An official website of the United States government
Unfamiliar accents can cause word recognition challenges, particularly in noisy environments, but few studies have incorporated quantitative pronunciation distance metrics to explain intelligibility differences across accents. To address this gap, intelligibility was measured for 18 talkers -- two from each of three first-language, one bilingual, and five second-language accents -- in quiet and two noise conditions. The relations between two edit distance metrics, which quantify phonetic differences from a reference accent, and intelligibility scores were assessed. Intelligibility was quantified through both fuzzy string matching and percent words correct. Both edit distance metrics were significantly related to intelligibility scores; a heuristic edit distance metric was the best predictor of intelligibility for both scoring methods. Further, there were stronger effects of edit distance as the listening condition increased in difficulty. Talker accent also contributed substantially to intelligibility models, but relations between accent and edit distance did not consistently pattern for the two talkers representing each accent. Frequency of production differences in vowels and consonants was negatively correlated with intelligibility, particularly for consonants. Together, these results suggest that significant amounts of variability in intelligibility across accents can be predicted by phonetic differences from the listener’s home accent. However, talker- and accent-specific pronunciation features, including suprasegmental characteristics, must be quantified to fully explain intelligibility across talkers and listening conditions.
more »
« less
Predicting intelligibility from pronunciation distance metrics
Unfamiliar native and non-native accents can cause word recognition challenges, particularly in noisy environments, but few studies have incorporated quantitative pronunciation distance metrics to explain intelligibility differences across accents. Here, intelligibility was measured for 18 talkers -- two from each of three native, one bilingual, and five non- native accents -- in three listening conditions (quiet and two noise conditions). Two variations of the Levenshtein pronunciation distance metric, which quantifies phonemic differences from a reference accent, were assessed for their ability to predict intelligibility. An unweighted Levenshtein distance metric was the best intelligibility predictor; talker accent further predicted performance. Accuracy did not fall along a native - non-native divide. Thus, phonemic differences from the listener’s home accent primarily determine intelligibility, but other accent- specific pronunciation features, including suprasegmental characteristics, must be quantified to fully explain intelligibility across talkers and listening conditions. These results have implications for pedagogical practices and speech perception theories.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 1941691
- PAR ID:
- 10491960
- Editor(s):
- Radek Skarnitzl & Jan Volín
- Publisher / Repository:
- Guarant International
- Date Published:
- ISBN:
- 978-80-908-114-2-3
- Subject(s) / Keyword(s):
- Speech perception intelligibility non-native accents regional accents
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Location:
- Prague, Czech Republic
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
Listeners attend to variation in segmental and prosodic cues when judging accent strength. The relative contributions of these cues to perceptions of accentedness in English remains open for investigation, although objective accent distance measures (such as Levenshtein distance) appear to be reliable tools for predicting perceptual distance. Levenshtein distance, however, only accounts for phonemic information in the signal. The purpose of the current study was to examine the relative contributions of phonemic (Levenshtein) and holistic acoustic (dynamic time warping) distances from the local accent to listeners’ accent rankings for nine non-local native and nonnative accents. Listeners (n =52) ranked talkers on perceived distance from the local accent (Midland American English) using a ladder task for three sentence-length stimuli. Phonemic and holistic acoustic distances between Midland American English and the other accents were quantified using both weighted and unweighted Levenshtein distance measures, and dynamic time warping (DTW). Results reveal that all three metrics contribute to perceived accent distance, with the weighted Levenshtein slightly outperforming the other measures. Moreover, the relative contribution of phonemic and holistic acoustic cues was driven by the speaker’s accent. Both nonnative and non-local native accents were included in this study, and the benefits of considering both of these accent groups in studying phonemic and acoustic cues used by listeners is discussed.more » « less
-
Abstract Children exhibit preferences for familiar accents early in life. However, they frequently have more difficulty distinguishing between first language (L1) accents than second language (L2) accents in categorization tasks. Few studies have addressed children’s perception of accent strength, or the relation between accent strength and objective measures of pronunciation distance. To address these gaps, 6- and 12-year-olds and adults ranked talkers’ perceived distance from the local accent (i.e., Midland American English). Rankings were compared with objective distance measures. Acoustic and phonetic distance measures were significant predictors of ladder rankings, but there was no evidence that children and adults significantly differed in their sensitivity to accent strength. Levenshtein Distance, a phonetic distance metric, was the strongest predictor of perceptual rankings for both children and adults. As a percept, accent strength has critical implications for social judgments, which determine real world social outcomes for talkers with non-local accents.more » « less
-
Native talkers are able to enhance acoustic characteristics of their speech in a speaking style known as “clear speech,” which is better understood by listeners than “plain speech.” However, despite substantial research in the area of clear speech, it is less clear whether non-native talkers of various proficiency levels are able to adopt a clear speaking style and if so, whether this style has perceptual benefits for native listeners. In the present study, native English listeners evaluated plain and clear speech produced by three groups: native English talkers, non-native talkers with lower proficiency, and non-native talkers with higher proficiency. Listeners completed a transcription task (i.e., an objective measure of the speech intelligibility). We investigated intelligibility as a function of language background and proficiency and also investigated the acoustic modifications that are associated with these perceptual benefits. The results of the study suggest that both native and non-native talkers modulate their speech when asked to adopt a clear speaking style, but that the size of the acoustic modifications, as well as consequences of this speaking style for perception differ as a function of language background and language proficiency.more » « less
-
We examined the neural correlates underlying the semantic processing of native- and nonnative-accented sentences, presented in quiet or embedded in multi-talker noise. Implementing a semantic violation paradigm, 36 English monolingual young adults listened to American-accented (native) and Chinese-accented (nonnative) English sentences with or without semantic anomalies, presented in quiet or embedded in multi-talker noise, while EEG was recorded. After hearing each sentence, participants verbally repeated the sentence, which was coded and scored as an offline comprehension accuracy measure. In line with earlier behavioral studies, the negative impact of background noise on sentence repetition accuracy was higher for nonnative-accented than for native-accented sentences. At the neural level, the N400 effect for semantic anomaly was larger for nativeaccented than for nonnative-accented sentences, and was also larger for sentences presented in quiet than in noise, indicating impaired lexical-semantic access when listening to nonnative-accented speech or sentences embedded in noise. No semantic N400 effect was observed for nonnative-accented sentences presented in noise. Furthermore, the frequency of neural oscillations in the alpha frequency band (an index of online cognitive listening effort) was higher when listening to sentences in noise versus in quiet, but no difference was observed across the accent conditions. Semantic anomalies presented in background noise also elicited higher theta activity, whereas processing nonnative-accented anomalies was associated with decreased theta activity. Taken together, we found that listening to nonnative accents or background noise is associated with processing challenges during online semantic access, leading to decreased comprehension accuracy. However, the underlying cognitive mechanism (e.g., associated listening efforts) might manifest differently across accented speech processing and speech in noise processing.more » « less
- Free Publicly Accessible Full Text
-
Accepted Manuscript1.0
- Conference Proceeding:
- The DOI is not currently available.
