An official website of the United States government
Climate change mitigation measures are often projected to reduce anthropogenic carbon dioxide concentrations. Yet, it seems there is ample evidence suggesting that we have a limited understanding of the impacts of these measures and their combinations. For example, the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) enacted in the U.S. in 2022 contains significant provisions, such as the electric vehicle (EV) tax credits, to reduce CO2 emissions. However, the impact of such provisions is not fully understood across the U.S., particularly in the context of their interactions with other macroeconomic systems. In this paper, we employ an Integrated Assessment Model (IAM), the Global Change Assessment Model (GCAM), to estimate the future CO2 emissions in the U.S. GCAM is equipped to comprehensively characterize the interactions among different systems, e.g., energy, water, land use, and transportation. Thus, the use of GCAM-USA that has U.S. state-level resolution allows the projection of the impacts and consequences of major provisions in the IRA, i.e., EV tax credits and clean energy incentives. To compare the performance of these incentives and credits, a policy effectiveness index is used to evaluate the strength of the relationship between the achieved total CO2 emissions and the overarching emission reduction costs. Our results show that the EV tax credits as stipulated in the IRA can only marginally reduce carbon emissions across the U.S. In fact, it may lead to negative impacts in some states. However, simultaneously combining the incentives and tax credits improves performance and outcomes better than the sum of the individual effects of the policies. This demonstrates that the whole is greater than the sum of the parts in this decarbonization approach. Our findings provide insights for policymakers with a recommendation that combining EV tax credits with clean energy incentives magnifies the intended impact of emission reduction.
more »
« less
Incentivizing household action: Exploring the behavioral wedge in the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act and the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act
In the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA) and the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), the United States (U.S.) Congress placed a major bet on the importance of household actions, and the incentives for these actions may yield disproportionately large emissions reductions. Modeling estimates from Rapid Energy Policy Evaluation and Analysis Toolkit (REPEAT) suggest that the IRA's $331 billion investment can reduce carbon emissions by as much as 4% below a 2005 baseline by 2030, assuming a low-friction economic environment. To evaluate the role of household actions, we use a two-part method: 1) Policy analyses of the IRA and IIJA to identify household incentives; 2) Secondary data analysis of REPEAT's policy models to identify the potential for emissions reductions associated with household action. We find that $39 billion, or 12% of climate and energy funds in the IRA and $4.3 billion or 5.7% of clean energy and power funds in the IIJA, target voluntary household actions, and that these actions contribute 40% of the cumulative emissions reductions under the IRA and IIJA, assuming a mid-range scenario for uptake. The importance of household actions to achieving IRA and IIJA's emissions reduction goals suggests that actual impacts will likely vary by behavioral plasticity, and that program design should reflect social and behavioral science insights.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 2115392
- PAR ID:
- 10491268
- Publisher / Repository:
- Elsevier
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Energy Policy
- Volume:
- 186
- Issue:
- C
- ISSN:
- 0301-4215
- Page Range / eLocation ID:
- 113992
- Subject(s) / Keyword(s):
- energy policy behavioral wedge behavioral plasticity inflation reduction act infrastructure investment and jobs act energy justice household energy behavior greenhouse gas emissions reduction private environmental governance
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
Abstract Capturing and sequestering carbon dioxide (CO2) from the atmosphere via large‐scale direct air capture (DAC) deployment is critical for achieving net‐zero emissions. Large‐scale DAC deployment, though, will require significant cost reductions in part through policy and investment support. This study evaluates the impact of policy interventions on DAC cost reduction by integrating energy system optimization and learning curve models. We examine how three policy instruments—incremental deployment, accelerated deployment, and R&D‐driven innovation—impact DAC learning investment, which is the total investment required until the technology achieves cost parity with conventional alternatives or target cost. Our findings show that while incremental deployment demands significant learning investment, R&D‐driven innovation is considerably cheaper at cost reduction. Under a baseline 8% learning rate, incremental deployment may require up to $998 billion to reduce costs from $1,154 to $400/tCO2, while accelerated deployment support could save approximately $7 billion on that investment. In contrast, R&D support achieves equivalent cost reductions at less than half the investment of incremental deployment. However, the effectiveness of R&D intervention varies with learning rates and R&D breakthroughs. R&D yields net benefits in all cases except at extremely low breakthroughs (5%) and very high learning rates (20%), where they are slightly more expensive. For learning rates below 20%, R&D provides net benefits even at minimal breakthroughs. These findings underscore the need for comprehensive public policy strategies that balance near‐term deployment incentives with long‐term innovation investments if we are to ensure DACS becomes a viable technology for mitigating climate change.more » « less
-
The food-energy-water (FEW) nexus presents an opportunity to rethink predominant approaches to household behavior change science. We linked emerging FEW nexus research with existing literature examining household consumption and pro-environmental behaviors. While a large body of work examines the environmental impacts of household life and explores pathways to behavior change for sustainability, the literature lacks studies that test interventions in multiple FEW resource categories, leaving researchers unable to identify tensions and tradeoffs in the household system. To guide this developing field and accumulate findings on household behavior across disciplines, we proposed a conceptual typology that synthesizes interdisciplinary analytic traditions to classify behavioral interventions targeting the household FEW nexus. The typology synthesizes behavioral interventions as active, passive, or structural, and household-specific or non-specific, illustrating six distinct categories: information, tailored information, action, gamification, policy/price change, and material/technology provision. A review of 40 studies that guided the typology identifies four significant lessons for future intervention research: household non-specific information and tailored information work better together, feedback is more effective when it is persistent, price-based interventions (information or incentives) are often ineffective, and material/technology provision is very effective but utilized in few household studies. To push forward household resource consumption science, we advocated for a holistic nexus focus that is rooted in interdisciplinarity, coalition building with stakeholders, and data reporting that facilitates knowledge accumulation.more » « less
-
This report documents the program and the outcomes of Dagstuhl Seminar "EU Cyber Resilience Act: Socio-Technical and Research Challenges" (24112). This timely seminar brought together experts in computer science, tech policy, and economics, as well as industry stakeholders, national agencies, and regulators to identify new research challenges posed by the EU Cyber Resilience Act (CRA), a new EU regulation that aims to set essential cybersecurity requirements for digital products to be permissible in the EU market. The seminar focused on analyzing the proposed text and standards for identifying obstacles in standardization, developer practices, user awareness, and software analysis methods for easing adoption, certification, and enforcement. Seminar participants noted the complexity of designing meaningful cybersecurity regulations and of aligning regulatory requirements with technological advancements, market trends, and vendor incentives, referencing past challenges with GDPR and COPPA adoption and compliance. The seminar also emphasized the importance of regulators, marketplaces, and both mobile and IoT platforms in eliminating malicious and deceptive actors from the market, and promoting transparent security practices from vendors and their software supply chain. The seminar showed the need for multi-disciplinary and collaborative efforts to support the CRA’s successful implementation and enhance cybersecurity across the EU.more » « less
-
Many organizations maintain and operate large shared computing clusters, since they can substantially reduce computing costs by leveraging statistical multiplexing to amortize it across all users. Importantly, such shared clusters are generally not free to use, but have an internal pricing model that funds their operation. Since employees at many large organizations, especially Universities, have some budgetary autonomy over purchase decisions, internal shared clusters are increasingly competing for users with cloud platforms, which may offer lower costs and better performance. As a result, many organizations are shifting their shared clusters to operate on cloud resources. This paper empirically analyzes the user incentives for shared cloud clusters under two different pricing models using an 8-year job trace from a large shared cluster for a large University system. Our analysis shows that, with either pricing model, a large fraction of users have little financial incentive to participate in a shared cloud cluster compared to directly acquiring resources from a cloud platform. While shared cloud clusters can provide some limited reductions in cost by leveraging reserved instances at a discount, due to bursty workloads, realizing these reductions generally requires imposing long job waiting times, which for many users are likely not worth the cost reduction. In particular, we show that, assuming users defect from the shared cluster if their wait time is greater than 15x their average job runtime, over 80% of the users would defect, which increases the price of the remaining users such that it eliminates any incentive to participate in a shared cluster. Thus, while shared cloud clusters may provide users other benefits, their financial incentives are weak.more » « less
- Free Publicly Accessible Full Text
-
Accepted Manuscript1.0
- Journal Article:
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2024.113992
