An official website of the United States government
ABSTRACT G‐protein‐coupled receptors (GPCRs) constitute one of the most prominent families of integral membrane receptor proteins that mediate most transmembrane signaling processes. Malfunction of these signal transduction processes is one of the underlying causes of many human pathologies (Parkinson's, Huntington's, heart diseases, etc), provoking that GPCRs are the largest family of druggable proteins. However, these receptors have been targeted traditionally by orthosteric ligands, which usually causes side effects due to the simultaneous targeting of homologous receptor subtypes. Allosteric modulation offers a promising alternative approach to circumvent this problematic and, thus, comprehending its details is a most important task. Here we use the Cannabinoid type‐1 receptor (CB1R) in trying to shed light on this issue, focusing on positive allosteric modulation. This is done by using the protein‐dipole Langevin‐dipole (PDLD) within the linear response approximation (LRA) framework (PDLD/S‐2000) along with our coarse‐grained (CG) model of membrane proteins to evaluate the dissociation constants (KBs) and cooperativity factors (αs) for a diverse series of CB1R positive allosteric modulators belonging to the 2‐phenylindole structural class, considering CP55940 as an agonist. The agreement with the experimental data evinces that significantly populated allosteric modulator:CB1R and allosteric modulator:CP55940:CB1R complexes have been identified and characterized successfully. Analyzing them, it has been determined that CB1R positive allosteric modulation lies in an outwards displacement of transmembrane α helix (TM) 4 extracellular end and in the regulation of the range of motion of a compound TM7 movement for binary and ternary complexes, respectively. In this respect, we achieved a better comprehension of the molecular architecture of CB1R positive allosteric site, identifying Lys1923.28and Gly1943.30as key residues regarding electrostatic interactions inside this cavity, and to rationalize (at both structural and molecular level) the exhibited stereoselectivity in relation to positive allosteric modulation activity by considered CB1R allosteric modulators. Additionally, putative/postulated allosteric binding sites have been screened successfully, identifying the real CB1R positive allosteric site, and most structure–activity relationship (SAR) studies of CB1R 2‐phenylindole allosteric modulators have been rationalized. All these findings point out towards the predictive value of the methodology used in the current work, which can be applied to other biophysical systems of interest. The results presented in this study contribute significantly to understand GPCRs allosteric modulation and, hopefully, will encourage a more thorough exploration of the topic.
more »
« less
Analogs of α‐conotoxin PnIC selectively inhibit α7β2‐ over α7‐only subtype nicotinic acetylcholine receptors via a novel allosteric mechanism
Abstract This study was undertaken to identify and characterize the first ligands capable of selectively identifying nicotinic acetylcholine receptors containing α7 and β2 subunits (α7β2‐nAChR subtype). Basal forebrain cholinergic neurons express α7β2‐nAChR. Here, they appear to mediate neuronal dysfunction induced by the elevated levels of oligomeric amyloid‐β associated with early Alzheimer's disease. Additional work indicates that α7β2‐nAChR are expressed across several further critically important cholinergic and GABAergic neuronal circuits within the central nervous system. Further studies, however, are significantly hindered by the inability of currently available ligands to distinguish heteromeric α7β2‐nAChR from the closely related and more widespread homomeric α7‐only‐nAChR subtype. Functional screening using two‐electrode voltage‐clamp electrophysiology identified a family of α7β2‐nAChR‐selective analogs of α‐conotoxin PnIC (α‐CtxPnIC). A combined electrophysiology, functional kinetics, site‐directed mutagenesis, and molecular dynamics approach was used to further characterize the α7β2‐nAChR selectivity and site of action of these α‐CtxPnIC analogs. We determined that α7β2‐nAChR selectivity of α‐CtxPnIC analogs arises from interactions at a site distinct from the orthosteric agonist‐binding site shared between α7β2‐ and α7‐only‐nAChR. As numerous previously identified α‐Ctx ligands are competitive antagonists of orthosteric agonist‐binding sites, this study profoundly expands the scope of use of α‐Ctx ligands (which have already provided important nAChR research and translational breakthroughs). More immediately, analogs of α‐CtxPnIC promise to enable, for the first time, both comprehensive mapping of the distribution of α7β2‐nAChR and detailed investigations of their physiological roles.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 2111728
- PAR ID:
- 10483570
- Publisher / Repository:
- DOI PREFIX: 10.1096
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- The FASEB Journal
- Volume:
- 38
- Issue:
- 1
- ISSN:
- 0892-6638
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
The long‐anticipated high‐resolution structures of the human melatonin G protein‐coupled receptors MT1and MT2, involved in establishing and maintaining circadian rhythm, were obtained in complex with two melatonin analogs and two approved anti‐insomnia and antidepression drugs using X‐ray free‐electron laser serial femtosecond crystallography. The structures shed light on the overall conformation and unusual structural features of melatonin receptors, as well as their ligand binding sites and the melatonergic pharmacophore, thereby providing insights into receptor subtype selectivity. The structures revealed an occluded orthosteric ligand binding site with a membrane‐buried channel for ligand entry in both receptors, and an additional putative ligand entry path in MT2from the extracellular side. This unexpected ligand entry mode contributes to facilitating the high specificity with which melatonin receptors bind their cognate ligand and exclude structurally similar molecules such as serotonin, the biosynthetic precursor of melatonin. Finally, the MT2structure allowed accurate mapping of type 2 diabetes‐related single‐nucleotide polymorphisms, where a clustering of residues in helices I and II on the protein–membrane interface was observed which could potentially influence receptor oligomerization. The role of receptor oligomerization is further discussed in light of the differential interaction of MT1and MT2with GPR50, a regulatory melatonin coreceptor. The melatonin receptor structures will facilitate design of selective tool compounds to further dissect the specific physiological function of each receptor subtype as well as provide a structural basis for next‐generation sleeping aids and other drugs targeting these receptors with higher specificity and fewer side effects.more » « less
-
Chiglitazar is a promising new-generation insulin sensitizer with low reverse effects for the treatment of type II diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and has shown activity as a nonselective pan-agonist to the human peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) (i.e., full activation of PPAR γ and a partial activation of PPAR α and PPAR β / δ ). Yet, it has no high-resolution complex structure with PPARs and its detailed interactions and activation mechanism remain unclear. In this study, we docked chiglitazar into three experimentally resolved crystal structures of hPPAR subtypes, PPAR α , PPAR β / δ , and PPAR γ , followed by 3 μ s molecular dynamics simulations for each system. Our MM-GBSA binding energy calculation revealed that chiglitazar most favorably bound to hPPAR γ (-144.6 kcal/mol), followed by hPPAR α (-138.0 kcal/mol) and hPPAR β (-135.9 kcal/mol), and the order is consistent with the experimental data. Through the decomposition of the MM-GBSA binding energy by residue and the use of two-dimensional interaction diagrams, key residues involved in the binding of chiglitazar were identified and characterized for each complex system. Additionally, our detailed dynamics analyses support that the conformation and dynamics of helix 12 play a critical role in determining the activities of the different types of ligands (e.g., full agonist vs. partial agonist). Rather than being bent fully in the direction of the agonist versus antagonist conformation, a partial agonist can adopt a more linear conformation and have a lower degree of flexibility. Our finding may aid in further development of this new generation of medication.more » « less
-
null (Ed.)Activation of the CB2 receptor has been shown to have anti-inflammatory and antinociceptive effects without causing psychoactive effects. Previously, we reported that the compound ethyl 2(2-(N-(2,3-dimethylphenyl) phenylsulfonamido)acetamido)benzoate (ABK5) is a CB2 subtype selective agonist with anti-inflammatory and antinociceptive effects. In the present study, we tested four ABK5 derivatives, ABK5-1, ABK5-2, ABK5-5, and ABK5-6, to analyze the structure of ABK5 to obtain CB2-selective agonists with higher affinity and efficacy. Affinity, subtype selectivity, and G-protein coupling were determined by radioligand binding assays. Selected compounds were then subjected to evaluation of anti-inflammatory effects using two different cell lines, Jurkat (ABK5-1 and 5-2) and BV-2 cells (ABK5-1), which are models of T cells and microglia, respectively. ABK5-1, ABK5-2, and ABK5-6 had comparable CB2 binding affinity with ABK5 (and stimulated G-protein coupling), while only ABK5-1 and ABK5-2 maintained CB2-subtype selectivity. ABK5-5 did not bind CB2 in the detectable range. RT-PCR and ELISA analysis showed that the two compounds also inhibit IL-2 and TNF-α production, and they were more efficacious than ABK5 in inhibiting TNF-α production. CXCL-12 mediated chemotaxis was also evaluated by the transwell migration assay, and both ABK5-1 and ABK5-2 inhibited chemotaxis with a stronger effect observed in ABK5-1. In the microglia cell line BV-2, ABK5-1 inhibited IL-1β and IL-6 production, which suggests this compound has anti-inflammatory effects through targeting multiple immune cells, and may be a candidate for treatment of inflammation.more » « less
-
Abstract The gonadotropins follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) and luteinizing hormone (LH) are key regulators of sexual development and the reproductive cycle in vertebrates. Unlike most G protein-coupled receptors (GPCR), the FSHR and LHR have large extracellular domains containing multiple leucine-rich repeats, which leads to an elaborate mechanism of receptor activation via orthosteric sites that is difficult to manipulate synthetically. To bypass the orthosteric mechanism, in this study using carp as a model organism we identified allosteric sites capable of receptor activation on the transmembrane domain, which are spatially separated from the orthosteric sites. We have further generated pharmacophore hypothesis based on the structural motifs and exposed residues of these cavities. Using available online small compound libraries consisting of >70000 small molecules, we have thereon used receptor cavity-based hypothesis and other screening stages to identify potential modulators of the allosteric binding site on the carp FSHR and LHRin-silico. We then examined byin vitrotransactivation assay the effect of four candidate compounds on FSHR and LHR, as compared to the activity of native ligands. Our results reveal both specific and dual effective allosteric modulators for FSHR and LHR, demonstrating the potential of our approach for efficient pharmacophore-based screening.more » « less
