An official website of the United States government
Previous satellite estimates of internal tides are usually based on 25 years of sea surface height (SSH) data from 1993 to 2017 measured by exact-repeat (ER) altimetry missions. In this study, new satellite estimates of internal tides are based on 8 years of SSH data from 2011 to 2018 measured mainly by nonrepeat (NR) altimetry missions. The two datasets are labeled ER25yr and NR8yr, respectively. NR8yr has advantages over ER25yr in observing internal tides because of its shorter time coverage and denser ground tracks. Mode-1 M2internal tides are mapped from both datasets following the same procedure that consists of two rounds of plane wave analysis with a spatial bandpass filter in between. The denser ground tracks of NR8yr make it possible to examine the impact of window size in the first-round plane wave analysis. Internal tides mapped using six different windows ranging from 40 to 160 km have almost the same results on global average, but smaller windows can better resolve isolated generation sources. The impact of time coverage is studied by comparing NR8yr160km and ER25yr160km, which are mapped using 160-km windows in the first-round plane wave analysis. They are evaluated using independent satellite altimetry data in 2020. NR8yr160km has larger model variance and can cause larger variance reduction, suggesting that NR8yr160km is a better model than ER25yr160km. Their global energies are 43.6 and 33.6 PJ, respectively, with a difference of 10 PJ. Their energy difference is a function of location. Significance StatementOur understanding of internal tides is mainly limited by the scarcity of field measurements with sufficient spatiotemporal resolution. Satellite altimetry offers a unique technique for observing and predicting internal tides on a global scale. Previous satellite observations of internal tides are mainly based on 25 years of data from exact-repeat altimetry missions. This paper demonstrates that internal tides can be mapped using 8 years of data made by nonrepeat altimetry missions. The new dataset has shorter time coverage and denser ground tracks; therefore, one can examine the impact of window size and time coverage on mapping internal tides from satellite altimetry. A comparison of models mapped from the two datasets sheds new light on the spatiotemporal variability of internal tides.
more »
« less
Phase‐Accurate Internal Tides in a Global Ocean Forecast Model: Potential Applications for Nadir and Wide‐Swath Altimetry
Abstract Internal tides (ITs) play a critical role in ocean mixing, and have strong signatures in ocean observations. Here, global IT sea surface height (SSH) in nadir altimetry is compared with an ocean forecast model that assimilates de‐tided SSH from nadir altimetry. The forecast model removes IT SSH variance from nadir altimetry at skill levels comparable to those achieved with empirical analysis of nadir altimetry. Accurate removal of IT SSH is needed to fully reveal lower‐frequency mesoscale eddies and currents in altimeter data. Analysis windows of order 30–120 days, made possible by the frequent (hourly) outputs of the forecast model, remove more IT SSH variance than longer windows. Forecast models offer a promising new approach for global internal tide mapping and altimetry correction. Because they provide information on the full water column, forecast models can also help to improve understanding of the underlying dynamics of ITs.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 1851164
- PAR ID:
- 10490281
- Publisher / Repository:
- DOI PREFIX: 10.1029
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Geophysical Research Letters
- Volume:
- 51
- Issue:
- 4
- ISSN:
- 0094-8276
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
Seventy‐five days of sea surface height measurements made by the Surface Water and Ocean Topography (SWOT) mission from 7 September to 21 November 2023 are used to explore SWOT's capability of observing internal tides. Mode‐1 internal tides are mapped by our updated mapping technique. SWOT‐75d represents a 75‐day instantaneous model. Nadir‐30y is constructed using 30 years of nadir altimetry data from 1993 to 2022 and represents a climate normal. The nadir altimetry data in 2023 are used for model evaluation. Despite its large errors, SWOT‐75d reveals the basic features of the global mode‐1 internal tide field, and causes positive variance reduction in regions of strong internal tides. Nadir‐30y performs better overall, but SWOT‐75d performs better in the tropical South Atlantic Ocean, the central North Pacific Ocean, and the Melanesian region. Evaluation using seasonally subsetted altimetry data reveals that internal tides have significant temporal variations. SWOT‐75d performs the best in fall, because the model is constructed using data largely in fall. SWOT‐75d has large phase anomalies, which are spatially smoothed and used to adjust the phases in Nadir‐30y. The phase‐adjusted model can better make internal tide correction for SWOT and its performance is improved by 20%. Our results demonstrate that (a) mode‐1 internal tides can be extracted from 75 days of SWOT data by our mapping technique, and (b) the instantaneous internal tide model can be used to improve internal tide correction for SWOT.more » « less
-
An internal tide model, ZHAO30yr, is developed using 30 years of satellite altimetry sea surface height (SSH) measurements from 1993 to 2022 by a recently improved mapping technique that consists of two rounds of plane wave analysis with a spatial bandpass filter in between. Prerequisite wavelengths are calculated using climatological annual mean hydrographic profiles in the World Ocean Atlas 2018. ZHAO30yr only extracts the 30-year phase-locked internal tide component, lacking the incoherent component caused by the time-varying ocean environment. The model contains 12 internal tide constituents: eight mode-1 constituents (M2, S2, N2, K2, K1, O1, P1, and Q1) and four mode-2 constituents (M2, S2, K1, and O1). Model errors are estimated to be lower than 1 mm in the SSH amplitude on global average, thanks to the long data record and improved mapping technique. The model is evaluated by making internal tide correction to independent altimetry data for 2023. A total of 10 constituents (but for K2 and Q1) can reduce variance on global average. K2 and Q1 can only cause variance reductions in their source regions. The model decomposes the multiconstituent, multimodal, multidirectional internal tide field into a series of simple plane waves at each grid point. The decomposition reveals unprecedented features previously masked by multiwave interference. The model divides each internal tide constituent into components by propagation direction. The directionally decomposed components show numerous long-range internal tidal beams associated with notable topographic features. The semidiurnal internal tidal beams off the Amazon shelf and the diurnal internal tidal beams in the Arabian Sea are examined in detail. ZHAO30yr is available at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.28078523 (Zhao, 2024b). Model errors are available at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.28559978.v3 (Zhao, 2025).more » « less
-
Abstract The yearly mode-1 M2internal tide model in 2019 is constructed using sea surface height measurements made by six concurrent satellite altimetry missions:Jason-3,Sentinel-3A,Sentinel-3B,CryoSat-2,Haiyang-2A, andSARAL/AltiKa. The model is developed following a three-step procedure consisting of two rounds of plane wave analysis with a spatial bandpass filter in between. Prior mesoscale correction is made on the altimeter data using AVISO gridded mesoscale fields. The model is labeled Y2019, because it represents the 1-yr-coherent internal tide field in 2019. In contrast, the model developed using altimeter data from 1992 to 2017 is labeled MY25, because it represents the multiyear-coherent internal tide field in 25 years. Thanks to the new mapping technique, model errors in Y2019 are as low as those in MY25. Evaluation using independent altimeter data confirms that Y2019 reduces slightly less variance (∼6%) than MY25. Further analysis reveals that the altimeter data from five missions (withoutJason-3) can yield an internal tide model of almost the same quality. Comparing Y2019 and MY25 shows that mode-1 M2internal tides are subject to significant interannual variability in both amplitude and phase, and their interannual variations are a function of location. Along southward internal tides from Amukta Pass, the energy flux in Y2019 is 2 times larger and the phase speed is about 1.1% faster. This mapping technique has been applied successfully to 2017 and 2018. This work demonstrates that yearly internal tides can be observed by concurrent altimetry missions and their interannual variations can be determined. Significance StatementThis work is motivated to study the interannual variations of internal tides using observation-based yearly internal tide models from satellite altimetry. Previous satellite observations of internal tides are usually based on 25 years of altimeter data from 1993 to 2017. The yearly subsetted altimeter data are short, so that the resultant yearly models are overwhelmed by noise. A new mapping technique is developed and demonstrated in this paper. It paves a path to study the interannual and decadal variations of internal tides on a global scale and monitor the global ocean changes by tracking long-range internal tides.more » « less
-
null (Ed.)Abstract The accuracy of three data-constrained barotropic ocean tide models is assessed by comparison with data from geodetic mission altimetry and ocean surface drifters, data sources chosen for their independence from the observational data used to develop the tide models. Because these data sources do not provide conventional time series at single locations suitable for harmonic analysis, model performance is evaluated using variance reduction statistics. The results distinguish between shallow and deep-water evaluations of the GOT410, TPXO9A, and FES2014 models; however, a hallmark of the comparisons is strong geographic variability that is not well summarized by global performance statistics. The models exhibit significant regionally coherent differences in performance that should be considered when choosing a model for a particular application. Quantitatively, the differences in explained SSH variance between the models in shallow water are only 1%–2% of the root-mean-square (RMS) tidal signal of about 50 cm, but the differences are larger at high latitudes, more than 10% of 30-cm RMS. Differences with respect to tidal currents variance are strongly influenced by small scales in shallow water and are not well represented by global averages; therefore, maps of model differences are provided. In deep water, the performance of the models is practically indistinguishable from one another using the present data. The foregoing statements apply to the eight dominant astronomical tides M 2 , S 2 , N 2 , K 2 , K 1 , O 1 , P 1 , and Q 1 . Variance reduction statistics for smaller tides are generally not accurate enough to differentiate the models’ performance.more » « less
