Roughly every decade, the ACM and IEEE professional organizations have produced recommendations for the education of undergraduate computer science students. These guidelines are used worldwide by research universities, liberal arts colleges, and community colleges. For the latest 2023 revision of the curriculum, AAAI has collaborated with ACM and IEEE to integrate artificial intelligence more broadly into this new curriculum and to address the issues it raises for students, instructors, practitioners, policy makers, and the general public. This paper describes the development process and rationale that underlie the artificial intelligence components of the CS2023 curriculum, discusses the challenges in curriculum design for such a rapidly advancing field, and examines lessons learned during this three-year process.
This content will become publicly available on December 5, 2024
Perspectives on Computer Science Curricula 2023 (CS2023)
Undergraduate Computer Science (CS) curricular guidelines have been published regularly since 1968, and the latest released in 2013. From early 2021, a task force of the ACM, IEEE-Computer Society, and the Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI) has worked on a decennial revision titled the ACM/IEEE-CS/AAAI Computer Science 2023 Curricula (CS2023).
The CS2023 task force includes a 17-member steering committee, 17 knowledge area subcommittees, and an international group of disciplinary experts. CS2023 provides curricular content – a knowledge model largely backward compatible with CS2013, supplemented by a competency model – and curricular practices, comprising articles by independent experts on program design and delivery that complement curricular content guidelines. CS2023 will inform educators and administrators on the what, why, and how to cover undergraduate CS over the next decade.
Ongoing work on CS2023 has been disseminated widely over the past two years: via the task force website; presentations at computing education conferences, e.g., SIGCSE Technical Symposium 2023; articles, e.g., ACM Inroads; emails to various computing education mailing lists; gathering community feedback via surveys and special sessions; and soliciting and receiving expert blind peer reviews. Building on earlier drafts, a gamma draft was released in September 2023, with the final version due by the end of 2023.
This panel examines CS2023 from different perspectives. All panelists serve on the CS2023 steering committee and have an intimate understanding of CS2023. The moderator will lay out its overall vision and structure while panelists will emphasize three major perspectives of CS education: software development fundamentals; systems development; and the increased role of societal, ethical, and professional aspects crucial to a modern CS graduate. Strong interdependencies exist between these perspectives, along with tensions arising from how much can be squeezed into a tight undergraduate CS curriculum. Attendees will take home an understanding of the approach taken by the CS2023 task force, the constraints on curriculum design, and how best to use the CS2023 guidelines to educate the next generation of CS graduates.
more »
« less
- NSF-PAR ID:
- 10501922
- Publisher / Repository:
- ACM
- Date Published:
- ISBN:
- 9798400703744
- Page Range / eLocation ID:
- 187 to 188
- Subject(s) / Keyword(s):
- Computer Science Curricular Guidelines, Model Curricula
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Location:
- Hyderabad India
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
more » « less
-
There can be many conflicting goals for the design of a computer science curriculum including: immediate employability in industry, preparation for long-term success in an ever-changing discipline and preparation for graduate (that is, post-graduate) study. Emphasis on immediate employability may lead to prioritizing current tools and techniques at the expense of foundational and theoretical skills as well as broader liberal-arts education that are crucial to long-term career success and for graduate study. The implications of these conflicting goals include allocation of finite resources (time, courses in the curriculum), unwillingness of students to invest in the mathematics that they see as irrelevant to their immediate career goals, and reluctance of faculty to have their courses driven by a continually evolving marketplace of tools and APIs. A balanced curriculum benefits all stakeholders: students, employers, and faculty. Would a data-driven approach help faculty design curricula that effectively balance these multiple goals? For example, if we ask graduates of computer science programs to reflect on the impact of their undergraduate education, explicitly focusing on short and long-term impact, will there be enough meaningful data to significantly inform curricular design? A recent survey of industry professionals undertaken by the ACM/IEEE-CS/AAAI 2023 Computer Science Curricular Task Force (CS2023) points the way. This column presents one aspect of that survey—a focus on comparing short-term versus long-term views—and calls for similar surveys of industry professionals to be conducted on an ongoing basis to refine our understanding of the role played by various elements of undergraduate computer science curricula in the success of graduates.more » « less
-
The NSF/IEEE-TCPP Parallel and Distributed Computing curriculum guidelines released in 2012 (PDC12) is an effort to bring more parallel computing education to early computer science courses. It has been moderately successful, with the inclusion of some PDC topics in the ACM/IEEE Computer Science curriculum guidelines in 2013 (CS13) and some coverage of topics in early CS courses in some universities in the U.S. and around the world. A reason often cited for the lack of a broader adoption is the difficulty for instructors who are not already knowledgable in PDC topics to learn how to teach those topics and align their learning objectives with early CS courses. There have been attempts at bringing textbook chapters, lecture slides, assignments, and demos to the hands of the instructors of early CS classes. However, the effort required to plow through all the available materials and figure out what is relevant to a particular class is daunting. This paper argues that classifying pedagogical materials against the CS13 guidelines and the PDC12 guidelines can provide the means necessary to reduce the burden of adoption for instructors. In this paper, we present CAR-CS, a system that can be used to categorize pedagogical materials according to well- known and established curricular guidelines and show that CAR-CS can be leveraged 1) by PDC experts to identify topics for which pedagogical material does not exist and that should be developed, 2) by instructors of early CS courses to find materials that are similar to the one that they use but that also cover PDC topics, 3) by instructors to check the topics that a course currently covers and those it does not cover.more » « less
-
null (Ed.)Teaching parallel and distributed computing (PDC) concepts is an ongoing and pressing concern for many undergraduate educators. The ACM/IEEE CS Joint Task Force on Computing Curricula (CS2013) recommends 15 hours of PDC education in the undergraduate curriculum. Most recently, the 2019 ABET Criteria for Accrediting Computer Science requires coverage of PDC topics. For faculty who are unfamiliar with PDC, the prospect of incorporating parallel computing into their courses can seem very daunting. For example, should PDC concepts be covered in a single required course (perhaps computer systems) or be scattered throughout different courses in the undergraduate curriculum? What languages are the best/easiest for students to learn PDC? How much revision is truly needed? This Birds of a Feather session provides a platform for computing educators to discuss the common challenges they face when attempting to incorporate PDC into their curricula and share potential solutions. Chiefly, the organizers are interested in identifying "gap areas" that hinder a faculty member's ability to integrate PDC into their undergraduate courses. The multiple viewpoints and expertise provided by the BOF leaders should lead to lively discourse and enable experienced faculty to share their strategies with those beginning to add PDC across their curricula. We anticipate that this session will be of interest to all CS faculty looking to integrate PDC into their courses and curricula.more » « less
-
This special session will report on the updated NSF/IEEE-TCPP Curriculum on Parallel and Distributed Computing released in Nov 2020 by the Center for Parallel and Distributed Computing Curricu- lum Development and Educational Resources (CDER). The purpose of the special session is to obtain SIGCSE community feedback on this curriculum in a highly interactive manner employing the hybrid modality and supported by a full-time CDER booth for the duration of SIGCSE. In this era of big data, cloud, and multi- and many-core systems, it is essential that the computer science (CS) and computer engineering (CE) graduates have basic skills in par- allel and distributed computing (PDC). The topics are primarily organized into the areas of architecture, programming, and algo- rithms topics. A set of pervasive concepts that percolate across area boundaries are also identified. Version 1 of this curriculum was released in December 2012. That curriculum guideline has over 140 early adopter institutions worldwide and has been incorpo- rated into the 2013 ACM/IEEE Computer Science curricula. This Version-II represents a major revision. The updates have focused on enhancing coverage related to the topical aspects of Big Data, Energy, and Distributed Computing. The session will also report on related CDER activities including a workshop series on a PDC institute conceptualization, developing a CE-oriented version of the curriculum, and identifying a minimal set of PDC topics aligned with ABET’s exposure-level PDC require- ments. The interested SIGCSE audience includes educators, authors,publishers, curriculum committee members, department chairs and administrators, professional societies, and the computing industry.more » « less
