An official website of the United States government
Dynamic site characterization was performed at 25 sites located on the western portion of the Mexico City Basin that were severely damaged during the Mw7.1 2017 Puebla–Morelos, Mexico, earthquake. Testing was conducted using active and passive seismic surface wave methods and the microtremor horizontal-to-vertical spectral ratio method to determine site periods and develop one-dimensional (1D) shear wave velocity ( Vs) profiles for the first 60 m of the subsoil. The measured site periods were compared to site period maps developed in 2004 and 2020 along with values computed using the Design Seismic Actions System (SASID) software following the 2020 version of the Complementary Technical Norms for Seismic Design (NTC-DS). The most noticeable biases in the predictions from the 2004 site period map were observed between the boundary of Zone II and Zone IIIa, at which site periods are overestimated. These estimates were improved upon in the 2020 site period map and showed a close similarity with SASID computed site period values. The Vs, depth, and thickness of the lacustrine clay layer were also determined to be quite variable within the basin. The softest sites are located between the lakebeds with a Vs between 45 and 57 m/s. Sites located toward the outer rim of the North lakebed have a higher Vs between 80 and 100 m/s. The thickness of the clay layer varies significantly in the western side of the Basin with values ranging between approximately 3 and 34 m. Overall, the results of this study indicate good agreement with the model embedded in the SASID software. The results (1) emphasize the need to regularly monitor changes that occur over time in the lacustrine clay layer, (2) complement the development of models that improve our understanding of wave propagation within the Basin, and (3) update and improve Mexico City’s Norms.
more »
« less
Shallow three-dimensional shear wave velocity model for the Mexico City Basin
In this study, a simplified shallow three-dimensional shear wave velocity (Vs) model is presented for the Mexico City Basin. To this end, previous studies were carefully reviewed to assemble a database of Vs and site period measurements for the region. The new site period measurements obtained at the western edge of the Basin were compared to the existing 2004 Complementary Technical Standards of Mexico site period nominal map, (NTC, 2004) the Lermo et al. (2020) site period map, and Design Seismic Actions System (SASID), 2020 site period predictions. Each site period prediction method was shown to have differences with respect to the new measurements along the western edge of the Basin. However, there was no bias for the prediction methods with the Lermo et al. (2020) and SASID predictions, demonstrating less error between the measured values than the NTC (2004) predictions. To develop the three-dimensional Vs model, the shallow (top 60 m) subsurface was divided into five generalized soil layers. The site period was used as the only input for the three-dimensional Vs model to simplify and maximize the model’s applicability. The performance of the model was assessed by comparing the measured and predicted Vs profiles. Overall, the three-dimensional Vs model developed in this study is a valuable tool that can be used along with geophysical estimates of deeper structure for ground motion modeling and preliminary site response studies along with other benefits to the seismic resiliency of the region.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 1822482
- PAR ID:
- 10484075
- Publisher / Repository:
- SAGE Publications
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Earthquake Spectra
- Volume:
- 40
- Issue:
- 1
- ISSN:
- 8755-2930
- Format(s):
- Medium: X Size: p. 314-345
- Size(s):
- p. 314-345
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
International Ocean Discovery Program (IODP) Site U1462 is 50 km north of the Montobello Islands in the Northern Carnarvon Basin, ~150 m from the Fisher-1 industry well (Figures F1, F2). Site U1462 is on the outer edge (87 m water depth) of a middle ramp (James et al., 2004). The seabed in the region is carbonate-rich (>90%) gravel and sand with minor mud (Jones, 1973; James et al., 2004). Coring at Site U1462 targeted a sequence of shelfal to shelf-edge carbonates that overlie a Miocene sand unit (the Bare Formation) (Figure F3).more » « less
-
International Ocean Discovery Program (IODP) Site U1461 is 100 km northwest of Barrow Island in the Northern Carnarvon Basin, ~150 m from the West Tryal Rocks-2 industry well (Figure F1). Site U1461 is on the shelf edge of an outer ramp (James et al., 2004). The seabed in the region is poorly sorted carbonate-rich (>90%) sediment made up of bioclastic gravel, sand, and mud (Jones, 1973; James et al., 2004). Coring at Site U1461 targeted a 1 km thick outer shelf to upper slope carbonate wedge that onlaps (because of basin-wide subsidence) a regional top Miocene surface (Figures F2, F3).more » « less
-
The principal aim at Site U1589 (proposed Site CSK-01A) was to reconstruct the evolution of the Anhydros Basin, including its history of subsidence, as well as to document the presence of volcanic event layers in the basin sediments and draw conclusions regarding the links between volcanism and crustal tectonics. The site is located about 10 km southwest of Amorgos Island at 484 meters below sea level (mbsl) (Figure F1). The drill site targeted the volcano-sedimentary fill of the Anhydros Basin. We received permission from the International Ocean Discovery Program (IODP) Environmental Protection and Safety Panel to touch the Alpine basement using an advanced piston corer/extended core barrel/rotary core barrel (APC/XCB/RCB) drilling strategy. The site involved three holes (U1589A–U1589C) and terminated in basement limestone at 612.4 meters below seafloor (mbsf) (all depths below seafloor are given using the core depth below seafloor, Method A [CSF-A] scale, except in Operations, where the drilling depth below seafloor [DSF] scale is used). Core recovery was good in Holes U1589A (78%) and U1589B (87%) and poor in Hole U1589C (24%). Site U1589 was chosen to sample the eruptive histories of both Santorini and the Kolumbo chain and was expected to yield volcaniclastics from many Kolumbo eruptions and the major Santorini eruptions. Many deposits from smaller Santorini eruptions were not expected at this distance from the volcano, in part due to flow blocking by the Kolumbo volcanic chain. Santorini has been active since 0.65 Ma, with many large explosive eruptions since about 0.36 Ma (Druitt et al., 2016). Kolumbo Volcano was known from seismic profiles to have had at least five eruptions (Hübscher et al., 2015), the last of which was in 1650 Common Era (CE) and killed 70 people on Santorini (Fuller et al., 2018). Seismic profiles provided constraints on the relative ages of the Kolumbo cones (Preine et al., 2022c) but not on the absolute ages. The site offered a near-continuous time series of volcanism in the area since rift inception. The site was also chosen to develop a core-log-seismic integration stratigraphy and compare it with the recently published seismic stratigraphy for the basin (Preine et al., 2022a) and the paleotectonic reconstruction of the region (Nomikou et al., 2016, 2018) to promote a holistic view of the Anhydros Basin evolution (Figure F2). The site transects all six seismic packages of the Anhydros rift basin, as well as the onlap surfaces between them (Nomikou et al., 2016, 2018; Preine et al., 2022a). The anticipated lithologies were undisturbed hemipelagic muds, volcaniclastics, turbidites, and finally continental basement rocks. A gravity core recovered 7 km to the east indicated that the uppermost sediments on site would consist of hemipelagic muds and volcaniclastic layers, as well as sapropels (Kutterolf et al., 2021). The Anhydros Basin is crossed by many seismic profiles obtained in campaigns between 2006 and 2019, many of them multichannel (Hübscher et al., 2015; Nomikou et al., 2016, 2018), and its southwestern part is included within the area of the 2015 PROTEUS seismic tomography experiment, during which subbottom profiling, gravity, and magnetic data were also recorded (Hooft et al., 2017). The basin bathymetry had been studied in several marine campaigns, and fault distributions and throws had been mapped (Nomikou et al., 2016; Hooft et al., 2017). Previously published analyses of the seismic data suggested the following possible interpretations (from the bottom up; Preine et al., 2022b, 2022c): Units U1 and U2: sediment packages predating Santorini and Kolumbo volcanism; Unit U3: sediments and the products of the early Kolumbo volcanism and some of the Kolumbo cones; Unit U4: sediments associated with a major rift pulse; and Units U5 and U6: sediments and the products of Santorini activity, some of the Kolumbo cones, and the later eruptions of Kolumbo including the 1650 CE eruption. Units U3–U6 were believed to be of Pleistocene age, and Units U1 and U2 were believed to be of possible Pliocene age. The site enabled us to test these interpretations by using the cores to reconstruct a near-complete volcanic stratigraphy consistent with both onshore and offshore constraints and pinned by chronological markers from biostratigraphy, magnetostratigraphy, and sapropel records. Benthic foraminifera from fine-grained sediments provided estimates of paleowater depths and, via integration with seismic profiles and chronologic data, of time-integrated basin subsidence rates. Coring at Site U1589 in the Anhydros Basin addressed scientific Objectives 1–4 and 6 of the Expedition 398 Scientific Prospectus (Druitt et al., 2022). It was complemented by Site U1592 in the Anafi Basin because each basin taps a different sediment distributary branch of the Christiana-Santorini-Kolumbo volcanic system.more » « less
-
Site U1592 (proposed Site CSK-09A) is located ~10 km southeast of Anhydros Island in the Anafi Basin at 693 meters below sea level (mbsl) (Figure F1). The aim at the site was to penetrate the entire volcano-sedimentary fill as far as the Alpine basement to reconstruct the evolution of the Anafi Basin: history of subsidence, presence of volcanic event layers in the basin sediments, and links between volcanism and crustal tectonics. We drilled to a maximum recovery depth of 519.8 meters below seafloor (mbsf) in two holes (U1592A and U1592B), terminating in limestone basement (all depths below seafloor [mbsf] are given using the core depth below seafloor, Method A [CSF-A], scale, except in Operations where the drilling depth below seafloor [DSF] scale is used). Average core recoveries were 71% (Hole U1592A) and 50% (Hole U1592B). The Anafi Basin potentially recorded the full volcanic history of Santorini (and any older centers) since rift inception, but it was envisaged to probably also contain few eruptive products from Kolumbo. Drilling enabled reconstruction of the volcanic, sedimentary, and tectonic histories of the Anafi Basin, allowing us to compare its evolution with that of the Anhydros Basin. The site was also chosen to develop a core-log-seismic integration stratigraphy and compare it with the recently published seismic stratigraphy for the basin (Preine et al., 2022a, 2022b) and the paleotectonic reconstruction of the region (Nomikou et al., 2016, 2018). The site transects six seismic packages of the Anafi rift basin, as well as the onlap surfaces between them (Nomikou et al., 2016, 2018; Preine et al., 2022a) (Figure F2). The Anafi Basin is crossed by many seismic profiles obtained in campaigns between 2006 and 2019, many of them multichannel (Hübscher et al., 2015; Nomikou et al., 2016, 2018). It is included within the area of the 2015 PROTEUS seismic tomography experiment, during which subbottom profiling, gravity, and magnetic data were also recorded (Hooft et al., 2017). The basin bathymetry had been studied in several marine campaigns, and fault distributions and throws had been mapped (Nomikou et al., 2016; Hooft et al., 2017). Previously published analyses of the seismic data suggested the following possible interpretations (from the bottom up; Preine et al., 2022a, 2022b): Units U1 and U2: sediment packages predating Santorini and Kolumbo volcanism; Unit U3: sediments and the products of the early Kolumbo volcanism and some of the Kolumbo cones; Unit U4: sediments associated with a major rift pulse; and Units U5 and U6: sediments and the products of Santorini activity, some of the Kolumbo cones, and the later eruptions of Kolumbo including the 1650 Common Era (CE) eruption. Units U3–U6 were believed to be of Pleistocene age, and Units U1 and U2 were believed to be possibly Pliocene. The site enabled us to test these interpretations by using the cores to reconstruct a near-complete volcanic stratigraphy consistent with both onshore and offshore constraints and pinned by chronological markers from biostratigraphy, magnetostratigraphy, and sapropel records. Benthic foraminifera from fine-grained sediments provided estimates of paleowater depths and, through integration with seismic profiles and chronologic data, of time-integrated basin subsidence rates. Coring at Site U1592 in the Anafi Basin addressed scientific Objectives 1–4 and 6 of the Expedition 398 Scientific Prospectus (Druitt et al., 2022). It was complemented by Site U1589 in the Anhydros Basin because each basin taps a different sediment distributary branch of the Christiana-Santorini-Kolumbo volcanic system.more » « less
