More Like this

1. Efficient Interactive Proofs for Non-Deterministic Bounded Space

   https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.APPROX/RANDOM.2023.47  

   Cook, Joshua ; Rothblum, Ron D. ( September 2023 , Approximation, Randomization, and Combinatorial Optimization. Algorithms and Techniques (APPROX/RANDOM 2023))

   Megow, Nicole ; Smith, Adam (Ed.)

   The celebrated IP = PSPACE Theorem gives an efficient interactive proof for any bounded-space algorithm. In this work we study interactive proofs for non-deterministic bounded space computations. While Savitch’s Theorem shows that nondeterministic bounded-space algorithms can be simulated by deterministic bounded-space algorithms, this simulation has a quadratic overhead. We give interactive protocols for nondeterministic algorithms directly to get faster verifiers. More specifically, for any non-deterministic space S algorithm, we construct an interactive proof in which the verifier runs in time Õ(n+S²). This improves on the best previous bound of Õ(n+S³) and matches the result for deterministic space bounded algorithms, up to polylog(S) factors. We further generalize to alternating bounded space algorithms. For any language L decided by a time T, space S algorithm that uses d alternations, we construct an interactive proof in which the verifier runs in time Õ(n + S log(T) + S d) and the prover runs in time 2^O(S). For d = O(log(T)), this matches the best known interactive proofs for deterministic algorithms, up to polylog(S) factors, and improves on the previous best verifier time for nondeterministic algorithms by a factor of log(T). We also improve the best prior verifier time for unbounded alternations by a factor of S. Using known connections of bounded alternation algorithms to bounded depth circuits, we also obtain faster verifiers for bounded depth circuits with unbounded fan-in. 

   more » « less
2. On the fine-grained complexity of small-size geometric set cover and discrete k-center for small k

   https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2023.34  

   Chan, Timothy M. ; He, Qizheng ; Yu, Yuancheng ( July 2023 , Proc. 50th International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2023))

   Etessami, Kousha ; Feige, Uriel ; Puppis, Gabriele (Ed.)

   We study the time complexity of the discrete k-center problem and related (exact) geometric set cover problems when k or the size of the cover is small. We obtain a plethora of new results: - We give the first subquadratic algorithm for rectilinear discrete 3-center in 2D, running in Õ(n^{3/2}) time. - We prove a lower bound of Ω(n^{4/3-δ}) for rectilinear discrete 3-center in 4D, for any constant δ > 0, under a standard hypothesis about triangle detection in sparse graphs. - Given n points and n weighted axis-aligned unit squares in 2D, we give the first subquadratic algorithm for finding a minimum-weight cover of the points by 3 unit squares, running in Õ(n^{8/5}) time. We also prove a lower bound of Ω(n^{3/2-δ}) for the same problem in 2D, under the well-known APSP Hypothesis. For arbitrary axis-aligned rectangles in 2D, our upper bound is Õ(n^{7/4}). - We prove a lower bound of Ω(n^{2-δ}) for Euclidean discrete 2-center in 13D, under the Hyperclique Hypothesis. This lower bound nearly matches the straightforward upper bound of Õ(n^ω), if the matrix multiplication exponent ω is equal to 2. - We similarly prove an Ω(n^{k-δ}) lower bound for Euclidean discrete k-center in O(k) dimensions for any constant k ≥ 3, under the Hyperclique Hypothesis. This lower bound again nearly matches known upper bounds if ω = 2. - We also prove an Ω(n^{2-δ}) lower bound for the problem of finding 2 boxes to cover the largest number of points, given n points and n boxes in 12D . This matches the straightforward near-quadratic upper bound. 

   more » « less
3. Constant-hop spanners for more geometric intersection graphs, with even smaller size

   https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.SoCG.2023.23  

   Chan, Timothy M. ; Huang, Zhengcheng ( June 2023 , Proc. 39th International Symposium on Computational Geometry (SoCG 2023))

   Chambers, Erin W. ; Gudmundsson, Joachim (Ed.)

   In SoCG 2022, Conroy and Tóth presented several constructions of sparse, low-hop spanners in geometric intersection graphs, including an O(nlog n)-size 3-hop spanner for n disks (or fat convex objects) in the plane, and an O(nlog² n)-size 3-hop spanner for n axis-aligned rectangles in the plane. Their work left open two major questions: (i) can the size be made closer to linear by allowing larger constant stretch? and (ii) can near-linear size be achieved for more general classes of intersection graphs? We address both questions simultaneously, by presenting new constructions of constant-hop spanners that have almost linear size and that hold for a much larger class of intersection graphs. More precisely, we prove the existence of an O(1)-hop spanner for arbitrary string graphs with O(nα_k(n)) size for any constant k, where α_k(n) denotes the k-th function in the inverse Ackermann hierarchy. We similarly prove the existence of an O(1)-hop spanner for intersection graphs of d-dimensional fat objects with O(nα_k(n)) size for any constant k and d. We also improve on some of Conroy and Tóth’s specific previous results, in either the number of hops or the size: we describe an O(nlog n)-size 2-hop spanner for disks (or more generally objects with linear union complexity) in the plane, and an O(nlog n)-size 3-hop spanner for axis-aligned rectangles in the plane. Our proofs are all simple, using separator theorems, recursion, shifted quadtrees, and shallow cuttings. 

   more » « less
4. Hardness of approximation in p via short cycle removal: cycle detection, distance oracles, and beyond

   https://doi.org/10.1145/3519935.3520066  

   Abboud, Amir ; Bringmann, Karl ; Khoury, Seri ; Zamir, Or ( June 2022 , STOC 2022: Proceedings of the 54th Annual ACM SIGACT Symposium on Theory of Computing)

   We present a new technique for efficiently removing almost all short cycles in a graph without unintentionally removing its triangles. Consequently, triangle finding problems do not become easy even in almost k-cycle free graphs, for any constant k≥ 4. Triangle finding is at the base of many conditional lower bounds in P, mainly for distance computation problems, and the existence of many 4- or 5-cycles in a worst-case instance had been the obstacle towards resolving major open questions. Hardness of approximation: Are there distance oracles with m1+o(1) preprocessing time and mo(1) query time that achieve a constant approximation? Existing algorithms with such desirable time bounds only achieve super-constant approximation factors, while only 3− factors were conditionally ruled out (Pătraşcu, Roditty, and Thorup; FOCS 2012). We prove that no O(1) approximations are possible, assuming the 3-SUM or APSP conjectures. In particular, we prove that k-approximations require Ω(m1+1/ck) time, which is tight up to the constant c. The lower bound holds even for the offline version where we are given the queries in advance, and extends to other problems such as dynamic shortest paths. The 4-Cycle problem: An infamous open question in fine-grained complexity is to establish any surprising consequences from a subquadratic or even linear-time algorithm for detecting a 4-cycle in a graph. This is arguably one of the simplest problems without a near-linear time algorithm nor a conditional lower bound. We prove that Ω(m1.1194) time is needed for k-cycle detection for all k≥ 4, unless we can detect a triangle in √n-degree graphs in O(n2−δ) time; a breakthrough that is not known to follow even from optimal matrix multiplication algorithms. 

   more » « less
5. Lattice Problems beyond Polynomial Time

   https://doi.org/10.1145/3564246.3585227  

   Aggarwal, Divesh ; Bennett, Huck ; Brakerski, Zvika ; Golovnev, Alexander ; Kumar, Rajendra ; Li, Zeyong ; Peters, Spencer ; Stephens-Davidowitz, Noah ; Vaikuntanathan, Vinod ( July 2023 , ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing)

   Servedio, Rocco (Ed.)

   We study the complexity of lattice problems in a world where algorithms, reductions, and protocols can run in superpolynomial time, revisiting four foundational results: two worst-case to average-case reductions and two protocols. We also show a novel protocol. 1. We prove that secret-key cryptography exists if O˜(n‾√)-approximate SVP is hard for 2εn-time algorithms. I.e., we extend to our setting (Micciancio and Regev's improved version of) Ajtai's celebrated polynomial-time worst-case to average-case reduction from O˜(n)-approximate SVP to SIS. 2. We prove that public-key cryptography exists if O˜(n)-approximate SVP is hard for 2εn-time algorithms. This extends to our setting Regev's celebrated polynomial-time worst-case to average-case reduction from O˜(n1.5)-approximate SVP to LWE. In fact, Regev's reduction is quantum, but ours is classical, generalizing Peikert's polynomial-time classical reduction from O˜(n2)-approximate SVP. 3. We show a 2εn-time coAM protocol for O(1)-approximate CVP, generalizing the celebrated polynomial-time protocol for O(n/logn‾‾‾‾‾‾‾√)-CVP due to Goldreich and Goldwasser. These results show complexity-theoretic barriers to extending the recent line of fine-grained hardness results for CVP and SVP to larger approximation factors. (This result also extends to arbitrary norms.) 4. We show a 2εn-time co-non-deterministic protocol for O(logn‾‾‾‾‾√)-approximate SVP, generalizing the (also celebrated!) polynomial-time protocol for O(n‾√)-CVP due to Aharonov and Regev. 5. We give a novel coMA protocol for O(1)-approximate CVP with a 2εn-time verifier. All of the results described above are special cases of more general theorems that achieve time-approximation factor tradeoffs. 

   more » « less