An official website of the United States government
The goal of this work is the flaw-free, industrial-scale production of biological additive manufacturing of tissue constructs (Bio-AM). In pursuit of this goal, the objectives of this work in the context of extrusion-based Bio-AM of bone tissue constructs are twofold: (1) detect flaw formation using data from in-situ infrared thermocouple sensors; and (2) prevent flaw formation through preemptive process control. In realizing the first objective, data signatures acquired from in-situ sensors were analyzed using several machine learning approaches to ascertain critical quality metrics, such as print regime, strand width, strand height, and strand fusion severity. These quality metrics are intended to capture the process state at the basic 1D strand-level to the 2D layer-level. For this purpose, machine learning models were trained to classify and predict flaw formation. These models predicted print quality features with accuracy nearing 90%. In connection with the second objective, the previously trained machine learning models were used to preempt flaw formation by changing the process parameters (print velocity) during deposition—a form of feedforward control. With the feedforward process control, strand width heterogeneity was statistically significantly reduced, reducing the strand width difference between strand halves to less than 50 µm. Using this integrated process monitoring, detection, and control approach, we demonstrate consistent, repeatable production of Bio-AM constructs.
more »
« less
Physics-Based Feedforward Control of Thermal History in Laser Powder Bed Fusion Additive Manufacturing
We developed and applied a model-based feedforward control approach to reduce temperature-induced flaw formation in the laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) additive manufacturing process. The feedforward control is built upon three basic steps. First, the thermal history of the part is rapidly predicted using a mesh-free graph theory model. Second, thermal history metrics are extracted from the model to identify regions of heat buildup, symptomatic of flaw formation. Third, process parameters are changed layer-by-layer based on insights from the thermal model. This technique was validated with two identical build plates (Inconel 718). Parts on the first build plate were made under manufacturer recommended nominal process parameters. Parts on the second build plate were made with model optimized process parameters. Results were validated with in-situ infrared thermography, and materials characterization techniques. Parts produced under controlled processing exhibited superior geometric accuracy and resolution, finer grain size, and increased microhardness.
more »
« less
- PAR ID:
- 10497533
- Publisher / Repository:
- American Society of Mechanical Engineers
- Date Published:
- ISBN:
- 978-0-7918-8723-3
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Location:
- New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
Abstract This work pertains to the laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) additive manufacturing process. The goal of this work is to mitigate the expense and time required for qualification of laser powder bed fusion processed parts. In pursuit of this goal, the objective of this work is to develop and apply a physics-based model predictive control strategy to modulate the thermal history before the part is built. The key idea is to determine a desired thermal history for a given part a priori to printing using a physics-based model. Subsequently, a model predictive control strategy is developed to attain the desired thermal history by changing the laser power layer-by-layer. This is an important area of research because the spatiotemporal distribution of temperature within the part (also known as the thermal history) influences flaw formation, microstructure evolution, and surface/geometric integrity, all of which ultimately determine the mechanical properties of the part. Currently, laser powder bed fusion parts are qualified using a build-and-test approach wherein parameters are optimized by printing simple test coupons, followed by examining their properties via materials characterization and testing — a cumbersome and expensive process that often takes years. These parameters, once optimized, are maintained constant throughout the process for a part. However, thermal history is a function of over 50 processing parameters including material properties and part design, consequently, the current approach of parameter optimization based on empirical testing of simple test coupons seldom transfers successfully to complex, practical parts. Rather than instinctive process parameter optimization, the model predictive control strategy presents a radically different approach to LPBF part qualification that is based on understanding and modulating the causal thermal physics of the process. The approach has three steps: (Step 1) Predict – given a part geometry, use a rapid, mesh-less physics-based simulation model to predict its thermal history, analyze the predicted thermal history trend, isolate potential red flag problems such as heat buildup, and set a desired thermal history that corrects deleterious trends. (Step 2) Parse – iteratively simulate the thermal history as a function of various laser power levels layer-by-layer over a fixed time horizon. (Step 3) Select – the laser power that provides the closest match to the desired thermal history. Repeat Steps 2 and 3 until the part is completely built. We demonstrate through experiments with various geometries two advantages of this model predictive control strategy when applied to laser powder bed fusion: (i) prevent part failures due to overheating and distortion, while mitigating the need for anchoring supports; and (ii) improve surface integrity of hard to access internal surfaces.more » « less
-
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to develop, apply and validate a mesh-free graph theory–based approach for rapid thermal modeling of the directed energy deposition (DED) additive manufacturing (AM) process. Design/methodology/approach In this study, the authors develop a novel mesh-free graph theory–based approach to predict the thermal history of the DED process. Subsequently, the authors validated the graph theory predicted temperature trends using experimental temperature data for DED of titanium alloy parts (Ti-6Al-4V). Temperature trends were tracked by embedding thermocouples in the substrate. The DED process was simulated using the graph theory approach, and the thermal history predictions were validated based on the data from the thermocouples. Findings The temperature trends predicted by the graph theory approach have mean absolute percentage error of approximately 11% and root mean square error of 23°C when compared to the experimental data. Moreover, the graph theory simulation was obtained within 4 min using desktop computing resources, which is less than the build time of 25 min. By comparison, a finite element–based model required 136 min to converge to similar level of error. Research limitations/implications This study uses data from fixed thermocouples when printing thin-wall DED parts. In the future, the authors will incorporate infrared thermal camera data from large parts. Practical implications The DED process is particularly valuable for near-net shape manufacturing, repair and remanufacturing applications. However, DED parts are often afflicted with flaws, such as cracking and distortion. In DED, flaw formation is largely governed by the intensity and spatial distribution of heat in the part during the process, often referred to as the thermal history. Accordingly, fast and accurate thermal models to predict the thermal history are necessary to understand and preclude flaw formation. Originality/value This paper presents a new mesh-free computational thermal modeling approach based on graph theory (network science) and applies it to DED. The approach eschews the tedious and computationally demanding meshing aspect of finite element modeling and allows rapid simulation of the thermal history in additive manufacturing. Although the graph theory has been applied to thermal modeling of laser powder bed fusion (LPBF), there are distinct phenomenological differences between DED and LPBF that necessitate substantial modifications to the graph theory approach.more » « less
-
Abstract The long-term goal of this work is to predict and control microstructure evolution in metal additive manufacturing processes. As a step towards this goal, the objective of this paper is the rapid prediction of the microstructure evolution in parts made using the laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) additive manufacturing process. To realize this objective, we developed and applied an approach which combines physics-based thermal modeling with data-driven machine learning to predict two important microstructure-related characteristics in Nickel Alloy 718 LPBF-processed parts: meltpool depth and primary dendritic arm spacing (PDAS). Microstructure characteristics are critical determinants of functional physical properties, e.g., yield strength and fatigue life. Currently, the microstructure of laser powder bed fusion parts is optimized through a cumbersome and costly build-and-characterize empirical approach. This makes the development of rapid and accurate models for predicting microstructure evolution practically valuable: these models reduce process development time and enable fabrication of parts with consistent properties. Unfortunately, due to their computational complexity, existing physics-based models for predicting microstructure evolution are limited to only a few layers and are challenging to scale to practical parts. To overcome the drawbacks of current microstructure prediction techniques, this paper establishes a novel physics and data integrated modeling approach. The approach consists of two steps. First, a rapid, part-level computational thermal model was used to predict the temperature distribution and cooling rate in the entire part before it was printed. Second, the foregoing physics-based thermal history quantifiers were used as inputs to a simple machine learning model (support vector machine) trained to predict the meltpool depth and primary dendritic arm spacing based on empirical materials characterization data. As an example of its efficacy, when tested on a separate set of samples from a different build, the approach predicted the PDAS with root mean squared error ≈ 110 nm. The modeling approach was further able to predict meltpool depth with a root mean squared error of 0.012mm. This model performance was validated through the creation of 21 geometries created under 7 different process parameters. Optical and scanning electron microscopy was conducted resulting in more than 1200 primary dendritic arm spacing and meltpool depth measurements. Primary dendritic arm spacing predictions were also validated on parts of a unique geometry created in a separate work. The model was able to successfully transfer to this build without further training, indicating that this method is transferrable to other parts made with laser powder bed fusion and Nickel Alloy 718. This work thus presents an avenue for future physics-based optimization and control of microstructural evolution in laser powder bed fusion.more » « less
-
null (Ed.)Despite its potential to overcome the design and processing barriers of traditional subtractive and formative manufacturing techniques, the use of laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) metal additive manufacturing is currently limited due to its tendency to create flaws. A multitude of LPBF-related flaws, such as part-level deformation, cracking, and porosity are linked to the spatiotemporal temperature distribution in the part during the process. The temperature distribution, also called the thermal history, is a function of several factors encompassing material properties, part geometry and orientation, processing parameters, placement of supports, among others. These broad range of factors are difficult and expensive to optimize through empirical testing alone. Consequently, fast and accurate models to predict the thermal history are valuable for mitigating flaw formation in LPBF-processed parts. In our prior works, we developed a graph theory-based approach for predicting the temperature distribution in LPBF parts. This mesh-free approach was compared with both non-proprietary and commercial finite element packages, and the thermal history predictions were experimentally validated with in- situ infrared thermal imaging data. It was found that the graph theory-derived thermal history predictions converged within 30–50% of the time of non-proprietary finite element analysis for a similar level of prediction error. However, these prior efforts were based on small prismatic and cylinder-shaped LPBF parts. In this paper, our objective was to scale the graph theory approach to predict the thermal history of large volume, complex geometry LPBF parts. To realize this objective, we developed and applied three computational strategies to predict the thermal history of a stainless steel (SAE 316L) impeller having outside diameter 155 mm and vertical height 35 mm (700 layers). The impeller was processed on a Renishaw AM250 LPBF system and required 16 h to complete. During the process, in-situ layer-by-layer steady state surface temperature measurements for the impeller were obtained using a calibrated longwave infrared thermal camera. As an example of the outcome, on implementing one of the three strategies reported in this work, which did not reduce or simplify the part geometry, the thermal history of the impeller was predicted with approximate mean absolute error of 6% (standard deviation 0.8%) and root mean square error 23 K (standard deviation 3.7 K). Moreover, the thermal history was simulated within 40 min using desktop computing, which is considerably less than the 16 h required to build the impeller part. Furthermore, the graph theory thermal history predictions were compared with a proprietary LPBF thermal modeling software and non-proprietary finite element simulation. For a similar level of root mean square error (28 K), the graph theory approach converged in 17 min, vs. 4.5 h for non-proprietary finite element analysis.more » « less
- Free Publicly Accessible Full Text
-
Accepted Manuscript1.0
- Conference Paper:
- https://doi.org/10.1115/MSEC2023-103829
