More Like this

1. GRiMeDB: a comprehensive global database of methane concentrations and fluxes in fluvial ecosystems with supporting physical and chemical information

   https://doi.org/10.6073/pasta/b7d1fba4f9a3e365c9861ac3b58b4a90  

   Stanley, Emily H.; Loken, Luke C.; Casson, Nora J.; Oliver, Samantha K.; Sponseller, Ryan A.; Wallin, Marcus B.; Zhang, Liwei; Rocher-Ros, Gerard (January 2022, Environmental Data Initiative)

   The Global River Methane Database (GriMeDB) is a compilation of measurements of CH4 concentrations and fluxes for flowing water environments derived from publications, reports, data repositories, and other outlets between 1973 and 2021. Assembly of GRiMeDB was motivated by the goal of having a centralized, standardized resource to facilitate further studies of CH4 pattern and process in flowing water systems, upscaling efforts, and identification of tendencies in when, where, and how CH4 has been sampled in streams and rivers across the world. Thus, CH4 data are supported by concurrent observations (as available) of aquatic CO2, N2O, temperature, conductivity, pH, dissolved oxygen, nitrogen, phosphorus, organic carbon, and discharge, along with site data (latitude, longitude, elevation, and [as available]: stream order, elevation, channel slope, catchment size, and codes for distinct or disturbed channel types). GRiMeDB includes over 24,000 records of CH4 concentration and greater than 8,000 flux measurements from over 5,000 unique sites, most of which are resolved to the daily time scale. 

   more » « less
2. GRiMeDB: the Global River Methane Database of concentrations and fluxes

   https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-2879-2023  

   Stanley, Emily H.; Loken, Luke C.; Casson, Nora J.; Oliver, Samantha K.; Sponseller, Ryan A.; Wallin, Marcus B.; Zhang, Liwei; Rocher-Ros, Gerard (January 2023, Earth System Science Data)

   Abstract. Despite their small spatial extent, fluvial ecosystems play a significant role in processing and transporting carbon in aquatic networks, which results in substantial emission of methane (CH4) into the atmosphere. For this reason, considerable effort has been put into identifying patterns and drivers of CH4 concentrations in streams and rivers and estimating fluxes to the atmosphere across broad spatial scales. However, progress toward these ends has been slow because of pronounced spatial and temporal variability of lotic CH4 concentrations and fluxes and by limited data availability across diverse habitats and physicochemical conditions. To address these challenges, we present a comprehensive database of CH4 concentrations and fluxes for fluvial ecosystems along with broadly relevant and concurrent physical and chemical data. The Global River Methane Database (GriMeDB; https://doi.org/10.6073/pasta/f48cdb77282598052349e969920356ef, Stanley et al., 2023) includes 24 024 records of CH4 concentration and 8205 flux measurements from 5029 unique sites derived from publications, reports, data repositories, unpublished data sets, and other outlets that became available between 1973 and 2021. Flux observations are reported as diffusive, ebullitive, and total CH4 fluxes, and GriMeDB also includes 17 655 and 8409 concurrent measurements of concentrations and 4444 and 1521 fluxes for carbon dioxide (CO2) and nitrous oxide (N2O), respectively. Most observations are date-specific (i.e., not site averages), and many are supported by data for 1 or more of 12 physicochemical variables and 6 site variables. Site variables include codes to characterize marginal channel types (e.g., springs, ditches) and/or the presence of human disturbance (e.g., point source inputs, upstream dams). Overall, observations in GRiMeDB encompass the broad range of the climatic, biological, and physical conditions that occur among world river basins, although some geographic gaps remain (arid regions, tropical regions, high-latitude and high-altitude systems). The global median CH4 concentration (0.20 µmol L−1) and diffusive flux (0.44 mmolm-2d-1) in GRiMeDB are lower than estimates from prior site-averaged compilations, although ranges (0 to 456 µmol L−1 and −136 to 4057 mmolm-2d-1) and standard deviations (10.69 and 86.4) are greater for this larger and more temporally resolved database. Available flux data are dominated by diffusive measurements despite the recognized importance of ebullitive and plant-mediated CH4 fluxes. Nonetheless, GriMeDB provides a comprehensive and cohesive resource for examining relationships between CH4 and environmental drivers, estimating the contribution of fluvial ecosystems to CH4 emissions, and contextualizing site-based investigations. 

   more » « less
3. FLUXNET-CH₄: a global, multi-ecosystem dataset and analysis of methane seasonality from freshwater wetlands

   https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-3607-2021  

   Delwiche, Kyle B.; Knox, Sara Helen; Malhotra, Avni; Fluet-Chouinard, Etienne; McNicol, Gavin; Feron, Sarah; Ouyang, Zutao; Papale, Dario; Trotta, Carlo; Canfora, Eleonora; et al (January 2021, Earth System Science Data)

   null (Ed.)

   Abstract. Methane (CH4) emissions from natural landscapes constituteroughly half of global CH4 contributions to the atmosphere, yet largeuncertainties remain in the absolute magnitude and the seasonality ofemission quantities and drivers. Eddy covariance (EC) measurements ofCH4 flux are ideal for constraining ecosystem-scale CH4emissions due to quasi-continuous and high-temporal-resolution CH4flux measurements, coincident carbon dioxide, water, and energy fluxmeasurements, lack of ecosystem disturbance, and increased availability ofdatasets over the last decade. Here, we (1) describe the newly publisheddataset, FLUXNET-CH4 Version 1.0, the first open-source global dataset ofCH4 EC measurements (available athttps://fluxnet.org/data/fluxnet-ch4-community-product/, last access: 7 April 2021). FLUXNET-CH4includes half-hourly and daily gap-filled and non-gap-filled aggregatedCH4 fluxes and meteorological data from 79 sites globally: 42freshwater wetlands, 6 brackish and saline wetlands, 7 formerly drainedecosystems, 7 rice paddy sites, 2 lakes, and 15 uplands. Then, we (2) evaluate FLUXNET-CH4 representativeness for freshwater wetland coverageglobally because the majority of sites in FLUXNET-CH4 Version 1.0 arefreshwater wetlands which are a substantial source of total atmosphericCH4 emissions; and (3) we provide the first global estimates of theseasonal variability and seasonality predictors of freshwater wetlandCH4 fluxes. Our representativeness analysis suggests that thefreshwater wetland sites in the dataset cover global wetland bioclimaticattributes (encompassing energy, moisture, and vegetation-relatedparameters) in arctic, boreal, and temperate regions but only sparselycover humid tropical regions. Seasonality metrics of wetland CH4emissions vary considerably across latitudinal bands. In freshwater wetlands(except those between 20∘ S to 20∘ N) the spring onsetof elevated CH4 emissions starts 3 d earlier, and the CH4emission season lasts 4 d longer, for each degree Celsius increase in meanannual air temperature. On average, the spring onset of increasing CH4emissions lags behind soil warming by 1 month, with very few sites experiencingincreased CH4 emissions prior to the onset of soil warming. Incontrast, roughly half of these sites experience the spring onset of risingCH4 emissions prior to the spring increase in gross primaryproductivity (GPP). The timing of peak summer CH4 emissions does notcorrelate with the timing for either peak summer temperature or peak GPP.Our results provide seasonality parameters for CH4 modeling andhighlight seasonality metrics that cannot be predicted by temperature or GPP(i.e., seasonality of CH4 peak). FLUXNET-CH4 is a powerful new resourcefor diagnosing and understanding the role of terrestrial ecosystems andclimate drivers in the global CH4 cycle, and future additions of sitesin tropical ecosystems and site years of data collection will provide addedvalue to this database. All seasonality parameters are available athttps://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4672601 (Delwiche et al., 2021).Additionally, raw FLUXNET-CH4 data used to extract seasonality parameterscan be downloaded from https://fluxnet.org/data/fluxnet-ch4-community-product/ (last access: 7 April 2021), and a completelist of the 79 individual site data DOIs is provided in Table 2 of this paper. 

   more » « less
4. Dynamics of Surface‐Water Connectivity in a Low‐Gradient Meandering River Floodplain

   https://doi.org/10.1029/2018WR023527  

   Czuba, Jonathan A.; David, Scott R.; Edmonds, Douglas A.; Ward, Adam S. (March 2019, Water Resources Research)

   Abstract High‐resolution topography reveals that floodplains along meandering rivers in Indiana commonly contain intermittently flowing channel networks. We investigated how the presence of floodplain channels affects lateral surface‐water connectivity between a river and floodplain (specifically exchange flux and timescales of transport) as a function of flow stage in a low‐gradient river‐floodplain system. We constructed a two‐dimensional, surface‐water hydrodynamic model using Hydrologic Engineering Center's River Analysis System (HEC‐RAS) 2D along 32 km of floodplain (56 km along the river) of the East Fork White River near Seymour, Indiana, USA, using lidar elevation data and surveyed river bathymetry. The model was calibrated using land‐cover specific roughness to elevation‐discharge data from a U.S. Geological Survey gage and validated against high‐water marks, an aerial photo showing the spatial extent of floodplain inundation, and measured flow velocities. Using the model results, we analyzed the flow in the river, spatial patterns of inundation, flow pathways, river‐floodplain exchange, and water residence time on the floodplain. Our results highlight that bankfull flow is an oversimplified concept for explaining river‐floodplain connectivity because some stream banks are overtopped and major low‐lying floodplain channels are inundated roughly 19 days per year. As flow increased, inundation of floodplain channels at higher elevations dissected the floodplain, until the floodplain channels became fully inundated. Additionally, we found that river‐floodplain exchange was driven by bank height or channel orientation depending on flow conditions. We propose a conceptual model of river‐floodplain connectivity dynamics and developed metrics to analyze quantitatively complex river‐floodplain systems. 

   more » « less
5. New remote method to systematically extract bedrock channel width of small catchments across large spatial scales using high‐resolution digital elevation models

   https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.5560  

   Eidmann, Johanna Sophie; Gallen, Sean (February 2023, Earth Surface Processes and Landforms)

   Abstract Bedrock river width is an essential geometric parameter relevant to understanding flood hazards and gauging station rating curves, and is critical to stream power incision models and many other landscape evolution models. Obtaining bedrock river width measurements, however, typically requires extensive field campaigns that take place in rugged and steep topography where river access is often physically challenging. Although prior work has turned to measuring channel width from satellite imagery, these data present a snapshot in time, are typically limited to rivers ≥ 10–30 m wide due to the image resolution, and are physically restricted to areas devoid of vegetation. For these reasons, we are generally data limited, and the factors impacting bedrock channel width remain poorly understood. Due to these limitations, researchers often turn to assumptions of width‐scaling relationships with drainage area or discharge to estimate bedrock channel width. Here we present a new method of obtaining bedrock channel width at a desired river discharge through the incorporation of a high‐resolution bare‐earth digital elevation model (DEM) using MATLAB Topotoolbox and the HEC‐RAS river analysis system. We validate this method by comparing modeled results to US Geological Survey (USGS) field measurements at existing gauging stations, as well as field channel measurements. We show that this method can capture general characteristics of discharge rating curves and predict field‐measured channel widths within uncertainty. As high‐resolution DEMs become more available across the United States through the USGS three‐dimensional elevation program (3DEP), the future utility of this method is notable. Through developing and validating a streamlined, open‐source, and freely available workflow of channel width extraction, we hope this method can be applied to future research to improve the quantity of channel width measurements and improve our understanding of bedrock channels. 

   more » « less