analyze fine-scale structures in winter storms. Part 1 contains files pre-dual polarization integration (1996-2012)Part 2 contains files post-dual polarization integration (2012-2023) 
    more » « less
  3. ; ; (, Atmospheric Measurement Techniques)
    Abstract. Radar observations of winter storms often exhibit locally enhanced linear features in reflectivity, sometimes labeled as snow bands. We have developed a new, objective method for detecting locally enhanced echo features in radar data from winter storms. In comparison to convective cells in warm season precipitation, these features are usually less distinct from the background echo and often have more fuzzy or feathered edges. This technique identifies both prominent, strong features and more subtle, faint features. A key difference from previous radar reflectivity feature detection algorithms is the combined use of two adaptive differential thresholds, one that decreases with increasing background values and one that increases with increasing background values. The algorithm detects features within a snow rate field rather than reflectivity and incorporates an underestimate and overestimate of feature areas to account for uncertainties in the detection. We demonstrate the technique on several examples from the US National Weather Service operational radar network. The feature detection algorithm is highly customizable and can be tuned for a variety of data sets and applications. 
    more » « less
  4. ; ; ; ; (, Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology)
    Abstract Recent studies from the Seeded and Natural Orographic Wintertime Clouds: The Idaho Experiment (SNOWIE) demonstrated definitive radar evidence of seeding signatures in winter orographic clouds during three intensive operation periods (IOPs) where the background signal from natural precipitation was weak and a radar signal attributable to seeding could be identified as traceable seeding lines. Except for the three IOPs where seeding was detected, background natural snowfall was present during seeding operations and no clear seeding signatures were detected. This paper provides a quantitative analysis to assess if orographic cloud seeding effects are detectable using radar when background precipitation is present. We show that a 5-dB change in equivalent reflectivity factorZeis required to stand out against background naturalZevariability. This analysis considers four radar wavelengths, a range of background ice water contents (IWC) from 0.012 to 1.214 g m−3, and additional IWC introduced by seeding ranging from 0.012 to 0.486 g m−3. The upper-limit values of seeded IWC are based on measurements of IWC from the Nevzorov probe employed on the University of Wyoming King Air aircraft during SNOWIE. This analysis implies that seeding effects will be undetectable using radar within background snowfall unless the background IWC is small, and the seeding effects are large. It therefore remains uncertain whether seeding had no effect on cloud microstructure, and therefore produced no signature on radar, or whether seeding did have an effect, but that effect was undetectable against the background reflectivity associated with naturally produced precipitation. Significance StatementOperational glaciogenic seeding programs targeting wintertime orographic clouds are funded by a range of stakeholders to increase snowpack. Glaciogenic seeding signatures have been observed by radar when natural background snowfall is weak but never when heavy background precipitation was present. This analysis quantitatively shows that seeding effects will be undetectable using radar reflectivity under conditions of background snowfall unless the background snowfall is weak, and the seeding effects are large. It therefore remains uncertain whether seeding had no effect on cloud microstructure, and therefore produced no signature on radar, or whether seeding did have an effect, but that effect was undetectable against the background reflectivity associated with naturally produced precipitation. Alternative assessment methods such as trace element analysis in snow, aircraft measurements, precipitation measurements, and modeling should be used to determine the efficacy of orographic cloud seeding when heavy background precipitation is present. 
    more » « less
  5. ; ; (, Atmosphere)
    With varying tangential winds and combinations of stratiform and convective clouds, tropical cyclones (TCs) can be difficult to accurately portray when mosaicking data from ground-based radars. This study utilizes the Dual-frequency Precipitation Radar (DPR) from the Global Precipitation Measurement Mission (GPM) satellite to evaluate reflectivity obtained using four sampling methods of Weather Surveillance Radar 1988-Doppler data, including ground radars (GRs) in the GPM ground validation network and three mosaics, specifically the Multi-Radar/Multi-Sensor System plus two we created by retaining the maximum value in each grid cell (MAX) and using a distance-weighted function (DW). We analyzed Hurricane Laura (2020), with a strong gradient in tangential winds, and Tropical Storm Isaias (2020), where more stratiform precipitation was present. Differences between DPR and GR reflectivity were larger compared to previous studies that did not focus on TCs. Retaining the maximum value produced higher values than other sampling methods, and these values were closest to DPR. However, some MAX values were too high when DPR time offsets were greater than 120 s. The MAX method produces a more consistent match to DPR than the other mosaics when reflectivity is <35 dBZ. However, even MAX values are 3–4 dBZ lower than DPR in higher-reflectivity regions where gradients are stronger and features change quickly. The DW and MRMS mosaics produced values that were similar to one another but lower than DPR and MAX values. 
    more » « less
  • Citation Formats
  • MLA
  • APA
  • Chicago
  • BibTeX
  • Save / Share this Record
  • Send to Email