skip to main content

Explore Research Products in the NSF-PAR

Title: Electroencephalogram Experimentation to Understand Creativity of Mechanical Engineering Students
Abstract

Electroencephalogram (EEG) alpha power (8–13 Hz) is a characteristic of various creative task conditions and is involved in creative ideation. Alpha power varies as a function of creativity-related task demands. This study investigated the event-related potentials (ERPs), alpha power activation, and potential machine learning (ML) to classify the neural responses of engineering students involved with creativity task. All participants performed a modified alternate uses task (AUT), in which participants categorized functions (or uses) for everyday objects as either creative, nonsense, or common. At first, this study investigated the fundamental ERPs over central and parietooccipital temporal areas. The bio-responses to understand creativity in engineering students demonstrates that nonsensical and creative stimuli elicit larger N400 amplitudes (−1.107 mV and −0.755 mV, respectively) than common uses (0.0859 mV) on the 300–500 ms window. N400 effect was observed on 300–500 ms window from the grand average waveforms of each electrode of interest. ANOVA analysis identified a significant main effect: decreased alpha power during creative ideation, especially over (O1/2, P7/8) parietooccipital temporal area. Machine learning is used to classify the specific temporal area data’s neural responses (creative, nonsense, and common). A k-nearest neighbors (kNN) classifier was used, and results were evaluated in terms of accuracy, precision, recall, and F1- score using the collected datasets from the participants. With an overall 99.92% accuracy and area under the curve at 0.9995, the kNN classifier successfully classified the participants’ neural responses. These results have great potential for broader adaptation of machine learning techniques in creativity research.

  more » « less
Award ID(s):
1726358
NSF-PAR ID:
10483187
Author(s) / Creator(s):
; ; ; ;
Publisher / Repository:
ASME
Date Published:
Journal Name:
ASME Open Journal of Engineering
Volume:
2
ISSN:
2770-3495
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. ; ; ; ( , Paper presented at 2019 Annual Conference)
    null (Ed.)
    Engineering programs, in general, do not explicitly address the need to enhance divergent thinking. To a certain extent this is due to a lack in knowledge on the cognitive and neural mechanisms underlying divergent thinking, and creative ideation more generally. We hypothesize that we can help enhance our students’ divergent thinking and creative processing outcomes by investigating the impacts of carefully selected methods and tools enabled by developments in the robust analysis of engineering ideation performance, and neurocognitive responses to creativity. In this paper, we present an experiment using the Event-Related brain Potentials (ERP) technique and creative language use (funded by Core R&D Programs). More specifically, we collected ERP responses to literal, nonsense, and novel metaphorical sentences that were either referring to engineering knowledge or general knowledge, testing engineering and non-engineering students. Following Rutter et al. [1], sentences differed in verb only and had been classified in prior sentence norming studies as highly unusual and highly appropriate (novel metaphors), low unusual and highly appropriate (literal sentences), and highly unusual and low appropriate (nonsense sentences). Participants read sentences while their EEG was recorded, and after reading the sentence made judgments about its unusualness and appropriateness. The findings indicate that prior knowledge modulates novel metaphor processing at the stage of lexico–semantic access, indexed by the amplitude of N400 component. Specifically, N400 amplitudes to novel metaphorical sentences are significantly reduced and pattern with literal sentences in engineers; in nonengineers, by contrast, we observed increased N400 amplitudes to novel metaphorical sentences that pattern with anomalous sentences. This mirror effect on the N400 corroborates recent findings demonstrating a strong impact of prior experience and expertise on meaning ambiguity resolution, which may in turn have implications for creative cognition. 
    more » « less
  2. ; ; ; ; ; ( , Clinical EEG and Neuroscience)

    The mismatch negativity (MMN) event-related potential (ERP) indexes relatively automatic detection of changes in sensory stimuli and is typically attenuated in individuals with schizophrenia. However, contributions of different frequencies of electroencephalographic (EEG) activity to the MMN and the later P3a attentional orienting response in schizophrenia are poorly understood and were the focus of the present study. Participants with a schizophrenia-spectrum disorder ( n = 85) and non-psychiatric control participants ( n = 74) completed a passive auditory oddball task containing 10% 50 ms “deviant” tones and 90% 100 ms “standard” tones. EEG data were analyzed using spatial principal component analysis (PCA) applied to wavelet-based time-frequency analysis and MMN and P3a ERPs. The schizophrenia group compared to the control group had smaller MMN amplitudes and lower deviant-minus-standard theta but not alpha event-related spectral perturbation (ERSP) after accounting for participant age and sex. Larger MMN and P3a amplitudes but not latencies were correlated with greater theta and alpha time-frequency activity. Multiple linear regression analyses revealed that control participants showed robust relationships between larger MMN amplitudes and greater deviant-minus-standard theta inter-trial coherence (ITC) and between larger P3a amplitudes and greater deviant-minus-standard theta ERSP, whereas these dynamic neural processes were less tightly coupled in participants with a schizophrenia-spectrum disorder. Study results help clarify frequency-based contributions of time-domain (ie, ERP) responses and indicate a potential disturbance in the neural dynamics of detecting change in sensory stimuli in schizophrenia. Overall, findings add to the growing body of evidence that psychotic illness is associated with widespread neural dysfunction in the theta frequency band.

     
    more » « less
  3. ; ; ; ; ( , Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience)
    null (Ed.)
    Recent studies of creative cognition have revealed interactions between functional brain networks involved in the generation of novel ideas; however, the neural basis of creativity is highly complex and presents a great challenge in the field of cognitive neuroscience, partly because of ambiguity around how to assess creativity. We applied a novel computational method of verbal creativity assessment—semantic distance—and performed weighted degree functional connectivity analyses to explore how individual differences in assembly of resting-state networks are associated with this objective creativity assessment. To measure creative performance, a sample of healthy adults ( n = 175) completed a battery of divergent thinking (DT) tasks, in which they were asked to think of unusual uses for everyday objects. Computational semantic models were applied to calculate the semantic distance between objects and responses to obtain an objective measure of DT performance. All participants underwent resting-state imaging, from which we computed voxel-wise connectivity matrices between all gray matter voxels. A linear regression analysis was applied between DT and weighted degree of the connectivity matrices. Our analysis revealed a significant connectivity decrease in the visual-temporal and parietal regions, in relation to increased levels of DT. Link-level analyses showed higher local connectivity within visual regions was associated with lower DT, whereas projections from the precuneus to the right inferior occipital and temporal cortex were positively associated with DT. Our results demonstrate differential patterns of resting-state connectivity associated with individual creative thinking ability, extending past work using a new application to automatically assess creativity via semantic distance. 
    more » « less
  4. ; ; ; ; ; ; ( , ASME 2020 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference)
    null (Ed.)
    Assessing creativity is not an easy task, but that has not stopped researchers from exploring it. Because creativity is essential to engineering disciplines, knowing how to enhance creative abilities through engineering education has been a topic of interest. In this paper, the event related potential (ERP) technique is used to study the neural responses of engineers via a modified alternative uses task (AUT). Though only a pilot study testing two participants, the preliminary results of this study indicate general neuro-responsiveness to novel or unusual stimuli. These findings also suggest that a scaled-up study along these lines would enable better understanding and modeling of neuroresponses of engineers and creative thinking, as well as contribute to the growing field of ERP research in the field of engineering. 
    more » « less
  5. ; ; ; ( , Behavior Research Methods)
    Abstract

    The visual modality is central to both reception and expression of human creativity. Creativity assessment paradigms, such as structured drawing tasks Barbot (2018), seek to characterize this key modality of creative ideation. However, visual creativity assessment paradigms often rely on cohorts of expert or naïve raters to gauge the level of creativity of the outputs. This comes at the cost of substantial human investment in both time and labor. To address these issues, recent work has leveraged the power of machine learning techniques to automatically extract creativity scores in the verbal domain (e.g., SemDis; Beaty & Johnson 2021). Yet, a comparably well-vetted solution for the assessment of visual creativity is missing. Here, we introduce AuDrA – an Automated Drawing Assessment platform to extract visual creativity scores from simple drawing productions. Using a collection of line drawings and human creativity ratings, we trained AuDrA and tested its generalizability to untrained drawing sets, raters, and tasks. Across four datasets, nearly 60 raters, and over 13,000 drawings, we found AuDrA scores to be highly correlated with human creativity ratings for new drawings on the same drawing task (r= .65 to .81; mean = .76). Importantly, correlations between AuDrA scores and human raters surpassed those between drawings’ elaboration (i.e., ink on the page) and human creativity raters, suggesting that AuDrA is sensitive to features of drawings beyond simple degree of complexity. We discuss future directions, limitations, and link the trained AuDrA model and a tutorial (https://osf.io/kqn9v/) to enable researchers to efficiently assess new drawings.

     
    more » « less
  • Citation Formats
  • MLA
  • APA
  • Chicago
  • BibTeX
  • Save / Share this Record
  • Send to Email