Restricting left turns throughout a network improves overall flow capacity by eliminating conflicts between left-turning and through-moving vehicles. However, doing so requires vehicles to travel longer distances. Implementing left-turn restrictions at only a subset of locations can help balance this tradeoff between increased capacity and longer trips. Unfortunately, identifying exactly where these restrictions should be implemented is a complex problem because of the many configurations that must be considered and interdependencies between left-turn restriction decisions at adjacent intersections. This paper compares three heuristic solution algorithms to identify optimal location of left-turn restrictions at individual intersections in perfect and imperfect grid networks. Scenarios are tested in which restriction decisions are the same for all intersection approaches and only the same for approaches in the same direction. The latter case is particularly complex as it increases the number of potential configurations exponentially. The results suggest all methods tested can be effectively used to solve this problem, although the hybrid method proposed in this paper appears to perform the best under scenarios with larger solution spaces. The proposed framework and procedures can be applied to realistic city networks to identify where left-turn restrictions should be implemented to improve overall network operations. Application of these methods to square grid networks under uniform demand patterns reveal a general pattern in which left turns should be restricted at central intersections that carry larger vehicle flows but allowed otherwise. Such findings can be used as a starting point for where to restrict left turns in more realistic networks. 
                        more » 
                        « less   
                    
                            
                            Network-Wide Implementation of Roundabouts Versus Signalized Intersections on Urban Streets: Analytical and Simulation Comparison
                        
                    
    
            This paper examines the impact of roundabouts implemented at intersections throughout a dense urban network on its operational performance. Metrics considered include the average free-flow speed, flow-moving capacity, trip-serving capacity, and fuel consumption rate. Three intersection strategies are compared: signalized intersections allowing left turns in a permitted manner (TWs), signalized intersections prohibiting left turns (TWLs), and modern roundabouts (RBs). Using the approaches of macroscopic fundamental diagrams and network exit functions, both analytical investigations and microscopic traffic simulations for grid networks were conducted. In general, the results from both analyses agree well. The results reveal that when single-lane roundabouts are applied in networks with a single travel in each direction, the RB network outperforms the TW network for all operational metrics. The RB network also outperforms the TWL network in free-flow speed and flow-moving capacity and has a similar trip-serving capacity as the TWL network. However, when roundabouts with two travel lanes are applied on multi-lane networks, the TWL network exceeds the RB network in both flow-moving and trip-serving capacities. This decrease in the performance of the RB network could possibly come from the complexity imposed on the entering vehicle that wants to use the inner lane. Moreover, because vehicles in the RB network need to accelerate/decelerate more frequently those in the other networks, the RB network generates a higher fuel consumption rate in uncongested and capacity conditions. The findings suggest intersections of roundabouts could be beneficial for networks with a single travel lane in each direction. 
        more » 
        « less   
        
    
                            - Award ID(s):
- 1749200
- PAR ID:
- 10500133
- Publisher / Repository:
- Sage
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board
- ISSN:
- 0361-1981
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
- 
            
- 
            Despite the common belief that one-way streets are more operationally efficient due to their larger capacities, two-way street networks, especially those without left turns at intersections, can outperform one-way street networks when measuring operational performance at a network level (i.e., using total trip completion rates). However, some recent studies indicated that two-way street networks without left turns may be highly vulnerable to disruptive events inside the network. This study uses a kinematic-wave theory model to compare the performance of three network configurations – specifically, two-way, two-way without left turns, and one-way networks – under link disruptions. When road users have prior knowledge about the link disruption and can detour in advance, the two-way network with left turns performs the worst because it has the lowest capacity among the three network configurations. When road users have no prior knowledge about the link disruption and begin to detour only after approaching the disrupted link, two-way networks with and without left turns are both severely impacted. As two-way network with left turns is still constrained by its capacity, degradation in two-way network without left turns is mainly contributed to inflexibility, especially when links in the network center are disrupted. One-way networks appear to more robustly accommodate disruptions both with and without prior knowledge, compared to the other two network configurations.more » « less
- 
            In the urban corridor with a mixed traffic composition of connected and automated vehicles (CAVs) alongside human-driven vehicles (HDVs), vehicle operations are intricately influenced by both individual driving behaviors and the presence of signalized intersections. Therefore, the development of a coordinated control strategy that effectively accommodates these dual factors becomes imperative to enhance the overall quality of traffic flow. This study proposes a bi-level structure crafted to decouple the joint effects of the vehicular driving behaviors and corridor signal offsets setting. The objective of this structure is to optimize both the average travel time (ATT) and fuel consumption (AFC). At the lower-level, three types of car-following models while considering driving modes are presented to illustrate the desired driving behaviors of HDVs and CAVs. Moreover, a trigonometry function method combined with a rolling horizon scheme is proposed to generate the eco-trajectory of CAVs in the mixed traffic flow. At the upper-level, a multi-objective optimization model for corridor signal offsets is formulated to minimize ATT and AFC based on the lower-level simulation outputs. Additionally, a revised Non-Dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II (NSGA-II) is adopted to identify the set of Pareto-optimal solutions for corridor signal offsets under different CAV penetration rates (CAV PRs). Numerical experiments are conducted within a corridor that encompasses three signalized intersections. The performance of our proposed eco-driving strategy is validated in comparison to the intelligent driver model (IDM) and green light optimal speed advisory (GLOSA) algorithm in single-vehicle simulation. Results show that our proposed strategy yields reduced travel time and fuel consumption to both IDM and GLOSA. Subsequently, the effectiveness of our proposed coordinated control strategy is validated across various CAV PRs. Results indicated that the optimal AFC can be reduced by 4.1%–32.2% with CAV PRs varying from 0.2 to 1, and the optimal ATT can be saved by 2.3% maximum. Furthermore, sensitivity analysis is conducted to evaluate the impact of CAV PRs and V/C ratios on the optimal ATT and AFC.more » « less
- 
            null (Ed.)Urban street networks are subject to a variety of random disruptions. The impact of movement restrictions (e.g., one-way or left-turn restrictions) on the ability of a network to overcome these disruptions—that is, its resilience—has not been thoroughly studied. To address this gap, this paper investigates the resilience of one-way and two-way square grid street networks with and without left turns under light traffic conditions. Networks are studied using a simplified routing algorithm that can be examined analytically and a microsimulation that describes detailed vehicle dynamics. In the simplified method, routing choices are enumerated for all possible origin–destination (OD) combinations to identify how the removal of a link affects operations, both when knowledge of the disruption is and is not available at the vehicle’s origin. Disruptions on two-way networks that allow left turns tend to have little impact on travel distances because of the availability of multiple shortest paths between OD pairs and the flexibility in route modification. Two-way networks that restrict left turns at intersections only have a single shortest-distance path between any OD pair and thus experience larger increases in travel distance, even when the disruption is known ahead of time. One-way networks sometimes have multiple shortest-distance routes and thus travel distances increase less than two-way network without left turns when links are disrupted. These results reveal a clear tradeoff between improved efficiency and reduced resilience for networks that have movement restrictions, and can be used as a basis to study network resilience under more congested scenarios and in more realistic network structures.more » « less
- 
            Even though extensive studies have developed various eco-driving strategies for vehicle platoon to travel on urban roads with traffic signals, most of them focus on vehicle-level trajectory planning or speed advisory rather than real-time platoon-level closed-loop control. In addition, majority of existing efforts neglect the traffic and vehicle dynamic uncertainties to avoid the modeling and solution complexity. To make up these research gaps, this study develops a system optimal vehicle platooning control for eco-driving (SO-ED), which can guide a mixed flow platoon to smoothly run on the urban roads and pass the signalized intersections without sudden deceleration or red idling. The SO-ED is mathematically implemented by a hybrid model predictive control (MPC) system, including three MPC controllers and an MINLP platoon splitting switching signal. Based on the features of the system, this study uses active set method to solve the large-scale MPC controllers in real time. The numerical experiments validate the merits of the proposed SO-ED in smoothing the traffic flow and reducing energy consumption and emission at urban signalized intersections.more » « less
 An official website of the United States government
An official website of the United States government 
				
			 
					 
					
 
                                    