An official website of the United States government
Abstract Biofilms can increase pathogenic contamination of drinking water, cause biofilm‐related diseases, alter the sediment erosion rate, and degrade contaminants in wastewater. Compared with mature biofilms, biofilms in the early‐stage have been shown to be more susceptible to antimicrobials and easier to remove. Mechanistic understanding of physical factors controlling early‐stage biofilm growth is critical to predict and control biofilm development, yet such understanding is currently incomplete. Here, we reveal the impacts of hydrodynamic conditions and microscale surface roughness on the development of early‐stagePseudomonas putidabiofilm through a combination of microfluidic experiments, numerical simulations, and fluid mechanics theories. We demonstrate that early‐stage biofilm growth is suppressed under high flow conditions and that the local velocity for early‐stageP. putidabiofilms (growth time < 14 h) to develop is about 50 μm/s, which is similar toP. putida's swimming speed. We further illustrate that microscale surface roughness promotes the growth of early‐stage biofilms by increasing the area of the low‐flow region. Furthermore, we show that the critical average shear stress, above which early‐stage biofilms cease to form, is 0.9 Pa for rough surfaces, three times as large as the value for flat or smooth surfaces (0.3 Pa). The important control of flow conditions and microscale surface roughness on early‐stage biofilm development, characterized in this study, will facilitate future predictions and managements of early‐stageP. putidabiofilm development on the surfaces of drinking water pipelines, bioreactors, and sediments in aquatic environments.
more »
« less
Microfluidic investigation of the impacts of flow fluctuations on the development of Pseudomonas putida biofilms
Abstract Biofilms play critical roles in wastewater treatment, bioremediation, and medical-device-related infections. Understanding the dynamics of biofilm formation and growth is essential for controlling and exploiting their properties. However, the majority of current studies have focused on the impact of steady flows on biofilm growth, while flow fluctuations are common in natural and engineered systems such as water pipes and blood vessels. Here, we reveal the effects of flow fluctuations on the development ofPseudomonas putidabiofilms through systematic microfluidic experiments and the development of a theoretical model. Our experimental results showed that biofilm growth under fluctuating flow conditions followed three phases: lag, exponential, and fluctuation phases. In contrast, biofilm growth under steady-flow conditions followed four phases: lag, exponential, stationary, and decline phases. Furthermore, we demonstrated that low-frequency flow fluctuations promoted biofilm growth, while high-frequency fluctuations inhibited its development. We attributed the contradictory impacts of flow fluctuations on biofilm growth to the adjustment time (T0) needed for biofilm to grow after the shear stress changed from high to low. Furthermore, we developed a theoretical model that explains the observed biofilm growth under fluctuating flow conditions. Our insights into the mechanisms underlying biofilm development under fluctuating flows can inform the design of strategies to control biofilm formation in diverse natural and engineered systems.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 2236497
- PAR ID:
- 10474587
- Publisher / Repository:
- Nature Publishing Group
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- npj Biofilms and Microbiomes
- Volume:
- 9
- Issue:
- 1
- ISSN:
- 2055-5008
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
Kline, Kimberly A (Ed.)ABSTRACT Biofilms provide individual bacteria with many advantages, yet dense cellular proliferation can also create intrinsic metabolic challenges including excessive acidification. Because such pH stress can be masked in buffered laboratory media—such as MSgg commonly used to studyBacillus subtilisbiofilms—it is not always clear how such biofilms cope with minimally buffered natural environments. Here, we report howB. subtilisbiofilms overcome this intrinsic metabolic challenge through an active pH regulation mechanism. Specifically, we find that these biofilms can modulate their extracellular pH to the preferred neutrophile range, even when starting from acidic and alkaline initial conditions, while planktonic cells cannot. We associate this behavior with dynamic interplay between acetate and acetoin biosynthesis and show that this mechanism is required to buffer against biofilm acidification. Furthermore, we find that buffering-deficient biofilms exhibit dysregulated biofilm development when grown in minimally buffered conditions. Our findings reveal an active pH regulation mechanism inB. subtilisbiofilms that could lead to new targets to control unwanted biofilm growth.IMPORTANCEpH is known to influence microbial growth and community dynamics in multiple bacterial species and environmental contexts. Furthermore, in many bacterial species, rapid cellular proliferation demands the use of overflow metabolism, which can often result in excessive acidification. However, in the case of bacterial communities known as biofilms, these acidification challenges can be masked when buffered laboratory media are employed to stabilize the pH environment for optimal growth. Our study reveals thatB. subtilisbiofilms use an active pH regulation mechanism to mitigate both growth-associated acidification and external pH challenges. This discovery provides new opportunities for understanding microbial communities and could lead to new methods for controlling biofilm growth outside of buffered laboratory conditions.more » « less
-
Mitchell, Aaron P. (Ed.)ABSTRACT Microbe-microbe interactions can strongly influence growth and biofilm formation kinetics. For Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Candida albicans , which are found together in diverse clinical sites, including urinary and intravenous catheters and the lungs of individuals with cystic fibrosis (CF), we compared the kinetics of biofilm formation by each species in dual-species and single-species biofilms. We engineered fluorescent protein constructs for P. aeruginosa (producing mKO-κ ) and C. albicans (producing mKate2 ) that did not alter growth and enabled single-cell resolution imaging by live-sample microscopy. Using these strains in an optically clear derivative of synthetic CF sputum medium, we found that both P. aeruginosa and C. albicans displayed increased biovolume accumulation—by three- and sixfold, respectively—in dual-species biofilms relative to single-species biofilms. This result was specific to the biofilm environment, as enhanced growth was not observed in planktonic cocultures. Stimulation of C. albicans biofilm formation occurred regardless of whether P. aeruginosa was added at the time of fungal inoculation or 24 h after the initiation of biofilm development. P. aeruginosa biofilm increases in cocultures did not require the Pel extracellular polysaccharide, phenazines, and siderophores known to influence C. albicans . P. aeruginosa mutants lacking Anr, LasR, and BapA were not significantly stimulated by C. albicans , but they still promoted a significant enhancement of biofilm development of the fungus, suggesting a fungal response to the presence of bacteria. Last, we showed that a set of P. aeruginosa clinical isolates also prompted an increase of biovolume by C. albicans in coculture. IMPORTANCE There is an abundance of work on both P. aeruginosa and C. albicans in isolation, and quite some work as well on the way these two microbes interact. These studies do not, however, consider biofilm environments under flow, and our results here show that the expected outcome of interaction between these two pathogens can actually be reversed under flow, from pure antagonism to an increase in biomass on the part of both. Our work also highlights the importance of cellular-scale spatial structure in biofilms for understanding multispecies population dynamics.more » « less
-
van_Kessel, Julia C (Ed.)ABSTRACT Bacterial motility plays a crucial role in biofilm development, yet the underlying mechanism remains not fully understood. Here, we demonstrate that the flagellum-driven motility ofPseudomonas aeruginosaenhances biofilm formation by altering the orientation of bacterial cells, an effect controlled by shear stress rather than shear rate. By tracking wild-typeP. aeruginosaand its non-motile mutants in a microfluidic channel, we demonstrate that while non-motile cells align with the flow, many motile cells can orient toward the channel sidewalls, enhancing cell surface attachment and increasing biofilm cell density by up to 10-fold. Experiments with varying fluid viscosities further demonstrate that bacterial swimming speed decreases with increasing fluid viscosity, and the cell orientation scales with the shear stress rather than shear rate. Our results provide a quantitative framework to predict the role of motility in the orientation and biofilm development under different flow conditions and viscosities.IMPORTANCEBiofilms are ubiquitous in rivers, water pipes, and medical devices, impacting the environment and human health. While bacterial motility plays a crucial role in biofilm development, a mechanistic understanding remains limited, hindering our ability to predict and control biofilms. Here, we reveal how the motility ofPseudomonas aeruginosa, a common pathogen, influences biofilm formation through systematically controlled microfluidic experiments with confocal and high-speed microscopy. We demonstrate that the orientation of bacterial cells is controlled by shear stress. While non-motile cells primarily align with the flow, many motile cells overcome the fluid shear forces and reorient toward the channel sidewalls, increasing biofilm cell density by up to 10-fold. Our findings provide insights into how bacterial transition from free-swimming to surface-attached states under varying flow conditions, emphasizing the role of cell orientation in biofilm establishment. These results enhance our understanding of bacterial behavior in flow environments, informing strategies for biofilm management and control.more » « less
-
Villanueva, Laura (Ed.)ABSTRACT Most microorganisms exist in biofilms, which comprise aggregates of cells surrounded by an extracellular matrix that provides protection from external stresses. Based on the conditions under which they form, biofilm structures vary in significant ways. For instance, biofilms that develop when microbes are incubated under static conditions differ from those formed when microbes encounter the shear forces of a flowing liquid. Moreover, biofilms develop dynamically over time. Here, we describe a cost-effective coverslip holder, printed with a three-dimensional (3D) printer, that facilitates surface adhesion assays under a broad range of standing and shaking culture conditions. This m ulti p anel ad hesion (mPAD) mount further allows cultures to be sampled at multiple time points, ensuring consistency and comparability between samples and enabling analyses of the dynamics of biofilm formation. As a proof of principle, using the mPAD mount for shaking, oxic cultures, we confirm previous flow chamber experiments showing that the Pseudomonas aeruginosa wild-type strain and a phenazine deletion mutant (Δ phz ) strain form biofilms with similar structure but reduced density in the mutant strain. Extending this analysis to anoxic conditions, we reveal that microcolony formation and biofilm formation can only be observed under shaking conditions and are decreased in the Δ phz mutant compared to wild-type cultures, indicating that phenazines are crucial for the formation of biofilms if oxygen as an electron acceptor is unavailable. Furthermore, while the model archaeon Haloferax volcanii does not require archaella for surface attachment under static conditions, we demonstrate that an H. volcanii mutant that lacks archaella is impaired in early stages of biofilm formation under shaking conditions. IMPORTANCE Due to the versatility of the mPAD mount, we anticipate that it will aid the analysis of biofilm formation in a broad range of bacteria and archaea. Thereby, it contributes to answering critical biological questions about the regulatory and structural components of biofilm formation and understanding this process in a wide array of environmental, biotechnological, and medical contexts.more » « less
