More Like this

1. Electron Scattering at Ru–TiN–Ru Interface Stacks

   https://doi.org/10.1109/TED.2024.3453223  

   Shen, Poyen; Gall, Daniel (November 2024, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices)
2. Access to Ru(IV)–Ru(V) and Ru(V)–Ru(VI) Redox in Layered Li ₇ RuO ₆ via Intercalation Reactions

   https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.2c00043  

   Li, Haifeng; Taudul, Beata; Alexander, Grant C.; Liu, Jue; Freeland, John W.; Doublet, Marie-Liesse; Cabana, Jordi (April 2022, Chemistry of Materials)
3. Bimetallic Ru–Pd and Trimetallic Ru–Pd–Cu Assemblies on the Carborane Cluster Surface

   https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.inorgchem.1c02799  

   Eleazer, Bennett J.; Jayaweera, H. D.; Gange, Gayathri B.; Smith, Mark D.; Martin, Corey R.; Park, Kyoung Chul; Popov, Alexey A.; Peryshkov, Dmitry V. (January 2021, Inorganic Chemistry)

   null (Ed.)
4. Electrodeposition of Ru onto Ru and Au Seed Layers from Solutions of Ruthenium Nitrosyl Sulfate and Ruthenium Chloride

   https://doi.org/10.1149/1945-7111/abff68  

   Gusley, Ryan; Cumston, Quintin; Coffey, Kevin R.; West, Alan C.; Barmak, Katayun (May 2021, Journal of The Electrochemical Society)

   The electrodeposition of Ru was investigated from solutions of ruthenium(III) nitrosyl sulfate and ruthenium(III) chloride onto seed layers of epitaxial and polycrystalline Ru and epitaxial Au. Using both galvanostatic and potentiostatic deposition modes, metallic Ru was found to electrodeposit as a porous layer comprised of (0001) oriented Ru crystallites, the presence of which was discovered and confirmed by X-ray and scanning transmission and transmission electron microscope (S/TEM) analyses. This finding was independent of the Ru salt and seed layer used. Using X-ray reflectivity (XRR), the average film density ρ e f f of the porous electrodeposited Ru layer was measured as less than the density of bulk Ru ρ R u , b u l k (14.414 g cm −3 ). Increasing the magnitude of the applied current density from −100 μ A cm −2 to −10 mA cm −2 in solutions of Ru nitrosyl sulfate increased the ρ e f f from 7.4 g cm −3 to 9.7 g cm −2 while the current efficiency decreased from 9.4% to 4.3%. 

   more » « less
5. Resistivity size effect in epitaxial Ru(0001) layers

   https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5046430  

   Milosevic, Erik; Kerdsongpanya, Sit; Zangiabadi, Amirali; Barmak, Katayun; Coffey, Kevin R.; Gall, Daniel (October 2018, Journal of Applied Physics)