An official website of the United States government
This data package includes an ArcMap geodatabase for the Chihuahuan Desert Rangeland Research Center (CDRRC) pastures 1, 4, 14, and 15: one polygon feature class, one point feature class, associated attribute tables and metadata. The spatial data, CDRRC1_4_14_15_StateMap_v1.gdb.zip, represents the ecological sites and states on Pastures 1, 4, 14 and 15 on the Chihuahuan Desert Rangeland Research Center, and includes field traverse data. CDRRC1_4_14_15_StateMapMetadata.pdf and TraversePointsMetadata.pdf contain the geospatial metadata provided by ArcMap. CDRRC1_4_14_15_StateMap_v1.csv is the attribute table associated with the state map’s polygon feature class, and TraversePoints.xlsx is the attribute table associated with the traverse points feature class and includes a sheet containing detailed attribute metadata.
more »
« less
Map of ecological sites and ecological states for the USDA Jornada Experimental Range
This data package includes an ArcMap geodatabase: a polygon feature class, associated attribute table and metadata. The spatial data, JERStateMap_v1.gdb.zip, represents the ecological sites and states on the Jornada Experimental Range. The attribute table for the spatial data, JERStateMap.csv, and a summary of the spatial metadata, JERStateMapMetadata.pdf, are also included.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 2025166
- PAR ID:
- 10476962
- Publisher / Repository:
- Environmental Data Initiative
- Date Published:
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
The research data repository of the Environmental Data Initiative (EDI) is building on over 30 years of data curation research and experience in the National Science Foundation-funded US Long-Term Ecological Research (LTER) Network. It provides mature functionalities, well established workflows, and now publishes all ‘long-tail’ environmental data. High quality scientific metadata are enforced through automatic checks against community developed rules and the Ecological Metadata Language (EML) standard. Although the EDI repository is far along in making its data findable, accessible, interoperable, and reusable (FAIR), representatives from EDI and the LTER are developing best practices for the edge cases in environmental data publishing. One of these is the vast amount of imagery taken in the context of ecological research, ranging from wildlife camera traps to plankton imaging systems to aerial photography. Many images are used in biodiversity research for community analyses (e.g., individual counts, species cover, biovolume, productivity), while others are taken to study animal behavior and landscape-level change. Some examples from the LTER Network include: using photos of a heron colony to measure provisioning rates for chicks (Clarkson and Erwin 2018) or identifying changes in plant cover and functional type through time (Peters et al. 2020). Multi-spectral images are employed to identify prairie species. Underwater photo quads are used to monitor changes in benthic biodiversity (Edmunds 2015). Sosik et al. (2020) used a continuous Imaging FlowCytobot to identify and measure phyto- and microzooplankton. Cameras at McMurdo Dry Valleys assess snow and ice cover on Antarctic lakes allowing estimation of primary production (Myers 2019). It has been standard practice to publish numerical data extracted from images in EDI; however, the supporting imagery generally has not been made publicly available. Our goal in developing best practices for documenting and archiving these images is for them to be discovered and re-used. Our examples demonstrate several issues. The research questions, and hence, the image subjects are variable. Images frequently come in logical sets of time series. The size of such sets can be large and only some images may be contributed to a dedicated specialized repository. Finally, these images are taken in a larger monitoring context where many other environmental data are collected at the same time and location. Currently, a typical approach to publishing image data in EDI are packages containing compressed (ZIP or tar) files with the images, a directory manifest with additional image-specific metadata, and a package-level EML metadata file. Images in the compressed archive may be organized within directories with filenames corresponding to treatments, locations, time periods, individuals, or other grouping attributes. Additionally, the directory manifest table has columns for each attribute. Package-level metadata include standard coverage elements (e.g., date, time, location) and sampling methods. This approach of archiving logical ‘sets’ of images reduces the effort of providing metadata for each image when most information would be repeated, but at the expense of not making every image individually searchable. The latter may be overcome if the provided manifest contains standard metadata that would allow searching and automatic integration with other images.more » « less
-
Zooplankton are sampled on Northeast U.S. Shelf Long-Term Ecological Research (NES-LTER) Transect cruises in summer and winter seasons in oblique tows with a bongo net equipped with two mesh sizes (335 micron and 150 micron). Tows are conducted at standard stations L1 to L11 along longitude 70 deg 53 min W extending southward from near Martha’s Vineyard, Massachusetts, to approximately 150 km offshore. Counts for taxa morphologically identified from the 335 micron net were provided by the Northeast Fisheries Science Center of the NOAA National Marine Fisheries Service. Counts were divided by volume and multiplied by depth sampled for abundance as per meter squared. The first version of this data package provides the abundance of 14 taxa from the 335 micron net for cruises in 2018 - 2020 in a described data table, as well as a supplemental table for the tow metadata.more » « less
-
Abstract This paper summarizes the open community conventions developed by the Ecological Forecasting Initiative (EFI) for the common formatting and archiving of ecological forecasts and the metadata associated with these forecasts. Such open standards are intended to promote interoperability and facilitate forecast communication, distribution, validation, and synthesis. For output files, we first describe the convention conceptually in terms of global attributes, forecast dimensions, forecasted variables, and ancillary indicator variables. We then illustrate the application of this convention to the two file formats that are currently preferred by the EFI, netCDF (network common data form), and comma‐separated values (CSV), but note that the convention is extensible to future formats. For metadata, EFI's convention identifies a subset of conventional metadata variables that are required (e.g., temporal resolution and output variables) but focuses on developing a framework for storing information about forecast uncertainty propagation, data assimilation, and model complexity, which aims to facilitate cross‐forecast synthesis. The initial application of this convention expands upon the Ecological Metadata Language (EML), a commonly used metadata standard in ecology. To facilitate community adoption, we also provide a Github repository containing a metadata validator tool and several vignettes in R and Python on how to both write and read in the EFI standard. Lastly, we provide guidance on forecast archiving, making an important distinction between short‐term dissemination and long‐term forecast archiving, while also touching on the archiving of code and workflows. Overall, the EFI convention is a living document that can continue to evolve over time through an open community process.more » « less
-
In the metadata of digital environmental datasets, automated processing is hindered by the wide variety of representations for unit that may be human-readable, but may not be unambiguous or machine-interpretable, (e.g., grams per square meter, gm/m2, g/m2, gm-2, g/m^2, g.m-2, g m-2 and gramPerMeterSquared). Matching disparate representations of the same unit into a single unit concept from an ontology assists with interpretation and reuse by providing a linkage to a complete unit definitions with label, description, dimensions. Datasets with shared units can be identified during searches, and are more suitable for automating analyses and potential transformation. This dataset contains data and code associated with a project to map units in ecological metadata collected between 2013 and 2022 by DataONE, the Environmental Data Initiative and the U.S. National Ecological Observatory Network to the QUDT ontology using successive string transformations. Data entities include a) raw metadata as received (355,057 unit instances); b) integrated raw data; c) substitution tables for string transformations; d) resulting lookup table for 896 distinct units matched to QUDT units; e) associated R code used for QUDT matching plus a web service and R functions for adding annotation elements to Ecological Metadata Language metadata documents. Using these substitutions and code, 91% of unit instances in the raw metadata could be matched to QUDT. Data and results are discussed in “Porter JH, M O’Brien, M Frants, S Earl, M Martin, C Laney. (in review) Using a Units Ontology to Annotate Pre-Existing Metadata. Submitted to Scientific Data.more » « less
