skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Title: Impacts of hydrodynamic conditions and microscale surface roughness on the critical shear stress to develop and thickness of early‐stage Pseudomonas putida biofilms
Abstract Biofilms can increase pathogenic contamination of drinking water, cause biofilm‐related diseases, alter the sediment erosion rate, and degrade contaminants in wastewater. Compared with mature biofilms, biofilms in the early‐stage have been shown to be more susceptible to antimicrobials and easier to remove. Mechanistic understanding of physical factors controlling early‐stage biofilm growth is critical to predict and control biofilm development, yet such understanding is currently incomplete. Here, we reveal the impacts of hydrodynamic conditions and microscale surface roughness on the development of early‐stagePseudomonas putidabiofilm through a combination of microfluidic experiments, numerical simulations, and fluid mechanics theories. We demonstrate that early‐stage biofilm growth is suppressed under high flow conditions and that the local velocity for early‐stageP. putidabiofilms (growth time < 14 h) to develop is about 50 μm/s, which is similar toP. putida's swimming speed. We further illustrate that microscale surface roughness promotes the growth of early‐stage biofilms by increasing the area of the low‐flow region. Furthermore, we show that the critical average shear stress, above which early‐stage biofilms cease to form, is 0.9 Pa for rough surfaces, three times as large as the value for flat or smooth surfaces (0.3 Pa). The important control of flow conditions and microscale surface roughness on early‐stage biofilm development, characterized in this study, will facilitate future predictions and managements of early‐stageP. putidabiofilm development on the surfaces of drinking water pipelines, bioreactors, and sediments in aquatic environments.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
2236497
PAR ID:
10525189
Author(s) / Creator(s):
;
Publisher / Repository:
Wiley
Date Published:
Journal Name:
Biotechnology and Bioengineering
Volume:
120
Issue:
7
ISSN:
0006-3592
Page Range / eLocation ID:
1797 to 1808
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. Abstract Biofilms play critical roles in wastewater treatment, bioremediation, and medical-device-related infections. Understanding the dynamics of biofilm formation and growth is essential for controlling and exploiting their properties. However, the majority of current studies have focused on the impact of steady flows on biofilm growth, while flow fluctuations are common in natural and engineered systems such as water pipes and blood vessels. Here, we reveal the effects of flow fluctuations on the development ofPseudomonas putidabiofilms through systematic microfluidic experiments and the development of a theoretical model. Our experimental results showed that biofilm growth under fluctuating flow conditions followed three phases: lag, exponential, and fluctuation phases. In contrast, biofilm growth under steady-flow conditions followed four phases: lag, exponential, stationary, and decline phases. Furthermore, we demonstrated that low-frequency flow fluctuations promoted biofilm growth, while high-frequency fluctuations inhibited its development. We attributed the contradictory impacts of flow fluctuations on biofilm growth to the adjustment time (T0) needed for biofilm to grow after the shear stress changed from high to low. Furthermore, we developed a theoretical model that explains the observed biofilm growth under fluctuating flow conditions. Our insights into the mechanisms underlying biofilm development under fluctuating flows can inform the design of strategies to control biofilm formation in diverse natural and engineered systems. 
    more » « less
  2. van_Kessel, Julia C (Ed.)
    ABSTRACT Bacterial motility plays a crucial role in biofilm development, yet the underlying mechanism remains not fully understood. Here, we demonstrate that the flagellum-driven motility ofPseudomonas aeruginosaenhances biofilm formation by altering the orientation of bacterial cells, an effect controlled by shear stress rather than shear rate. By tracking wild-typeP. aeruginosaand its non-motile mutants in a microfluidic channel, we demonstrate that while non-motile cells align with the flow, many motile cells can orient toward the channel sidewalls, enhancing cell surface attachment and increasing biofilm cell density by up to 10-fold. Experiments with varying fluid viscosities further demonstrate that bacterial swimming speed decreases with increasing fluid viscosity, and the cell orientation scales with the shear stress rather than shear rate. Our results provide a quantitative framework to predict the role of motility in the orientation and biofilm development under different flow conditions and viscosities.IMPORTANCEBiofilms are ubiquitous in rivers, water pipes, and medical devices, impacting the environment and human health. While bacterial motility plays a crucial role in biofilm development, a mechanistic understanding remains limited, hindering our ability to predict and control biofilms. Here, we reveal how the motility ofPseudomonas aeruginosa, a common pathogen, influences biofilm formation through systematically controlled microfluidic experiments with confocal and high-speed microscopy. We demonstrate that the orientation of bacterial cells is controlled by shear stress. While non-motile cells primarily align with the flow, many motile cells overcome the fluid shear forces and reorient toward the channel sidewalls, increasing biofilm cell density by up to 10-fold. Our findings provide insights into how bacterial transition from free-swimming to surface-attached states under varying flow conditions, emphasizing the role of cell orientation in biofilm establishment. These results enhance our understanding of bacterial behavior in flow environments, informing strategies for biofilm management and control. 
    more » « less
  3. Abstract Biofilms are subjected to many environmental pressures that can influence community structure and physiology. In the oral cavity, and many other environments, biofilms are exposed to forces generated by fluid flow; however, our understanding of how oral biofilms respond to these forces remains limited. In this study, we developed a linear rocker model of fluid flow to study the impact of shear forces onStreptococcus gordoniiand dental plaque‐derived multispecies biofilms. We observed that as shear forces increased,S. gordoniibiofilm biomass decreased. Reduced biomass was largely independent of overall bacterial growth. Transcriptome analysis ofS. gordoniibiofilms exposed to moderate levels of shear stress uncovered numerous genes with differential expression under shear. We also evaluated an ex vivo plaque biofilm exposed to fluid shear forces. LikeS. gordonii, the plaque biofilm displayed decreased biomass as shear forces increased. Examination of plaque community composition revealed decreased diversity and compositional changes in the plaque biofilm exposed to shear. These studies help to elucidate the impact of fluid shear on oral bacteria and may be extended to other bacterial biofilm systems. 
    more » « less
  4. ABSTRACT Bacteria form complex multicellular structures on solid surfaces known as biofilms, which allow them to survive in harsh environments. A hallmark characteristic of mature biofilms is the high-level antibiotic tolerance (up to 1,000 times) compared with that of planktonic cells. Here, we report our new findings that biofilm cells are not always more tolerant to antibiotics than planktonic cells in the same culture. Specifically, Escherichia coli RP437 exhibited a dynamic change in antibiotic susceptibility during its early-stage biofilm formation. This phenomenon was not strain specific. Upon initial attachment, surface-associated cells became more sensitive to antibiotics than planktonic cells. By controlling the cell adhesion and cluster size using patterned E. coli biofilms, cells involved in the interaction between cell clusters during microcolony formation were found to be more susceptible to ampicillin than cells within clusters, suggesting a role of cell-cell interactions in biofilm-associated antibiotic tolerance. After this stage, biofilm cells became less susceptible to ampicillin and ofloxacin than planktonic cells. However, when the cells were detached by sonication, both antibiotics were more effective in killing the detached biofilm cells than the planktonic cells. Collectively, these results indicate that biofilm formation involves active cellular activities in adaption to the attached life form and interactions between cell clusters to build the complex structure of a biofilm, which can render these cells more susceptible to antibiotics. These findings shed new light on bacterial antibiotic susceptibility during biofilm formation and can guide the design of better antifouling surfaces, e.g., those with micron-scale topographic structures to interrupt cell-cell interactions. IMPORTANCE Mature biofilms are known for their high-level tolerance to antibiotics; however, antibiotic susceptibility of sessile cells during early-stage biofilm formation is not well understood. In this study, we aim to fill this knowledge gap by following bacterial antibiotic susceptibility during early-stage biofilm formation. We found that the attached cells have a dynamic change in antibiotic susceptibility, and during certain phases, they can be more sensitive to antibiotics than planktonic counterparts in the same culture. Using surface chemistry-controlled patterned biofilm formation, cell-surface and cell-cell interactions were found to affect the antibiotic susceptibility of attached cells. Collectively, these findings provide new insights into biofilm physiology and reveal how adaptation to the attached life form may influence antibiotic susceptibility of bacterial cells. 
    more » « less
  5. Kline, Kimberly A (Ed.)
    ABSTRACT Biofilms provide individual bacteria with many advantages, yet dense cellular proliferation can also create intrinsic metabolic challenges including excessive acidification. Because such pH stress can be masked in buffered laboratory media—such as MSgg commonly used to studyBacillus subtilisbiofilms—it is not always clear how such biofilms cope with minimally buffered natural environments. Here, we report howB. subtilisbiofilms overcome this intrinsic metabolic challenge through an active pH regulation mechanism. Specifically, we find that these biofilms can modulate their extracellular pH to the preferred neutrophile range, even when starting from acidic and alkaline initial conditions, while planktonic cells cannot. We associate this behavior with dynamic interplay between acetate and acetoin biosynthesis and show that this mechanism is required to buffer against biofilm acidification. Furthermore, we find that buffering-deficient biofilms exhibit dysregulated biofilm development when grown in minimally buffered conditions. Our findings reveal an active pH regulation mechanism inB. subtilisbiofilms that could lead to new targets to control unwanted biofilm growth.IMPORTANCEpH is known to influence microbial growth and community dynamics in multiple bacterial species and environmental contexts. Furthermore, in many bacterial species, rapid cellular proliferation demands the use of overflow metabolism, which can often result in excessive acidification. However, in the case of bacterial communities known as biofilms, these acidification challenges can be masked when buffered laboratory media are employed to stabilize the pH environment for optimal growth. Our study reveals thatB. subtilisbiofilms use an active pH regulation mechanism to mitigate both growth-associated acidification and external pH challenges. This discovery provides new opportunities for understanding microbial communities and could lead to new methods for controlling biofilm growth outside of buffered laboratory conditions. 
    more » « less