An official website of the United States government
Twenty-six students participated in an NSF GEOPATHs funded undergraduate research experience. This experience consisted of a two-week field-based summer research course and a follow-up 15-week course-based undergraduate research experience. The goal of this project was to attract, retain, and graduate a diverse group of students into a new Environmental Geology BS program. Hispanic and female students were targeted for the cohorts. 58% of our cohort were female, 27% were Hispanic, and 8% were black. The students were split into two groups. One group focused on barrier island groundwater in Southwest Florida and the other group studied calcite from Southwest Florida. Students in the groundwater cohort learned how to install temporary groundwater wells, collect groundwater and surface water samples, use probes and laboratory methods to measure water quality. Students in the calcite group learned how to collect and prepare samples for analytical work and use advanced instrumentation to determine the calcite’s unit cells, atomic bonding, and classification. Summative assessments based on Creative Exercises of Lewis et al. (2010) were given as pre- and post-tests during the summer field courses and again at the end of the fall course. A combined mean score for the summer pre-tests was 45%, while the fall post-tests score was 68%. A paired samples t-test for the combined summer assessment suggests a statistically significant difference between the pre- and post-test scores (t-score = 2.06; P = 2.55 x 10-6). An attitude assessment was based on Lopatto (2010) CURE survey and was given at the end of both courses. The students indicated this research experience increased their confidence to: conduct more research, and research with an outdoor component; help them identify as a scientist; and, positively influenced their decision to major in environmental geology. The students also indicated the location of the research experiences in Southwest Florida caused them to be more invested in the research. This suggests sense of place was impactful to the students’ positive experiences during this project.
more »
« less
The results of a course-based undergraduate research experience to attract and retain students to geoscience. A combined summer and fall experience
Twenty-five students over two years participated in an NSF GEOPATHs funded two-week, field-based summer research course and a follow up 15-week course-based undergraduate research experience (CURE). The goal was to attract, retain, and graduate a diverse group of students into an Environmental Geology program. Hispanic and female students were targeted for the cohorts, and 58% were female, 27% were Hispanic, and 8% were black. The students were split into two groups which worked in SW Florida. One group focused on surface water and groundwater in barrier islands and the other group studied calcite. Students in the surface water/groundwater group learned how to install temporary groundwater wells, collected groundwater and surface water samples, and analyzed water chemistry. Students in the calcite group learned how to collect field samples, prepare samples for analysis, and use advanced instrumentation to determine the calcite samples’ unit cells, atomic bonding, and classification. An attitude assessment, based on Lopatto (2010), was given at the end of both the summer and fall course. The students indicated that this research experience increased their confidence to conduct more research which occurs outdoors, help them identify as a scientist, and positively influenced their decision to major in Environmental Geology. Compared to the two-week summer program, survey results showed a slight decrease in students’ interest in the semester-long Fall course. Ninety six percent of the students indicated the SW Florida location caused them to be more invested in the research experiences, suggesting a sense of place was important to the students’ positive experiences during this project. Summer pre-test scores on summative assessments, based on Lewis et al. (2020), had a mean of 44% while the post-test had a mean of 68%. The Fall post-test mean increased to 88%. Paired t-tests for the summer and fall assessments show a statistically significant difference between the pre- and post-test scores. The students seemed to have a slightly more positive attitude towards research and geology as a result of the field experience, but their learning was higher after the semester-long CURE course. Fifty six percent of the cohort graduated with a degree in geoscience; 79% of the cohort currently have jobs in the geoscience sector or are attending graduate school the rest are still enrolled.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 1911476
- PAR ID:
- 10476444
- Publisher / Repository:
- Geological Society of America
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Geological Society of America, Abstracts with Programs
- Volume:
- 55
- Issue:
- 6
- Page Range / eLocation ID:
- 10.1130/abs/2023AM-391303
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
null (Ed.)Course-based undergraduate research experiences (CUREs) are well-documented as high-impact practices that can broaden participation and success in STEM. Drawing primarily from a community-of-practice theoretical framework, we previously developed an interdisciplinary CURE course (Science Bootcamp) for STEM majors focused entirely on the scientific process. Among first-year students, Science Bootcamp leads to psychosocial gains and increased retention. In the current study, we test whether an online Science Bootcamp also improves outcomes for STEM transfer students—a group that faces “transfer shock,” which can negatively impact GPA, psychosocial outcomes, and retention. To this end, we redesigned Science Bootcamp to a two-week course for STEM transfer students to complete prior to beginning the fall semester at our four-year institution. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the course was conducted in an entirely virtual format, using primarily synchronous instruction. Despite the course being virtual, the diverse group of STEM majors worked in small groups to conduct rigorous, novel empirical research projects from start to finish, even presenting their results in a poster symposium. Assessment data confirm the compressed, online Science Bootcamp contains key CURE components—opportunities for collaboration, discovery/relevance, and iteration—and that students were highly satisfied with the course. Moreover, in line with our hypothesis, STEM transfer students who participated in the online Science Bootcamp experienced a range of psychosocial gains (e.g., belonging to STEM). In sum, these findings suggest our online Science Bootcamp promotes positive STEM outcomes, representing a highly flexible and affordable CURE that can be scaled for use at institutions of any size.more » « less
-
null (Ed.)Here we evaluate undergraduate student attitudes about science after each of three authentic research experiences in a semester of an introductory biology laboratory course at Utah State University. The three course-based research experiences (CUREs) vary in length and student freedom, and they cover different areas of biology. Students responded to the science attitude items of the CURE Survey. When compared to national data, our students faired similarly, and all students struggled with certain epistemic assumptions about science knowledge. As also seen in the national database, change in science attitude was slight and nonlinear. Student self confidence in what a career scientist is and in scientific process skills was the best predictor of scientific maturity, not the three CUREs or other aspects of students’ background. We discuss the slight positive and negative change in attitude we did influence, and we note that most students would choose to have another research experience.more » « less
-
The COVID-19 outbreak has had a significant impact on higher education worldwide. In-person courses had to be quickly transited to online, including lab courses embedded with Course-based Undergraduate Research Experiences (CUREs). In response to this challenge, we successfully converted a fully in-person biochemistry lab that integrated with a 6-week modular CURE (mCURE) into a hybrid CURE (hCURE) in Fall 2020, with support from the Malate dehydrogenase CUREs Community. The hCURE was structured to have in-person labs and online activities arranged on an alternating weekly basis, so that only half of the regular class size of students attended the hands-on labs at any given time to maintain proper social distancing. To evaluate the efficacy of the hCURE, student science self-efficacy and conceptual understanding of protein structure–function relationships were measured using pre-course and post-course surveys and tests, respectively. Our data showed a significant increase in student science self-efficacy and conceptual knowledge test scores. Furthermore, we compared the pre-lab quiz scores that assessed various biochemical concepts and skills across three different semesters, Fall 2019 with a fully in-person mCURE before the pandemic, Fall 2020 with the hCURE implemented during the pandemic, and Fall 2021 when the lab returned to the fully in-person mCURE following the pandemic. A significant decline in quiz scores from Fall 2019 to Fall 2020, and an even further decline from Fall 2019 to Fall 2021 were observed, suggesting that apart from the impact of course modality, the pandemic may have exerted a lasting adverse effect on student learning.more » « less
-
The Academy of Engineering Success (AcES), supported by an NSF S-STEM grant since 2016, employs literature-based, best practices to support and retain students in engineering. AcES students participate in a one-week summer bridge experience; a common fall semester course focused on professional development, time management and study skills, and career exploration; and a common spring semester course emphasizing the role of engineers in societal development. Students are also immersed in co-curricular activities with the goals of fostering feelings of institutional inclusion and belonging in engineering, providing academic support and student success skills, and professional development. AcES students participate in the GRIT, LAESE, and MSLQ surveys at the start and end of each fall semester and at the end of the spring semester each year. Focus group data is collected at the beginning, middle and end of each semester and one-on-one interviews occur at the start and end of each semester. The surveys provide a measure of students’ GRIT, general self-efficacy, engineering self-efficacy, test anxiety, math outcome efficacy, intrinsic value of learning, inclusion, career expectations, and coping efficacy. A previous study, based on an analysis of the 2017 AcES cohort survey responses, produced a surprising result. When the responses of AcES students who retained were compared to the responses of AcES students who left engineering, those who left engineering had higher baseline values of GRIT, career expectations, engineering self-efficacy, and math outcome efficacy than those students who retained. These results appear to support the Kruger-Dunning effect. This paper presents the subsequent analysis of two years of participant data, the 2017 and 2018 cohorts, to further explore the possibility or the strength of this effect for these students and investigates possible reasons for the results.more » « less
