An official website of the United States government
Locations of groundwater discharging to surface water are hydrologically and ecologically important for nutrient processing and thermal refugia, yet little is known about the spatial distribution of groundwater discharges at the river network scale. Groundwater discharge locations can be used to identify anomalous groundwater discharging to surface water as colder groundwater interfaces with warmer surface water in late summer. This data release contains GPS locations, thermal infrared images, and direct temperature measurements of groundwater discharges throughout the Farmington and Housatonic River watersheds. These data were collected in late summer/ early fall 2019 to characterize the spatial distribution of groundwater discharges throughout the Farmington and Housatonic River networks. The initial data release contains groundwater discharge locations and associated thermal images along the Salmon Brook River in the Farmington River watershed. Additional data for the Farmington and Housatonic River watersheds will be added to this dataset in the future. This dataset contains 3 files: 1) SalmonBrook_FLIR.zip is a zipped directory containing thermal infrared and real color images. 2) SalmonBrook_Image_Details.csv contains attribute information for each thermal image. 3) SalmonBrook_Seeps.shp is an ESRI shapefile of the groundwater discharge locations with FLIR thermal images and field notes. Files associated with this shapefile include: the database file SalmonBrook_Seeps.dbf, the projection file SalmonBrook_Seeps.prj, and the geodatabse file SalmonBrook_Seeps.shx. 4) LegacyN_FLIR_2019_readme is a high level readme text file that describes all of the files on the root landing page.
more »
« less
Passive seismic depth to bedrock data collected along streams of the Farmington River watershed, CT, USA
Using the horizontal-to-vertical spectral-ratio (HVSR) method, we infer regolith thickness (i.e., depth to bedrock) throughout the Farmington River Watershed, CT, USA. Between Nov. 2019 and Nov. 2020, MOHO Tromino Model TEP-3C (MOHO, S.R.L.) three-component seismometers collected passive seismic recordings along the Farmington River and the upstream West Branch of Salmon Brook. From these recordings, we derived resonance frequencies using the GRILLA software (MOHO, S.R.L.), and then inferred potential regolith thicknesses based on likely shear wave velocities, Vs, intrinsic to the underlying sediment. Three potential shear wave velocities (Vs = 300m/s, 337m/s, 362 m/s) were considered for Farmington River watershed sediments, providing a range of potential depth estimates along the Farmington. This release contains raw passive seismic recording data, processed resonance frequency data, and the resulting inferred depth estimates displayed in both tabular and vector form. This dataset currently contains 3 zipped files: 1) ?Processed.zip? is a zipped directory containing .asc text files of processed passive seismic data, individual processed reports, tabulated results, and an associated summary text file, 'readme_Processed.txt'; 2) 'Raw.zip' contains .saf text files of passive seismic recordings and an associated 'readme_Raw.txt;' and 3) ?XYLegacyN_HVSR.zip'? contains ESRI shapefile of HVSR point locations with attribute data & a map image offering a visualization of the depth results (where, Vs = 300m/s). Additionally, the main folder contains LegacyN_HVSR_readme.txt which describes these sub-directories in further detail.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 1824820
- PAR ID:
- 10478254
- Publisher / Repository:
- U.S. Geological Survey
- Date Published:
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
We used spatial data from previously mapped preferential groundwater discharges throughout the Farmington River watershed in Connecticut and Massachusetts (https://doi.org/10.5066/P915E8JY) to guide water sample collection at known locations of groundwater discharging to surface water. In 2017 and 2019 - 2021, samples were collected during general river baseflow conditions (July ? November, less than 30.9 cms mean daily discharge (USGS gage 01189995, statistics 2010-2022) when the riverbank discharge points were exposed. We collected a suite of dissolved constituents and stable isotopes of water directly in the shallow saturated sediments of active points of discharge, and coincident stream chemical samples were also collected adjacent to locations of groundwater discharge. Data collected includes nutrients (NO3, NH4, Cl, SO4, PO4, dissolved organic carbon (DOC), and total nitrogen (TN)), greenhouse gases (CO2, CH4, and N2O), dissolved gases (N2, dissolved oxygen (DO)), conductivity, sediment characteristics, temperature, and spatial information. This dataset includes 2 main files: 1) Farmington_Chemistry_2017_2021.csv contains attribute information for each biogeochemical constituent collected at preferential groundwater discharges along the Farmington River network. 2)Farmington_Temporal_Cl_Rn_Iso_2020.csv contain attribute information for source characteristic data (Chloride, Radon, Isotope) collected at locations of repeat sampling at 5 groundwater seep faces along the Farmington River (Alsop and Rainbow Island).more » « less
-
Abstract The Indo‐Burman subduction zone represents a global endmember for extreme sediment accretion and is a region characterized by ambiguous tectonic structure. The recent collection of broadband seismic data across the Indo‐Burman accretionary margin as part of the Bangladesh‐India‐Myanmar Array (BIMA) experiment provides an opportunity to investigate the subsurface velocity structure across the incoming plate of an endmember subduction system. We construct a three‐dimensional model for seismic shear velocity using a joint inversion of surface‐ and scattered‐wave constraints. Rayleigh‐wave phase velocities measured from ambient‐noise (12–25 s) and teleseismic earthquakes (20–80 s) constrain absolute shear velocities, while we constrain the locations of and relative contrasts across significant discontinuities in the subsurface using observations from scattered‐wave imaging. From the resulting inversion, we observe two model classes that characterize the evolution of consolidation within the markedly slow uppermost sediments and metasediments along a predominantly southwest‐to‐northeast trend. We interpret variations in deeper seismic structure under two proposed scenarios: (a) a Moho of ∼21–26 km depth underlying a package of metasediments and a thinned basement component, with a slow mantle lithosphere (4.2 km/s) that may contain retained melt from the onset of India‐Antarctica seafloor spreading; or (b) a Moho of ∼51–59 km depth underlying a package of metasediments, basement, and a thick slug of mafic material, which may correspond to significant Kerguelen‐plume‐related underplating. By combining constraints from highly resolved phase‐velocity estimates and scattered‐wave images, we successfully characterize the lateral transitions across the Indo‐Burman forearc margin.more » « less
-
Dataset Description This dataset contains 6710 structural configurations and solvophobicity values for topologically and chemically diverse coarse-grained polymer chains. Additionally, 480 polymers include shear-rate dependent viscosity profiles at 2 wt% polymer concentration.The data is provided as serialized objects using the pickle Python module.All files were generated using Python version 3.10. Data There are three pickle files containing serialized Python objects. Key files include: data_aug10.pickle Contains the coarse-grained polymer dataset with 6710 entries. Each entry includes: Polymer graph Squared radius of gyration (at lambda = 0). Solvophobicity (lambda). Bead count (N). Chain virial number (Xi). topo_param_visc.pickle Shear-rate-dependent viscosity profiles of 480 polymer systems. target_curves.pickle Contains 30 target viscosity profiles used for active learning. Usage To load the dataset stored in data_aug10.pickle, use the following code: import pickle with open("data_aug10.pickle", "rb") as handle: ( (x_train, y_train, c_train, l_train, graph_train), (x_valid, y_valid, c_valid, l_valid, graph_valid), (x_test, y_test, c_test, l_test, graph_test), NAMES, SCALER, SCALER_y, le ) = pickle.load(handle) x: node features for each polymer graph y: labels (e.g., predicted properties) c: topological class indices l: topological descriptors graph: NetworkX graphs representing polymer topology NAMES: list of topological class names SCALER: fitted scaler for topological descriptors (l) SCALER_y: fitted scaler for property labels (y) le: label encoder for topological class indices To load the dataset stored in topo_param_visc.pickle, use the following code: import pickle with open("poly_data_ml.pickle", "rb") as handle: desc_all, ps_all, curve_all, shear_rate, graph_all = pickle.load(handle) desc_all: topological descriptors for each polymer graph ps_all: fitted Carreau–Yasuda model parameters curve_all: fitted viscosity curves shear_rate: shear rates corresponding to each viscosity curve graph_all: polymer graphs represented as NetworkX objects First 30: seed dataset Next 150: 5 iterations (30 each) from class-balanced space-filling Following 150: space-filling without class balancing Final 150: active learning samples To load the dataset stored in target_curves.pickle, use the following code: import pickle with open("target_curves.pickle", "rb") as handle: data = pickle.load(f) curves = data['curves']params = data['params']shear_rate = data["xx"] curves: target viscosity curves used as design objectives params: Carreau–Yasuda model parameters fitted to the target curves shear_rate: shear rate values associated with the target curves Help, Suggestions, Corrections?If you need help, have suggestions, identify issues, or have corrections, please send your comments to Shengli Jiang at sj0161@princeton.edu GitHubAdditional data and code relevant for this study is additionally accessible at https://github.com/webbtheosim/cg-topo-solvmore » « less
-
This archive contains COAWST model input, grids and initial conditions, and output used to produce the results in a submitted manuscript. The files are:</p> model_input.zip: input files for simulations presented in this paper ocean_rip_current.in: ROMS ocean model input file swan_rip_current.in: SWAN wave model input file (example with Hs=1m) coupling_rip_current.in: model coupling file rip_current.h: model header file model_grids_forcing.zip: bathymetry and initial condition files hbeach_grid_isbathy_2m.nc: ROMS bathymetry input file hbeach_grid_isbathy_2m.bot: SWAN bathymetry input file hbeach_grid_isbathy_2m.grd: SWAN grid input file hbeach_init_isbathy_14_18_17.nc: Initial temperature, cool surf zone dT=-1C case hbeach_init_isbathy_14_18_19.nc: Initial temperature, warm surf zone dT=+1C case hbeach_init_isbathy_14_18_16.nc: Initial temperature, cool surf zone dT=-2C case hbeach_init_isbathy_14_18_20.nc: Initial temperature, warm surf zone dT=+2C case hbeach_init_isbathy_14_18_17p5.nc: Initial temperature, cool surf zone dT=-0.5C case hbeach_init_isbathy_14_18_18p5.nc: Initial temperature, warm surf zone dT=+0.5C case</p> model_output files: model output used to produce the figures netcdf files, zipped variables included: x_rho (cross-shore coordinate, m) y_rho (alongshore coordinate, m) z_rho (vertical coordinate, m) ocean_time (time since initialization, s, output every 5 mins) h (bathymetry, m) temp (temperature, Celsius) dye_02 (surfzone-released dye) Hwave (wave height, m) Dissip_break (wave dissipation W/m2) ubar (cross-shore depth-average velocity, m/s, interpolated to rho-points) Case_141817.nc: cool surf zone dT=-1C Hs=1m Case_141819.nc: warm surf zone dT=+1C Hs=1m Case_141816.nc: cool surf zone dT=-2C Hs=1m Case_141820.nc: warm surf zone dT=-2C Hs=1m Case_141817p5.nc: cool surf zone dT=-0.5C Hs=1m Case_141818p5.nc: warm surf zone dT=+0.5C Hs=1m Case_141817_Hp5.nc: cool surf zone dT=-1C Hs=0.5m Case_141819_Hp5.nc: warm surf zone dT=+1C Hs=0.5m Case_141817_Hp75.nc: cool surf zone dT=-1C Hs=0.75m Case_141819_Hp75.nc: warm surf zone dT=+1C Hs=0.75m</p> COAWST is an open source code and can be download at https://coawstmodel-trac.sourcerepo.com/coawstmodel_COAWST/. Descriptions of the input and output files can be found in the manual distributed with the model code and in the glossary at the end of the ocean.in file.</p> Corresponding author: Melissa Moulton, mmoulton@uw.edu</p>more » « less
